Skip to main content
Log in

Screening chickpea germplasm for ascochyta blight resistance

  • Published:
Australasian Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ascochyta blight resistance of 14 chickpea cultivars, 29 imported chickpea lines and 38 local breeding lines to four Australian isolates of Ascochyta rabiei was investigated. Each isolate was tested individually on each chickpea genotype. There were no differences between the four isolates in their pathogenicity. However, there were large differences between chickpea genotypes in the expression of disease symptoms. All of the Australian chickpea cultivars tested were susceptible to A. rabiei. Seven imported lines and three local breeding lines were found to be resistant to A. rabiei. The eight isolates of A. rabiei tested in these studies were all the same mating type, i.e. MAT1-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Jamil, F.F., Sarwar, M., Haq, I. and Bashir, N. (1995) — Identification of pathotypes in Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Lab., the cause of chickpea blight, in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany 27: 193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan, H. and Wiese, M.V. (1991) — Virulence forms of Ascochyta rabiei affecting chickpea in the Palouse. Plant Disease 75: 904–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, W.J. (1973) — Factors affecting growth, sporulation, pathogenicity and survival of Ascochyta rabiei. Mycologia 65: 444–457.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, W.J. (1997) — Inter- and intranational spread of ascochyta pathogens, chickpeas, faba bean and lentils. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 19: 215–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, W.J. and Kusmenoglu, I. (1997) — Distribution of mating types and the teleomorph of Ascochyta rabiei on chickpea in Turkey. Plant Disease 81: 1284–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, W.J., Wang, B.C. and Rogers, J.D. (1997) — Ascochyta fabae and A. lentis: Host specificity, teleomorph (Didymella), hybrid analysis, and taxonomic status. Plant Disease 81: 809–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir, M. and Bretag, T.W. (1997) — First report of ascochyta blight of chickpea in Victoria, Australia. Eleventh Biennial APPS Conference, 29 September to 2 October 1997, Perth, Western Australia. p. 302.

  • Porta-Puglia, A., Croni, P. and Mosconi, C. (1996) — Variability in virulence to chickpea of an Italian population of Ascochyta rabzei. Plant Disease 80: 39–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, M.V. and Singh, K.B. (1983) — Foliar application of Bravo-500 for Ascochyta blight control. International Chickpea Newsletter 8: 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, M.V. and Singh, K.B. (1984) — Evaluation of a world collection of chickpea germplasm accessions for resistance to Ascochyta blight. Plant Disease 68: 900–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K.B., Hawtin, G.C., Nene, Y.L. and Reddy, M.V. (1981) — Resistance in chickpeas to Ascochyta rabiei. Plant Disease 65: 586–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K.B., Reddy, M.V. and Nene, Y.L. (1984) — International testing of chickpeas for resistance to ascochyta blight. Plant Disease 68: 782–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trapero-Casas, A., Navas-Cortes, J.A., and Jimenez-Diaz, R.M. (1996) — Airborne ascospores of Didymella rabiei as a major primary inoculum for Ascochyta blight epidemics in chickpea crops in southern Spain. European Journal of Plant Pathology 102: 237–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. W. Bretag.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nasir, M., Bretag, T.W., Kaiser, W.J. et al. Screening chickpea germplasm for ascochyta blight resistance. Australasian Plant Pathology 29, 102–107 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1071/AP00018

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AP00018

Additional keywords

Navigation