Australasian Plant Pathology

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 78–86

A stem injection of phosphite protects Banksia species and Eucalyptus marginata from Phytophthora cinnamomi for at least four years



Longevity of effectiveness of stem-injected phosphite against Phytophthora cinnamomi was determined in two ways. Injected and not injected Banksia grandis and Eucalyptus marginata were challenge inoculated with P. cinnamomi at different times over an 8-year period. The mortality of injected and not injected B. attenuata and B. grandis was monitored over a 16-year period on active disease fronts. Duration of phosphite effectiveness was determined from the time after stem injection to 50% inhibition of either lesion length or girdling following challenge inoculation with P. cinnamomi and time to 50% mortality following injection of trees in disease fronts. For both B. grandis and E. marginata, time to 50% inhibition of lesion length increased from 4–5 years for 50 g phosphite/L to at least 10 years for 200 g phosphite/L. Time to 50% inhibition of girdling was significantly less than that for lesion length. In B. grandis, time to 50% inhibition of girdling increased with phosphite concentration from 2.9 years for 50 g phosphite/L to 10 years for 200 g phosphite/L. Time to 50% inhibition of girdling in E. marginata was 4 years. Predicted response surfaces of the effect of phosphite concentration and time on inhibition of lesion length and girdling showed that there was a much more gradual decline in predicted inhibition in E. marginata than the more susceptible B. grandis. An injection of 100 g phosphite/L of Banksia trees on disease fronts delayed time to 50% mortality by 3 to 4.8 years (mean 4.1±0.6 years). At least 4 years of effectiveness of phosphite against P. cinnamomi in native communities is much greater than the ≲2 years found in agriculture. The effects of phosphate competition and adaptation to infertile environments on longevity of effectiveness of phosphite are discussed. Demonstration that the effectiveness of an injection of phosphite against P. cinnamomi will last at least 4 years in native flora confirms the practical utility of using phosphite injection for the control of P. cinnamomi in threatened communities. A greater understanding than available at present of the differences in phosphite uptake, within-plant distribution, loss and effectiveness between targeted plant species can optimise current phosphite prescriptions. Additional keywords: apparent mortality rate, host defence mechanisms, longevity, persistence, phosphonate, phytotoxicity.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aerts R, Chapin FS (2000) The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Advances in Ecological Research 30, 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afek U, Sztejnberg A (1989) Effects of fosetyl-Al and phosphorous acid on scoparone, a phytoalexin associated with resistance of citrus to Phytophthora citrophthora. Phytopathology 79, 736–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barchietto T, Saindrenan P, Bompeix G (1988) Characterization of phosphonate uptake in two Phytophthora spp. and its inhibition by phosphate. Archives of Microbiology 151, 54–58. doi: 10.1007/ BF00444669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett S (2003) Monitoring of aerial phosphite applications for the control of Phytophthora cinnamomi in the Albany district. In ‘Phytophthora in forests and natural ecosystems. 2nd International IUFROWorking Party 7.02.09 Meeting, Albany, WA’. (Eds JA McComb, GE StJ Hardy, IC Tommerup) pp. 132–137. (Murdoch University Print: Murdoch)Google Scholar
  5. Barrett SR, Shearer BL, Hardy GEStJ (2003) The efficacy of phosphite applied after inoculation on the colonisation of Banksia brownii stems by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Australasian Plant Pathology 32, 1–7. doi: 10.1071/AP02061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrett SR, Shearer BL, Hardy GEStJ (2004) Phytotoxicity in relation to in planta concentration of the fungicide phosphite in nine Western Australian native species. Australasian Plant Pathology 33, 521–528. doi: 10.1071/AP04055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bettenay E (1983) Western region (II). In ‘Soils: an Australian viewpoint’. pp. 179–187. (CSIRO: Melbourne/Academic Press: London)Google Scholar
  8. Carswell C, Grant BR, Theodorou ME, Harris J, Niere JO, Plaxton WC (1996) The fungicide phosphonate disrupts the phosphate-starvation response in Brassica nigra seedlings. Plant Physiology 110, 105–110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapin FS (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11, 233–260. doi: 10.1146/ 11.110180.001313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cochrane A, Coates D (1994) Western Australia’s Threatened Flora Seed Centre and its role in conservation of genetic diversity. Danthonia 3, 4–7.Google Scholar
  11. Commonwealth of Australia (1992) ‘Endangered Species Protection Act.’ (Commonwealth Government Printer: Canberra)Google Scholar
  12. Darakis GA, Bourbos VA, Skoudridakis MT (1997) Phosphonate transport in Phytophthora capsici. Plant Pathology 46, 762–772. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.1997.d01-59.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Day PR (1965) Particle fraction and particle-size analysis. In ‘Methods of soil analysis. Part 1’. (Ed. CA Black) pp. 545–567. Agronomy Monograph 9. (ASA and SSSA: Madison, WI)Google Scholar
  14. Dolan TE, Coffey MD (1988) Correlative in vitro and in vivo behavior of mutant strains of Phytophthora palmivora expressing different resistances to phosphorous acid and fosetyl-Na. Phytopathology 78, 974–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. El-Hamalawi ZA, Menge JA, Adams CJ (1995) Methods of fosetyl-Al application and phosphonate levels in avocado tissue needed to control stem canker caused by Phytophthora citricola. Plant Disease 79, 770–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fairbanks MM, Hardy GEStJ, McComb JA (2000) Comparison of phosphite concentrations in Corymbia (Eucalyptus) calophylla tissues after spray, mist or soil drench applications with the fungicide phosphite. Australasian Plant Pathology 29, 96–1011. doi: 10.1071/AP00017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fenn ME, Coffey MD (1984) Studies on the in vitro and in vivo antifungal activity of fosetyl-Al and phosphorous acid. Phytopathology 74, 606–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fenn ME, Coffey MD (1989) Quantification of phosphonate and ethyl phosphonate in tobacco and tomato tissues and significance for the mode of action of two phosphonate fungicides. Phytopathology 79, 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Forster H, Adaskaveg JE, Kim DH, Stanghellini ME (1998) Effect of phosphite on tomato and pepper plants and on susceptibility of pepper to Phytophthora root and crown rot in hydroponic culture. Plant Disease 82, 1165–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grant BR, Dunstan RH, Griffith JM, Niere JO, Smillie RH (1990) The mechanisms of phosphonic (phosphorous) acid action in Phytophthora. Australasian Plant Pathology 19, 115–121. doi: 10.1071/APP9900115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grierson PF, Adams MA (1999) Nutrient cycling and growth in forest ecosystems of south western Australia. Relevance to agricultural landscapes. Agroforestry Systems 45, 215–244. doi: 10.1023/ A:1006267604313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Griffith JM, Coffey MD, Grant BR (1993) Phosphonate inhibition as a function of phosphate concentration in isolates of Phytophthora palmivora. Journal of General Microbiology 139, 2109–2116.Google Scholar
  23. Guest DI, Anderson RD, Foard HJ, Phillips D, Worboys S, Middleton RM (1994) Long-term control of Phytophthora disease of cocoa using trunk-injected phosphonate. Plant Pathology 43, 479–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Handreck KA (1997) Phosphorus requirements of Australian native plants. Australian Journal of Soil Research 35, 241–289. doi: 10.1071/S96060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holderness M (1992) Comparison of metalaxyl/cuprous oxide sprays and potassium phosphonate as sprays and trunk injections for control of Phytophthora palmivora pod rot and canker of cocoa. Crop Protection 11, 141–147. doi: 10.1016/0261-2194(92)90097-OCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson TJ, Burgess T, Colquhoun I, Hardy GEStJ (2000) Action of the fungicide phosphite on Eucalyptus marginata inoculated with Phytophthora cinnamomi. Plant Pathology 49, 147–154. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2000.00422.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kirby KN (1993) ‘Advanced data analysis with SYSTAT.’ (Van Nostrad Reinhold: New York)Google Scholar
  28. Leconte F, Bonnemain JL, Deirot S, Bompeix G, Besson J (1990) Properties and mechanisms of phosphite uptake (ambimobile antifungal compound) in leaf tissues. In ‘International conference on phloem transport and assimilate compartmentation’. Cognac, France, 19–24 August.Google Scholar
  29. Lim TM (1993) Trunk injection with phosphorous acid for controlling Phytophthora on chestnuts: early promising results. In ‘Proceedings of the 9th biennial conference of the Australasian Plant Pathology Society, Hobart’. p. 25. (Australasian Plant Pathology Society: Hobart)Google Scholar
  30. Lavorel S, Garnier E (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology 16, 545–556. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Long PG, Miller SA, Davis LK (1989) Duration of fungicidal effect following injection of apple trees with fosetyl-Al. Journal of Phytopathology 124, 89–96.Google Scholar
  32. McKenzie HA, Wallace HS (1954) The Kjeldahl determination of nitrogen: a critical study of digestion conditions - temperature, catalyst and oxidising agent. Australian Journal of Chemistry 7, 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Monks L, Coates D (2002) The translocation of two critically endangered Acacia species. Conservation Science Western Australia 4, 54–61.Google Scholar
  34. Murphy J, Riley T (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 27, 31–36. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Myers N, Mittermeler RA, Mittermeler CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858. doi: 10.1038/35002501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ouimette DG, Coffey MD (1989a) Phosphonate levels in avocado (Persea americana) seedlings and soil following treatment with fosetyl-Al or potassium phosphonate. Plant Disease 73, 212–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ouimette DG, Coffey MD (1989b) Comparative antifungal activity of four phosphonate compounds against isolates of nine Phytophthora species. Phytopathology 79, 761–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ouimette DG, Coffey MD (1990) Symplastic entry and phloem translocation of phosphonate. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 38, 18–25. doi: 10.1016/0048-3575(90)90143-PCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pate JS, Dell B (1984) Economy of mineral nutrients in sandplain species. In ‘Kwongan, plant life of the sandplain’. (Eds JS Pate, JS Beard) pp. 227–252. (University of Western Australia Press: Perth)Google Scholar
  40. Pilbeam R (2003) Effects of phosphite on disease development and histological responses in Eucalyptus marginata infected with Phytophthora cinnamomi. PhD thesis, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia.Google Scholar
  41. Piper CS (1942) ‘Soil and plant analysis.’ (University of Adelaide: Adelaide)Google Scholar
  42. Reich PB, Wright IJ, Cavender-Bares J, Craine JM, Oleksyn J, Westoby M, Walters MB (2003) The evolution of plant functional variation: traits, spectra, and strategies. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164, S143-S164. doi: 10.1086/374368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schutte GC, Bezuidenhout JJ, Kotze JM (1991) Timing of application of phosphonate fungicides using different application methods as determined by means of gas-liquid-chromatography for Phytophthora root rot control of citrus. Phytophylactica 23, 69–71.Google Scholar
  44. Shea SR, Gillen KJ, Leppard WI (1980) Seasonal variation in population levels of Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands in soil in diseased, freely drained Eucalyptus marginata Sm Sites in the northern jarrah forest of south-western Australia. Protection Ecology 2, 135–156.Google Scholar
  45. Shearer BL, Wilcoxson RD (1980) Sporulation of Septoria species on wheat and barley in Minnesota. Agricultural Experimental Station Technical Bulletin 323. (University of Minnesota: St. Paul, MN)Google Scholar
  46. Shearer BL, Tippett JT (1989) Jarrah dieback: the dynamics and management of Phytophthora cinnamomi in the jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) forest of south-western Australia. Research Bulletin 3. (Department of Conservation and Land Management: Perth)Google Scholar
  47. Shearer BL, Michaelsen BJ, Warren HJ (1987a) Comparative behaviour of Phytophthora species in the secondary phloem of stems and excised roots of Banksia grandis and Eucalyptus marginata. Australian Journal of Botany 35, 103–110. doi: 10.1071/BT9870103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shearer BL, Shea SR, Deegan PM (1987b) Temperature-growth relationships of Phytophthora cinnamomi in the secondary phloem of roots of Banksia grandis and Eucalyptus marginata. Phytopathology 77, 661–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shearer BL, Michaelsen BJ, Somerford PJ (1988) Effects of isolate and time of inoculation on invasion of secondary phloem of Eucalyptus spp. and Banksia grandis by Phytophthora spp. Plant Disease 72, 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shearer BL, Fairman RG (1997) Foliar application of phosphite delays and reduces the rate of mortality of three Banksia species in communities infested with Phytophthora cinnamomi. In ‘Proceedings of the 11th biennial conference of the Australasian Plant Pathology Society, Perth’. p. 180. (Australasian Plant Pathology Society: Perth)Google Scholar
  51. Shearer BL, Crane CE, Cochrane A (2004a) Quantification of the susceptibility of the native flora of the south-west botanical province, Western Australia, to Phytophthora cinnamomi. Australian Journal of Botany 52, 435–443. doi: 10.1071/BT03131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shearer BL, Crane CE, Fairman RG (2004b) Phosphite reduces disease extension of a Phytophthora cinnamomi front in Banksia woodland, even after fire. Australasian Plant Pathology 33, 249–254. doi: 10.1071/AP04002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shearer BL, Fairman RG, Grant M (2006) Effective concentration of phosphite in controlling Phytophthora cinnamomi following stem injection of Banksia species and Eucalyptus marginata. Forest Pathology 36, 119–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2006.00440.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smillie R, Grant BR, Guest D (1989) The mode of action of phosphite: evidence for both direct and indirect modes of action on three Phytophthora spp. in plants. Phytopathology 79, 921–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith BJ, Shearer BL, Sivasithamparam K (1997) Compartmentalization of Phytophthora cinnamomi in stems of highly susceptible Banksia brownii treated with phosphonate. Mycological Research 101, 1101–1107. doi: 10.1017/S0953756297003754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Specht RL, Groves RH (1966) A comparison of the phosphorus nutrition of Australian heath plants and introduced economic plants. Australian Journal of Botany 14, 201–221. doi: 10.1071/BT9660201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sukarno N, Smith SE, Scott ES (1993) The effect of fungicides on vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: I. The effects on vesiculararbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth. The New Phytologist 25, 139–147.Google Scholar
  58. Thompson CH, Moore AW, Northcote KH (1983) Soils and land use. In ‘Soils: An Australian Viewpoint’. pp. 757–775. (CSIRO: Melbourne/Academic Press: London)Google Scholar
  59. Tippett JT, Hill TC, Shearer BL (1985) Resistance of Eucalyptus spp. to invasion by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Australian Journal of Botany 33, 409–418. doi: 10.1071/BT9850409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tippett JT, Crombie DS, Hill TC (1987) The effect of phloem water relations on the growth of Phytophthora cinnamomi in Eucalyptus marginata. Phytopathology 77, 246–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tippett JT, McGrath JF, Hill TC (1989) Site and seasonal effects on susceptibility of Eucalyptus marginata to Phytophthora cinnamomi. Australian Journal of Botany 37, 481–490. doi: 10.1071/BT9890481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tsao PH, Guy SO (1977) Inhibition of Mortierella and Pythium in Phytophthora- isolation medium containing hymexazol. Phytopathology 67, 796–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tynan KM, Wilkinson CJ, Holmes JM, Dell B, Colquhoun IJ, McComb JA, Hardy GEStJ (2001) The long-term ability of phosphite to control Phytophthora cinnamomi in two native plant communities of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 49, 761–770. doi: 10.1071/BT00062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Whiley AW, Hargreaves PA, Pegg KG, Doogan VJ, Ruddle LJ, Saranah JB, Langdon PW (1995) Changing sink strengths influence translocation of phosphonate in avocado (Persea americana Mill.) trees. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 1079–1090. doi: 10.1071/AR9951079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wicks TJ, Hall B (1988) Preliminary evaluation of phosphorous acid, fosetyl-Al and metalaxyl for controlling Phytophthora cambivora on almond and cherry. Crop Protection 7, 314–318. doi: 10.1016/0261-2194(88)90078-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilkinson L (2002) ‘SYSTAT 10.2. Statistics I.’ (SYSTAT Software Inc: San Jose, CA)Google Scholar
  67. Wright IJ, Westoby M (2003) Nutrient concentration, resorption and lifespan: leaf traits of Australian sclerophyll species. Functional Ecology 17, 10–19. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2003.00694.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zadoks JC, Schein RD (1979) ‘Epidemiology and Plant Disease Management.’ (Oxford University Press: New York)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian Plant Pathology Society 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Science Division, Department of Environment and ConservationBentley Delivery CentreAustralia

Personalised recommendations