Australasian Plant Pathology

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 489–498 | Cite as

Characterisation and pathogenicity of Cylindrocladiella spp. associated with root and cutting rot symptoms of grapevines in nurseries

  • G. J. van Coller
  • S. Denman
  • J. Z. Groenewald
  • S. C. Lamprecht
  • P. W. Crous


Species of Cylindrocladiella occur on a variety of hosts, where they are known to act as pathogens or saprobes. Eight species from this genus are currently recognised, of which five have been reported previously in South Africa: C. camelliae, C. elegans, C. lageniformis, C. parva and C. peruviana. Isolates of Cylindrocladiella were obtained from a newly established 99-Richter grapevine mother vine block exhibiting decline symptoms. The DNA phylogeny of these and additional isolates, also obtained from declining grapevines, was determined by sequencing the ITS (ITS 1, ITS2 and 5.8S) as well as (β-tubulin and histone H3 gene regions. This identified four species of Cylindrocladiella on grapevines in South Africa: C. lageniformis, C. parva, C. peruviana and a new species described here as C. viticola, which forms part of the C. infestans species complex. Pathogenicity trials, using stem inoculations on green and 1-year-old 99-Richter cuttings to determine the pathogenicity of selected isolates of these species, gave inconclusive results.

Additional keywords

Cylindrocladiella viticola 99-Richter 101-14 Mgt 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boesewinkel HJ (1982) Cylindrocladiella, a new genus to accommodate Cylindrocladium parvum and other small-spored species of Cylindrocladium. Canadian Journal of Botany 60, 2288–2294.Google Scholar
  2. Crous PW (2002) ‘Taxonomy and pathology of Cylindrocladium (Calonectria) and allied genera.’ (APS Press: Minnesota)Google Scholar
  3. Crous PW, Wingfield MJ (1993) A re-evaluation of Cylindrocladiella, and a comparison with morphological similar genera. Mycological Research 97, 433–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crous PW, Wingfield MJ (1994) A monograph of Cylindrocladium, including anamorphs of Calonectria. Mycotaxon 51, 341–435.Google Scholar
  5. Crous PW, Phillips AJL, Wingfield MJ (1992) Effects of cultural conditions on vesicle and conidium morphology in species of Cylindrocladium and Cylindrocladiella. Mycologia 84, 497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Lennox CL (1994) A comparison of generic concepts in Calonectria and Nectria with anamorphs in Cylindrocladium and Cylindrocladiella. South African Journal of Science 90, 485–188.Google Scholar
  7. Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Risede J-M, Hywel-Jones NL (2004) Calonectria species and their Cylindrocladium anamorphs: species with sphaeropedunculate vesicles. Studies in Mycology 50, 415–130.Google Scholar
  8. Farris JS, Kallersjo M, Kluge AG, Bult C (1994) Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10, 315–320. doi; 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1994.tb00181.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher NL, Burgess LW, Toussoun TA, Nelson PE (1982) Carnation leaves as a substrate and for preserving cultures of Fusarium species. Phy topathology 11, 151–153.Google Scholar
  10. Glass NL, Donaldson GC (1995) Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61, 1323–1330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hillis DM, Bull JJ (1993) An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42, 182–192.Google Scholar
  12. John JA, Quenouille MH (1977) ‘Design and analysis’. (The Garden City Press Ltd: Letchworth, UK)Google Scholar
  13. Kang JC, Crous PW, Schoch CL (2001) Species concepts in the Cylindrocladium floridanum and Cy. spathiphylli complexes (Hypocreaceae) based on multi-allelic sequence data, sexual compatibility and morphology. Systematic and Applied Microbiology 24, 206–217. doi: 10.1078/0723-2020-00026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee SB, Taylor JW (1990) Isolation of DNA from fungal mycelia and single spores. In ‘PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications’. (Eds MA Innis, DH Gelfand, JJ Sninsky, TJ White) pp. 282–287. (Academic Press: New York)Google Scholar
  15. Levene H (1960) Robust test in the equality of variance. In ‘Contributions to probability and statistics’. (Ed. IP Alto) pp. 278–292. (University Press: Stanford, CA)Google Scholar
  16. Mandal NC, Dasgupta MK (1983) Postharvest diseases of perishables in West Bengal 1: new host records and a new fungus from India. Indian Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology 13, 73–77.Google Scholar
  17. O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E (1997) Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7, 103–116. doi: 10.1006/mpev.l996.0376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Page RDM (1996) TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 12, 357–358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Peerally A (1991) The classification and phytopathology of Cylindrocladium species. Mycotaxon 40, 323–366.Google Scholar
  20. Rambaut A (2002) ‘Sequence alignment editor. Version 2.0’. (Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford)Google Scholar
  21. Rayner RW (1970) ‘A mycological colour chart.’ (Commonwealth Mycological Institute: UK)Google Scholar
  22. Rossman AY (1979) A preliminary account of the taxa described in Calonectria. Mycotaxon 8, 485–558.Google Scholar
  23. SAS Institute Inc. (1999) ‘SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 8, 1st printing, vol. 2.’ (SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, North Carolina)Google Scholar
  24. Schoch CL, Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD (2000) Phylogeny of Calonectria and selected hypocrealean genera with cylindrical macroconidia. In ‘Molecules, morphology and classification: towards monophyletic genera in the Ascomycetes’. (Eds KA Seifert, W Gams, PW Crous, GJ Samuels). Studies in Mycology 45, 45–62.Google Scholar
  25. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52, 591–611.Google Scholar
  26. Sharma JK, Mohanan C (1991) In vitro evaluation of fungicides against Cylindrocladium spp. causing diseases of Eucalyptus in Kerala, India. European Journal of Forest Pathology 21, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1989) ‘Statistical methods’. 8th Edition. (Iowa State University Press: Iowa)Google Scholar
  28. Swofford DL (2000) PAUP. ‘Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods) version 4.’ (Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, Massachusetts)Google Scholar
  29. Victor D, Crous PW, Janse BJH, Van Zyl WH, Wingfield MJ, Alfenas AC (1998) Systematic appraisal of species complexes within Cylindrocladiella. Mycological Research 102, 273–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor JW (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes forphylogenetics. In: ‘PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications’. (Eds MA Innis, DH Gelfand, JJ Sninsky, TJ White) pp. 315–322 (Academic Press: New York)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian Plant Pathology Society 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. J. van Coller
    • 1
  • S. Denman
    • 1
    • 3
  • J. Z. Groenewald
    • 1
    • 4
  • S. C. Lamprecht
    • 1
    • 5
  • P. W. Crous
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Plant PathologyUniversity of StellenboschMatielandSouth Africa
  2. 2.Western Cape Department of AgricultureElsenburgSouth Africa
  3. 3.Forest Research StationAlice Holt LodgeFarnhamUK
  4. 4.Centraalbureau voor ScimmelculturesCT UtrechtThe Netherlands
  5. 5.ARC-PPRIStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations