Advertisement

Australasian Plant Pathology

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 513–519 | Cite as

Global distribution of Diplodia pinea genotypes revealed using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers

  • T. I. BurgessEmail author
  • M. J. Wingfield
  • B. D. Wingfield
Article

Abstract

Pinus spp. have a number of fungal endophytes of which the latent pathogen Diplodia pinea is a well-known example. In this study, 12 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were used to consider the origin of the southern hemisphere isolates and to evaluate genetic diversity and gene flow between populations of D. pinea. Three populations were isolated from Pinus sp. within the native range of the fungus in the northern hemisphere and three populations were isolated from P. radiata in the southern hemisphere. Populations of D. pinea exhibited low allelic diversity and appear to be clonal, not only regionally, but also across continents. The origin of the southern hemisphere populations could not be determined, as the same alleles are found in all populations. There was no evidence for genetic drift or fixation of alleles in local populations, and some genotypes were found across continents, suggesting both a long asexual history and considerable movement of this pathogen probably assisted by human activities.

Additional keywords

genotypic diversity fungal endophyte Pinus micro satellite marker population genetics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agapow P-M, Burt A (2000) ‘Multilocus 1.2.’ (Department of Biology, Imperial College: Ascot, UK)Google Scholar
  2. Burgess T, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ (2001a) Comparison of genotypic diversity in native and introduced populations of Sphaeropsis sapinea isolated from Pinus radiata. Mycological Research 105, 1331–1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burgess T, Wingfield M J (2001) Exotic pine forestry in the Southern Hemisphere: a brief history of establishment and quarantine practices. South African Forestry Journal 192, 79–84.Google Scholar
  4. Burgess T, Wingfield MJ (2002) Quarantine is important in restricting the spread of exotic seed-borne tree pathogens in the southern hemisphere. International Forestry Review 4, 56–65.Google Scholar
  5. Burgess T, Wingfield M J, Wingfield BD (2001b) Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers distinguish between morphotypes of Sphaeropsis sapinea. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 67, 354–362. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.1.354-362.2001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Burt A, Dechairo BM, Koenig GL, Carter DA, White TJ, Taylor JW (1997) Molecular markers reveal differentiation among isolates of Coccidiodes immitis from California, Arizona and Texas. Molecular Ecology 6, 781–786. doi: 10.1046/J.1365-294X. 1997.00245.XCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen RS, Boeger JM, McDonald BA (1994) Genetic stability in a population of a plant pathogenic fungus over time. Molecular Ecology 3, 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Wet J, Burgess T, Slippers B, Presig O, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ (2003) Multiple gene genealogies and microsatellite markers reflect relationships between morphotypes of Sphaeropsis sapinea and identify a new species of Diplodia. Mycological Research 107, 557–566. doi: 10.1017/S0953756203007706CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. de Wet J, Wingfield MJ, Coutinho TA, Wingfield WD (2000) Characterization of Sphaeropsis sapin ea isolates from South Africa, Mexico and Indonesia. Plant Disease 84, 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Empire Forestry Association (1934) New Zealand: report of the state forest service for the year ended 31st March 1934. Empire Forestry Journal 13, 294–296.Google Scholar
  11. Flowers E, Nuckles E, Hartman J, Vaillancourt L (2001) Latent infection of Austrian and Scots pine tissues by Sphaeropsis sapinea. Plant Disease 85, 1107–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fraedrich SW, Miller T, Zarnoch SJ (1994) Factors affecting the incidence of black seed rot in slash pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24, 1717–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ganley RJ, Brunsfeld SJ, Newcombe G (2003) Species diversity of fungal endophytes in Pinus monticola. In Proceedings of the 8th international congress of plant pathology.’ Offered Papers, p. 152.Google Scholar
  14. Gibson IAS (1979) ‘Diseases of forest trees widely planted as exotics in the tropics and southern hemisphere. Part 2. The genus Pinus.’ (Commonwealth Mycological Institute: Kew, UK and Commonwealth Forestry Institute, University of Oxford: Oxford, England)Google Scholar
  15. Hausner G, Hopkin AA, Davis CN, Reid J (1999) Variation in culture and rDNA among isolates of Sphaeropsis sapinea from Ontario and Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 21, 256–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laughton EM (1937) The incidence of fungal diseases of timber trees in South Africa. South African Journal of Science 33, 337–382.Google Scholar
  17. Linde C, Zhan J, McDonald BA (2002) Population structure of Mycosphaerella graminicola: from lesions to continents. Phytopathology 92, 946–955.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lundquist JE (1987) A history of five forest diseases in South Africa. South African Forestry Journal 140, 51–59.Google Scholar
  19. McDonald BA (1997) The population genetics of fungi: tools and techniques. Phytopathology 87, 448–453.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. McDonald BA, Linde C (2002) Pathogen population genetics, evolutionary potential and durable resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology 40, 349–379. doi: 10.1146/ANNUREVPHYTO.40.120501.101443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 70, 3321–3323.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Palmer MA, Stewart EL, Wingfield M J (1987) Variation among isolates of Sphaeropsis sapinea in North Central United States. Phytopathology 77, 944–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Petrini O, Fisher PJ (1988) A comparative study of fungal endophytes in xylem and whole stem of Pinus sylvestris and Fagus sylvatica. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 91, 233–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Punithalingam E, Waterson JM (1970) ‘Diplodia pinea.’ (Commonwealth Mycological Institute and Association of Applied Biologists: Kew, UK)Google Scholar
  25. Raeder U, Broda P (1985) Rapid preparation of DNA from filamentous fungi. Letters in Applied Microbiology 1, 17–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Slatkin M (1987) Gene flow and geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236, 787–792.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith DR, Stanosz GR (1995) Confirmation of two distinct populations of Sphaeropsis sapinea in the Northern Central United States using RAPDs. Phytopathology 85, 669–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith H, Wingfield MJ, Crous PW, Coutinho TA (1996) Sphaeropsis sapinea and Botryosphaeria dothidea endophytic in Pinus spp. and Eucalyptus spp. in South Africa. South African Journal of Botany 62, 86–88.Google Scholar
  29. Smith H, Wingfield MJ, de Wet J, Coutinho TA (2000) Genotypic diversity of Sphaeropsis sapinea from South Africa and Northern Sumatra. Plant Disease 84, 139–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stanosz GR, Smith DR, Guthmiller MA, Stanosz JC (1995) Persistence of Sphaeropsis sapinea on or in asymptomatic stems of red pine nursery seedlings. Phytopathology 85, 1196.Google Scholar
  31. Stanosz GR, Swart WJ, Smith DR (1999) RAPD marker and isozyme characterization of Sphaeropsis sapinea from diverse coniferous hosts and locations. Mycological Research 103, 1193–1202. doi: 10.1017/S0953756299008382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stoddart JA, Taylor JF (1988) Genotypic diversity: estimation and prediction in samples. Genetics 118, 705–711.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Taylor J W, Geiser DM, Burt A, Koufopanou V(1999a) The evolutionary biology and population genetics underlying fungal strain typing. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 12, 126–146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Taylor JW, Jacobson DJ, Fisher MC (1999b) The evolution of asexual fungi: reproduction, speciation and classification. Annual Review of Phytopathology 37, 197–246. doi: 10.1146/ANNUREV.PHYTO.37.1.197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Thomson AP (1969) New Zealand’s expanding forest resources, Commonwealth Forest Review 48, 289–301.Google Scholar
  36. Wang C-G, Blanchette RA, Jackson WA, Palmer MA (1985) Differences in conidial morphology among isolates of Sphaeropsis sapinea. Plant Disease 69, 838–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weir BS (1997) ‘Genetic data analysis II.’ (Sinauer Associates Inc.: Sunderland, MA)Google Scholar
  38. Wingfield MJ (1999) Pathogens in exotic plantation forestry. International Forestry Review 1, 163–168.Google Scholar
  39. Workman PL, Niswander JD (1970) Population studies in South-western Indian tribes. II. Local genetic variation in the Papago. American Journal of Human Genetics 22, 24–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Wright JP, Marks GC (1970) Loss of merchantable wood in radiata pine associated with infection by Diplodia pinea. Australian Forestry 34, 107–119.Google Scholar
  41. Yeh FC, Yang R-C, Boyle T ( 1999) ‘POPGENE version 1.31 (Microsoft windows based freeware for population genetic analysis. Alberta).’Google Scholar
  42. Zhou S, Smith DR, Stanosz GR (2001) Differentiation of Botryosphaeria species and related anamorphic fungi using Inter Simple or Short Sequence Repeat (ISSR) fingerprinting. Mycological Research 105, 919–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian Plant Pathology Society 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. I. Burgess
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • M. J. Wingfield
    • 1
  • B. D. Wingfield
    • 2
  1. 1.Forestry and Agriculture Biotechnology InstituteUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaRepublic of South Africa
  2. 2.Department of GeneticsUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaRepublic of South Africa
  3. 3.School of Biological Sciences and BiotechnologyMurdoch UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations