Australasian Plant Pathology

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 305–307 | Cite as

Distribution of Sugarcane mosaic virus in sugarcane plants

  • Lilik K. Putra
  • Helen J. Ogle
  • Anthony P. James
  • Peter J. L. Whittle
Short Research Note


Variation in the concentration of virus in different parts of the plant has implications for virus-indexing programs. To allow more reliable detection of Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV), the distribution of the virus in sugarcane plants after artificial inoculation was studied using a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. Leaves of susceptible and moderately resistant sugarcane were mechanically inoculated with SCMV 6 weeks after planting. Weekly for 8 weeks after inoculation, plants were examined for mosaic symptoms and samples of leaves, roots and tillers were tested by RT-PCR to detect virus. SCMV moved from the point of inoculation to younger leaves, roots and tillers and eventually to leaves that emerged prior to inoculation. The pattern of SCMV distribution in moderately resistant and susceptible cultivars was not substantially different. However, the virus moved more slowly in the moderately resistant than in the susceptible cultivar. Young leaves proved to be the most suitable tissue for testing.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barnett OW (1986) Application of new test procedures to surveys: merging the new with the old. In ‘Developments and applications in virus testing’. (Eds RAC Jones, L Torrance) pp. 247–267. (The Lavenham Press Ltd: Sudbury, UK)Google Scholar
  2. Dinesen IG, van Zaayen A (1996) Potential of pathogen detection technology for management of diseases in glasshouse ornamental crops. Advances in Botanical Research 23, 137–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Handojo H, Siswojo, Legowo L (1978) Penyakit mosaik, kerugian dan pengujian resistensi (Mosaic disease, yield losses and resistance testing). Majaiah Perusahaan Gula 17, 1–5.Google Scholar
  4. Hansen MA, Wick RL (1993) Plant disease diagnosis: present status and future prospects. Advances in Plant Patholology 10, 65–117.Google Scholar
  5. Jordan R (1992) Potyviruses, monoclonal antibodies, and antigenic sites. Archives of Virology Supplement 5, 81–95.Google Scholar
  6. Koike H, Gillaspie Jr AG (1989) Mosaic. In ‘Diseases of sugarcane: major diseases’. (Eds C Ricaud, BT Egan, AG Gillaspie Jr, GG Hughes) pp. 301–322. (Elsevier: Amsterdam)Google Scholar
  7. Lin CP, Chen CT (1994) Application of biotechnology in detecting sugarcane diseases. In ‘Current trends in sugarcane pathology’. (Eds GP Rao, AG Gillaspie Jr, P Upadhyaya, A Bergamin, VP Agnihorti, CT Chen) pp. 221–233. (IBPSS: Delhi)Google Scholar
  8. Shukla DD, Tosic M, Jilka J, Ford RE, Toler RW, Langham MAC (1989) Taxonomy of potyviruses infecting maize, sorghum and sugarcane in Australia and the United States as determined by reactivities of polyclonal antibodies directed towards virus-specific N-termini of coat proteins. Phytopathology 79, 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Singh SP, Rao GP, Singh J, Singh SB (1997) Effect of sugarcane mosaic potyvirus infection on metabolic activity, yield and juice quality. Sugar Can 5, 19–23.Google Scholar
  10. Smith G R, van de Velde R ( 1994) Detection of sugarcane mosaic virus and Fiji disease virus in diseased sugarcane using polymerase chain reaction. Plant Disease 78, 557–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Teakle D (1997) Virus and viroid diseases and their control. In ‘Plant pathogens and plant diseases’. (Eds JF Brown, HJ Ogle) pp. 488–504. (Rockvale Publications: Armidale, NSW)Google Scholar
  12. Thomson D, Dietzgen RG (1995) Detection of DNA and RNA plant viruses by PCR and RT-PCR using a rapid virus release protocol without tissue homogenization. Journal of Virology Methods 54, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Thomson D, Henry R (1995) Single-step protocol for preparation of plant tissue for analysis by PCR. BioTechniques 19, 394–400.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian Plant Pathology Society 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lilik K. Putra
    • 1
  • Helen J. Ogle
    • 2
  • Anthony P. James
    • 3
  • Peter J. L. Whittle
    • 3
  1. 1.Indonesian Sugar Research Institute JlPasuruanIndonesia
  2. 2.School of Land and Food SciencesThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia
  3. 3.David North Plant Research CentreBureau of Sugar Experiment StationsIndooroopillyAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Primary IndustriesBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations