Distribution of Sugarcane mosaic virus in sugarcane plants
Variation in the concentration of virus in different parts of the plant has implications for virus-indexing programs. To allow more reliable detection of Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV), the distribution of the virus in sugarcane plants after artificial inoculation was studied using a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. Leaves of susceptible and moderately resistant sugarcane were mechanically inoculated with SCMV 6 weeks after planting. Weekly for 8 weeks after inoculation, plants were examined for mosaic symptoms and samples of leaves, roots and tillers were tested by RT-PCR to detect virus. SCMV moved from the point of inoculation to younger leaves, roots and tillers and eventually to leaves that emerged prior to inoculation. The pattern of SCMV distribution in moderately resistant and susceptible cultivars was not substantially different. However, the virus moved more slowly in the moderately resistant than in the susceptible cultivar. Young leaves proved to be the most suitable tissue for testing.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Barnett OW (1986) Application of new test procedures to surveys: merging the new with the old. In ‘Developments and applications in virus testing’. (Eds RAC Jones, L Torrance) pp. 247–267. (The Lavenham Press Ltd: Sudbury, UK)Google Scholar
- Handojo H, Siswojo, Legowo L (1978) Penyakit mosaik, kerugian dan pengujian resistensi (Mosaic disease, yield losses and resistance testing). Majaiah Perusahaan Gula 17, 1–5.Google Scholar
- Hansen MA, Wick RL (1993) Plant disease diagnosis: present status and future prospects. Advances in Plant Patholology 10, 65–117.Google Scholar
- Jordan R (1992) Potyviruses, monoclonal antibodies, and antigenic sites. Archives of Virology Supplement 5, 81–95.Google Scholar
- Koike H, Gillaspie Jr AG (1989) Mosaic. In ‘Diseases of sugarcane: major diseases’. (Eds C Ricaud, BT Egan, AG Gillaspie Jr, GG Hughes) pp. 301–322. (Elsevier: Amsterdam)Google Scholar
- Lin CP, Chen CT (1994) Application of biotechnology in detecting sugarcane diseases. In ‘Current trends in sugarcane pathology’. (Eds GP Rao, AG Gillaspie Jr, P Upadhyaya, A Bergamin, VP Agnihorti, CT Chen) pp. 221–233. (IBPSS: Delhi)Google Scholar
- Shukla DD, Tosic M, Jilka J, Ford RE, Toler RW, Langham MAC (1989) Taxonomy of potyviruses infecting maize, sorghum and sugarcane in Australia and the United States as determined by reactivities of polyclonal antibodies directed towards virus-specific N-termini of coat proteins. Phytopathology 79, 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Singh SP, Rao GP, Singh J, Singh SB (1997) Effect of sugarcane mosaic potyvirus infection on metabolic activity, yield and juice quality. Sugar Can 5, 19–23.Google Scholar
- Teakle D (1997) Virus and viroid diseases and their control. In ‘Plant pathogens and plant diseases’. (Eds JF Brown, HJ Ogle) pp. 488–504. (Rockvale Publications: Armidale, NSW)Google Scholar