Australasian Plant Pathology

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 103–105 | Cite as

Plant health as a trade policy issue

Letter to the Editor

Abstract

Plant health status has always influenced international trade. However, since the establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995, the plant health status of Member countries has be come an integral part of import risk analysis via the disciplines of the WTO’s SPS Agreement. It is now incumbent on Member countries not using international standards to produce import risk analyses that are science-based, objective, defensible and transparent to support the imposition of sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures. The SPS Agreement builds on previous GATT trade rules to restrict the use of unjustified SPS measures for the purpose of trade protection while still acknowledging a country’s right to determine the level of health protection it deems appropriate. Now more than ever, plant health is a trade policy issue.

Additional keywords

biosecurity quarantine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ikin B, Small N (2000) ‘National standards for documenting plant pest and disease records.’ Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Publication. Project AQS-2A. 38 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Merriman P, Moran J, Rodoni B (2001) ‘Faces’ of quarantine — challenges facing growers, diagnostic scientists and quarantine managers. Australasian Plant Pathology 30, 141–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Pauwelyn J (1999) Th e WTO agreement on sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures as applied in the first three SPS disputes. EC-Hormones, Australia-Salmon and Japan-Varietals. Journal of International Economic Law 1999, 641–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Phillips D, Chandrashekar M, Roberts WP (1994) Pest risk analysis and its implications for pest and disease exclusion from Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology 23, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Roberts D (2001) The integration of economics into SPS risk management policies: issues and challenges. In ‘The economics of quarantine and the SPS Agreement’. (Eds K Anderson. CF McRae, D Wilson) pp. 9–28. (Biosecurity Australia and Centre for International Economic Studies. Adelaide University: Aelaide)Google Scholar
  6. Wilson D (2000) The appropriate level of protection. In ‘Quarantine and market access — playing by the WTO rules’. Forum Proceedings, 6–7 September 2000, Canberra, ACT, Australia. ISBN 0642455058. pp. 159–164.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian Plant Pathology Society 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biosecurity Development and EvaluationBiosecurity Australia, Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, AustraliaCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations