Skip to main content

Analysis of referral patterns, predictive accuracy, and impact on patient management of myocardial perfusion imaging in a new nuclear cardiology laboratory

Abstract

Background

Most of the published data on myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) come from large tertiary-referral medical centers with extensive experience in cardiac imaging as well as a large volume of procedures. Whether the results of MPI remain as reliable in new nuclear cardiology laboratories with smaller volumes of procedures is unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze the referral patterns, predictive accuracy, and impact of MPI on clinical practice in a newly opened nuclear cardiology laboratory.

Methods and Results

We performed a prospective study on all patients referred for MPI at our nuclear cardiology laboratory during its first year of operation. Patients were followed up for 3 months after the MPI study to determine whether they underwent coronary angiography. The study population consisted of 334 patients. Their mean age was 56 ± 10 years, and 80% were men. Of the patients, 30% were asymptomatic, 29% had angina, and only 6% had recent acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina. Fifty-one patients (fifteen percent) were subsequently referred for coronary angiography. The positive and negative predictive values of MPI were 91% and 86%, respectively. The presence of reversible perfusion defects (P = .02) and the presence of multiple perfusion defects (P = .01) on MPI were the most important determinants of subsequent referral to coronary angiography.

Conclusions

MPI stress testing retains its high diagnostic accuracy in a new nuclear cardiology laboratory with a relatively small volume of procedures. Furthermore, MPI findings in this population had a strong impact on the clinical practice of the referring physicians in terms of subsequent referral to coronary angiography. (J Nucl Cardiol 2003;10:148-53.)

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Beller GA, Zaret BL. Contributions of nuclear cardiology to diagnosis and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 2000;101:1465–78.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.Beller GA. Detection of coronary artery disease. In: Beller GA, editor. Clinical nuclear cardiology. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1995. p. 82–137.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Iskandrian AS, Verani MS. Exercise perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease: physiology and diagnosis. In: Iskandrian AS, Verani MS, editors. Nuclear cardiac imaging: principles and applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis; 1996. p. 73–132.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mahmarian JJ. State of the art for coronary artery disease detection: thallium-201. In: Zaret BL, Beller GA, editors. Nuclear cardiology: state of the art and future directions. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999. p. 237–72.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beller GA. Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction by using noninvasive radionuclide imaging. In: Zaret BL, Beller GA, editors. Nuclear cardiology: state of the art and future directions. 2nd ed. St. Louis; Mosby; 1999. p. 451–67.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Verani MS. Risk stratifying patients who survive an acute myocardial infarction. J Nucl Cardiol 1998;5:96–108.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Iskander S, Iskandrian AE. Risk assessment using single-photon emission computed tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:57–62.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.Brown KA. Prognosis in stable coronary artery disease. In: Zaret BL, Beller GA, editors. Nuclear cardiology: state of the art and future directions. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999. p. 331–45.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dakik HA, Mahmarian JJ, Kimball KT, et al. Prognostic value of exercise thallium-201 tomography in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy during acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1996;94:2735–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bateman TM, O’Keefe JH, Dong VM, Barnhart C, Ligon RW. Coronary angiographic rates after stress single-photon emission computed tomographic scintigraphy. J Nucl Cardiol 1995;2:217–23.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nallamothu N, Pancholy SB, Lee KL, Heo J, Iskandrian AS. Impact of exercise single-photon emission tomographic thallium imaging on patient management and outcome. J Nucl Cardiol 1995;2:334–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Kiat H, et al. Incremental value of prognostic testing in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease: a basis for optimal utilization of exercise technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:639–47.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dakik HA, Kimball KT, Mahmarian JJ, Verani MS. The impact of stress myocardial perfusion tomography on the selection of patients for coronary angiography [abstract]. J Nucl Cardiol 1995;2(Suppl 2):S11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, et al. Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease: incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification. Circulation 1996;93:905–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Habib A. Dakik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hannoush, H., Shaar, K., Alam, S. et al. Analysis of referral patterns, predictive accuracy, and impact on patient management of myocardial perfusion imaging in a new nuclear cardiology laboratory. J Nucl Cardiol 10, 148–153 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1067/mnc.2003.397

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mnc.2003.397

Key Words

  • Myocardial perfusion imaging
  • coronary angiography
  • coronary artery disease