Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing diagnostic performance in nuclear cardiology

  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Botvinick EH, editor. Nuclear medicine cardiology: physical and technical aspects of nuclear cardiology. Self-study program III: cardiology topic 1. Reston (VA): Society of Nuclear Medicine; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. English RJ, Brown SE. SPECT: single-photon emission computed tomography: a primer. New York: Society of Nuclear Medicine; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. DePuey GE, editor. Myocardial imaging with Cardiolite: a workbook. Wilmington (DE): DuPont Pharmaceuticals; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Germano G, Berman DS. Clinical gated SPECT. Armonk (NY): Futura Publishing; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gross R. Making medical decisions: an approach to clinical decision making for practicing physicians. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beller GA. Clinical nuclear cardiology. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Diamond GA, Forrester J. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979; 300:1350–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gibbons RJ, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Douglas JS, Fihn SD, Gardin JM, et al. ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina) [published erratum appears in J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:314]. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:2092–197.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. DePuey EG, Rozanski A. Using gated technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT to characterize fixed myocardial defects as infarct or artifact. J Nucl Med 1995;36:952–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Smanio PE, Watson DD, Segalla DL, Vinson EL, Smith WH, Beller GA. Value of gating of technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1687–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978;8:283–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Turner DA. An intuitive approach to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. J Nucl Med 1978;19:213–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Patton DD. Introduction to clinical decision making. Semin Nucl Med 1978;8:273–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rozanski A. Referral bias and the efficacy of radionuclide stress tests: problems and solutions [editorial]. J Nucl Med 1992;33:2074–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas GS, Bateman TM, Gal RA, Pounds BK, Ziffer JA, Fabizi RR, et al. ASNC Report Card Task Force & Writing Group. ASCN Report Card. Version 1.54-2-15-99. Bethesda (MD): ASNC; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, Carabello B, Dehmer GJ, Eagle KA, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1756–824.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mahmarian JJ, Boyce TM, Goldberg RK, Cocanougher MK, Roberts R, Verani MS. Quantitative exercise thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography for the enhanced diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:318–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Verna E, Ceriani L, Giovanella L, Binaghi G, Garancini S. False-positive myocardial perfusion scintigraphy findings in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries: insights from intravascular sonography studies. J Nucl Med 2000;41:1935–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Erbel R, Ge J, Bockisch A, Gorge G, Haude M, Schumann D, et al. Value of intracoronary ultrasound and Doppler in the differentiation of angiographically normal coronary arteries: a prospective study in patients with angina pectoris. Eur Heart J 1996;17:880–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gassler JP, Topol EJ. Reperfusion revisited: beyond TIMI 3 flow. Clin Cardiol 1999;22(Suppl IV):IV20–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ziffer JA, Janowitz WR, Vuong HV, Quesada R. What is the contribution of nuclear cardiology to normal coronary angiographic rates in men and women with suspected coronary artery disease? [abstract]. From the Scientific Program the 86th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, Nov 26–Dec 1, 2000, Chicago, Ill.

  22. Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB, Clark DA, Cusma JT, Dehmer GJ, et al. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:2170–214.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Marwick TH, Lauer MS, Heller GV, et al. The economic consequences of available diagnostic and prognostic strategies for the evaluation of stable angina patients: an observational assessment of the value of pre-catheterization ischemia. Economics of Noninvasive Diagnosis (END) Multicenter Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:661–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Koller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koller, D. Assessing diagnostic performance in nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol 9, 114–123 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1067/mnc.2002.121472

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mnc.2002.121472

Keywords

Navigation