Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tolerance and diagnostic accuracy of an abbreviated adenosine infusion for myocardial scintigraphy: A randomized, prospective study

  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

The objectives of this study were 2-fold: (1) to determine the tolerance of adenosine perfusion tomography with the use of an abbreviated (3-minute) infusion in comparison to the standard (6-minute) infusion, and (2) to assess the relative diagnostic accuracy of a 3-minute adenosine infusion in patients referred for arteriography. An abbreviated adenosine infusion may decrease the frequency and duration of side effects and be a more cost-effective alternative.

Methods and Results

We prospectively randomized 599 patients undergoing adenosine myocardial perfusion tomography to either a 3-minute or 6-minute adenosine infusion at 140 μg/kg per minute. Among the 599 enrolled patients, 142 subsequently underwent coronary angiography. Patients randomized to the 3-minute adenosine infusion tolerated the procedure better than those randomized to the standard infusion (P < .01). Flushing, headache, neck pain, and atrioventricular block were all significantly less frequent (P < .01) with the abbreviated infusion. Moreover, patients receiving the abbreviated infusion had less hypotension and tachycardia (P < .05). The sensitivity of the test for detection of coronary artery disease was 88% for both the 3- and 6-minute infusions. In patients with abnormal scan results, perfusion defect size was slightly larger in those receiving a 6-minute infusion versus those receiving a 3-minute infusion (P = .05).

Conclusions

An abbreviated 3-minute adenosine infusion, in combination with perfusion tomography, has similar sensitivity for detection of coronary artery disease and is better tolerated than the standard 6-minute infusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mahmarian JJ, Pratt CM, Nishimura S, Abreu A, Verani MS. Quantitative adenosine Tl-201 single-photon emission computed tomography for the early assessment of patients surviving acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1993; 87: 1197–210.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Abreu A, Mahmarian JJ, Nishimura S, Boyce TM, Verani MS. Tolerance and safety of pharmacologic coronary vasodilation with adenosine in association with thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 730–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lagerqvist B, Sylven C, Waldenstrom A. Lower threshold for adeno-sine-induced chest pain in patients with angina and normal coronary angiograms. Br Heart J 1992; 68: 282–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cerqueira MD, Verani MS, Schwaiger M, Heo J, Iskandrian A. Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 384–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Keefe JH Jr, Bateman TM, Silvestri R, Barnhart C. Safety and diagnostic accuracy of adenosine thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients unable to exercise and those with left bundle branch block. Am Heart J 1992; 124: 614–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Verani MS, Mahmarian JJ, Hixson JB, Boyce TM, Staudacher RA. Diagnosis of coronary artery disease by controlled coronary vasodilation with adenosine and thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients unable to exercise. Circulation 1990; 82: 80–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shryock JC, Belardinelli L. Adenosine and adenosine receptors in the cardiovascular system: biochemistry, physiology, and pharmacology. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 2–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fredholm BB, Abbracchio MP, Burnstock G, Daly JW, Harden TK, Jacobson KA, et al. Nomenclature and classification of purinoreceptors. Pharmacol Rev 1994; 46: 143–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Olah ME, Stiles GL. Adenosine receptor subtypes: characterization and therapeutic regulation. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1995; 35: 581–606.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson RF, Wyche K, Christensen BV, Zimmer S, Laxson DD. Effects of adenosine on human coronary arterial circulation. Circulation 1990; 82: 1595–606.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rossen JD, Quillen JE, Lopez AG, Stenberg RG, Talman CL, Winniford MD. Comparison of coronary vasodilation with intravenous dipyridamole and adenosine. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 485–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Villegas BJ, Hendel RC, Dahlberg ST, McSherry BA, Leppo JA. Comparison of 3- versus 6-minute infusions of adenosine in thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging. Am Heart J 1993; 126: 103–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Keefe JH Jr, Bateman TM, Handlin LR, Barnhart CS. Four- versus 6-minute infusion protocol for adenosine thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography imaging. Am Heart J 1995; 129: 482–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cabell F, Weiss DS, Price JM. Inhibition of adenosine-induced coronary vasodilation by block of large-conductance Ca(2+)-activated K+ channels. Am J Physiol 1994; 267: H1455–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kleppisch T, Nelson MT. Adenosine activates ATP-sensitive potassium channels in arterial myocytes via A2 receptors and cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995; 92: 12441–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shryock JC, Snowdy S, Baraldi PG, Cacciari B, Spalluto G, Monopoli A, et al. A2A-adenosine receptor reserve for coronary vasodilation. Circulation 1998; 98: 711–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Belardinelli L, Shryoock JC, Song Y, Wang D, Srinivas M. Ionic basis of the electrophysiological actions of adenosine on cardiomyocytes. FASEB J 1995; 9: 359–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Calker D, Mueller M, Hambrecht B. Adenosine regulates via two different types of receptors, the accumulation of cyclic AMP in cultured brain cells. J Neurochem 1979; 33: 999–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Salvatore CA, Jacobson MA, Taylor HE, Linden J, Johnson RG. Molecular cloning and characterization of the human A3 adenosine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90: 10365–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nishimura S, Mahmarian JJ, Boyce TM, Verani MS. Quantitative thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography during maximal pharmacologic coronary vasodilation with adenosine for assessing coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 736–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario S. Verani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Treuth, M.G., Reyes, G.A., He, ZX. et al. Tolerance and diagnostic accuracy of an abbreviated adenosine infusion for myocardial scintigraphy: A randomized, prospective study. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 8, 548–554 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1067/mnc.2001.116167

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mnc.2001.116167

Key Words

Navigation