Background Aims and Scope
Sustainability was adopted by UNEP in Rio de Janeiro (1992) as the main political goal for the future development of humankind. It should also be the ultimate aim of product development. According to the well known interpretation of the original definition given in the Brundtland report, sustainability comprises three components: environment, economy and social aspects. These components or “pillars” of sustainability have to be properly assessed and balanced if a new product is to be designed or an existing one is to be improved.
The responsibility of the researchers involved in the assessment is to provide appropriate and reliable instruments. For the environmental part there is already an internationally standardized tool: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Life Cycle Costing (LCC) is the logical counterpart of LCA for the economic assessment. LCC surpasses the purely economic cost calculation by taking into account the use-and end-of-life phases and hidden costs. For this component, a guideline is being developed by SETAC as a basis for future standardization. It is a very important point that different life-cycle based methods (including Social Life Cycle Assessment ‘SLCA’) for sustainability assessment use consistent — ideally identical — system boundaries. This requirement includes that in LCC the physical life cycle (‘from cradle-to-grave’) is used instead of the frequently used marketing life cycle (‘from product development-to-end of market life’).
SLCA has been neglected in the past, but is now beginning to be developed. The central problems seem to be how to relate the social indicators (social impact assessment) to the functional unit of the product-system and how to restrict the many social indicators proposed to a manageable number. Meanwhile, qualitative and semi-quantitative approaches are used as substitutes for a full, quantitative SLCA. It is hoped that new methods will be developed and finally standardized by ISO. The combination of LCA, LCC and SLCA will provide the much needed tool for sustainability assessment of products.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Carlowitz HC (2000): Sylvicultura Oeconomica — Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum-Zucht. Leipzig 1713 (Reprint [ISBN 3-86012-115-4]: TU, Bergakademie Freiberg, Akademische Buchhandlung Freiberg 2000)
WCED — World Commission on Environment and Development (1987): Our Common Future. Oxford
Projektgruppe ökologische Wirtschaft (ed) (1987): Produktlinienanalyse: Bedürfnisse, Produkte und ihre Folgen. Kölner Volksblattverlag, Köln
Grießhammer R, Buchert M, Gensch C-O, Hochfeld C, Manhart A, Reisch L, Rüdenauer I: PROSA — Product Sustainability Assessment. Öko-Institut e.V., Freiburg (undated)
Hunkeler D, Rebitzer G (2005): The Future of Life Cycle Assessment. Int J LCA 10, 305–308
Kloepffer W (2003): Life-Cycle Based Methods for Sustainable Product Development. Editorial for the Life Cycle Management (LCM) Section in Int J LCA 8, 157–159
Hunkeler D, Lichtenvort K, Rebitzer G (eds): Environmental Life Cycle Costing. Report by a SETAC Europe working group, Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL, USA (in print)
Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) (1993): Guidelines for Life Cycle Assessment: A ‘Code of Practice’. Edition 1. From the SETAC Workshop held at Sesimbra, Portugal, 31 March–3 April 1993. Brussels, Belgium, and Pensacola, Florida, USA, August 1993
O’Brian M, Doig A, Clift R (1996): Social and Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (SELCA). Int J LCA 1, 231–237
Dreyer LC, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2006): A Framework for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Int J LCA 11, 88–97
Labuschagne C, Brent AC (2006): Social Indicators for Sustainable Project and Technology Life Cycle Management in the Process Industry. Int J LCA 11, 3–15
Weidema BP (2006): The Integration of Economic and Social Aspects in Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Int J LCA 11,Special Issue 1, 89–96
Norris GA (2006): Social Impacts in Product Life Cycles. Towards Life Cycle Attribute Assessment. Int J LCA 11,Special Issue 1, 97–104
Hunkeler D (2006): Societal LCA Methodology and Case Study. Int J LCA 11, 371–382
Saling P, Gensch C-O, Kreisel G, Kralisch D, Diehlmann A, Preuße D, Meurer M, Kölsch D, Schmidt I (2007): Entwicklung der Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung SEEbalance® — im BMBF-Projekt ‘Nachhaltige Aromatenchemie’. Karlsruher Schriften zur Geographie und Geoökologie
Saling P, Kicherer A, Dittrich-Krämer B, Wittlinger R, Zombik W, Schmidt I, Schrott W, Schmidt S (2002): Ecoefficiency Analysis by BASF: The method. Int J LCA 7, 203–218
Landsiedel R, Saling P (2002): Assessment of Toxicological Risks for Life Cycle Assessment and Eco-efficiency Analysis. Int J LCA 7, 261–268
Kicherer A, Schaltegger S, Tschochohei H, Ferreira Pozo B (2007): Eco-Efficiency. Combining Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costs via Normalization. Int J LCA 12, 537–543
University of Stuttgart LBP, Dept. Life Cycle Engineering: Social Aspects in Life Cycle Assessments (Life Cycle Working Environment — LCWE). Information leaflet (undated)
Grießhammer R, Benoît C, Dreyer LC, Flysjö A, Manhart A, Mazijn B, Méthot A, Weidema BP (2006): Feasibility Study: Integration of Social Aspects into LCA. Discussion paper from UNEP/SETAC Task Force Integration of Social Aspects in LCA, Freiburg
Finkbeiner M (2007): Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung von Produkten und Prozessen — Vom Leitbild zur Umsetzung. Presentation given at the 12. Produktionstechnisches Kolloquium PTK, 11. and 12.10.2007, Berlin
Kloepffer W (2006): The Role of SETAC in the Development of LCA. Int J LCA 11,Special issue 1, 116–122
Rikhardsson P, Bennett M, Bouma J, Schaltegger S (eds) (2005): Implementing Environmental Management Accounting: Status and Challenges. Springer Kluwer
Kloepffer W, Renner I (accepted for publication (2007)): Life-Cycle Based Sustainability Assessment of Products. In: Schaltegger S (ed): Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production (in print)
Remmen A, Jensen AA, Frydendal J (2007): The Triple Bottom Line — the Business Case of Sustainability. In: Life Cycle Management. A Business Guide to Sustainability. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. ISBN 978-92-807-2772-2. UNEP 2007, 10–11
Barthel L-P, Held M (2007): Social LCA — Analogies and Differences to Environmental LCA. Platform presentation at the 3rd International Conference on Life Cycle Management Zurich, 27–29 August 2007
Manhart A, Grießhammer R (2007): Social Impacts of the Production of Notebooks. Platform presentation at the 3rd International Conference on Life Cycle Management Zurich, 27–29 August 2007
Pesonen H-L (2007): Sustainability SWOTS — New Method for Summarizing Product Sustainability Information for Business Decision Making. Platform presentation at the 3rd International Conference on Life Cycle Management Zurich, 27–29 August 2007
Benoît C, Revéret J-P (2007): Developing a Methodology for Social Life Cycle Assessment: The North American Tomato’s CSR. Platform presentation at the 3rd International Conference on Life Cycle Management Zurich, 27–29 August 2007
Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild MZ (2008): Methodologies for Social Life Cycle Assessment. Int J LCA 13(2) 96–103
Udo de Haes HA (2006): How to approach land use in LCIA or, how to avoid the Cinderella effect? Comments on ‘Key Elements in a Framework for Land Use Impact Assessment Within LCA’ (see ). Int J LCA 11, 219–221
Milà i Canals L, Bauer C, Depestele J, Dubreuil A, Freiermuth Knuchel R, Gaillard G, Michelsen O, Mueller-Wenk R, Rydgren B (2007): Key Elements in a Framework for Land Use Impact Assessment Within LCA. Int J LCA 12, 5–15
Bellekom S, Potting J, Benders R (2006): Feasibility of Applying Site-dependent Impact Assessment of Acidification in LCA. Int J LCA 11, 417–424
Kloepffer W (1996): Reductionism versus Expansionism in LCA. Int J LCA 1, 61
Kloepffer W, Renner I (2007): Lebenszyklusbasierte Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung von Produkten. Technikfolgenabschätzung — Theorie und Praxis (TATuP) 16, 32–38
Huppes G (2007): Why we Need Better Eco-Efficiency Analysis. From Technological Optimism to Realism. Technikfolgenabschätzung — Theorie und Praxis (TATuP) 16, 38–45
Wrisberg N, Udo de Haes HA, Triebswetter U, Eder P, Clift R (eds) (2002): Analytical Tools for Environmental Design and Management in a Systems Perspective. Kluwer Academics Publ., Dordrecht (NL)
Elkington J (1997): Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone Publ, Oxford
Rebitzer G (2007): Integrating Life Cycle Thinking into the Business Process of a Multinational Company. LCM2007, Zurich, August 27–29, 2007
ESS-Submission Editor: Dr. David Hunkeler (email@example.com)
Presented at the 3rd International Conference on Life Cycle Management in Zurich, August 2007.
About this article
Cite this article
Kloepffer, W. Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13, 89 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2008.02.376
- Life cycle costing (LCC)
- life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA)
- products, life cycle sustainability assessment
- sustainable products