Skip to main content
Log in

Biodegradation of phenolic mixtures in a sequencing batch reactor

A kinetic study

  • Research Article
  • Subject Area 5.1: Microbial Waste Disposal
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goal, Scope and Background

In this study, attention was focused on substituted phenols because of their widespread presence in industrial effluents originating from many different sources: they are major constituents of wastewater from coal conversion processes, coke ovens, petroleum refineries and petrochemical industries, resin and fibreglass manufacturing and herbicide production. Moreover, for their characteristics of toxicity to humans and aquatic life (1 mgl−1 is enough to detect the effects), they are included in the USEPA list of priority pollutants. Toxicity is higher in substituted phenols and is dependent on the nature and numbers of substituent groups. Objective of the present paper is to give a contribution to the modelling of phenolic mixture biodegradation by kinetic studies in which the different compounds are followed separately: this can be easily attained with an experimental apparatus such as the Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR). Two substituted phenols, 4-nitrophenol (4NP) and 3,4-dimethylphenol (3,4DMP), were utilized as substrates and their degradation kinetics were investigated to evaluate the process parameters both in single compound and in mixture tests.

Methods

Single compound and mixture kinetic tests have been carried out during the reaction phase of the working cycle of the SBR reactor. The single substrates and their mixture were utilized as sole carbon and energy sources. Moreover, in order to verify data reproducibility, all kinetic tests have been carried out in at least two replicates under the same operating conditions.

Results and Discussion

Kinetic data showed the presence of substrate inhibition, to model this experimental evidence the Haldane equation, that is usually employed for substrate inhibited kinetics, was rearranged in a different form with parameters which have a precise meaning in relation to the process kinetics and, at the same time, make the integration procedure easier. The derivation of the equation is shown in an Appendix at the end of the paper. Kinetic parameters obtained are suitable for application. It was observed that the 4-nitrophenol removal rate in single compound tests is significantly higher than the 3,4-dimethylphenol removal rate in the whole range of investigated concentrations (up to 80 mg COD l−1). A faster 4-nitrophenol biodegradation was also observed in mixture tests. Moreover, it is worth noting that the two compounds were simultaneously degraded and no diauxic growth was observed. The comparison between single compound and mixture degradation kinetics showed that the 4-nitrophenol degradation rate was comparable in the two cases while a significantly beneficial effect (by increase by about 80% of the maximum removal rate) was detected for 3,4-dimethylphenol degradation in the mixture.

Conclusions

Results of this study showed that the biodegradation kinetics of substituted phenols in mixture can be significantly different from that observed in single compound tests: in fact, the presence of a faster degradable compound (the 4NP) seems to exert a positive effect on the removal of a slower degradable compound (the 3,4DMP). The higher removal rate detected for 4NP, both in single compound and mixture tests, confirmed the key role of the biomass acclimatization in determining the biodegradation kinetics of xenobiotic compounds. The experimental approach and the original method applied for data analysis are of general validity and can be extended to the investigation of different classes of compounds.

Recommendations and Perspectives

A relevant aspect related to the process applicability is the demonstrated possibility of easily adapting an enriched culture grown on a specific xenobiotic (in our case the 4NP) for the removal of similar single compounds or in mixtures. When biological process are considered for xenobiotic removal, this suggests a possible strategy of developing enriched cultures on target compounds that can be efficiently utilized on more complex matrices with reduced start up and acclimatization periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (1998): 20th edition: American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington DC, USA

  • Bhatti ZI, Toda H, Furukawa K (2002): p-Nitrophenol degradation by activated sludge attached nonwovens. Wat Res 36, 1135–1142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buitron G, Gonzalez A (1996): Characterization of the microorganisms from an acclimated activated sludge degrading phenolic compounds. Wat Sci Tech 34, 289–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buitron G, Gonzalez A, Lopez-Marin LM (1998): Biodegradation of phenolic compounds by an acclimated activated sludge and isolated bacteria. Wat Sci Tech 37, 371–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis TG, Smets BF, Magbanua BS Jr., Grady CPL Jr. (1996): Changes in measured biodegradation kinetics during the long-term operation of completely mixed activated sludge (CMAS) bioreactors. Wat Sci Tech 34, 35–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T, Matsuo T, Wentzel MC, Marais GvR (1997): Activated Sludge Model No 2. Scientific and Technical Reports No 3, IAWQ Task group on mathematical modelling for design and operation of biological wastewater treatment processes, International Association on Water Quality, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahru A, Maloverjan A, Sillak H, Põllumaa L (2002): The toxicity and fate of phenolic pollutants in the contaminated soils associated with the oilshale industry. Env Sci Pollut Res, Special No 1, 27–33

  • Kappeler J, Gujer W (1992): Estimation of kinetic parameters of heterotrophic biomass under aerobic conditions and characterization of wastewater for activated sludge modelling. Wat Sci Tech 25, 125–139

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luthy RG, Stamoudis VC, Campbell JR, Harrison W (1983): Removal of organic contaminants from coal conversion process condensates. J WPCF 55, 196–207

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morville S, Scheyer A, Mirabel P, Millet M (2006): Spatial and geographical variations of urban, suburban and rural atmospheric concentrations of phenols and nitro-phenols. Env Sci Pollut Res 2, 83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray P, Oubelli Ait M, Loser C (1999) Aerobic 4-nitrophenol degradation by microorganisms fixed in a continuously working aerated solid-bed reactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51, 284–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Razo-Flores E, Iniestra-Gonzalez M, Field JA, Olguin-Lora P, Puig-Grajales L (2003): Biodegradation of mixtures of phenolic compounds in an upward-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. J Environ Eng 129, 999–1006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suidan MT, Strubler CE, Kao SW, Pfeffer JT (1983): Treatment of coal gasification wastewater with anaerobic filter technology. J WPCF 55, 1263–1270

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomei MC, Annesini MC (2005): 4-nitrophenol biodegradation in a sequencing batch reactor operating with aerobic-anoxic cycles. Environ Sci Technol 39, 5059–5065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomei MC, Annesini MC, Bussoletti S (2004): 4-nitrophenol biodegradation in a sequencing batch reactor: kinetic study and effect of filling time. Wat Res 38, 375–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomei MC, Annesini MC, Luberti R, Cento G, Senia A (2003): Kinetics of 4-nitrophenol biodegradation in a sequencing batch reactor. Wat Res 37, 3803–3814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai KC, Folsom CM (1982): Treatment of coal liquefaction waste with PAC-enhanced activated sludge process. In: Proceedings of the 39th Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University, Purdue, May, pp 497–505

  • Ugurlu M, Kula I (2007): Decolourization and removal of some organic compounds from olive mill wastewater by advanced oxidation processes and lime treatment. Env Sci Pollut Res 14(5) 319–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veeresh GS, Kumar P, Mehrotra I (2005): Treatment of phenol and cresols in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) process: A review. Wat Res 39, 154–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viggor S, Heinaru E, Loponen J, Merimaa M, Tenno T, Heinaru A (2002): Biodegradation of dimethylphenols by bacteria with different ring-cleavage pathways of phenolic compounds. Env Sci Pollut Res, Special No 1, 19–26

  • Walker JD (1989) Effect of chemicals on microorgamisms. J WPCF 61, 1077–1097

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams TM, Unz RF (1989): The nutrition of Thiothrix, Type 021N, Beggiatoa and Leucothrix strains. Wat Res 23, 15–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xing XH, Inoue T, Tanji Y, Unno H (1999): Enhanced microbial adaptation to p-Nitrophenol using activated sludge retained in porous carrier particles and simultaneous removal of nitrite released from degradation of p-Nitrophenol. J Biosci Bioeng 87, 372–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Concetta Tomei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tomei, M.C., Annesini, M.C. Biodegradation of phenolic mixtures in a sequencing batch reactor. Environ Sci Pollut Res 15, 188–195 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2007.12.470

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2007.12.470

Keywords

Navigation