Advertisement

Selected endocrine disrupting compounds (Vinclozolin, Flutamide, Ketoconazole and Dicofol): Effects on survival, occurrence of males, growth, molting and reproduction of Daphnia magna

  • Maher H. Haeba
  • Klára Hilscherová
  • Edita Mazurová
  • Ludek BláhaEmail author
Research Article Area 6.4 · Monitoring and Fate of Persistent Chemicals

Abstract

Background, Aim and Scope

Pollution-induced endocrine disruption in vertebrates and invertebrates is a worldwide environmental problem, but relatively little is known about effects of endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) in planktonic crustaceans (including Daphnia magna). Aims of the present study were to investigate acute 48 h toxicity and sub-chronic (4–6 days) and chronic (21 days) effects of selected EDCs in D. magna. We have investigated both traditional endpoints as well as other parameters such as sex determination, maturation, molting or embryogenesis in order to evaluate the sensitivity and possible use of these endpoints in ecological risk assessment.

Materials and Methods

We have studied effects of four model EDCs (vinclozolin, flutamide, ketoconazole and dicofol) on D. magna using (i) an acute 48 h immobilization assay, (ii) a sub-chronic, 4–6 day assay evaluating development and the sex ratio of neonates, and (iii) a chronic, 21 day assay studying number of neonates, sex of neonates, molting frequency, day of maturation and the growth of maternal organisms.

Results

Acute EC50 values in the 48 h immobilization test were as follows (mg/L): dicofol 0.2, ketoconazole 1.5, flutamide 2.7, vinclozolin >3. Short-term, 4–6 day assays with sublethal concentrations showed that the sex ratio in Daphnia was modulated by vinclozolin (decreased number of neonate males at 1 mg/L) and dicofol (increase in males at 0.1 mg/L). Flutamide (up to 1 mg/L) had no effect on the sex of neonates, but inhibited embryonic development at certain stages during chronic assay, resulting in abortions. Ketoconazole had no significant effects on the studied processes up to 1 mg/L.

Discussion

Sex ratio modulations by some chemicals (vinclozolin and dicofol) corresponded to the known action of these compounds in vertebrates (i.e. anti-androgenicity and anti-oestrogenicity, respectively). Our study revealed that some chemicals known to affect steroid-regulated processes in vertebrates can also affect sublethal endpoints (e.g. embryonic sex determination and/or reproduction) in invertebrates such as D. magna.

Conclusions

A series of model vertebrate endocrine disrupters affected various sub-chronic and chronic parameters in D. magna including several endpoints that have not been previously studied in detail (such as sex determination in neonates, embryogenesis, molting and maturation). Evaluations of traditional reproduction parameters (obtained from the 21 day chronic assay) as well as the results from a rapid, 4–6 day, sub-chronic assay provide complementary information on non-lethal effects of suspected organic endocrine disrupters.

Recommendations and Perspectives

It seems that there are analogies between vertebrates and invertebrates in toxicity mechanisms and in vivo effects of endocrine disruptors. However, general physiological status of organisms may also indirectly affect endpoints that are traditionally considered ‘hormone regulated’ (especially at higher effective concentrations as observed in this study) and these factors should be carefully considered. Further research of D. magna physiology and comparative studies with various EDCs will help to understand mechanisms of action as well as ecological risks of EDCs in the environment.

Keywords

Daphnia magna dicofol endocrine disruption flutamide ketoconazole sex determination vinclozolin 

References

  1. Andersen H, Wollenberger L, Halling-Sorensen B, Kusk K (2001): Development of Copepod nauplii to copepodites — A parameter for chronic toxicity including endocrine disruption. Environ Toxicol & Chem 20, 2821–2829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin W, Graham S, Shea D, LeBlanc G (1998): Altered metabolic elimination of testosterone and associated toxicity following exposure of Daphnia magna to nonylphenol polyethoxylate. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 39(2) 104–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin W, Leblanc G (1994): In-vivo biotransformation of testosterone by phase-I and phase-Ii detoxication enzymes and their modulation by 20-Hydroxyecdysone in Daphni magna. Aquat Toxicol 29(1–2) 103–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barata C, Baird J (2000): Determining the ecotoxicological mode of action of chemicals from measurements made on individuals: Results from instar-based tests with Daphnia magna Straus. Aquat Toxicol 48, 195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basler A, Lebsanft J (1999): Endocrine disrupters — Status and regulatory aspects. Env Sci Pollut Res 6, 44–48Google Scholar
  6. Bayley M, Junge M, Baatrup E (2002): Exposure of juvenile guppies to three antiandrogens causes demasculinization and a reduced sperm count in adult males. Aquat Toxicol 56, 227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryan GW, Gibbs PE, Hummerstone (1986): The decline of the gastropod Nucella lapillus around south-west England: Evidence for the effect of tributyltin from antifouling paints. J Marine Biol Assoc UK 66, 611–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang E (1993): Comparative endocrinology of molting and reproduction — Insects and crustaceans. Annu Rev Entomol 38, 161–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dodson S, Hanazato T (1995): Commentary on effects of anthropogenic and natural organic chemicals on the development, swimming behavior, and reproduction of Daphnia, a key member of aquatic ecosystem. Environ Health Perspect 103, 7–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dodson S, Merritt C, Shannahan J, Shults C (1999a): Low exposure concentrations of atrazine increase male production in Daphnia pulicaria. Environ Toxico Chem 18, 1568–1573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Finney D (1971): Probit analysis. Cambridge University, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Gray L, Lambright C, Mann P, Price M, Cooper R, Ostby J (1999): Administration of potentially antiandrogenic pesticides (procymidone, linuron, iprodione, chlozolinate, p,p′-DDE, and ketoconazole) and toxic substances (dibutyl-and diethylhexyl phthalate, PCB 169, and ethane dimethane sulphonate) during sexual differentiation produces diverse profiles of reproductive malformations in the male rat. Toxicol Ind Health 15, 94–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heckman W, Kane B, Pakyz R, Cosentino M (1992): The effect of ketoconazole on endocrine and reproductive parameters in malemice and rats. J Androl 13, 191–198Google Scholar
  14. Heinz -RK, Werner K, Martin S, Iika L, Anna L, Reye, Rita T, Roland N, Gilbert S (2007): Sex steroid receptor evolution and signalling in aquatic invertebrates. Ecotoxicology 16(1) 131–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hense B, Severin G, Pfister G, Welzl G, Jaser W, Schramm K (2005): Effects of anthropogenic estrogens nonylphenol and 17 alphaethinylestradiol in aquatic model ecosystems. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 33(1) 27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kashian D (2004): Toxaphene detoxification and acclimation in Daphnia magna: do cytochrome P-450 enzymes play a role? Comp Biochem Phys C 137, 53–63Google Scholar
  17. Kashian D, Dodson S (2004). Effects of vertebrate hormones on development and sex determination in Daphnia magna. Environ Toxicol Chem 23, 1282–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kast-Hutcheson K, Rider C, LeBlanc G (2001): The fungicide propiconazole interferes with embryonic development of the crustacean Daphnia magna. Environ Toxicol Chem 20, 502–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keiter S, Rastall A, Kosmehl T, Wurm K, Erdinger L, Braunbeck T, Hollert H (2006): Ecotoxicological assessment of sediment, suspended matter and water samples in the upper Danube River — A pilot study in search for the causes for the decline of fish catches. Env Sci Pollut Res 13, 308–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelce W, Monosson E, Gamcsik M, Laws S, Gray L (1994): Environmental Hormone Disruptors: Evidence That Vinclozolin Developmental Toxicity Is Mediated by Antiandrogenic Metabolites. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 126, 276–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kolvenbag G, Iversen P, Newling D (2001): Antiandrogen monotherapy: A new form of treatment for patients with prostate cancer. Urol 58, 16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kunimatsu T, Yamada T, Miyata K, Yabushita S, Seki T, Okuno Y, Matsuo M (2004): Evaluation for reliability and feasibility of the draft protocol for the enhanced rat 28-day subacute study (OECD Guideline 407) using androgen antagonist flutamide. Toxicol 200, 77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. LeBlanc G, McLachlan J (1999): Molt-independent growth inhibition of Daphnia magna by a vertebrate antiandrogen. Environ Toxicol Chem 18, 1450–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. LeBlanc G (2007): Crustacean endocrine toxicology: A review. Ecotoxicology 16(1) 61–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oda S, Tatarazako N, Watanabe H, Morita M, Iguchi T (2005a): Production of male neonates in Daphnia magna (Cladocera, Crustacea) exposed to juvenile hormones and their analogs. Chemosphere 61, 1168–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oda S, Tatarazako N, Watanabe H, Morita M, Iguchi T (2005b): Production of male neonates in four cladoceran species exposed to a juvenile hormone analog, fenoxycarb. Chemosphere 60, 74–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oda S, Tatarazako N, Watanabe H, Morita M, Iquchi T (2006): Genetic differences in the production of male neonates in Daphnia magna exposed to juvenile hormone analogs. Chemosphere 63(9) 1477–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. OECD (1996): Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development — Guideline 202, Daphnia sp., Acute Immobilisation Test and Reproduction TestGoogle Scholar
  29. Olmstead A, LeBlanc GA (2000): Effects of endocrine-active chemicals on the development of sex characteristics of Daphnia magna. Environ Toxicol Chem 19, 2107–2113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Olmstead A, Leblanc G. (2002): Juvenoid hormone methyl farnesoate is a sex determinant in the crustacean Daphnia magna. J Exp Zool 293, 736–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olmstead A, LeBlanc G (2003): Insecticidal juvenile hormone analogs stimulate the production of male offspring in the crustacean Daphnia magna. Environ Health Perspect 111, 919–924Google Scholar
  32. Olmstead A, LeBlanc G (2001): Low exposure concentration effects of methoprene on endocrine-regulated processes in the crustacean Daphnia magna. Toxicol Sci 62, 268–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peterson J, Kashian D, Dodson S (2001): Methoprene and 20-OH-ecdysone affect male production in Daphnia pulex. Environ Toxicol Chem 20, 582–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Preston B, Snell T, Robertson T, Dingmann B (2000): Use of freshwater rotifer brachionus calyciflorus in screening assay for potential endocrine disruptors. Environ Toxicol Chem 19, 2923–2928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Samel A, Ziegenfuss M, Goulden C, Banks S, Baer K (1999): Culturing and bioassay testing of Daphnia magna using Elendt M4, Elendt M7, and COMBO media. Ecotox Environ Safe 43, 103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sanchez P, Alonso C, Fernandez C, Vega M, Garcia M, Tarazona J (2005): Evaluation of a multi-species test system for assessing acute and chronic toxicity of sediments and water to aquatic invertebrates — Effects of pentachlorophenol on Daphnia magna and Chironomus prasinus. J Soils Sediments 5, 53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schurmeyer T, Nieschlag E (1984): Effect of ketoconazole and other imidazole fungicides on testosterone biosynthesis. Acta Endocrinologica 105, 275–280Google Scholar
  38. Sperry T, Thomas P (1999): Identification of two nuclear androgen receptors in kelp bass (Paralabrax clathratus) and their binding affinities for xenobiotics: Comparison with Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus) androgen receptors. Biol Reprod 61, 1152–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. StahlschmidtAllner P, Allner B, Rombke J, Knacker T (1997): Endocrine disruptors in the aquatic environment. Env Sci Pollut Res 4, 155–162Google Scholar
  40. Subramonian T (2000): Crustacean ecdysteroids and embryogenesis. Comp Biochem Phys C 125, 135–156Google Scholar
  41. Tatarazako N, Oda S, Watanabe H, Morita M, Iguchi T (2003): Juvenile hormone agonists affect the occurrence of male Daphnia. Chemosphere 53, 827–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tillmann M, Schulte-Oehlmann U, Duft M, Markert B, Oehlmann J (2001): Effects of endocrine disruptors on prosobranch snails (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in the laboratory. Part III: Cyproterone acetate and vinclozolin as antiandrogens. Ecotoxicology 10, 373–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tyler C, Jobling S, Sumpter J (1998): Endocrine disruption in wildlife: A critical review of the evidence. Crit Rev Toxicol 28(4) 319–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vinggaard A, Hnida C, Breinholt V, Larsen J (2000): Screening of selected pesticides for inhibition of CYP19 aromatase activity in vitro. Toxicol in Vitro 14, 227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang H, Olmstead A, Li H, LeBlanc G (2005): The screening of chemicals for juvenoid-related endocrine activity using the water flea Daphnia magna. Aquat Toxicol 74, 193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zou E, Fingerman M (1997): Effects of estrogenic xenobiotics on molting of the water flea, Daphnia magna. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 38(3) 281–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maher H. Haeba
    • 1
  • Klára Hilscherová
    • 1
    • 2
  • Edita Mazurová
    • 1
  • Ludek Bláha
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.RECETOX — Research Centre for Environmental Chemistry and EcotoxicologyMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of BotanyCzech Academy of SciencesBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations