Skip to main content

PCA and multidimensional visualization techniques united to aid in the bioindication of elements from transplanted Sphagnum palustre moss exposed in the Gdańsk City Area

Abstract

Goal, Scope and Background

During the last decades, a technique for assessing atmospheric deposition of heavy elements was developed based on the principle that samples of moss are able to accumulate elements and airborne particles from rain, melting snow and dry deposition. Despite a broad interest in bioindication there are still ongoing works aimed at the preparation of a standard procedure allowing for a comparison of research carried out in various areas. This is why the comparison of living and dry moss of the same species and growth site seems to be interesting, logical and promising. A most reliable approach seems to be the application of bioindication connected with multivariate statistics and efficient visualization techniques in the interpretation of monitoring data. The aim of this study was: (i) to present cumulative properties of transplanted Sphagnum palustre moss with differentiation into dry and living biomaterial; (ii) to determine and geographically locate types of pollution sources responsible for a structure of the monitoring data set; (iii) to visualize geographical distribution of analytes in the Gdańsk metropolitan area and to identify the high-risk areas which can be targeted for environmental hazards and public health.

Materials and Methods

A six month air pollution study based on Sphagnum palustre bioindication is presented and a simplified procedure of the experiment is given. The study area was located at the mouth of the Vistula River on the Baltic Sea, in Gdańsk City (Poland). Sphagnum palustre was selected for research because of its extraordinary morphological properties and its ease in being raised. The capability of dry and living moss to accumulate elements characteristic for anthropogenic and natural sources was shown by application of Principal Component Analysis. The high-risk areas and pollution profiles are detected and visualized using surface maps based on Kriging algorithm.

Results

The original selection of elements included all those that could be reliably determined by Neutron Activation Analysis in moss samples. Elimination of variables covered the elements whose concentrations in moss were lower than the reported detection limits for INAA for most observations or in cases where particular elements did not show any variation. Eighteen elements: Na, Ca, Sc, Fe, Co, Zn, As, Br, Mo, Sb, Ba, La, Ce, Sm, Yb, Lu, Hf, Th, were selected for the research presented.

Discussion

Two runs of PCA were performed since, in the first-run a heavy polluted location (Stogi — ‘Sto’) understood as outlier in the term of PCA approach was detected and results in the form of block diagrams and surface maps were presented. As ensues from the first-run PCA analysis, the factor layout for both indicators is similar but not identical due to the differences in the elements accumulation mechanism. Three latent factors (‘phosphatic fertilizer plant impact’, ‘urban impact’ and ‘marine impact’) explain over 89% and 82% of the total variance for dry and living moss respectively. In the second-run PCA three latent factors are responsible for the data structure in both moss materials. However, in the case of dry moss analysis these factors explain 85% of the total variance but they are rather hard to interpret. On the other hand living moss shows the same pattern as in first-run PCA. Three latent factors explain over 84% of the total variance in this case. The pollution profiles extracted in PCA of dry moss data differ tremendously between both runs, while no deterioration was found after removal of Stogi from data set in case of living moss. Performance of the second-run PCA with exception of Stogi as a heavy polluted location has led to the conclusion that living moss shows better indication properties than dry one.

Conclusions

While using moss as wet and dry deposition sampler it is not possible to calculate deposition values since the real volume of collected water and dust is hard to estimate due to a splash effect and irregular surface. Therefore, accumulation values seam to be reasonable for moss-based air pollution surveys. Both biomaterials: dry and living Sphagnum palustre show cumulative properties relative to elements under interest. Dry moss has a very loose collection of the atmospheric particles, which can also easily get lost upon rinsing with rainwater running through exposed dry moss material. The living moss may, on the contrary, incorporate the elements in its tissue, thus being less susceptible to rinsing and thus better reflecting the atmospheric conditions. Despite the differences in element uptake and uphold capabilities dry and living moss reflect characteristic anthropogenic and natural profiles.

Visible differences in impacts’ map coverage exist mostly due to the accumulation mechanisms differentiating dry from living moss. However, in case of each indicator ‘phosphatic fertilizer plant impact’ is recognized as the strongest pollution source present in examined region.

Recommendations and Perspectives

General types of pollution sources responsible for a structure of monitoring data set were determined as high-risk/low-risk areas and visualized in form of geographic distribution maps. These locations can be targeted for environmental hazards and public health. Chemometric results in the form of easy defined surface maps can became a powerful instrument in hands of decision-makers working in the field of sustainable development implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Astel A, Mazerski J, Polkowska Ż, Namieśnik J (2004): Application of PCA and time series analysis in studies of precipitation in Tricity (Poland). Adv Environ Res 8, 337–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ballach HJ (1997): Suitability and use of poplars as bioindicators — A new concept — Part I. Env Sci Pollut Res 1, 37–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg T, Royset O, Steinnes E, Vadset M (1995): Atmospheric trace element deposition: Principal component analysis of ICP-MS data from moss samples. Environ Pollut 88, 67–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bode P (1994): Role of primary standards, reference materials, and laboratory intercomparisons in an accredited INAA laboratory. Transact Am Nucl Soc 71, 46–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Bode P, Van Dalen JP (1994): Accreditation: A forthcoming prerequisite, also for neutron activation analysis laboratories.?! J Radioanal Nucl Chem 179, 141–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bode P (2000): Automation and quality assurance in the NAA facilities in Delft. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 245, 127–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burns DT, Danzer K, Townshend A (2002): Use of the terms ‘recovery’ and ‘apparent recovery’ in analytical procedures. Pure Appl Chem 74(11) 2201–2205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coşkun M, Frontasyeva MV, Steiness E, Cotuk AY, Pavlov SS, Coşkun M, Sazonov AS, Cayir A, Belivermis M (2005): Atmospheric deposition of heavy metals in Thrace studies by analysis of moss (Hypnum cupressiforme). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 74, 201–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Couto JA, Fernández JA, Aboal JR, Carballeira A (2004): Active biomonitoring of element with terrestrial mosses: a comparison of bulk and dry deposition. Sci Total Environ 324, 211–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dijngova R, Kovacheva P, Wagner G, Markert B (2003): Distribution of platinum group elements and other traffic related elements among different plants along some highways in Germany. Sci Total Environ 308, 235–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Djingova R, Kulef I, Markert B (2004): Chemical fingerprinting of plants. Ecol Res 19, 3–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dragan G, Davor H, Sanja S, Aleksandar S (1996): QSAR in predictive environmental toxicology. Env Sci Pollut Res 4, 224–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Einax JW, Zwanziger KH, Geiß S (1997): Chemometrics in environmental analysis. VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández JA, Aboal JR, Carballeira A (2004): Identification of pollution sources by means of moss bags. Ecotox Environ Safe 59, 76–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerdol R, Bragazza L, Marchesini R, Alber R, Bonetti L, Lorenzoni G, Achilli M, Buffoni A, De Marco N, Franchi M, Pison S, Giaquinta S, Palmieri F, Spezzano P (2000): Monitoring of heavy metal in Northern Italy by moss analysis. Environ Pollut 108, 201–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giordano S, Adamo P, Sorbo S, Vingiani S (2005): Atmospheric trace metals pollution in the Naples urban area based on results from moss and lichen bags. Environ Pollut 136, 431–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grünfeld K (2005): Integrating spatio-temporal information in environmental monitoring data — A visualization approach applied to moss data. Sci Total Environ 347, 1–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harnish J, Borchers R, Fabian P, Kourtidis K (1995): Aluminium production as a source of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide (COS). Env Sci Pollut Res 3, 161–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmers E, Kümmerer K (1998): Platinum group elements in the environment-Anthropogenic impact, anthropogenic platinum fluxes: Quantification of sources and sinks, and outlook. Env Sci Pollut Res 1, 29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning WJ, Feder WA (1980): Biomonitoring air pollutants with plants. Elsevier, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Massart DL, Kaufam L (1983): The interpretation of analytical chemical data by the use of cluster analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda J, Crespo I (2000): Absolute principal component analysis of atmospheric aerosols in Mexico City. Env Sci Pollut Res 1, 14–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Pais I (1997): The handbook of trace elements. Jones J (ed), Boca Raton, Florida, pp 153–163

  • Pantelica A, Salagean M, Georgescu I, Pincovschi E (1997): INAA of some phosphates used in fertilizer industries. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 216, 216–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesch R, Schroeder W (2006): Mosses bioindicators for metal accumulation: Statistical aggregation of measurement data to exposure indices. Ecol Indic 6, 137–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poikolainen J, Kubin E, Piispanen J, Karhu J (2004): Atmospheric heavy metal deposition in Finland during 1985–2000 using mosses as bioindicators. Sci Total Environ 318, 171–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rühling Å (ed) (1994): Atmospheric heavy metal deposition in Europe-Estimation based on moss analysis. NORD 9

  • Rühling Å, Germund T (2004): Changes in the atmospheric deposition of minor and rare elements between 1975 and 2000 in south Sweden as measured by moss analysis. Environ Pollut 131, 417–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samara C, Koiumtzis TH, Katsoulos G (1994): Characterization of airborne particulate matter in Thessaloniki, Greece. Part III: Comparison of two multivariate modeling approaches for the source apportionment of heavy metal concentrations within total suspended particles. Toxic Environ Chem 44 147–158

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samara C, Voutsa D, Kouimtizis TH, Bournis N, Tsani E (1990): Characterization of airborne particulate matter in Thessaloniki, Greece. Part 1: Source related heavy metal concentrations within TSP. Toxicol Environ Chem 29, 107–116

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaug J, Rambæk JP, Steinnes E, Henry RC (1990): Multivariate analysis of trace element data from moss samples used to monitor atmospheric deposition. Atmos Environ 24A, 2625–2361

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schintu M, Cogoni A, Durante L, Cantalupp C, Contu A (2005): Moss (Bryum radiculosum) as a bioindicator of trace metal deposition around an industrialized area in Sardinia (Italy). Chemosphere 60, 610–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanesi G, Baldassarre G, Senesi N, Radina B (1999): Trace element inputs into soils by anthropogenic activities and implications for human health. Chemosphere 39, 343–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A (1996): Tutorial, outliers and robust procedures in some chemometric applications. Chem Intell Lab Sys 33, 75–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simeonov V, Massart DL, Andreev G, Tsakovski S (2000): Assessment of metal pollution based on multivariate statistical modeling of ‘hot spot’ sediments from the Black Sea. Chemosphere 41, 1411–1417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stanimirova I, Daszykowski M, Walczak B (2007): Dealing with missing values and outliers in principal component analysis. Talanta 72, 172–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft, Inc. (2001): STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 6. www.statsoft.com

  • Surfer ver. 8.04, Golden Software, Inc., Surfer ver. 8.04 Guide Book

  • Szczepaniak K, Astel A, Bode P, Sârbu C, Biziuk M, Raińska E, Gos K (2006): Assessment of atmospheric inorganic pollution in the urban region of Gdańsk, Northern Poland. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 270(1) 35–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szczepaniak K, Biziuk M (2003): Aspects of the biomonitoring studies using mosses and lichens as indicators of metal pollution. Environ Res 93, 221–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thurston G, Spengler J (1985) Quantitative assessment of source contributions to inhalable particulate matter pollution in metropolitan Boston. Atmos Environ 19, 9–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler G (1970): Moss analysis: a method for surveying heavy metal deposition. In: Proceedings of the second international clean air congress. Washington DC, pp 129–132

  • Tyler G (1984): The impact of heavy metal pollution on forests: a case study of Gusum, Sweden. Ambio 13(1) 18–24

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vandeginste B, Massart DL, Buydens L, De Jong S, Lewi P, Smeyers-Verbeke J (1998): Handbook of chemometrics and qualimetrics. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Zechmeister HG, Hohenwallner D, Riss A, Hanus-Iilnar A (2005): Estimation of element deposition derived from road traffic sources by using mosses. Environ Pollut 138, 238–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zechmeister HG, Dullinger S, Hohenwallner D, Riss A, Hanus-Illnar A, Scharf S (2006): Pilot study on road traffic emissions (PAHs, heavy metals) measured by using mosses in a tunnel experiment in Vienna, Austria. Env Sci Pollut Res 6, 398–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Zereini F, Dirksen F, Skerstupp B, Urban H (1998): Sources of anthropogenic platinum-group elements (PGE): automotive catalysts versus PGE-Processing industries. Env Sci Pollut Res 4, 223–230

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksander Astel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Astel, A., Astel, K. & Biziuk, M. PCA and multidimensional visualization techniques united to aid in the bioindication of elements from transplanted Sphagnum palustre moss exposed in the Gdańsk City Area. Environ Sci Pollut Res 15, 41 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2007.05.422

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2007.05.422

Keywords

  • Air pollution
  • bioindication
  • chemometrics
  • Gdańsk City
  • Kriging maps
  • moss
  • Sphagnum palustre