Abstract
Goal, Scope and Background
One of the principal experimental variables which effect the results of phosphorus (P) sorption studies is the ionic composition, in addition to both species and concentrations of the contacting solution. In spite of the realization that ionic species, concentrations and their compositions effect P sorption and/or desorption, most of the salt-related studies are confined to Cl− (anion) in association with different cations. While the knowledge about the comparative response of P to Cl− and SO 2−4 ions was lacking, the current study was conducted to evaluate the comparative effects of anions (in association with cations) on inorganic P release and P fractions in the soil.
Methods
The test soil was amended with livestock compost manure (OP); KH2PO4 (IPk) or Ca(H2PO4)2 (IPc) at a rate of 1ppm. Soil was subjected to one salt and nine subsequent water extractions and different P fractions were measured. Four salt types, NaCl, Na2SO4, KCl and K2SO4, were used at levels of 0.5 M.
Results
Irrespective of P sources, P release was substantially increased in the salt-pretreated soil as compared to the non-saline soil. Sulfate salts released more P in subsequent water extractions than Cl−. Phosphorus release decreased for salt types with Na2SO4> NaCl> K2SO4> KCl and for P sources with OP ∼IPk > Control (without P application) > IPc, respectively.
Discussion
No previous study was found to compare the results of more P release by SO 2−4 than Cl− salt. Most of the previous studies focused on anion sorption capacities, but the mechanism for their adsorption is not fully known. Most of the authors suggested that the mechanisms of SO 2−4 and PO 3−4 adsorption are similar, and that both ions compete for the same sorption sites (Kamprath et al. 1956, Couto et al. 1979, Pasricha and Fox 1993). Although adsorbed SO 2−4 does not compete strongly with PO 3−4 , there is likely to be some competition for sorption between these anions which may cause comparatively more P release by SO 2−4 than Cl-salts. Higher P release by Nasaturation could be due to the release of P associated with oxide surfaces or due to dissolution of Ca-P phases (Curtin et al. 1987).
Conclusions
Study clearly showed that not only cations species differ for P desorption capacity, but associated anions also play a vital role in the fate of P under saline environments. Synergetic effects exist between Na and SO 2−4 ions which enhanced the P release. This study has also confirmed the fact that P from organic sources is available as well as from inorganic P sources. However, P release depends more on the type of P source applied than on total P.
Recommendations and Perspectives
It is highly recommended that more than one anion species must be used in the research plans for evaluating the P response in a saline environment. The results have important implications from the point of view of research, as most of the researchers focus on different cations only for evaluating P response to salts from an environmental point of view. However, our study has made it clear that anions in association with cations differed for their effects on P release.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Abbott JL, Tuker TC (1973): Persistence of manure phosphorus availability in calcareous soil. Soil Sci Soc Am Pro 37, 60–63
Agbenin JO, Tiessen H (1995): Phosphorus sorption at field capacity and soil ionic strength: Kinetics and transformation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59, 998–1005
Barrow NJ (1972): Influence of solution concentration of calcium on the adsorption of phosphate, sulphate, and molybdate by soils. Soil Sci 113, 175–180
Barrow NJ (1983): A mechanistic model for describing the sorption and desorption of phosphate by soil. J Soil Sci 34, 733–750
Barrow NJ, Shaw TC (1979): Effect of ionic strength and nature of the cation on desorption of phosphate from soil. J Soil Sci 30, 53–65
Basta NT, Pantone DJ, Tabatabai MA (1993): Path analysis of heavy metal adsorption by soil. Agron J 85, 1054–1057
Bowman RA, Cole CV (1978): Transformations of organic phosphorus substrates in soils evaluated by NaHCO3 extraction. Soil Sci 125, 49–54
Brennan RF, Bolland MDA, Jeffrey RC, Allen DG (1994): Phosphorus adsorption by a range of western Australian soils related to soil properties. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 25, 2782–2795
Burt R, Mays MD, Benham EC, Wilson MA (2002): Phosphorus characterization and correlation with properties of selected benchmark soils of the United States. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 33, 117–141
Couto W, Lathwell DJ, Boulden DR (1979): Sulfate sorption by two Oxisols and an Alfisol of the tropics. Soil Sci 127, 108–116
Curtin D, Syers JK, Smillie GW (1987): The importance of exchangeable cations and resin-sink characteristics in the release of soil phosphorus. J Soil Sci 38, 711–716
Dodor DE, Oya K (2000): Phosphorus sorption characteristics of major soils in Okinawa, Japan. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 31, 277–288
Elias-Azar K, Laag AE, Pratt PF (1980): Bicarbonate-extractable phosphorus in fresh and composted dairy manures. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44, 435–437
Elsharkawi H, Honna T, Yammamoto S, Enje A: Biological nitrogen fixation by native microorganisms in a waste-amended paddy soil. J Sust Agri (in press)
Fixen PE, Ludwick AE, Olsen SR (1983): Phosphorus and potassium fertilization on irrigated alfalfa on calcareous soils: II. Soil phosphorus solubility relationships. Soil Sci Soc Am J 47, 112–117
Gale PM, Mullen MD, Cieslik C, Tyler DD, Dcuk BN, Kirchner M, McClure J (2000): Phosphorus distribution and availability in response to dairy manure applications. Commun. Soil Sci Plant Anal 31, 553–565
Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986): Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A (ed), Method of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Agronomy series No. 9. Am Soc Agronomy and Soil Sci Soc Am Inc Publ, Madison WI, pp 383–411
Hedley MJ, Stewart JW, Chauhan BS (1982): Changes in inorganic and organic soil phosphorus fractions induced by cultivation practices and by laboratory incubation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46, 970–976
Hue NV (1991): Effect of organic acids/anions on P sorption and phytoavailability in soils with different mineralogies. Soil Sci 152, 463–471
Johnson GV, Raun WR, Zhang H, Hattery JA (1997): Oklahoma soil fertility hand book 4th ed. Dept. of Agronomy, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA
Kafkafi U, Bar-Yosef B, Rosenberg R, Sposito G (1988): Phosphorus adsorption by kaolinte and montmorillonite: II. Organic anion competition. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52, 1585–1589
Kamprath EJ, Nelson WL, Fitts JW (1956): The effect of pH, sulphate and phosphate concentrations on the adsorption of sulphate by soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 28, 463–466
Kashem MA, Akinremi OO, Racz GJ (2004): Phosphorus fractions in soil amended with organic and inorganic phosphorus sources. Can J Soil Sci 84, 83–90
Liu F, He J, Colombo C, Violante A (1999): Competitive adsorption of sulfate and oxalate on goethite in the absence or presence of phosphate. Soil Sci 164, 180–189
Manchanda HR, Sharma SK, Bhandari DK (1982): Response of barley and wheat to phosphorus in the presence of chloride and sulphate salinity. Plant and Soil 66, 233–241
Mattson S, Williams EG, Eriksson E, Vahtras K (1950): Phosphate relationships of soil and plant. II. Soil-soil solution equilibria and phosphate solubility. Lantbr Hogsk Ann 17, 64–91
Meek BD, Graham LE, Donovan TJ, Mayberry KS (1979): Phosphorus availability in a calcareous soil after high loading rates of animal manure. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43, 741–743
Parfitt RL, Farmer VC, Russell JD (1977): Adsorption on hydrous oxides. I. Oxalate and benzoate on goethite. J Soil Sci 28, 289–296
Parfitt RL (1980): Chemical properties of variable charge soils. In: Theng BKG (ed), Soils with variable charge. New Zealand Society of Soil Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, pp 167–194
Pasricha NS, Fox RI (1993): Plant nutrient sulfur in the tropics and subtropics. Adv Agron 50, 209–269
Ryden JC, Syers JK, McLaughlin JR (1977a): Effect of ionic strength on chemisorption and potential determining sorption of phosphate by soils. J Soil Sci 28, 62–71
Ryden JC, Syers JK (1977b): Origin of the labile phosphate pool in soils. Soil Sci 123, 353–361
SAS (1999): StatView for windows, Version. 5.0.1. SAS Institute Inc Car, NY, USA
Sharpley AN, Curtin D, Syers JK (1988): Changes in water extractability of soil inorganic phosphate induced by sodium saturation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52, 637–640
Smillie GW, Curtin D, Syers JK (1987): Influence of exchangeable Ca on phosphate retention in weakly acid soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51, 1169–1172
Syers JK, Brownman MG, Smillie GW, Corey RB (1973): Phosphorus sorption by soils evaluated by Langmuir adsorption equation. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 33, 117–141
Thomas GW (1982): Exchangeable cations. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds), Methods of soil Analysis, Part 2, Agronomy series No. 9. Am Soc Agronomy and Soil Sci Soc Am Inc, Publ Madison WI, USA, pp 159–165
Tiessen H, Moir JO (1993): Characterization of available P by sequential extraction. In: Carter MR (ed), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Ration, FL, USA, pp 75–86
Wild A (1950) Effects of salts on the retention of phosphate by clay at various pH values. 4th Int Congr Soil Sci Amsterdam, pp 146–148
Williams JDH, Mayers T, Nriagu JO (1980): Extractability of phosphorus from phosphate minerals common in soils and sediment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44, 462–465
Zhang H, Schroder JL, Fuhrman JK, Basta NT, Storm DE, Payton ME (2005): Path and multiple regression analyses of phosphorus sorption capacity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69, 96–106
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ESS-Submission Editor: Prof. Maria Teresa Vasconlelos (mtvascon@fc.up.pt)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahmad, Z., Faridullah, El-Sharkawi, H. et al. Changes in water-extractability of soil inorganic phosphate induced by chloride and sulfate salts. Environ Sci Pollut Res 15, 23–26 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2006.06.309
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2006.06.309