Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in water-extractability of soil inorganic phosphate induced by chloride and sulfate salts

  • Research Article
  • Subject Area 6.1: Sample preparations, separation techniques and analytical methods
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goal, Scope and Background

One of the principal experimental variables which effect the results of phosphorus (P) sorption studies is the ionic composition, in addition to both species and concentrations of the contacting solution. In spite of the realization that ionic species, concentrations and their compositions effect P sorption and/or desorption, most of the salt-related studies are confined to Cl (anion) in association with different cations. While the knowledge about the comparative response of P to Cl and SO 2−4 ions was lacking, the current study was conducted to evaluate the comparative effects of anions (in association with cations) on inorganic P release and P fractions in the soil.

Methods

The test soil was amended with livestock compost manure (OP); KH2PO4 (IPk) or Ca(H2PO4)2 (IPc) at a rate of 1ppm. Soil was subjected to one salt and nine subsequent water extractions and different P fractions were measured. Four salt types, NaCl, Na2SO4, KCl and K2SO4, were used at levels of 0.5 M.

Results

Irrespective of P sources, P release was substantially increased in the salt-pretreated soil as compared to the non-saline soil. Sulfate salts released more P in subsequent water extractions than Cl. Phosphorus release decreased for salt types with Na2SO4> NaCl> K2SO4> KCl and for P sources with OP ∼IPk > Control (without P application) > IPc, respectively.

Discussion

No previous study was found to compare the results of more P release by SO 2−4 than Cl salt. Most of the previous studies focused on anion sorption capacities, but the mechanism for their adsorption is not fully known. Most of the authors suggested that the mechanisms of SO 2−4 and PO 3−4 adsorption are similar, and that both ions compete for the same sorption sites (Kamprath et al. 1956, Couto et al. 1979, Pasricha and Fox 1993). Although adsorbed SO 2−4 does not compete strongly with PO 3−4 , there is likely to be some competition for sorption between these anions which may cause comparatively more P release by SO 2−4 than Cl-salts. Higher P release by Nasaturation could be due to the release of P associated with oxide surfaces or due to dissolution of Ca-P phases (Curtin et al. 1987).

Conclusions

Study clearly showed that not only cations species differ for P desorption capacity, but associated anions also play a vital role in the fate of P under saline environments. Synergetic effects exist between Na and SO 2−4 ions which enhanced the P release. This study has also confirmed the fact that P from organic sources is available as well as from inorganic P sources. However, P release depends more on the type of P source applied than on total P.

Recommendations and Perspectives

It is highly recommended that more than one anion species must be used in the research plans for evaluating the P response in a saline environment. The results have important implications from the point of view of research, as most of the researchers focus on different cations only for evaluating P response to salts from an environmental point of view. However, our study has made it clear that anions in association with cations differed for their effects on P release.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Abbott JL, Tuker TC (1973): Persistence of manure phosphorus availability in calcareous soil. Soil Sci Soc Am Pro 37, 60–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Agbenin JO, Tiessen H (1995): Phosphorus sorption at field capacity and soil ionic strength: Kinetics and transformation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59, 998–1005

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow NJ (1972): Influence of solution concentration of calcium on the adsorption of phosphate, sulphate, and molybdate by soils. Soil Sci 113, 175–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow NJ (1983): A mechanistic model for describing the sorption and desorption of phosphate by soil. J Soil Sci 34, 733–750

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow NJ, Shaw TC (1979): Effect of ionic strength and nature of the cation on desorption of phosphate from soil. J Soil Sci 30, 53–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basta NT, Pantone DJ, Tabatabai MA (1993): Path analysis of heavy metal adsorption by soil. Agron J 85, 1054–1057

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman RA, Cole CV (1978): Transformations of organic phosphorus substrates in soils evaluated by NaHCO3 extraction. Soil Sci 125, 49–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan RF, Bolland MDA, Jeffrey RC, Allen DG (1994): Phosphorus adsorption by a range of western Australian soils related to soil properties. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 25, 2782–2795

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt R, Mays MD, Benham EC, Wilson MA (2002): Phosphorus characterization and correlation with properties of selected benchmark soils of the United States. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 33, 117–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Couto W, Lathwell DJ, Boulden DR (1979): Sulfate sorption by two Oxisols and an Alfisol of the tropics. Soil Sci 127, 108–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin D, Syers JK, Smillie GW (1987): The importance of exchangeable cations and resin-sink characteristics in the release of soil phosphorus. J Soil Sci 38, 711–716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dodor DE, Oya K (2000): Phosphorus sorption characteristics of major soils in Okinawa, Japan. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 31, 277–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elias-Azar K, Laag AE, Pratt PF (1980): Bicarbonate-extractable phosphorus in fresh and composted dairy manures. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44, 435–437

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elsharkawi H, Honna T, Yammamoto S, Enje A: Biological nitrogen fixation by native microorganisms in a waste-amended paddy soil. J Sust Agri (in press)

  • Fixen PE, Ludwick AE, Olsen SR (1983): Phosphorus and potassium fertilization on irrigated alfalfa on calcareous soils: II. Soil phosphorus solubility relationships. Soil Sci Soc Am J 47, 112–117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gale PM, Mullen MD, Cieslik C, Tyler DD, Dcuk BN, Kirchner M, McClure J (2000): Phosphorus distribution and availability in response to dairy manure applications. Commun. Soil Sci Plant Anal 31, 553–565

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986): Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A (ed), Method of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Agronomy series No. 9. Am Soc Agronomy and Soil Sci Soc Am Inc Publ, Madison WI, pp 383–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedley MJ, Stewart JW, Chauhan BS (1982): Changes in inorganic and organic soil phosphorus fractions induced by cultivation practices and by laboratory incubation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46, 970–976

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hue NV (1991): Effect of organic acids/anions on P sorption and phytoavailability in soils with different mineralogies. Soil Sci 152, 463–471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GV, Raun WR, Zhang H, Hattery JA (1997): Oklahoma soil fertility hand book 4th ed. Dept. of Agronomy, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafkafi U, Bar-Yosef B, Rosenberg R, Sposito G (1988): Phosphorus adsorption by kaolinte and montmorillonite: II. Organic anion competition. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52, 1585–1589

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamprath EJ, Nelson WL, Fitts JW (1956): The effect of pH, sulphate and phosphate concentrations on the adsorption of sulphate by soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 28, 463–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashem MA, Akinremi OO, Racz GJ (2004): Phosphorus fractions in soil amended with organic and inorganic phosphorus sources. Can J Soil Sci 84, 83–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, He J, Colombo C, Violante A (1999): Competitive adsorption of sulfate and oxalate on goethite in the absence or presence of phosphate. Soil Sci 164, 180–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manchanda HR, Sharma SK, Bhandari DK (1982): Response of barley and wheat to phosphorus in the presence of chloride and sulphate salinity. Plant and Soil 66, 233–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mattson S, Williams EG, Eriksson E, Vahtras K (1950): Phosphate relationships of soil and plant. II. Soil-soil solution equilibria and phosphate solubility. Lantbr Hogsk Ann 17, 64–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek BD, Graham LE, Donovan TJ, Mayberry KS (1979): Phosphorus availability in a calcareous soil after high loading rates of animal manure. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43, 741–743

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parfitt RL, Farmer VC, Russell JD (1977): Adsorption on hydrous oxides. I. Oxalate and benzoate on goethite. J Soil Sci 28, 289–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parfitt RL (1980): Chemical properties of variable charge soils. In: Theng BKG (ed), Soils with variable charge. New Zealand Society of Soil Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, pp 167–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasricha NS, Fox RI (1993): Plant nutrient sulfur in the tropics and subtropics. Adv Agron 50, 209–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryden JC, Syers JK, McLaughlin JR (1977a): Effect of ionic strength on chemisorption and potential determining sorption of phosphate by soils. J Soil Sci 28, 62–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryden JC, Syers JK (1977b): Origin of the labile phosphate pool in soils. Soil Sci 123, 353–361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1999): StatView for windows, Version. 5.0.1. SAS Institute Inc Car, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley AN, Curtin D, Syers JK (1988): Changes in water extractability of soil inorganic phosphate induced by sodium saturation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52, 637–640

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smillie GW, Curtin D, Syers JK (1987): Influence of exchangeable Ca on phosphate retention in weakly acid soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51, 1169–1172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Syers JK, Brownman MG, Smillie GW, Corey RB (1973): Phosphorus sorption by soils evaluated by Langmuir adsorption equation. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 33, 117–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas GW (1982): Exchangeable cations. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds), Methods of soil Analysis, Part 2, Agronomy series No. 9. Am Soc Agronomy and Soil Sci Soc Am Inc, Publ Madison WI, USA, pp 159–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiessen H, Moir JO (1993): Characterization of available P by sequential extraction. In: Carter MR (ed), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Ration, FL, USA, pp 75–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild A (1950) Effects of salts on the retention of phosphate by clay at various pH values. 4th Int Congr Soil Sci Amsterdam, pp 146–148

  • Williams JDH, Mayers T, Nriagu JO (1980): Extractability of phosphorus from phosphate minerals common in soils and sediment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44, 462–465

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Schroder JL, Fuhrman JK, Basta NT, Storm DE, Payton ME (2005): Path and multiple regression analyses of phosphorus sorption capacity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69, 96–106

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahoor Ahmad.

Additional information

ESS-Submission Editor: Prof. Maria Teresa Vasconlelos (mtvascon@fc.up.pt)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmad, Z., Faridullah, El-Sharkawi, H. et al. Changes in water-extractability of soil inorganic phosphate induced by chloride and sulfate salts. Environ Sci Pollut Res 15, 23–26 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2006.06.309

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2006.06.309

Keywords

Navigation