Skip to main content

Making a case for evidence-informed decision making for participatory urban design

URBAN DESIGN International volume 17, pages 336–348 (2012)Cite this article

Abstract

Urban regeneration has emerged as a response to government attempts to reverse the blight of industrial decline in the United Kingdom. The challenge has however been in developing sustainable solutions while meeting the needs of the citizens. Design-led initiatives have come under a lot of criticism for its subjective approach to urban design, focussing on the requirements of the developer or designer, but failing to meet the needs of the citizen or end user. This article offers a critical review and analysis of the current approaches to urban design in regeneration. It draws on cross-disciplinary literature and examples from practice and research to identify the key issues and challenges that restricts designs’ role as an agent of positive change. The article investigates the opportunities of a knowledge transfer from evidence-based decision making to effectively devise strategies to address the identified issues and challenges in the participatory urban design process. It presents a five-dimensional (5D) approach to decisionmaking, influenced by the realist synthesis and the domain of applied ontology to bargain better informed design decisions that supports effectual citizen participation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Figure 1
Figure 2

References

  • Archer, B. (1995) The nature of research. Co-design Journal 1 (2): 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, T. (2011) Using space syntax to design an architecture of visual relations. Journal of Space Syntax, online publication 15 December, http://joss.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/index.php/joss/article/viewFile/86/pdf_43, accessed 29 February 2012.

  • Ball, M. (2004) Co-operation with the community in property-led urban regeneration. Journal of Property Research 21 (2): 119–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, M. and Maginn, P.J. (2005) Urban change and conflict: Evaluating the role of partnerships in urban regeneration in the UK. Housing Studies 20 (1): 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangor University. (2012) IMPACT, http://www.bangor.ac.uk/healthcaresciences/research2/IMPLEMENT%20Impact.php.en, accessed 27 July 2012.

  • Bell, D. and Jayne, M. (2003) Design-led urban regeneration: A critical perspective. Local Economies 18 (2): 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentivegna, V., Curwell, S., Deakin, M., Lombardi, P., Mitchell, G. and Nijkamp, P. (2002) A vision and methodology for integrated sustainable urban development: BEQUEST. Building Research and Information 30 (2): 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boero, R., Ferro, E., Osella, M., Charalabidis, Y. and Loukis, E. (2012) Policy Intelligence in the Era of Social Computing: Towards a Cross-Policy Decision Support System, ESWC 2011 Workshops, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7117, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, pp. 217–228.

  • Bogost, I. (2009) What is object oriented ontology? A definition for ordinary folk. Blog post, 8 December, http://www.bogost.com/blog/what_is_objectoriented_ontolog.shtml, accessed 27 July 2012.

  • Boyko, C.T., Cooper, R. and Davey, C. (2005) Sustainability and the urban design process. Engineering Sustainability 158 (3): 119–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyko, C.T., Cooper, R., Davey, C.L. and Wootton, A.B. (2006) Addressing sustainability early in the urban design process. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 17 (6): 689–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradt, D.A. (2009) Evidence-based decision-making (Part 1): Origins and evolution in the health sciences. Prehospital & Disaster Medicine 24 (4): 298–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, R., Chong, H. and Martin, M. (2010) Design Informed: Driving Innovation with Evidence Based Design. Canada: John Wiley & sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, T. and Hamnett, C. (2012) Regenerating a global city. Routledge Online Studies on the Olympic and Paralympic Games 40 (1): 40–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • CABE, Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment. (2000) By Design: URBAN DESIGN in the Planning System. London: Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment.

  • Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T. and Tiesdell, S. (2003) Public Places – Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of URBAN DESIGN. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M. and Tiesdell, S. (eds.) (2007) URBAN DESIGN Reader. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, A. (2007) Understanding Urban Policy: A Critical Approach. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J.R., Busby, P., Guenther, R., Briney, L., Blaviesciunaite, A. and Alencar, T. (2012) A regenerative design framework: Setting new aspirations and initiating new discussions. Building Research & Information 40 (1): 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curwell, S., Deakin, M. and Symes, M. (2005) Sustainable Urban Development: Volume 1. The Framework and Protocols for Environmental Assessment. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dant, T. (1999) Material Culture in the Social World. Buckinghamshire, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, K., Kellett, J., Wilson, L. and Pullen, S. (2012) Assessing urban sustainability from a social democratic perspective: A thematic approach. The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 17 (1): 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, M., Mitchell, G., Nijkamp, P. and Vrekeer, R. (2007) Sustainable Urban Development: Volume 2. The Environmental Assessment Methods. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (2008) Discourse on the Method, Translated by J. Veith. New York: Cosimo, Originally published in 1924. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doblin, J. (1987) A short, Grandiose theory of design. STA Design Journal, Analysis and Intuition: 6–16.

  • Doucet, B. (2007) Flagship regeneration: Panacea or urban problem? Paper presented at EURA Conference: The Vital City; 12–14 September, Glasgow, Scotland.

  • Drexhage, J. and Murphy, D. (2010) Sustainable Development: From Brundtland to Rio 2012. New York, USA: United Nations Headquarters. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Driedger, M.S., Kothari, A., Morrison, J., Sawada, M., Crighton, J. and Graham, D. (2007) Correction: Using participatory design to develop (public) health decision support systems through GIS. International Journal of Health Reprographics 53 (6), doi:10.1186/1476-072X-6-53.

  • Duncan, P. and Thomas, S. (2002) Neighbourhood Regeneration: Resourcing Community Involvement. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, J. (2004) Egan review: Skills for sustainable communities, http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/communities/pdf/152086.pdf, accessed 19 April 2011.

  • Eisinger, P. (2000) The politics of bread and circuses: Building the city for the visitor class. Urban Affairs Review 35 (3): 316–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekins, P. and Cooper, I. (1993) Cities and Sustainability. Swindon, UK: Joint research agenda for SERC and ESRC. Clean Technology Unit, SERC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faludi, A. (1973) Planning Theory. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M.S. and Downey, G. (2006) Frontiers of Capital: Ethnographic Reflections on the New Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. (2010) Cities for People. Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S.D. (1996) A metaphorical analysis of client organizations and the briefing process. Construction Management and Economics 14 (2): 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, T. (2009) Ontology Encyclopaedia of Database Systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, K. (2004) Four levels of evidence-based practice. The AIA Journal of Architecture, http://www.sereneview.com/pdf/4levels_ebd.pdf, accessed 28 February 2012.

  • Hatherley, O. (2010) A Guide to the New Ruins of Great Britain. London: Verso books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, S., Bowlby, S. and Raco, M. (2007) Refashioning local government and inner-city regeneration: The Salford experience. Urban Studies 44 (8): 1441–1463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B. (1996) Space is the Machine. A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoehndorf, R., Dumontier, M. and Gkoutos, G. (2012) Towards quantitative measures in applied ontology, http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.3602v1, accessed 29 March 2012.

  • Hunter, B., Berends, L. and Mclean, S. (2012) Using realist synthesis to develop an evidence base from an identified data set on enablers and barriers for alcohol and drug program implementation. The Qualitative Report 17 (1): 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, P. (1996) Urban design and city regeneration: Social representations of entrepreneurial Landscapes. Urban Studies 33 (8): 1441–1461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IAP2. (2007) IAP2 core values of public participation, http://iap2.affiniscape.com/associations/4748/files/CoreValues.pdf, accessed 27 July 2012.

  • IAP2. (2009) About IAP2, http://www.iap2.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=3, accessed 27 July 2012.

  • IAP2. (2012) Good public participation results in better decisions, http://iap2.org/, accessed 29 February 2012.

  • Jones, A. (2010) New approach is needed to revive our cities. 18 December, http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/letters-and-columnists/alexandra-jones-new-approach-is-needed-to-revive-our-cities-1-3028709, accessed 29 February 2012.

  • Jones, P. and Evans, J. (2008) Urban Regeneration in the UK. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julier, G. (2000) The Culture of Design. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karimi, K., Amir, A. and Shaiei, K. (2007) Evidence-based Spatial Intervention for Regeneration of Informal Settlements: The Case of Jeddah Central Unplanned Areas, Proceedings of the 6th International Space Sytnax Symposium; 12–15 June, Istanbul, Turkey: Space syntax.

  • Lindblom, C.E. (1959) The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review 19 (2): 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, P. (2010) Evidence-Based Design of Elementary and Secondary Schools. United States of America: John Wiley and sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • LUDA. (2006) Large urban distressed areas, http://www.luda-europe.net/hb5/evaluation.php, accessed 29 February 2012.

  • Madanipour, A. (2007) Ambiguities of urban design. In: M. Carmona and S. Tiesdell (eds.) URBAN DESIGN Reader. London: Architectural Press, pp. 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maginn, P.J. (2007) Towards more effective community participation? The potential of collaborative planning and applied ethnography. Qualitative Research 7 (1): 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mang, P. (2011) Regenerative development and design. In: R.A. Meyers (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Sustainability Science and Technology. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzini, E. (2009) Design new knowledge. Design studies 30 (1): 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (2007) Partnership, Collaborative Planning and Urban Regeneration. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ODPM. (2003) ODPM: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Committee; the effectiveness of government regeneration initiatives. London: UK. House of Commons Seventh Report of Session 2002–2003, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmselect/cmodpm/76/76.pdf, accessed 28th February 2012.

  • Pawson, R. (2001) Evidence based policy II: The promise of ‘realist synthesis’. ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice. London: Queen Mary, University of London, Working paper, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, R. (2002) Evidence-based policy: The promise of ‘realist synthesis’. Evaluation 8 (3): 340–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G. and Walshe, K. (2004) Realist Synthesis: An Introduction: ESRC Research Methods Programme. Working paper series 2004.

  • Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G. and Walshe, K. (2005) Realist review: A new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 10 (1): 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratchett, L., Durose, C., Lowndes, V., Smith, G., Stoker, G. and Wales, C. (2009) Empowering Communities to Influence Local Decision Making: Evidence-based Lessons for Policy Makers and Practitioners. London: Department for Communities and Local Government report.

  • Pullen, W.R. (2005) Towards evidence based reasoning in facilities management. Keynote lecture FMA Ideaction 2005, Melbourne.

  • Punter, J. (2007) Design-led regeneration? Evaluating the design outcomes of Cardiff Bay and their implications for future regeneration and design. Journal of URBAN DESIGN 12 (3): 375–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raco, M., Henderson, S. and Bowlby, S. (2008) Changing times, changing places: Urban development and the politics of space-time. Environment and Planning 40 (11): 2652–2673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. (2000) The evolution, definition and purpose of urban regeneration. In: P. Roberts and H. Sykes (eds.) Urban Regeneration: A Handbook. London: Sage publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, J. (1995) The urban design process. URBAN DESIGN Quarterly, www.rudi.net/bookshelf/ej/udq/56/udp.cfm, accessed 14 July 2004.

  • Rowley, A. (1994) Definitions of urban design: The nature and concerns of urban design. Planning Practice & Research 9 (3): 179–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudlin, D. and Falk, N. (2009) Sustainable Urban Neighbourhood: Building the 21st Century Home. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rycroft-Malone, J., Kitson, A., Harvey, G., McCormack, B., Titchen, A. and Estabrooks, C. (2002) Ingredients for change: Revisiting a conceptual framework. Quality & Safety in HealthCare 11 (2): 174–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, D.L., Rosenberg, W.M.C., Gray, J.A.M., Haynes, R.B. and Richardson, W.S. (1996) Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal 312 (7023): 71–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sailer, K., Budgen, A., Lonsdale, N., Turner, A. and Penn, A. (2009) Evidence-based Design: Theoretical and Practical Reflections of an Emerging Approach in Office Architecture. Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference; 16–19 July, Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Hallam University.

  • Sharrock, W. and Anderson, B. (1994) The user as a scenic feature of the design space. Design Studies 15 (1): 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, R. and Utz, S. (2012) Making it count: A review of the value and techniques for public consultation. The Journal of Planning Literature 27 (1): 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Space syntax. (2012). Revealing unseen opportunities and creating better idea, http://www.spacesyntax.com/, accessed 29 February 2012.

  • Stangl, P. and Jeffery, G.M. (2011) Neighborhood design, connectivity assessment and obstruction. URBAN DESIGN International 16 (4): 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stonor, T. (2004) Towards evidence based urban design, http://spacesyntax.com/oldsite/Files/MediaFiles/SpaceSyntax_TowardsEvidenceBasedUrbanDesign.pdf, accessed 29 February 2012.

  • Taylor, M. (2007) Community participation in the real world: Opportunities and pitfalls in new governance spaces. Urban Studies 44 (2): 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, P. and Warnock, C. (2011) Regeneration: Written submission to selected committee enquiry into regeneration, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmcomloc/writev/regeneration/m65.htm, accessed 29 February 2012.

  • Unsworth, R. and Nathan, M. (2006) Beyond city living: Remaking the inner suburbs. Built Environment 32 (3): 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • URBAN DESIGN Handbook. (2003) The URBAN DESIGN Handbook: Techniques and Working Methods. United States of America: URBAN DESIGN Associates.

  • Wates. (2005) Wates report – Failing communities: Breaking the cycle Wates Group, Leatherhead, Surrey, http://www.wates.co.uk/uploads/pdfs/Corporate%20Responsibililty/Sustainability%20Report.Pdf, accessed 29 February 2012.

  • Webber, C., Larkin, K., Tochtermann, L., Varley-Winter, O. and Wilcox, Z. (2010) Grand Designs? A New Approach to the Built Environment in England's Cities. London, UK: Centre for Cities. Agenda for Growth 2010 Report no. 3.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Advanced Engineering and Sciences, University of Bolton, Deane Road, Bolton, BL3 5AB, UK

    Bobby Nisha & Margaret Nelson

Authors
  1. Bobby Nisha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Margaret Nelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bobby Nisha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nisha, B., Nelson, M. Making a case for evidence-informed decision making for participatory urban design. Urban Des Int 17, 336–348 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2012.16

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2012.16

Keywords

  • evidence based
  • decision making
  • urban design
  • urban regeneration