Abstract
In this piece, I make a distinction between the terms “subjectivity” and “self” in social science, arguing that the term subject – a being subject to others by control or dependence and subject to itself through reflexive domination – cannot be simply substituted for the term self. Talk of subjectivity helps critical psychologists understand how individuals are formed in power relations, but the term self helps us understand individuals in a more well-rounded way as having identities formed in more general social relations. However, I argue that the power relations shaping everyday lives today are those of neo-liberal capitalism, which is attempting to create individuals who are the subjects of work and consumerism. Yet to understand the agents who resist this form of power and subjection, we need a conception of selves that have the social bases from which to develop critical ideas and alternative lifestyles and values.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arendt, H. (1973). On Revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Bauman, Z. (1983). Industrialism, Consumerism and Power. Theory, Culture and Society, 1 (3), pp. 32–43.
Blackman, L. (2001). Hearing Voices: Embodiment and Experience. London: Free Association Books.
Burkitt, I. (2005). Powerful Emotions: Power, Government and Opposition in the “War on Terror”. Sociology, 39 (4), pp. 679–695.
Butler, J. (1997). The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Cromby, J. and Harper, D. (forthcoming). Paranoia: A Social Account. Theory and Psychology.
Elliott, A. (2002). Identity Politics and Privatisation: Modern Fantasies, Postmodern After-Effects. In Walkerdine, V. (ed.) Challenging Subjects: Critical Psychology for a New Millennium. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Foucault, M. (1982). Afterword: The Subject and Power. In Dreyfus, H.L. and Rabinow, P. (eds) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Brighton: Harvester, pp. 208–226.
Hertz, N. (2001). The Silent Takeover: Global Capitalism and the Death of Democracy. London: Heinemann.
Hook, D. (2001). Discourse, Knowledge, Materiality, History: Foucault and Discourse Analysis. Theory and Psychology, 11 (4), pp. 521–547.
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso.
Klein, N. (2001). No Logo. London: Flamingo.
Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. London: Hutchinson Radius.
Partner, M. (forthcoming). Choice and Control: A Study of Governmentality Within Contemporary Learning Disabilities Legislation. MPhil Dissertation. University of Bradford.
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sennett, R. (1998). The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Venn, C. (2002). Refiguring Subjectivity after Modernity. In Walkerdine, V. (ed.) Challenging Subjects: Critical Psychology for a New Millennium. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Vološinov, V.N. (1986). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Tr. L. Matejka and I. R. Titunik. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walkerdine, V. (2002). Introduction. In Walkerdine, V. (ed.) Challenging Subjects: Critical Psychology for a New Millennium. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burkitt, I. Subjectivity, Self and Everyday Life in Contemporary Capitalism. Subjectivity 23, 236–245 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.13
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.13