Abstract
Debating obesity can be difficult. For example, critiquing obesity discourse might be (mis)read as a criticism of individual doctors, or a failure to appreciate public health, which ostensibly seeks to avoid victim blaming with its focus on ‘the obesogenic environment’. In extending the obesity debate and politicising fatness and health (practice) more generally, this article responds to such criticisms as expressed by a ‘sceptic’ who has otherwise sought to challenge obesity science. This, in turn, helps to ‘clear some ground’ for critical weight studies and alternative clinical paradigms. After engaging relevant literature and repudiating the misrecognition of some of my own research, the article concludes with some reflections on how the debate might proceed amidst the flak and ‘friendly fire’.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The term ‘sceptic’ connotes a doubting attitude towards the validity of that which purports to be factual or truthful, similar to a postmodern sensibility. However, the term does not capture the various critical approaches towards ‘the war on obesity’ – approaches that may be much more evaluative not only of discourses but also of ‘beneath the surface’ social structures and other (in)transitive realities as part of a broader commitment to social justice, tackling health inequalities and promoting ethical clinical practice. I have previously discussed the value of ‘exercising healthy scepticism’ when researching the war on obesity, though I also deemed the institutional ‘attack on fat’ objectionable on critical realist or corporeal realist grounds (Monaghan, 2008).
Following Bhaskar (1989, p. 60), I would add that facts cannot simply be defined as ‘true assertions’ or ‘statements’ since ‘we do not make facts [they] pre-exist their discovery as results to be achieved (just as they pre-exist their statement as achievements)’.
Such words do, of course, counter ideas pertaining to the ‘civilised body’ (Elias, 2000), which is well-groomed, mannered and exercises self-restraint. Interestingly, aspects of the civilising process – which include the historical development of table manners in Europe – were commonly rationalised in terms of health and hygiene but, in practice, there were entirely different ‘sociogenetic’ factors in operation. Similarly, the anti-obesity offensive is irreducible to biomedical health and may have a great deal to do with middle-class efforts to civilise bodies which, regardless of their actual weight, are deemed to lack ‘social fitness’ (Monaghan, forthcoming).
I go to great lengths to clarify and qualify my use of biomedical terms (see Monaghan, 2008, pp. 21–25). Furthermore, my book on ‘big fellas’ only contains three references to so-called ‘ “obese” people’: once in relation to an exercise physiology study (which found people categorised as ‘obese’ and physically active had lower mortality risk than ‘normal’ weight sedentary people), once in relation to general societal stereotypes and once in relation to proponents of the anti-obesity offensive who want to fight stigma but offer a circular line of reasoning that unintentionally reproduces stigma. These references do not support Gard's (2009b, p. 235) review where I purportedly berate ‘obesity medical science’ for hating so-called ‘obese people’.
At the same time, I have a recurrent interest in critiquing ‘ideal typical’ obesity epidemic entrepreneurs who enjoy greater standing on the hierarchy of credibility and authoritatively denigrate fatness. Ideal types are not real, concrete individuals; rather, the ideal type is a heuristic device. In Monaghan et al (2010), we also refer to ‘modes of entrepreneurship’ insofar as we seek to explore and critique configurations of social interests and practices, rather than specific individuals. Even so, some individuals enthusiastically enact the ideal type when pontificating on the obesity epidemic. Jamie Oliver, as described by Warin (2011), would be typified as a supporter in our schema, that is, those entrepreneurs who seek to mobilise ‘solutions’ through campaigning, education and perhaps exploiting commercial opportunities. They seemingly have humanitarian concerns, though opportunists, a sub-type of supporter, have more naked economic interests.
Unfortunately, such an observation may have little impact on some factions of the public health community. For example, Bayer (2008, p. 471) believes that if public health interventions unavoidably and even intentionally stigmatise people then this may be defended on ‘moral grounds’. In rejecting Bayer's argument, Burris (2008, p. 475) writes: ‘stigma is a barbaric form of social control’.
In this regard it is interesting to note the role of money in the US political system, a system that is widely considered corrupt given the enormous (discrediting) sums spent on lobbying (Klein, 2012). Yet, in the context of those relationships that emerge between lobbyists and congressmen it is possible (probable) that ‘decent souls [can] come together to create an indecent system’ (ibid.). Interestingly, as explained by Klein, between 1998 and 2011 the health care industry spent the most on lobbyists ($4.87 billion), slightly more than the widely reviled finance, insurance and real estate (FIRE) sector ($4.85 billion).
References
Aphramor, L. (2005) Is a weight-centred health framework salutogenic? Some thoughts on unhinging certain dietary ideologies. Social Theory & Health 3 (4): 315–340.
Aphramor, L. (2009) Disability and the anti-obesity offensive. Disability & Society 24 (7): 897–909.
Aphramor, L. (2010) ‘Never mind the ethics, feel the resistance’: The challenges of HAES in the UK. Key Note and Participant Feedback. ESRC Fat Studies and HAES Seminar Series. Seminar 2: Fat in the Clinic/HAES, 13–14 May. Warwick University.
Aphramor, L. and Gingras, J. (2011) Helping people change: Promoting politicised practice in the healthcare professions. In: E. Rich, L.F. Monaghan and L. Aphramor (eds.) Debating Obesity: Critical Perspectives. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bacon, L. (2008) Health at Every Size: The Surprising Truth About Your Weight. Dallas: Benbella.
Bayer, R. (2008) Stigma and the ethics of public health: Not can we but should we. Social Science & Medicine 67 (3): 463–472.
Bhaskar, R. (1989) Reclaiming Reality. London: Verso.
Bhaskar, R. and Hartwig, M. (2010) The Formation of Critical Realism: A Personal Perspective. London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (2001) Masculine Domination. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Burawoy, M. (2005) 2004 American sociological association presidential address: For public sociology. British Journal of Sociology 56 (2): 259–294.
Burris, S. (2008) Stigma, ethics and policy: A commentary on Bayer's ‘stigma and ethics of public health: Not can we but should we. Social Science & Medicine 67 (3): 473–475.
Campos, P. (2004) The Obesity Myth: Why America's Obsession with Weight is Hazardous to Your Health. New York: Gotham Books.
Campos, P. (2011) Does fat kill? A critique of the epidemiological evidence. In: E. Rich, L.F. Monaghan and L. Aphramor (eds.) Debating Obesity: Critical Perspectives. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chang, V. and Christakis, N. (2002) Medical modelling of obesity: A transition from action to experience in a 20th century American textbook. Sociology of Health & Illness 24 (2): 151–177.
Cooper, C. (1998) Fat and Proud: The Politics of Size. London: The Women's Press.
Cooper, C. (2010) Fat studies: Mapping the field. Sociology Compass 4 (12): 1020–1034.
De Vogli, R. (2011) Neoliberal globalisation and health in a time of economic crisis. Social Theory & Health 9 (4): 311–325.
Durham University. (2011) Fat studies and health at every size. Department of Geography, http://www.dur.ac.uk/geography/research/researchprojects/fat_studies_and_health_at_every_size/, accessed 19 July 2012.
Elias, N. (2000) The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations, Revised Edition (Orig. 1939) Oxford: Blackwell.
Evans, B. (2010) Anticipating fatness: Childhood, affect and the pre-emptive ‘war on obesity’. Transactions 35 (1): 21–38.
Evans, B. and Colls, R. (2009) Measuring fatness, governing bodies: The spatialities of the body mass index (BMI) in anti-obesity politics. Antipode 41 (5): 1051–1083.
Evans, J., Rich, E., Davies, B. and Allwood, R. (2008) Education, Disordered Eating and Obesity Discourse: Fat Fabrications. New York: Routledge.
Featherstone, M. (1991) The body in consumer culture. In: M. Featherstone, M. Hepworth and B. Turner (eds.) The Body: Social Process and Cultural Theory. London: Sage.
Fitzpatrick, M. (2004) The obesity time bomb. The British Journal of General Practice 54 (504): 557.
Gard, M. (2009a) Friends, enemies and the cultural politics of critical obesity research. In: J. Wright and V. Harwood (eds.) Biopolitics and the Obesity Epidemic: Governing Bodies. New York: Routledge.
Gard, M. (2009b) Book review. Men and the war on obesity. Managing Leisure 14 (3): 235–236.
Gard, M. (2011) The End of the Obesity Epidemic. New York: Routledge.
Gard, M. and Wright, J. (2005) The Obesity Epidemic: Science, Morality and Ideology. London: Routledge.
Guthman, J. (2011) Weighing In: Obesity, Food Justice and the Limits of Capitalism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Herndon, M. (2005) Collateral damage from friendly fire?: Race, nation, class and the ‘war against obesity’. Social Semiotics 15 (2): 127–141.
Horan, N. (2011) I’m not fat, but 250,000 tapes are telling me I am. Sunday Independent, 5 June.
Klein, E. (2012) Our corrupt politics: It's not all money. New York Review of Books, 22 March, http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/mar/22/our-corrupt-politics-its-not-all-money/, accessed 5 March 2012.
Klein, N. (2007) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. London: Penguin.
LeBesco, K. (2004) Revolting Bodies: The Struggle to Redefine Fat Identity. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
Levinson, R. (1998) Issues at the interface of medical sociology and public health. In: G. Scambler and P. Higgs (eds.) Modernity, Medicine and Health: Medical Sociology Towards 2000. London: Routledge.
Mann, T., Tomiyama, J., Westling, E., Lew, A., Samuels, B. and Chatman, J. (2007) Medicare's search for effective obesity treatments: Diets are not the answer. American Psychologist 62 (3): 220–233.
Marmot, M. (2004) The Status Syndrome: How Your Social Standing Directly Affects Your Health. London: Bloomsbury.
McDonough, T., Loughrey, J., Klemm, A., Dunne, F. and Pentony, S. (2009) The H.E.A.P. Chart: Hierarchy of Earnings, Attributes and Privileges Analysis. Dublin: TASC.
Mills, C.W. (1970) The Sociological Imagination, (Original 1959) New York: Penguin.
Monaghan, L.F. (2005) Discussion piece: A critical take on the obesity debate. Social Theory & Health 3 (4): 302–314.
Monaghan, L.F. (2007) Body mass index, masculinities and moral worth: Men's critical understandings of ‘appropriate’ weight-for-height. The Sociology of Health & Illness 29 (4): 584–609.
Monaghan, L.F. (2008) Men and the War on Obesity: A Sociological Study. New York: Routledge.
Monaghan, L.F. (2010a) Physician heal thyself’, part 1: A qualitative analysis of a medscape debate about clinicians’ bodyweight. Social Theory & Health 8 (1): 1–27.
Monaghan, L.F. (2010b) Physician heal thyself’, part 2: Debating clinicians’ bodyweight. Social Theory & Health 8 (1): 28–50.
Monaghan, L.F. (forthcoming) Civilizing recalcitrant boy's bodies: Promoting social fitness through the anti-obesity offensive. Sport, Education and Society, in press.
Monaghan, L.F., Hollands, R. and Pritchard, G. (2010) Obesity epidemic entrepreneurs: Types, practices and interests. Body & Society 16 (2): 37–71.
Monaghan, L.F. and O'Flynn, M. (2012) The Madoffization of society: A corrosive process in an age of fictitious capital. Critical Sociology, advance online publication, 13 July, doi: 10.1177/0896920512446760.
Monaghan, L.F., Rich, E. and Aphramor, L. (eds.) (2011) Reflections on and developing critical weight studies. In: Debating Obesity: Critical Perspectives. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Norman, M.E. (2007) Book review. The obesity epidemic. Body & Society 13 (4): 118–121.
New York Times. (2012) More than 100 charged in medicare fraud sweep. The New York Times 3 May.
Petersen, A. and Lupton, D. (1996) The New Public Health: Health and Self in the Age of Risk. London: Sage.
Porter, R. (1993) Critical realist ethnography: The case of racism and professionalism in a medical setting. Sociology 27 (4): 591–609.
Prentice, A.M. and Jebb, S.A. (1995) Obesity in Britain: Gluttony or sloth? British Medical Journal 311: 437–439.
Rich, E. and Evans, J. (2005) Fat ethics: The obesity discourse and body politics. Social Theory & Health 3 (4): 341–358.
Ritenbaugh, C. (1982) Obesity as a culture bound syndrome. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 6 (4): 347–361.
Rogge, M.M., Greenwald, M. and Golden, A. (2004) Obesity, stigma and civilized oppression. Advanced Nursing Studies 27 (4): 301–315.
Rose, N. (2007) Molecular biopolitics, somatic ethics and the spirit of biocapital. Social Theory & Health 5 (1): 3–29.
Scambler, G. (1998) Medical sociology and modernity: Reflections on the public sphere and the roles of intellectuals and social critics. In: G. Scambler and P. Higgs (eds.) Modernity, Medicine and Health: Medical Sociology Towards 2000. London: Routledge.
Scambler, G. (2001) Critical realism, sociology and health inequalities: Social class as a generative mechanism and its media of enactment. Journal of Critical Realism 4 (1): 35–42.
Scambler, G. (2006) Jigsaws, models and the sociology of stigma. Journal of Critical Realism 5 (2): 273–289.
Scambler, G. (2009) Capitalists, workers and health: Illness as a ‘side-effect’ of profit-making. Social Theory & Health 7 (2): 117–128.
Scambler, G. and Higgs, P. (eds.) (1998) Modernity, Medicine and Health: Medical Sociology Towards 2000. London: Routledge.
Shilling, C. (2003) The Body and Social Theory, 2nd edn. London: Sage.
Solovay, S. (2000) Tipping the Scales of Justice: Fighting Weight-Based Discrimination. New York: Prometheus books.
Sontag, S. (1978) Illness as Metaphor. New York: Penguin.
Taft, M. (2012) Poorer and more unequal. Irish Left Review 20 February.
Warin, M. (2011) Foucault's progeny: Jamie Oliver and the art of governing obesity. Social Theory & Health 9 (1): 24–40.
WHO. (2004) Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Wilkinson, I. (2005) Suffering: A Sociological Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Williams, S.J. (2003) Beyond meaning and discourse: Critical realist reflections on health. Social Theory & Health 1 (1): 42–71.
Williams, S.J. and Bendelow, G. (1998) The Lived Body: Sociological Themes, Embodied Issues. London: Routledge.
Wright, J. (2009) Biopower, biopedagogies and the obesity epidemic. In: J. Wright and V. Harwood (eds.) Biopolitics and the Obesity Epidemic: Governing Bodies. New York: Routledge.
Wright, J. and Harwood, V. (eds.) (2009) Biopolitics and the Obesity Epidemic: Governing Bodies. New York: Routledge.
Acknowledgements
A version of this article was presented at the Aix Marseille School of Economics ‘Risk in Health’ workshop, Marseille, 22 May 2012. I am grateful to the School for the invitation and hospitality. The ESRC funded my research on men and weight-related issues (grant number: RES-000-22-0784), and the UK Fat Studies and HAES Seminar Series (co-applicant; grant number: RES-451-26-078-A). I am also grateful to Micheal O’Flynn, Lucy Aphramor, Bethan Evans, Rachel Colls, Samantha Murray and Jonathan Gabe for commenting on earlier drafts of this article. The late Micheal Hardey also shared his thoughts with me on this article in early 2012. Mike's recent death is a terrible loss to his family, friends and the sociological community more generally. He will be sorely missed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Monaghan, L. Extending the obesity debate, repudiating misrecognition: Politicising fatness and health (practice). Soc Theory Health 11, 81–105 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2012.10
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2012.10