Advertisement

Security Journal

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 198–215 | Cite as

(S)he shall not be moved: Gender, bodies and travel rights in the post-9/11 era

  • Laura Sjoberg
Original Article
  • 428 Downloads

Abstract

Using examples from the gendered targeting of airport security assemblages post-9/11, this article points out that the travelable body is straight; healthy; identifiable in sex, gender and race; not clearly religious; and, depending on where it is in the world, of a particular race and/or ethnicity. This article looks at the securitized production of the travelable body through gender lenses. It reads several key changes in people’s rights to movement as gendered, as significant and as signifying fundamental changes in (gendered) security orders. Particularly, building on Cynthia Enloe’s use of the idea of secure states containing insecure women to critique both the actual security of the state and women’s position in it, this article makes the argument that the gendered violations of people’s rights to movement and bodily integrity post-9/11 is a step backwards both for human security within the state and for the national security of the state.

Keywords

sex gender travel rights security terrorism 

References

  1. Axworthy, L. (2001) Human security and global governance: Putting people first. Global Governance 41 (7): 19–25.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, E. (2002) Flying while Arab – Racial profiling and air travel security. Journal of Air Law and Commerce 67 (4): 1375–1406.Google Scholar
  3. Beauchamp, T. (2009) Artful concealment and strategic visibility: Transgender bodies and US state surveillance after 9/11. Surveillance & Society 6 (4): 356–366.Google Scholar
  4. Benhabib, S. (1992) Situating the self: Gender, community, and postmodernism. Hypatia 22 (3): 43–65.Google Scholar
  5. Bettcher, T.M. (2007) Evil deceivers and make-believers: On transphobic violence and the politics of illusion. Hypatia 22 (3): 43–65.Google Scholar
  6. Brickley, A. (2009) U.N. report says counterterrorism measures ‘risk unduly penalizing transgender persons’. CNS News 19 October, http://cnsnews.com/news/article/un-report-says-counterterrorism-measures-risk-unduly-penalizing-transgender-persons, accessed 2 November 2010.
  7. Brown, G.R. (2006) Transsexuals in the military: Flight into hypermasculinity. In: Stryker, S. and Whittle, S. (eds.) The Transgender Studies Reader. New York: CRC Press, pp. 537–544.Google Scholar
  8. Bumiller, E. (2012) One year later, military says gay policy is working. New York Times 19 September, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/20/us/dont-ask-dont-tell-anniversary-passes-with-little-note.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0, accessed 2 July 2013.
  9. Butler, J. (1988) Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal 40 (4): 519–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits Of Sex. London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  12. Butler, J. (2006) Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  13. Buzan, B., Waever, O. and de Wilde, J. (1998) Security: A New Framework For Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  14. Chowdhury, E.H. (2012) Calling for a chai summit. International Feminist Journal of Politics 14 (2): 149–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cockburn, C. (2010) Gender relations as causal in militarization and war: A feminist standpoint. International Feminist Journal of Politics 12 (2): 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohn, C. (2012) Feminist Security Studies: Toward a reflexive practice. Politics and Gender 7 (4): 581–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coyote, I. (2010) Flying while butch. Daily Extra 15 December, http://www.xtra.ca/public/Vancouver/Flying_while_butch-9562.aspx, accessed 15 September 2012.
  18. Currah, P. and Mulqueen, T. (2011) Securitizing gender: Identity, biometrics and transgender bodies at the airport. Social Research: An International Quarterly 78 (2): 557–582.Google Scholar
  19. Department of Defense. (2013) Statement from secretary of defense Leon E. Panetta on the Extension of Benefits to Same-Sex Partners. 11 February, http://www.defense.gov/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=15809.
  20. Doe, v. Alexander (1981) 510 F. Supp. 900 (D. Minn, 1981).Google Scholar
  21. Eichler, M. (2012) Militarizing Men: Gender, Conscription, and War in Post-Soviet Russia. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Press.Google Scholar
  22. Elshtain, J.B. (1987) Women and War. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Enloe, C. (1990) Bananas, Beaches, and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Enloe, C. (1993) The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2005) The bare bones of sex: Part I–sex and gender. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30 (2): 1491–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Galtung, J. (1969) Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research 6 (3): 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gasper, D. (2005) Securing humanity: Situating ‘human security’ as concept and discourse. Journal of Human Development 6 (2): 220–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Geen, J. (2010) Privacy warning over trans people using airport scanners. Pink News 18 January, http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/01/18/privacy-warning-over-trans-people-using-airport-scanners/, accessed 2 November 2013.
  29. Goldstein, J. (2001) War and Gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hoogensen, G. and Stuvoy, K. (2006) Gender, resistance, and human security. Security Dialogue 37 (2): 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hudson, H. (2005) ‘Doing’ security as though humans matter: A feminist perspective on gender and the politics of human security. Security Dialogue 36 (2): 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones, K. (2011) Airport Security (Again): Another Paper in the Story of My Packy and the TSA. Butchtastic.net, September 26, http://www.butchtastic.net/2011/09/airport-security-again-another-chapter-in-the-story-of-my-packy-and-the-tsa/, accessed 20 November.
  33. Krause, K. and Williams, M.C. (1996) Broadening the agenda of security studies: Politics and methods. Mershon International Studies Review 40 (2): 229–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Magnet, S. and Rodgers, T. (2011) Stripping for the state: Whole body imaging technologies and the surveillance of othered bodies. Feminist Media Studies 12 (1): 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McClam, E. (2013) Valor knows no gender: Pentagon lifts ban on women in Combat. US News 24 January, http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/24/16681072-valor-knows-no-gender-pentagon-lifts-ban-on-women-in-combat?lite, accessed 24 January 2013.
  36. McClintock, A. (1993) Family feuds: Gender, nationalism, and the family. Feminist Review 44: 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Millet, K. (1971) Sexual Politics. London: Granada Press.Google Scholar
  38. Miller, K. (2012) The new DADT: The military’s ban on transgender service. Outserve Magazine 31 January, http://outservemag.com/2012/01/the-new-dadt-the-militarys-ban-on-transgender-service, accessed 2 July 2013.
  39. Moon, K. (1997) Sex Among Allies: Military Prostitution in US-Korea Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Parashar, S. (2009) Feminist international relations and women militants: Case studies from Sri Lanka and Kashmir. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22 (2): 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peterson, V.S. (ed.) (1992) Gendered States: Feminist (Re)visions of International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Peterson, V.S. (2004) Feminist theories within, invisible to, and beyond IR. Brown Journal of World Affairs X (2): 35–46.Google Scholar
  43. Peterson, V.S. (2010) Informalization, inequalities, and global insecurities. International Studies Review 12 (2): 244–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Putz, O. (2011) From non-places to non-events: The airport security checkpoint. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 41 (2): 154–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Raj, A. (2012) Canada identity screening regulations: Transgendered community effectively banned from flying. Huffington Post 1 February, http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/01/31/canada-air-travel-transgendered-community_n_1245598.html, accessed 28 June 2013.
  46. Redden, S.M. (2013) How lines organize compulsory interaction, emotion management, and ‘emotional taxes’: The implications of passenger emotion and expression in airport security lines. Management Construction Quarterly 27 (1): 121–149.Google Scholar
  47. Redden, S.M. and Terry, J. (2013) The end of the line: Feminist understandings of resistance to full-body scanning technology. International Feminist Journal of Politics 15 (2): 234–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roen, K. (2002) ‘Either-or’ and ‘both-neither’: Discursive tensions in transgender politics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 27 (2): 501–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Runyan, A.S. (1990) Gender relations and the politics of protection. Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice 2 (4): 28–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salter, M. (2004) Passports, mobility, and security: How smart can the border be? International Studies Perspectives 5 (1): 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shanker, T. (2013) Partners of gays in service are granted some benefits. New York Times 11 February, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/12/us/partners-of-gay-military-personnel-are-granted-benefits.html, accessed 2 July 2013.
  52. Shepherd, L.J. and Sjoberg, L. (2012) Trans- bodies in/of war(s): Cisprivilege and contemporary security strategy. Feminist Review 101: 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sjoberg, L. (2007) Mothers, Monsters, Whores: Women’s Violence in Global Politics. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  54. Sjoberg, L. (2009) Introduction to security studies: Feminist contributions. Security Studies 18 (2): 183–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sjoberg, L. (2012) What Waltz couldn’t see: Gender, structure, and war. International Theory 4 (1): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sjoberg, L. (2013) Gendering Global Conflict: Toward a Feminist Theory of War. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Sylvester, C. (1994) Feminist International Relations In A Postmodern Era. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Sylvester, C. (2013) War as Experience: Contributions From International Relations and Feminist Analysis. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  59. Tickner, J.A. (1988) Hans Morgenthau’s principles of political realism: A feminist reformulation. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 17 (3): 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tickner, J.A. (1992) Gender in International Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Tickner, J.A. (2001) Gendering World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  62. True, J. (2003) Mainstreaming gender in global public policy. International Feminist Journal of Politics 5 (3): 368–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. United Nations Development Program. (1994) Human Development Report: New Dimensions of Human Security, http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr1994, accessed 21 June 2012.
  64. United Nations General Assembly. (2009) Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms While Countering Terrorism, http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/pdfid/4aae4eea0.pdf, accessed 3 August 2009.
  65. United States Transportation Security Administration. (2012) Transgender travelers: Special considerations, http://www.tsa.gov/traveler-information/transgender-travelers, accessed 6 December 2012.
  66. Walt, S. (1991) The renaissance of security studies. International Studies Quarterly 34 (1): 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Walt, S. (2013) Why gay marriage is good for U.S. Foreign Policy 29 March, http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/03/29/why-gay-marriage-is-good-for-u-s-foreign-policy/.
  68. Weber, C. (2002) Flying planes can be dangerous. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31 (1): 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Welch, M. (2003) Trampling human rights in the war on terror: Implications to the sociology of denial. Critical Criminology 12 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wilcox, L. (2013) Practices of Violence: Theorized Embodied Subjects in International Relations. Unpublished book manuscript.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Sjoberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations