Advertisement

Security Journal

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 880–902 | Cite as

Examining active shooter events through the rational choice perspective and crime script analysis

  • Jeffery R Osborne
  • Joel A Capellan
Original Article

Abstract

Active shooter events involve individuals entering a public space and opening fire with the intent to kill as many people as possible. In recent years this topic has received extensive media coverage, followed by an increase in academic attention. Much research focuses on high-profile active shooter events, labeled as mass homicide events or mass shootings. The present study examined active shooter events through the rational choice perspective and crime script analysis, with emphasis placed on finding similarities between the motivation for an offense and event-level characteristics. Once events were organized into three general scripts (that is, autogenic, victim-specific and ideological), variables pertaining to the commission of the offenses were examined. While event characteristics overlapped between scripts, key differences in the planning, execution and conclusion stages were observed. This new typology may be a useful analytic tool, not only to empirically study active shooter events, but also for the development of policies to help reduce the occurrence and/or lethality of these events.

Keywords

active shooter events rational choice perspective crime script analysis mass homicide mass shooting 

References

  1. Aitken, L., Oosthuizen, P., Emsley, R. and Seedat, S. (2008) Mass murders: Implications for mental health professionals. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 38(3): 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beauregard, E., Proulx, J., Rossmo, D.K., Leclerc, B. and Allaire, J. (2007) Script analysis of the hunting process of serial sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior 34(8): 1069–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blair, J.P., Nichols, T., Burns, D. and Curnutt, J.R. (2013) Active Shooter: Events and Responses. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blair, J.P. and Schweit, K. (2014) A Study of Active Shooter Incidents, 2000-2013. Texas State University and Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  5. Bowers, T.G., Holmes, E.S. and Rhom, A. (2010) The nature of mass murder and autogenic massacre. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 25(2): 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgess, A.W. (2006) Mass, spree, and serial homicide. In: J.E. Douglas, A.W. Burgess, A.G. Burgess and R.K. Ressler (eds.) Crime Classification Manual: A Standard System for Investigating and Classifying Violent Crimes. 2nd edn. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 437–469.Google Scholar
  7. Chui, Y., Leclerc, B. and Townsley, M. (2011) Crime script analysis of drug manufacturing in clandestine laboratories. British Journal of Criminology 51(2): 355–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke, R.V. and Cornish, D.B. (1985) Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. In: M. Tonry and N. Morris (eds.) Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research. Volume 6. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 147–185.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, R.V. and Newman, G.R. (2006) Outsmarting the Terrorists. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International.Google Scholar
  10. Cornish, D.B. (1994) The procedural analysis of offending and its relevance for situational prevention. In: R.V. Clarke (ed.) Crime Prevention Studies. Volume 3. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 151–196.Google Scholar
  11. Cornish, D.B. and Clarke, R.V. (1986) Introduction. In: D.B. Cornish and R.V. Clarke (eds.) The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. New York: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cornish, D.B. and Clarke, R.V. (1985) The rational choice perspective. In: R. Wortley and L. Mazerolle (eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis. New York: Routledge, pp. 21–47.Google Scholar
  13. Creswell, J.W. (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Dietz, P.E. (1986) Mass, serial, and sensational homicides. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 62(5): 477–491.Google Scholar
  15. Duwe, G. (2007) Mass Murder in the United States: A History. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.Google Scholar
  16. Fox, J.A. and DeLateur, M.J. (2014) Mass shootings in America: Moving beyond Newton. Homicide Studies 18(1): 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fox, J.A. and Levin, J. (2015) Extreme Killing: Understanding Serial and Mass Murder. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Holmes, R.M. and Holmes, S.T. (2001) Mass Murder in the United States. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Huff-Corzine, L. et al (2014) Shooting for accuracy: Comparing data sources on mass murder. Homicide Studies 18(1): 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelly, R.W. (2012) Active Shooter: Recommendations and Analysis for Risk Mitigation. 2012 edn. New York: New York City Police Department.Google Scholar
  21. Lankford, A. (2013) A comparative analysis of suicide terrorists and rampage, workplace, and school shooters in the United States from 1990 to 2010. Homicide Studies 17(3): 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leclerc, B., Wortley, R. and Smallbone, S. (2011) Getting into the script of adult child sex offenders and mapping out situational prevention measures. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 48(2): 209–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mullen, P.E. (2004) The autogenic (self-generated) massacre. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 22(3): 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Palermo, G.B. (1997) The berserk syndrome: A review of mass murder. Aggression and Violent Behavior 2(1): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tremblay, P., Talon, B. and Hurley, D. (2001) Body switching and related adaptations in the resale of stolen vehicles: Script elaborations and aggregate crime learning curves. British Journal of Criminology 41(4): 561–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. United States Department of Homeland Security. (2008) Active shooter: How to Respond. Washington DC: US Department of Homeland Security.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffery R Osborne
    • 1
  • Joel A Capellan
    • 1
  1. 1.John Jay College of Criminal JusticeNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations