Advertisement

Security Journal

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 401–416 | Cite as

The economics of private security expenditure: The influence of perceptions of crime

  • Matthew Manning
  • Christopher FlemingEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Given that crime is a complex societal problem, the argument to embrace interdisciplinary scholarship seems an obvious one. The study of crime and its control, however, has largely remained multidisciplinary in nature. In this article, we provide an interdisciplinary, accessible economic model for understanding choices by individuals, as well as demonstrate the application of self-reported life satisfaction data to the issue of property crime. We find that: individuals’ perceptions of crime in their local area are far greater than actual levels of crime; the gap between perceived and real crime is widening; and real crime rates detract more from an individual’s self-reported life satisfaction than perceived rates of crime. However, perceived rates of crime have an adverse impact on life satisfaction beyond those associated with real crime. Together, these results suggest that societal welfare could be significantly enhanced by reducing individual’s perceptions of crime, irrespective of any changes in the real crime rate.

Keywords

private security expenditure life satisfaction perceptions of crime economic theory 

References

  1. Becker, G. (1968) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. The Journal of Political Economy 76(2): 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellair, P. and Browning, C. (2010) Contemporary disorganization research: An assessment and further test of the systemic model of neighborhood crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Deliquency 47(4): 496–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bushway, S. and Reuter, P. (2008) Economists’ contribution to the study of crime and the criminal justice system. Crime and Justice 37(1): 389–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cameron, A. and Trivedi, P. (2010) Microeconometrics Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, R. (2009) The theory of crime prevention through environmental design. Police Management Studies Quarterly 3(3): 344–356.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, R. and Cornish, D. (1985) Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. Crime and Justice 6(1): 147–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clotfelter, C. (1977) Public services, private substitutes, and the demand for protection against crime. American Economic Review 67(5): 867–877.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, M. (2000) Measuring the costs and benefits of crime and justice. Criminal Justice 4(1): 263–315.Google Scholar
  9. Cook, P. (1986) The demand and supply of criminal opportunities. Crime and Justice 7(1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cook, P. and MacDonald, J. (2010) Public Safety through Private Action: An Economic Assessment of BIDs, Locks, and Citizen Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornish, D. and Clarke, R. (2003) Opportunities, precipitators, and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley’s critique of situational crime prevention. In: M. Smith and D. Cornish (eds.) Theory for Practice in Situational Crime Prevention. Vol. 16, Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 41–96.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, B. and Dossetor, K. (2010) (Mis)Perceptions of Crime in Australia. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No. 396. Australian Institute of Criminology. Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  13. Duffy, B., Wake, R., Burrows, T. and Bremner, P. (2008) Closing the gaps – Crime and public perceptions. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology 22(1–2): 17–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehrlich, I. (1974) Participation in illegitimate activities: An economic analysis. In: G. Becker and W. Landes (eds.) Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  15. Ehrlich, I. (1981) On the usefulness of controlling individuals: An economic analysis of rehabilitation, incapacitation and deterrence. American Economic Review 71(3): 307–322.Google Scholar
  16. Ehrlich, I. (1996) Crime, punishment, and the market for offenses. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(1): 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehrlich, I. and Saito, T. (2010) Taxing guns vs. taxing crime: An application of the ‘market for offenses model’. Journal of Policy Modeling 32(5): 670–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferguson, K. and Mindel, C. (2007) Modeling fear of crime in Dallas neighborhoods: A test of social capital theory. Crime and Delinquency 53(2): 322–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frijters, P., Haisken-DeNew, J. and Shields, M. (2004) Money does matter! Evidence from increasing real income and life satisfaction in East Germany following reunification. American Economic Review 94(3): 730–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frijters, P., Johnston, D. and Shields, M. (2011) Life satisfaction dynamics with quarterly life event data. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 113(1): 190–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jackson, J. (2004) Experience and expression: Social and cultural significance in the fear of crime. British Journal of Criminology 44(6): 946–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levitt, S. and Dubner, S. (2005) Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything. New York: William Morrow/HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  23. Levitt, S. and Miles, T. (2006) Economic contributions to the understanding of crime. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2(1): 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lochner, L. (2003) Individual perceptions of the Criminal Justice System. National Bureau of Economic Research, No W9474, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  25. Mazerolle, L.G., Kadleck, C. and Roehl, J. (1998) Controlling drug and disorder problems: The role of place managers. Criminology 36(2): 371–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nagin, D. and Pogarsky, G. (2001) Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a model of general deterrance: Theory and evidence. Criminology 39(4): 865–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nagin, D. and Pogarsky, G. (2003) An experimental investigation of deterrence: Cheating, self-serving bias, and impulsivity. Criminology 41(1): 167–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research. (2012) Crime Information for New South Wales and Your Local Area, http://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/bocsar/ll_bocsar.nsf/pages/bocsar_crime_stats, accessed 14 April 2013.
  29. Philipson, T. and Poser, R. (1996) The economic epidemiology of crime. Journal of Law and Economics 39(1): 405–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Renaur, B. (2007) Reducing fear of crime: Citizen, police, or government responsibility? Police Quarterly 10(1): 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ross, C. and Jang, S. (2000) Neighborhood disorder, fear and mistrust: The buffering role of social ties with neighbors. American Journal of Community Psychology 28(4): 401–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shavell, S. (1991) Individual precautions to prevent theft: Private versus socially optimal behavior. International Review of Law and Economics 11(2): 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vold, G., Bernard, T. and Snipes, J. (2002) Theoretical Criminology. 5th edn. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Warr, M. (1982) The accuracy of public beliefs about crime: Further evidence. Criminology 20(2): 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Watson, N. and Wooden, M. (2012) The HILDA survey: A case study in the design and development of a successful household panel study. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies 3(3): 369–381.Google Scholar
  36. Weatherburn, D. and Indermaur, D. (2004) Public Perceptions of Crime Trends in New South Wales and Western Australia. Crime and Justice Bulletin: Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice No. 80. New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research. Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  37. Weatherburn, D., Matka, E. and Lind, B. (1996) Crime Perception and Reality: Public Perceptions of the Risk of Criminal Victimisation in Australia. Crime and Justice Bulletin: Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice No. 28. Sydney: New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.Google Scholar
  38. Weisburd, D. and Mazerolle, L. G. (2000) Crime and disorder in drug hot spots: Implications for theory and practice in policing. Police Quarterly 3(3): 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Copland Building # 24, Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Social and Economic Research Program, Griffith University, Nathan CampusNathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations