Advertisement

Security Journal

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 1–24 | Cite as

The role of neighborhood parks as crime generators

  • Elizabeth GroffEmail author
  • Eric S McCord
Original Article

Abstract

Neighborhood parks in urban areas have long been seen as contested spaces. Because they are publically owned, they are at the same time everyone's and no one's. As public resources they have little intrinsic guardianship and thus are susceptible to being taken over for undesirable activities (that is, living spaces for the homeless, markets for drug dealers and delinquent behavior magnets for juveniles). While much has been written about parks and crime, little research exists which empirically examines the topic. The current research examines neighborhood parks in Philadelphia, PA as they relate to crime and disorder that occurs outdoors. We use primary data collection to quantify the number of potential activity generators (recreation centers, pools, playground, night lighting, and so on) and other park characteristics. Land use on adjacent streets is also collected. Our analysis finds that neighborhood parks are associated with increased levels of crime in the surrounding area. However, specific characteristics of parks are associated with lower crime levels.

Keywords

parks proximity crime generators land use crime 

References

  1. Braga, A.A. (2001) The effects of hot spots policing on crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 578: 104–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braga, A.A. (2007) Effects of hot spots policing on crime, http://www.sfi.dk/graphics/Campbell/reviews/Hot_spots_policing_review.pdf.
  3. Braga, A.A., Weisburd, D.L., Waring, E., Mazzerole, L., Spelman, W. and Gajewski, F. (1999) Problem-oriented policing in violent crime places: A randomized controlled experiment. Criminology 37 (3): 541–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brantingham, P.J. and Brantingham, P.L. (1991 [1981]) Environmental Criminology. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brantingham, P.L. and Brantingham, P.J. (1993) Environment, routine, and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. In: R.V. Clarke and M. Felson (eds.) Routine Activity and Rational Choice, Vol. 5. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 259–294.Google Scholar
  6. Brantingham, P.L. and Brantingham, P.J. (1995a) Criminality of place: Crime generators and crime attractors. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 3 (3): 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brantingham, P.L. and Brantingham, P.J. (1995b) Location quotients and crime hotspots in the city. In: C. Block, M. Dabdoub and S. Fregly (eds.) Crime Analysis Through Computer Mapping. Washington DC: Police Executive Research Forum, pp. 129–149.Google Scholar
  8. Brower, S. (1980) Territory in urban settings. In: I. Altman and C.M. Werner (eds.) Human Behavior and Environment: Current Theory and Research, Vol. 4. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  9. Brower, S. (1984) The Harlem Park Renovation Project: Baltimore Maryland. Baltimore, MD: University of Maryland at Baltimore County.Google Scholar
  10. Burgess, J., Harrison, C.M. and Limb, M. (1988) People, parks and the urban green: A study of popular meanings and values for open spaces in the city. Urban Studies 25 (6): 455–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiesura, A. (2004) The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning 68: 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke, R.V. (1983) Situational crime prevention: Its theoretical basis and practical scope. In: M. Tonry and N. Morris (eds.) Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, Vol. 14. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 225–256.Google Scholar
  13. Clarke, R.V. (ed.) (1997) Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies, 2nd edn. Albany, NY: Harrow and Heston Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Clarke, R.V. (2008) Situational crime prevention. In: R. Wortley and L. Mazerolle (eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis. Portland, OR: Willan Publishing, pp. 178–194.Google Scholar
  15. Clarke, R.V. and Eck, J. (2007) Understanding Risky Facilities, Center for Problem-Oriented Policing, http://www.popcenter.org/tools/PDFs/risky_facilities.pdf.
  16. Cohen, L.E. and Felson, M. (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 44: 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crewe, K. (2001) Linear parks and urban neighborhoods: A case study of the crime impact of the Boston South-West corridor. Journal of Urban Design 6 (3): 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crompton, J.L. (2001) The impact of parks on property values: A review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Leisure Research 33: 1–31.Google Scholar
  19. Dehring, C. and Dunse, N. (2006) Housing density and the effect of proximity to public open space in Aberdeen, Scotland. Real Estate Economics 34 (4): 553–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eck, J.E. (1995) A general model of the geography of illicit retail marketplaces. In: J.E. Eck and D. Weisburd (eds.) Crime and Place. Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press, pp. 67–93.Google Scholar
  21. Espey, M. and Owusu-Edusei, K.J. (2001) Neighborhood parks and residential property values in Greenville, South Carolina. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 33: 487–492.Google Scholar
  22. Evans, D.J. and Oulds, G. (1984) Geographical aspects of the incidence of residential Burglary in Newcastle-Under-Lyme, U.K. Tijdschrift voor Economische Sociale Geografie 75 (5): 344–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Felson, M. (1995) Those who discourage crime. In: J.E. Eck and D.L. Weisburd (eds.) Crime and Place. Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press, pp. 53–66.Google Scholar
  24. Groff, E.R., Weisburd, D. and Yang, S.-M. (2010) Is it important to examine crime trends at a local “micro” level?: A longitudinal analysis of street to street variability in crime trajectories. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 26: 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hakim, S. and Shachamurove, Y. (1996) Spatial and temporal patterns of commercial burglaries: The evidence examined. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 55 (4): 443–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hayward, J. (ed.) (1989) Urban Parks: Research, Planning, and Social Change, Vol. 10: Public Places and Spaces. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herbert, D.T. (1982) The Geography of Urban Crime. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  28. Hilborn, J. (2009) Dealing with Crime and Disorder in Urban Parks, http://www.popcenter.org/responses/PDFs/urban_parks.pdf.
  29. Jacobs, J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  30. Jeffery, C.R. (1971) Crime Prevention through Environmental Design. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Knutsson, J. (1997) Restoring public order in a city park. In: R. Homel (ed.) Policing for Prevention: Reducing Crime, Public Intoxication and Injury, Vol. 7. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 133–151.Google Scholar
  32. Kühlhorn, E. (1978) Deprivation of Freedom and the Police. Stockholm, Sweden: National Swedish Council for Crime Prevention.Google Scholar
  33. Kurtz, E.M., Koons, B.A. and Taylor, R.B. (1998) Land use, physical deterioration, resident-based control, and calls for service on urban streetblocks. Justice Quarterly 15 (1): 121–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. LaGrange, T.C. (1999) The impact of neighborhoods, schools, and malls on the spatial distribution of property damage. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 36 (4): 393–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leon Younger and PROS (2004) A Bridge to the Future: Fairmount Park Strategic Plan. Report to Fairmont Park Commission; Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  36. Lockwood, D. (2007) Mapping crime in Savannah: Social disadvantage, land use, and violent crimes reported to the police. Social Science Computer Review 25 (2): 194–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lutzenhiser, M. and Netusil, N.R. (2001) The effect of open spaces on a home's sale price. Contemporary Economic Policy 19: 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Madden, K., Love, K. and Davies, S. (1982) User Analysis: An Approach to Park Planning and Management. Washington D.C.: American Society of Landscape Architects.Google Scholar
  39. Maguire, M. (1982) Burglary in a Dwelling. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  40. McCord, E.S. and Ratcliffe, J.H. (2007) A micro-spatial analysis of the demographic and criminogenic environment of drug markets in Philadelphia. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 40 (1): 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McCord, E.S. and Ratcliffe, J.H. (2009) Intensity value analysis and the criminogenic effects of land use features on local crime patterns. Crime Patterns and Analysis 2 (1): 17–30.Google Scholar
  42. Michael, S.E., Hull, B.R. and Zahm, D.L. (2001) Environmental factors influencing auto Burglary: A case study. Environment and Behavior 33 (3): 368–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miethe, T.D. and McDowall, D. (1993) Contextual effects in models of criminal victimization. Social Forces 71: 741–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. New Yorkers for Parks and Ernst Young. (2003) Analysis of secondary economic impacts resulting from park expenditures [Electronic Version], http://www.ny4p.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=25&Itemid=211.Google Scholar
  45. Newman, O. (1972) Defensible Space: Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Parkes, A., Kearns, A. and Atkinson, R. (2002) What makes people dissatisfied with their neighbourhoods? Urban Studies 39 (13): 2413–2438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pendleton, M. (1998) Policing the park: Understanding soft enforcement. Journal of Leisure Research 30 (4): 552–571.Google Scholar
  48. Pendleton, M. and Thompson, H.L. (2000) Criminal careers of park and recreational hot spots. Parks and Recreation 35: 57–63.Google Scholar
  49. Perkins, D., Wandersman, A., Rich, R. and Taylor, R.B. (1993) The physical environment of street crime: Defensible space, territoriality and incivilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology 13: 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Project for Public Spaces. (2005) How to Turn a Place Around: A Handbook for Creating Successful Places. New York: Project for Public Spaces.Google Scholar
  51. Reeves, N. (2000) The condition of public urban parks and greenspace in Britain. Journal of CIWEM 14: 157–163.Google Scholar
  52. Rengert, G., Ratcliffe, J.H. and Chakravorty, S. (2005) Policing Illegal Drug Markets: Geographic Approaches to Crime Reduction. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  53. Rengert, G. and Wasilchick, J. (1985) Suburban Burglary: A Time and a Place for Everything. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.Google Scholar
  54. Rengert, G.F. (1996) The Geography of Illegal Drugs. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  55. Roncek, D.W. and Faggiani, D. (1985) High schools and crime: A replication. The Sociological Quarterly 26 (4): 491–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roncek, D.W. and Lobosco, A. (1983) The effect of high schools on crime in their neighborhoods. Social Science Quarterly 64 (3): 598–613.Google Scholar
  57. Sampson, R.J. and Groves, W.B. (1989) Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology 94 (4): 774–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sampson, R.J. and Raudenbush, S.W. (1999) Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology 105 (3): 603–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schroeder, H.W. and Anderson, L.M. (1984) Perception of personal safety in urban recreation sites. Journal of Leisure Research 16 (2): 178–194.Google Scholar
  60. Sherman, L.W., Gartin, P. and Buerger, M.E. (1989) Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology 27 (1): 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smith, W.R., Frazee, S.G. and Davison, E.L. (2000) Furthering the integration of routine activity and social disorganization theories: Small units of analysis and the study of street robbery as a diffusion process. Criminology 38 (2): 489–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taylor, R.B. and Harrell, A. (1996) Physical environment and crime, http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/physenv.pdf, accessed 21 January 2010.
  63. Troy, A. and Grove, J.M. (2008) Property values, parks, and crime: A hedonic analysis in Baltimore, MD. Landscape and Urban Planning 87: 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Voicu, I. and Been, V. (2008) The effect of community gardens on neighboring property values. Real Estate Economics 36 (2): 241–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Weisburd, D. and Eck, J. (2004) What can police do to reduce crime, disorder and fear? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 593 (1): 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Weisburd, D., Bushway, S., Lum, C. and Yang, S.-M. (2004) Trajectories of crime at places: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology 42 (2): 283–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weisburd, D., Morris, N. and Groff, E.R. (2009) Hot spots of juvenile crime: A longitudinal study of arrest incidents at street segments in Seattle, Washington. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 25 (4): 443–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weisburd, D., Groff, E.R. and Yang, S.-M. (2010a) Explaining Developmental Crime Trajectories at Places: A Study of ‘Crime Waves’ and ‘Crime Drops’ at Micro Units of Geography. Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  69. Weisburd, D., Telep, C., Hinkle, J.C. and Eck, J.E. (2010b) Is problem-oriented policing effective in reducing crime and disorder? Findings from a Campbell Systematic Review. Criminology and Public Policy 9 (1): 139–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Westover, T.N. (1985) Perceptions of crime and safety in three Midwestern parks. Professional Geographer 37 (4): 410–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Whyte, W.H. (1980) The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. New York: Project for Public Spaces.Google Scholar
  72. Wilcox, P., Quisenberry, N., Cabrera, D.T. and Jones, S. (2004) Busy places and broken windows? Toward defining the role of physical structure and process in community crime models. The Sociological Quarterly 45 (2): 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeTemple University, 550 Gladfelter HallPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Justice AdministrationUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations