Advertisement

Security Journal

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 344–356 | Cite as

Simulated multiplexed CCTV: The effects of screen layout and task complexity on user performance and strategies

  • Alex W Stedmon
  • Sarah Harris
  • John R Wilson
Original Article

Abstract

Successful closed circuit television (CCTV) surveillance relies on the skill and competence of operators performing complex visual tasks. Techniques can be employed during the design of control rooms that facilitate performance by increasing the probability of operators noticing an incident, maximising viewing comfort and reducing workload. This article describes an exploratory study in which two experiments were developed to simulate a multiplexed CCTV security monitoring task of a specific area. The experiments investigated the effectiveness of techniques for facilitating operator performance: mapping the images presented on CCTV according to the layout and logical viewing process of multiple images. The findings suggested that manipulating the layout of images improved task efficiency and provided novel insights into strategies and behaviours that participants adopted. Further consideration was given to suspicious activities within the context of a university campus and raised interesting questions regarding the generalisation of suspicious acts across different locations.

Keywords

closed circuit television surveillance suspicious behaviour control room design operator performance human factors 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Work funded through the EPSRC Rail Research UK, with the cooperation of Network Rail. The authors are indebted to the anonymous reviewers of this article who offered valuable and constructive feedback.

References

  1. Becker, M. and Pashler, H. (2002) Volatile visual representations: Failing to detect changes in recently processed information. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 (4): 744–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Byers, J.C., Bittner, A.C. and Hill, S.G. (1989) Traditional and raw task load index (TLX) correlations: Are paired comparisons necessary? In: A. Mital (ed.) Advances in Industrial Ergonomics and Safety I. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 481–485.Google Scholar
  3. Donald, C. (1998) Ergonomic considerations in CCTV viewing. Hi-Tech Security Systems Publication 4 (3), http://www.leaderware.com/Hitech/ergonomic%20monitoring.htm.
  4. Grimes, J.J. (1996) On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In: A.A. Kathleen (ed.) Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, Perception, Vol 5. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Heath, C., Luff, P. and Svensson, M.S. (2002) Overseeing organizations: Configuring action and its environment. British Journal of Sociology 53 (2): 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hitchcock, E.M. et al (2003) Automation cueing modulates cerebral blood flow and vigilance in a simulated air traffic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 4 (1): 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Itti, L., Koch, C. and Niebur, E. (1998) Model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20 (11), doi: 10.1109/34.730558.Google Scholar
  8. Keval, H.U. and Sasse, M.A. (2006) Man or a gorilla? Performance issues with CCTV technology in security control rooms. In: R.N. Pikaar, E.A.P. Koningsveld and P.J.M. Settels (eds.) Proceedings of IEA 2006 Congress, International Ergonomics Association 16th Triennial Congress; 9–14 July, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Elsevier, CD-ROM.Google Scholar
  9. Keval, H.U. and Sasse, M.A. (2010) ‘Not the usual suspects': A study of factors reducing the effectiveness of CCTV. Security Journal 23 (2): 134–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mery, D. (2005) Suspicious behaviour on the tube. The Guardian, 22 September.Google Scholar
  11. Parasuraman, R. et al (2009) Detecting threat-related intentional actions of others: Effects of image quality, response mode and target cuing on vigilance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 15 (4): 275–290.Google Scholar
  12. Pethick, A.J. and Wood, J. (1989) Closed circuit television and user needs. In: E. Megaw (ed.) Contemporary Ergonomics 1989. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  13. Silverman, M. and Mack, A. (2006) Change blindness and priming: When it does and does not occur. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (2): 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Simons, D.J. (2000) Current approaches to change blindness. Visual Cognition 7 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stedmon, A.W., Harris, S., Carse, A., Sharples, S.C. and Wilson, J.R. (2008) Tracking a suspicious person using CCTV: But what do we mean by suspicious behaviour? In: P. Bust (ed.) Contemporary Ergonomics 2008. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  16. Tickner, A.H. and Poulton, E.C. (1973) Monitoring up to 16 synthetic television pictures showing a great deal of movement. Ergonomics 16: 381–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tickner, A.H. and Poulton, E.C. (1975) Watching for people and actions. Ergonomics 18: 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tickner, A.H., Poulton, E.C., Copeman, A.K. and Simmonds, D.C.V. (1972) Monitoring 16 television screens showing little movement. Ergonomics 15: 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Troscianko, T., Holmes, A., Stillman, J., Mirmehdi, M., Wright, D. and Wilson, A. (2004) What happens next? The predictability of natural behaviour viewed through CCTV cameras. Perception 33: 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Underwood, G., Foulsham, T., van Loon, E. and Underwood, J. (2005) Visual attention, visual saliency, and eye movements during the inspection of natural scenes. Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Engineering Applications: A Bioinspired Approach Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3562: 459–468.Google Scholar
  21. Wallace, E. and Diffley, C. (1998) CCTV: Making it work. CCTV control room ergonomics. Police Scientific Development Branch Publication, 14/98.Google Scholar
  22. Wallace, E., Diffley, C. and Aldridge, J. (1996) Good Practice for the Use and Management of Town Centre CCTV, Proceedings of IEEE 30th International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, 2–4 October, Lexington, KY, USA: IEEE, pp. 171–175.Google Scholar
  23. Wallace, E., Diffley, C., Baines, E. and Aldridge, J. (1997) Ergonomic design considerations for public area CCTV safety and security applications. In: P. Seppälä, T. Luopajärvi, C.H. Nygård and M. Mattila (eds.) Proceedings of IEA 1997 Congress, International Ergonomics Association 13th Triennial Congress; 29 June–4 July, Tampere, Finland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  24. Wood, J. (1997) The ergonomics of closed circuit television (CCTV) systems. In: P. Seppälä, T. Luopajärvi, C.H. Nygård and M. Mattila (eds.) Proceedings of IEA 1997 Congress, International Ergonomics Association 13th Triennial Congress, 29 June–4 July, Tampere, Finland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  25. Wood, J. and Clarke, T. (2006) Practical guidelines for CCTV ergonomics, In: R.N. Pikaar, E.A.P. Koningsveld and P.J.M. Settels (eds.) Proceedings of IEA 2006 Congress, International Ergonomics Association 16th Triennial Congress; 9–14 July. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Elsevier, CD-ROM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex W Stedmon
    • 1
  • Sarah Harris
    • 1
  • John R Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Factors Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations