Skip to main content
Log in

Response to Levine

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Security Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Chainey, S.P., Tompson, L. and Uhlig, S. (2008) The Utility of Hotspot Mapping for Predicting Spatial Patterns of Crime. Security Journal. Vol. 21, No. 1–2, pp 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getis, A. and Ord, J.K. (1996) Local Spatial Statistics An Overview. In Longley, P. and Batty, M. (eds) Spatial Analysis: Modelling in a GIS Environment. Cambridge, England: GeoInformation International, pp 261–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, N. (2008) The “Hottest” Part of a Hotspot: Comments on “The Utility of Hotspot Mapping for Predicting Spatial Patterns of Crime”. Security Journal. Vol. 21, No. 4, pp 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, J. (2002) HotSpot Detective 2.0 for MapInfo Professional 7.0. Available online at http://jratcliffe.net/hsd/.

  • Ratcliffe, J. (2004) HotSpot Detective for MapInfo Helpfile Version 2.0.

  • Weir, R. and Bangs, M. (2007) The Use of Geographic Information Systems by Crime Analysts in England and Wales. Home Office Online Report Series. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spencer Chainey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chainey, S., Tompson, L. & Uhlig, S. Response to Levine. Secur J 21, 303–306 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2008.7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2008.7

Navigation