Abstract
In 2016 the Visegrad states' political representatives were seemingly more comfortable with the election of Donald Trump than their Western EU counterparts. Though this geographical rift among EU members in accepting the Trump administration can be viewed partly through ideological proximity of contemporary Visegrad governments to the Trump agenda, this article argues that the matter should be analyzed through the prism of status enhancement. The V4 states are still perceived as new members and even “junior partners” within the Transatlantic community, burdened with the post-communist semi-peripheral position in the global economy, and have felt deprived of attention from their most significant peer partner—the US—during previous presidential administrations. The Trump administration presented a unique window of opportunity for the Visegrad states to remind the USA of their persisting partnership and contribution to the survival of the Transatlantic community through various substantive initiatives. On the case of status-enhancing behavior of the Visegrad states during the Trump presidency, the paper introduces three attention-seeking mechanisms—agenda co-option, ideational alignment and partnership concessions—employed by the respective governments. The paper argues that the V4 states individually sought attention from the Trump administration, which hence served as a social reinforcer of their relevance and worth for the Transatlantic club, but also as part of domestic political legitimation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
Anthony Faiola, ‘Angela Merkel congratulates Donald Trump—kind of’, Washington Post, 9 November 2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/11/09/angela-merkel-congratulates-donald-trump-kind-of/.
Matthew Weaver et al., ‘Rightwing populists first to congratulate Trump on historic upset’, The Guardian, 9 November 2016, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/09/far-right-first-to-congratulate-donald-trump-on-historic-upset.
Boris Kalnoky, ‘Why Eastern Europeans like Donald Trump’, DW, 12 November 2018, https://www.dw.com/en/my-europe-why-eastern-europeans-like-donald-trump/a-46254389.
Reuters, ‘Czech president very happy with Trump win, says shares his views’, 9 November 2016, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-czech-idUSKBN1342HT.
Interview 1 (2019).
Anne Gearan, ‘Trump’s White House guest list favours smaller European countries over traditional allies’, The Independent, 21 August 2019, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-white-house-guest-list-europe-romania-germany-france-klaus-iohannis-a9072696.html.
Wohlforth et al. (2018).
Emily Tamkin, ‘Does Anyone in the Trump Administration Care About the Visegrad 4?’ Foreign Policy, 17 August 2017, https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/17/does-anyone-in-the-trump-administration-care-about-the-visegrad-4/.
Renshon (2017, 33).
Wohlforth et al. (2018, 528).
Stolte (2015, 27).
Renshon (2017, 1).
Larson and Shevchenko (2019).
Jakobsen et al. (2018).
Sergeev (1997).
Daniela Lazarová, ‘Visegrad Four states protest against double standard in quality of food products sold around EU’, Radio Prague International, 3 March 2017, https://english.radio.cz/visegrad-four-states-protest-against-double-standard-quality-food-products-sold-8199112; Ezster Zalan, ‘Visegrad cracks and divisions’, EU Observer, 2 January 2018, https://euobserver.com/political/139771; Judith Mischke, ‘Slovak PM: Visegrad group “not black sheep” of EU’, Politico, 26 January 2018, https://www.politico.eu/article/slovak-pm-visegrad-group-not-black-sheep-of-eu-robert-fico/.
Enyedi (2020).
Baldacchino and Wivel (2020).
Väyrynen (1971).
See Weiss and Edwards (2022).
Neumann and de Carvalho (2015, 1).
Wohlforth et al. (2018, 528).
Wood and Cox (2021, 635).
Götz (2021, 231).
Neumann and de Carvalho (2015, 2).
Parlar Dal (2019, 502).
Wohlforth et al. (2018, 530).
Ringsmose and Henriksen (2012, 158).
Hafner-Burton et al. (2017).
Renshon (2017, 154).
Armstrong and Drabman (1994).
Dreikurs (1964, 1).
Enlow (1968, 9).
Enlow (1968, 9).
Dreikurs (1964, 1).
Wendt (2004).
Park and Jakstaite-Confortola (2021).
Mohammadzadeh (2017, 20).
Dreikurs (1964, 1).
Park and Jakstaite-Confortola (2021).
Murray (2019, 191).
See Gheciu (2005).
Larson, Paul and Wohlforth (2014, 9).
Dreikurs (1964, 1).
See Hornat (2021).
Remarks by President Obama and President Komorowski in Discussion on Democracy in Warsaw, Poland, 28 May 2011, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/05/28/remarks-president-obama-and-president-komorowski-discussion-democracy-wa.
Remarks by Vice President Biden on America Central Europe and A Partnership for the 21st Century, 22 October 2009, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/remarks-vice-president-biden-america-central-europe-and-a-partnership-21st-century.
Beata Balogová, ‘Slovakia punches above its weight’, The Slovak Spectator, 13 September 2010, https://spectator.sme.sk/c/20037362/slovakia-punches-above-its-weight.html.
Jan Richter, ‘Prime Minister Sobotka endorses Havel legacy on US visit’, Radio Prague International, 19 November 2014, https://english.radio.cz/prime-minister-sobotka-endorses-havel-legacy-us-visit-8277438.
Mcauliffe (2000).
Strategy Session on Hungarian and NATO Security Challenges with Csaba Hende, Atlantic Council, 16 May 2013, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/commentary/event-recap/strategy-session-on-hungarian-and-nato-security-challenges-with-csaba-hende/.
John Hooper and Ian Black, ‘Anger at Rumsfeld attack on “old Europe”’, 24 January 2003, The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/jan/24/germany.france.
CNN, ‘Chirac lashes out at “new Europe”’, 18 February 2003, https://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europe/02/18/sprj.irq.chirac/.
Matthew Rhodes, ‘Obama and the “New Europe”’, The George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies, Occasional Paper no. 23, November 2012, https://www.marshallcenter.org/sites/default/files/files/2019-07/PDF_PUB_OPS_23.pdf.
Ian Traynor, ‘Europe reacts to Obama dropping missile defence shield’, The Guardian, 17 September 2009, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/sep/17/poland-czech-missile-defence-shield.
The letter appeared in the Polish daily Gazeta Wyborcza on July 16, 2009. Its text is available here: https://www.rferl.org/a/An_Open_Letter_To_The_Obama_Administration_From_Central_And_Eastern_Europe/1778449.html.
See Glenn (2015).
Michael Birnbaum, ‘Obama slammed Polish democracy on Friday. Here’s how Polish TV proved him right’, Washington Post, 9 July 2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/07/09/obama-slammed-polish-democracy-on-friday-heres-how-polish-tv-proved-him-right/.
Al Kamen, ‘Hungary’s Viktor Orban has no Appetite for Democracy,’ Washington Post, 14 October 2011, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/hungarys-viktor-orban-has-no-appetite-for-democracy/2011/10/11/gIQAfIJaiL_story.html.
Wess A. Mitchell, ‘The Transatlantic Bond: Preserving the West’, Lecture delivered at The Heritage Foundation, 5 June 2018, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2018-10/HL1292_0.pdf.
Michael Pompeo, Remarks at U.S. Embassy Budapest, 11 February 2019, https://www.state.gov/remarks-at-u-s-embassy-budapest/.
Interview 2 (2018).
The Prague Proposals, The Chairman Statement on cyber security of communication networks in a globally digitalized world, Prague 5G Security Conference, 3 May 2019, https://www.vlada.cz/assets/media-centrum/aktualne/PRG_proposals_SP_1.pdf.
Statement from the Press Secretary, The White House, 3 May 2019, https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/statement-press-secretary-54/.
United States–Czech Republic Joint Declaration on 5G Security, 6 May 2020, https://www.vlada.cz/assets/media-centrum/aktualne/deklarace-G5.pdf.
Michael Pompeo, Video Remarks at the Prague 5G Security Conference, 23 September 2020, https://2017-2021.state.gov/secretary-pompeos-video-remarks-at-the-prague-5g-security-conference-2020/index.html.
Ištok et al. (2021, 314).
The member states are Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia.
Donald Trump, Remarks at the Three Seas Initiative Summit in Poland, 6 July 2017, https://time.com/4846780/read-donald-trump-speech-warsaw-poland-transcript/.
Secretary Michael R. Pompeo at the Three Seas Virtual Summit and Web Forum, 19 October 2020, https://ee.usembassy.gov/2020-10-19-2/.
Grgić (2023, 228–229).
Kurucz (2020), 104.
Viktor Orbán’s speech at the 28th Bálványos Summer Open University and Student Camp, 22 July 2017, Tusnádfürdő (Băile Tuşnad, Romania), https://visegradpost.com/en/2017/07/24/full-speech-of-v-orban-will-europe-belong-to-europeans/.
Raskin Calls on Trump to Cancel Orbán Meeting, 10 May 2019, https://raskin.house.gov/2019/5/raskin-calls-trump-cancel-orb-n-meeting.
EURACTIV, ‘Hungary’s “Trump before Trump” PM Orban faces US reset’, 17 November 2020, https://www.euractiv.com/section/central-europe/news/hungarys-trump-before-trump-pm-orban-faces-us-reset/.
Julian Borger and Shaun Walker, ‘Trump lauds Hungary's nationalist PM Orbán for “tremendous job”’, The Guardian, 13 May 2019, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/may/13/trump-latest-viktor-orban-hungary-prime-minister-white-house.
Joanna Kakissis, “Leaders of Hungary And Slovenia, Stout Trump Allies In EU, Say U.S. Vote Isn't Over”, NPR, 7 November 2020, https://www.npr.org/sections/live-updates-2020-election-results/2020/11/07/932581107/leaders-of-hungary-and-slovenia-stout-trump-allies-in-eu-say-u-s-vote-isnt-over?t=1627049783523.
Adam Payne, ‘Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban endorses Trump and denounces the “moral imperialism” of the Democrats’, Business Insider, 21 September 2020, https://www.businessinsider.com/viktor-orban-endorses-trump-denounces-moral-imperialism-of-democrats-2020-9.
Reuters, ‘PM of Melania's homeland congratulates Trump on victory’, 4 November 2020, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-slovenia-idUSKBN27K19R.
Miloš Zeman, The Address of the President of the Czech Republic on the Occasion of the Day of Independence of the USA, 30 June 2020, https://www.hrad.cz/en/president-of-the-cr/current-president-of-the-cr/selected-speeches-and-interviews/a-message-of-greeting-of-the-president-of-the-czech-republic-on-the-occasion-of-the-day-of-independence-of-the-usa-15471.
Daniel Anýž, ‘Babišovo hvězdné přijetí v Bílém domě: Chci také obnovit velikost Česka, lichotil premiér Trumpovi, klíčové téma ale scházelo’, Hospodářské noviny, 8 March 2019, https://domaci.ihned.cz/c1-66511590-babisovo-hvezdne-prijeti-v-bilem-dome-doslo-na-lichotky-klicove-tema-ale-schazelo.
Globsec Policy Institute, ‘Globsec Trends: Stredná Európa pod paľbou ruskej propagandy: skúmanie postojov verejnosti v Čechách, Maďarsku a na Slovensku’, September 2016, https://www.globsec.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/globsec_trends_2016_sk.pdf.
International Republican Institute, ‘Public Opinion in Slovakia’, Center for Insight in Survey Research, March 2017, https://www.iri.org/sites/default/files/2017-7-13_slovakia_poll_slides_pdf.pdf.
Janebová and Végh (2019).
The Slovak Spectator, ‘Pompeo: The promise of 1989 is as alive today as it was 30 years ago’, 12 February 2019, https://spectator.sme.sk/c/22051559/pompeo-slovakia-has-never-been-as-independent-and-prosperous-as-it-is-now.html.
Michael Pompeo, Remarks with Slovak President Andrej Kiska Before Their Meeting, 12February 2019, https://2017-2021.state.gov/remarks-with-slovak-president-andrej-kiska-before-their-meeting/index.html.
Interview 2 (2018).
Jacqueline Feldscher, ‘Trump is blasting the military-industrial complex. But he's one of its biggest boosters’, Politico, 8 September 2020, https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/08/trump-military-defense-industry-booster-410396.
Michal Půr, ‘Vrtulníky ukazují, kolik stála schůzka Babiše s Trumpem a s kým budou problémy’, INFO.cz, 24 June 2019, https://www.info.cz/nazory/pur-vrtulniky-ukazuji-kolik-stala-schuzka-babise-s-trumpem-a-s-kym-budou-problemy.
Security Magazin, ‘Kauza nákupu vrtulníků bude pokračovat před Evropskou komisí. Metnarovi není do smíchu. Zřejmě zvýhodnil americký Bell’, 22 February 2021, https://www.securitymagazin.cz/defence/kauza-nakupu-vrtulniku-bude-pokracovat-pred-evropskou-komisi-metnarovi-neni-do-smichu-zrejme-zvyhodnil-americky-bell-1404066517.html
The Defense Post, ‘Czech Republic to buy 12 Bell military helicopters for $630 million’, 12 November 2019, https://www.thedefensepost.com/2019/11/12/czech-republic-purchase-uh-1y-ah-1z-helicopters-textron/.
Joint Declaration on Advancing Defense Cooperation, 23 September 2019, https://www.gov.pl/web/nato-en/joint-declaration-on-advancing-defense-cooperation.
Meghan Myers, ‘It’s not “Fort Trump,” but a US division headquarters heading to Poland’, Military Times, 12 June 2019, https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2019/06/12/its-not-fort-trump-but-a-us-division-headquarters-heading-to-poland/.
Joanna Plucinska and Idrees Ali, ‘U.S.-Polish Fort Trump project crumbles’, Reuters, 10 June 2020, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-poland-usa-defense-forttrump-idUSKBN23H36P.
Andrew Buncombe, ‘Donald Trump finally says US will defend European NATO allies as Russia stance hardens ahead of Putin meeting’, The Independent, 6 July 2017, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-us-nato-europe-defence-valdimir-putin-meeting-g20-summit-russia-poland-a7827036.html.
Remarks by Secretary of State Pompeo and Foreign Minister Szijjártó at a Press Availability, February 11, 2019, https://hu.usembassy.gov/remarks-by-secretary-of-state-pompeo-and-foreign-minister-szijjarto-at-a-press-availability/.
Bence Gaál, ‘Parliament approves new U.S.-Hungary defense agreement’, Budapest Business Journal, 2 July 2019, https://bbj.hu/budapest/culture/history/parliament-approves-new-u-s-hungary-defense-agreement.
Dimitar Bechev, ‘Central and Eastern Europe’s Pushback Against Sanctions on Russia’, Atlantic Council, 11 October 2017, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/central-and-eastern-europe-s-pushback-against-sanctions-on-russia/.
Natalie Liu, ‘Slovak PM's White House Visit Spotlights US Defense Accords’, Voice of America, 4 May 2019, https://www.voanews.com/europe/slovak-pms-white-house-visit-spotlights-us-defense-accords.
Joint Statement by President Trump and Prime Minister Peter Pellegrini of Slovakia, 3 May 2019, https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/joint-statement-president-trump-and-prime-minister-peter-pellegrini-slovakia.
Teraz.sk, ‘P. Pellegrini: Odmietnutie financií z USA pre mňa nie je uzavreté’, 13 March 2019, https://www.teraz.sk/slovensko/p-pellegrini-odmietnutie-financii-z-u/383448-clanok.htm.
U.S. Embassy Slovakia, ‘Veľvyslanec Adam Sterling uvádza fakty o DCA’, 18 March 2019, https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2230222100370297.
Brezáni (2020), 54.
Ward (2017, 3).
Ryan Heath, Alexander Ward, and Nahal Toosi, ‘What foreign ambassadors really think about Biden’s first year’, 20 January 2022, Politico, https://www.politico.com/news/2022/01/20/foreign-ambassadors-biden-first-year-527441.
Interview 5 (2021).
References
Armstrong, Kevin J., and Ronald Drabman. 1994. The Clinical Use of Sports Skills Tutoring with Grade School Boys Referred for School Behavioural Problems. Child and Family Behavior Therapy 16 (1): 43–48.
Baldacchino, Godfrey, and Anders Wivel, eds. 2020. Handbook on the Politics of Small States. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Banka, Andris. 2022. Neither Reckless Nor Free-Riders: Auditing the Baltics as US Treaty Allies. Journal of Transatlantic Studies 20: 161–183.
Brezáni, Peter, ed. 2020. Yearbook of Slovakia’s Foreign Policy 2019. Bratislava: Research Center of the Slovak Foreign Policy Association.
Browning, Christopher S. 2006. Small, Smart and Salient? Rethinking Identity in the Small States Literature. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 19 (4): 669–684.
Dreikurs, Rudolf. 1964. The Immediate Purpose of Children’s Misbehavior, Its Recognition and Correction. Collected Papers. Chicago: Alfred Adler Institute.
Enlow, Ralph V. 1968. A Study of Attention-Seeking Behavior in Young Children. Dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Technological College.
Enyedi, Zsolt. 2020. Right-Wing Authoritarian Innovations in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics 36 (3): 363–377.
Garai, Nikolett. 2018. challenges Faced by the Visegrad Group in the ‘European Dimension’ of Cooperation. International Issues and Slovak Foreign Policy Affairs 27 (1–2): 24–42.
Gheciu, Alexandra. 2005. Security Institutions as Agents of Socialization? NATO and the “New Europe.” International Organization 59 (4): 973–1012.
Glenn, John K. 2015. Czech–American Relations: A Roadmap for the Future. Prague: CEVRO Institute Academic Press.
Götz, Elias. 2021. Status Matters in World Politics. International Studies Review 23 (1): 228–247.
Grgić, Gorana. 2023. The Changing Dynamics of Regionalism in Central and Eastern Europe: The Case of the Three Seas Initiative. Geopolitics 28 (1): 216–238.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie, Stephan Haggard, David Lake, and David Victor. 2017. The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations. International Organization 71 (S1): S1–S31.
Hornat, Jan. 2021. The Visegrad Group and Democracy Promotion: Transition Experience and Beyond. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Interview 1. 2019. An Official from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic.
Interview 2. 2018. An Official from the Ministry of Defence of the Czech Republic.
Interview 3. 2019. An Official from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic.
Interview 4. 2019. An Official from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic.
Interview 5. 2021. An Official from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic.
Ištok, Robert, Irina Kozárová, and Anna Polačková. 2021. The Intermarium as a Polish Geopolitical Concept in History and in the Present. Geopolitics 26 (1): 314–341.
Jakobsen, Peter, Jens Ringsmose, and Hakon Saxi. 2018. Prestige-Seeking Small States: Danish and Norwegian Military Contributions to US-Led Operations. European Journal of International Security 3 (2): 256–277.
Janebová, Pavlína, and Zsuzsanna Végh. 2019. Trends of Visegrad Foreign Policy. Prague: Association for International Affairs.
Kent, Ann. 2002. China’s International Socialization: The Role of International Organizations. Global Governance 8 (3): 343–364.
Kugiel, Patryk, ed. 2016. V4 Goes Global: Exploring Opportunities and Obstacles in the Visegrad Countries’ cooperation with Brazil, India, China and South Africa. Warsaw: Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych.
Kurucz, Milan. 2020. Hungary–United States Relations under Obama and Trump Administration. Politické Vedy 2: 98–113.
Larson, Deborah W., T.V. Paul, and William C. Wohlforth, eds. 2014. Status and World Order. In Status in World Politics, 3–29. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Larson, Deborah W., and Alexei Shevchenko. 2019. Quest for Status: Chinese and Russian Foreign Policy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mcauliffe, Amy. 2000. Poland, Trying to Punch Above Its Weight Class in NATO. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies 13 (4): 1–28.
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2006. Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma. European Journal of International Relations 12 (3): 341–370.
Mohammadzadeh, Babak. 2017. Status and Foreign Policy Change in Small States: Qatar’s Emergence in Perspective. The International Spectator 52 (2): 19–36.
Murray, Michelle. 2019. The Struggle for Recognition in International Relations: Status, Revisionism, and Rising Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Neuman, Marek. 2017. The Visegrád Group as a Vehicle for Promoting National Interests in the European Union: The Case of the Czech Republic. Politics in Central Europe 13 (1): 55–67.
Neumann, Iver B., and Benjamin de Carvalho, eds. 2015. Small State Status Seeking: Norway’s Quest for International Standing. London: Routledge.
Park, Ausra, and Gerda Jakstaite-Confortola. 2021. Small State Status Seeking: Lithuania’s Foreign Policy Status Aspirations. Europe-Asia Studies 73 (7): 1279–1302.
Parlar Dal, Emel. 2019. Status competition and rising powers in global governance: An introduction. Contemporary Politics 25 (5): 499–511.
Renshon, Jonathan. 2017. Fighting for Status: Hierarchy and Conflict in World Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ringsmose, Jens, and Anders Henriksen. 2012. What did Denmark Gain? Iraq, Afghanistan and the Relationship with Washington. In Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook 2012, ed. Nanna Hvidt and Hans Mouritzen. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.
Rumelili, Bahar. 2015. Identity and Desecuritisation: The Pitfalls of Conflating Ontological and Physical Security. Journal of International Relations and Development 18: 52–74.
Schmitt, Olivier. 2018. Allies That Count: Junior Partners in Coalition Warfare. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Sergeev, Viktor. 1997. The Wild East: Crime and Lawlessness in Post-communist Russia. London: Routledge.
Stolte, Christina. 2015. Brazil’s Africa Strategy: Role Conception and the Drive for International Status. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Väyrynen, Raimo. 1971. On the Definition and Measurement of Small Power Status. Cooperation and Conflict 6 (1): 91–102.
Ward, Steven. 2017. Status and the Challenge of Rising Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wendt, Alexander. 2004. The State as Person in International Theory. Review of International Studies 30 (2): 289–316.
Weiss, Tomáš and Edwards, Geoffrey (eds.). 2022. Small States and Security in Europe: Between National and International Policymaking. Abingdon: Routledge.
Wivel, Anders, and Matthew Crandall. 2019. Punching Above Their Weight, But Why? Explaining Denmark and Estonia in the Transatlantic Relationship. Journal of Transatlantic Studies 17 (3): 392–419.
Wohlforth, William, Benjamin De Carvalho, Halvard Leira, and Iver Neumann. 2018. Moral Authority and Status in International Relations: Good States and the Social Dimension of Status Seeking. Review of International Studies 44 (3): 526–546.
Wood, Steve, and Lloyd Cox. 2021. Status, Imitation, and Affective Dissonance in International Relations. International Relations 35 (4): 634–656.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hornat, J. Status enhancement and attention-seeking in the transatlantic relationship: the Visegrad states and the Trump administration. J Transatl Stud 21, 197–221 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s42738-023-00110-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s42738-023-00110-2