Skip to main content
Log in

MNE–SME co-innovation in peripheral regions

  • Published:
Journal of International Business Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While there is growing interest in the division of entrepreneurial labor between MNEs and SMEs, most prior work focuses on empirical settings based within reputed clusters. To gain a more complete understanding of this phenomenon, we explore policy-induced efforts to facilitate MNE–SME collaboration for innovation in peripheral subnational regions (ones outside reputed clusters) in China and the UK. Our inductive study suggests that non-market actors’ intervention in the form of entrepreneurial boundary work entails three sub-processes: sensing, interfacing and co-creating. We find that boundary work manifests differently in advanced and emerging economies: as bottom–up opportunity discovery in the UK and top–down opportunity creation in China, with the former involving a bespoke policy measure and the latter a “bricolage” approach of making do with an existing generic policy that was creatively utilized. We thus shed useful light on how boundary work could connect previously unconnected innovation partners in different institutional contexts, and highlight the importance of integrative and innovative regional policies for promoting mutually beneficial MNE–SME collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. 2007. Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2): 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi, D., & Iammarino, S. 1999. The policy implications of the globalisation of innovation. Research Policy, 28(2–3): 317–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arikan, A. T. 2009. Interfirm knowledge exchanges and the knowledge creation capability of clusters. Academy of Management Review, 34(4): 658–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athreye, S. 2005. The Indian software industry and its evolving service capability. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(3): 393–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athreye, S., & Kapur, S. 2001. Private foreign investment in India: pain or panacea? World Economy, 24(3): 399–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3): 329–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batjargal, B., Hitt, M. A., Tsui, A. S., Arregle, J.-L., Webb, J. W., & Miller, T. L. 2013. Institutional polycentrism, entrepreneurs’ social networks, and new venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4): 1024–1049.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., & Young, S. 2005. Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance. International Business Review, 14(2): 227–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouquet, C., & Birkinshaw, J. 2008. Managing power in the multinational corporation: How low-power actors gain influence. Journal of Management, 34(3): 477–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J. 2018. Towards a theoretically-based global foreign direct investment policy regime. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(3–4): 184–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., & Prashantham, S. 2016. Global interfirm networks: The division of entrepreneurial labor between MNEs and SMEs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1): 40–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cano-Kollmann, M., Cantwell, J., Hannigan, T. J., Mudambi, R., & Song, J. 2016. Knowledge connectivity: An agenda for innovation research in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(3): 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. 2013. Blurred boundaries between firms, and new boundaries within (large multinational) firms: The impact of decentralized networks for innovation. Seoul Journal of Economics, 26(1): 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J., Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. 2010. An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4): 567–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J., & Mudambi, R. 2005. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12): 1109–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. A., & Mudambi, R. 2011. Physical attraction and the geography of knowledge sourcing in multinational enterprises. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3–4): 206–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crescenzi, R., & Iammarino, S. 2017. Global investments and regional development trajectories: The missing links. Regional Studies, 51(1): 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, R. J., Sine, W. D., & Haveman, H. A. 2013. Seizing opportunity in emerging fields: How institutional entrepreneurs legitimated the professional form of management consulting. Organization Science, 24(2): 356–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitratos, P., Liouka, I., Ross, D., & Young, S. 2009. The multinational enterprise and subsidiary evolution: Scotland since 1945. Business History, 51(3): 401–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. 2007. Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 1246–1264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3): 543–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, M. J. 2000. Regional clusters and multinational enterprises: Independence, dependence, or interdependence? International Studies of Management and Organization, 30(2): 114–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, D., & Kim, L. 2002. Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation. Research Policy, 31(8–9): 1417–1429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M., Francis, J., & Bercovitz, J. 2010. Creating a cluster while building a firm: Entrepreneurs and the formation of industrial clusters. Regional Studies, 39(1): 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G. 2019. Global value chains and international development policy: Bringing firms, networks and policy-engaged scholarship back in. Journal of International Business Policy, 2(3): 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T. F. 1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6): 781–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goerzen, A. 2018. Small firm boundary-spanning via bridging ties: Achieving international connectivity via cross-border inter-cluster alliances. Journal of International Management, 24(2): 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iammarino, S. 2018. FDI and regional development policy. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(3–4): 157–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iammarino, S., Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. 2019. Regional inequality in Europe: Evidence, theory and policy implications. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(2): 273–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T. 2008. Billions of entrepreneurs: How China and India are reshaping their futures and yours. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4): 691–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leick, B., & Lang, T. 2018. Re-thinking non-core regions: Planning strategies and practices beyond growth. European Planning Studies, 26(2): 213–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, M., & Mudambi, R. 2013. Clusters, connectivity and catch-up: Bollywood and Bangalore in the global economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(3): 501–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundan, S. M. 2018. From the editor: Engaging international business scholars with public policy issues. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(1–2): 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, P. 2001. Knowledge creation and diffusion in geographic clusters. International Journal of Innovation Management, 05(02): 213–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, P., & Acs, Z. J. 2011. Globalization: Countries, cities and multinationals. Regional Studies, 45(1): 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, F., & Birkinshaw, J. 2017. The external knowledge sourcing process in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2): 342–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R. 2018. Knowledge-intensive intangibles, spatial transaction costs, and the rise of populism. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(1–2): 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R., & Santangelo, G. D. 2016. From shallow resource pools to emerging clusters: The role of multinational enterprise subsidiaries in peripheral areas. Regional Studies, 50(12): 1965–1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, S., & Bechky, B. A. 2008. Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3): 422–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. 1998. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouder, R., & St. John, C. H. 1996. Hot spots and blind spots: Geographical clusters of firms and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4): 1192–1225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prashantham, S., & Birkinshaw, J. 2008. Dancing with gorillas: How small firms can effectively partner with multinational corporations. California Management Review, 51(1): 6–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prashantham, S., & Birkinshaw, J. 2019. MNE-SME cooperation: An integrative framework. Journal of International Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00214-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prashantham, S., Kumar, K., & Bhattacharyya, S. 2019. International new ventures from emerging economies: Network connectivity and legitimacy building. Management & Organization Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2019.22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prashantham, S., & Yip, G. S. 2017. Microsoft Starts Up, Strategy + Business, Issue 86 (Spring): 1–5.

  • Stovel, K., & Shaw, L. 2012. Brokerage. Annual Review of Sociology, 38: 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R., Bruton, G. D., & Si, S. X. 2015. Entrepreneurship through a qualitative lens: Insights on the construction and/or discovery of entrepreneurial opportunity. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szogs, A., Cummings, A., & Chaminade, C. 2011. Building systems of innovation in less developed countries: The role of intermediate organizations supporting interactions in Tanzania and El Salvador. Innovation and Development, 1(2): 283–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N., & Pinch, S. 2004. Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 29(2): 258–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13): 1319–1350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Phelps, N. A. 2000. Levelling the uneven playing field: Inward investment, interregional rivalry and the planning system. Regional Studies, 34(5): 429–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troilo, M. L. 2014. Collaboration, product innovation, and sales: An empirical study of Chinese firms. Journal of Technology Management in China, 9(1): 37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkina, E., & Van Assche, A. 2018. Global connectedness and local innovation in industrial clusters. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(6): 706–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Assche, A. 2018. From the editor: Steering a policy turn in international business—Opportunities and challenges. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(3–4): 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Tunzelmann, N. 2009. Regional capabilities and industrial regeneration. In M. Farshchi, O. Janne, & P. McCann (Eds), Technological change and mature industrial regions: Firms, knowledge and policy: 11–28. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. 2010. The state in the economy: Neoliberal or neoactivist? In J. Campbell, C. Crouch, P. H. Kristensen, G. Morgan, O. K. Pedersen, & R. Whitley (Eds), Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. W. C. 2009. Regional development and the competitive dynamics of global production networks: An East Asian perspective. Regional Studies, 43(3): 325–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. 1994. Case study research, design and methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S., Hood, N., & Peters, E. 1994. Multinational enterprises and regional economic development. Regional Studies, 28(7): 657–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. 2008. The virtuous cycle of discovery and creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(3): 243–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zietsma, C., & Lawrence, T. B. 2010. Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2): 189–221.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Stephen Young for his collaboration on the UK study, Stella Yu for research assistance with the China study and Roy Suddaby for helping shape the ideas in this paper. The first author acknowledges generous support through a CEIBS research grant and NUBS China ORSS funding. Comments on earlier drafts from seminar participants at CEIBS and the University of Glasgow are appreciated. An earlier version of the paper was presented at the 2019 Academy of International Business Conference in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shameen Prashantham.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Accepted by Suma Athreye, Area Editor, 20 September 2019. This article has been with the authors for one revision.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prashantham, S., Bhattacharyya, S. MNE–SME co-innovation in peripheral regions. J Int Bus Policy 3, 134–153 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-019-00037-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-019-00037-6

Keywords

Navigation