Abstract
In this commentary, we take up two key elements of Dani Rodrik’s analysis of the economic underpinnings of populist politics. We focus on the links between globalization (especially trade integration) and populism and the role of global institutions (notably trade agreements) in both generating the economic pressures to which populist politicians are responding and in constraining the ability of governments to deal with adverse distributional effects of these pressures. We argue that it is important to distinguish between trade shocks and trade agreements; that the role of both is given too much weight relative to the effects of financialization and international capital flows, migration, and technological change; and that deepening international cooperation (global governance) can – and should – be part of the supply response to populism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Autor, D., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. 2016. The China shock: Learning from labor market adjustment to large changes in trade. Annual Review of Economics, 8(1): 205–240.
Baldwin, R. 2016. The great convergence: Information technology and the new globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Baily, M., & Bosworth, B. 2014. US manufacturing: Understanding its past and its potential future. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(1): 3–26.
Caliendo, L., & Parro, F. 2015. Estimates of the trade and welfare effects of NAFTA. The Review of Economic Studies, 82(1): 1–44.
Card, D. 2009. Immigration and inequality. American Economic Review, 99(2): 1–21.
Feenstra, R., & Sasahara, A. 2017. The “China Shock,” exports and U.S. employment: A global input–output analysis. NBER Working Paper 24022.
Hakobyan, S., & McLaren, J. 2016. Looking for local labor-market effects of NAFTA. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(4): 728–741.
Hiscox, M. J. 2006. Through a glass darkly: Framing effects and individuals’ attitudes toward trade. International Organization, 60(3): 755–780.
Hoekman, B., & Nelson, D. 2018. 21st century trade agreements and the Owl of Minerva. CEPR Discussion Paper 12620.
Hoekman, B., & Sabel, C. 2017. Trade agreements, regulatory sovereignty and democratic legitimacy. EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2017/36.
Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Wilson, C. J. 2002. Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?. Comparative Political Studies, 35(8): 965–989.
Hornbeck, J. F. 2013. Trade adjustment assistance for firms: Economic, program, and policy issues. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Kehoe, T. J. 2005. An evaluation of the performance of applied general equilibrium models on the impact of NAFTA. In T. J. Kehoe, T. N. Srinivasan, & J. Whalley (Eds), Frontiers in applied general equilibrium modeling, 341–377. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Dolezal, M., Helbling, M., Höglinger, D., Hutter, S., & Wüest, B. 2012. Political conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mansfield, E. D., & Mutz, D. C. 2009. Support for free trade: Self-interest, sociotropic politics, and out-group anxiety. International Organization, 63(3): 425–457.
Müller, J.-W. 2016. What is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Mundell, R. 1957. International trade and factor mobility. American Economic Review, 47(3): 321–335.
Polanyi, K. 1944. The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.
Rodrik, D. 2011. The globalization paradox: Democracy and the future of the world economy. New York: W.W. Norton.
Rodrik, D. 2017. Straight talk on trade: Ideas for a sane world economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rodrik, D. 2018. Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(1).
Schumpeter, J. A. 1942. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Slaughter, M. J. 2000. What are the results of product-price studies and what can we learn from their differences? In R. Feenstra (Ed), The impact of international trade on wages. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 129–169.
Tinbergen, J. 1954. International economic integration. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Trefler, D. 2004. The long and short of the Canada–U.S. free trade agreement. American Economic Review, 94(4): 870–895.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Sarianna Lundan, Laura Seelkopf, and Ari Van Aasche for their helpful comments on an earlier draft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Accepted by Sarianna Lundan, Editor-in-Chief, 19 March 2018. This paper has been with the authors for one revision.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoekman, B., Nelson, D.R. Reflecting on populism and the economics of globalization. J Int Bus Policy 1, 34–43 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-0003-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-0003-2