The importance of managing intellectual property (IP) on a global basis has been widely acknowledged by scholars and practitioners alike. However, we still have limited understanding of how multinational enterprises (MNEs) choose – among all the countries they do business in – where to file for IP protection and where they exercise their IP rights through litigation. In this study, we examine MNEs’ strategic choices of patenting and litigation locations through the lens of global competition. We argue that, while IP protection is local, relying on local policies and institutions, firms engaging in litigation are global. Thus, they prefer to litigate in the few countries with substantial track records to send strong signals to competitors elsewhere. This is particularly true for highly concentrated industries, where the same competitors face off in various countries, and for firms with radical innovations, which require expertise for a convincing verdict. We find supportive evidence of country, industry, and firm effects from extensive interviews with industry insiders and a comprehensive dataset documenting all the IP-related activities of Fortune Global 500 companies from 2007 to 2014. We discuss how the strategic choices made by global firms, in turn, influence the effectiveness of local policies and IP harmonization efforts across countries.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Agarwal, R., Ganco, M., & Ziedonis, R. H. 2009. Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: Implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility. Strategic Management Journal, 30(13): 1349–1374.
Alcácer, J., Beukel, K., & Cassiman, B. 2017. Capturing value from intellectual property (IP) in a global environment. In J. Alcácer, B. Kogut, C. Thomas, & B. Y. Yeung (Eds.), Geography, location, and strategy (advances in strategic management) (Vol. 36, pp. 163–228). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Alcácer, J., Dezso, C. L., & Zhao, M. 2013. Firm rivalry, knowledge accumulation, and MNE location choices. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5): 504–520.
Alcácer, J., & Zhao, M. 2012. Local R&D strategies and multilocation firms: The role of internal linkages. Management Science, 58(4): 734–753.
Alkaersig, L., Beukel, K., & Reichstein, T. 2015. Intellectual property rights management: Rookies, dealers, strategists and strategic dealers. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Arora, A. 1997. Patents, licensing, and market structure in the chemical industry. Research Policy, 26(4–5): 391–403.
Arora, A., & Ceccagnoli, M. 2006. Patent protection, complementary assets, and firms’ incentives for technology licensing. Management Science, 52(2): 293–308.
Berry, H. 2017. Managing valuable knowledge in weak IP protection countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(7): 787–807.
Bessen, J., & Meurer, M. J. 2008. Patent failure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Branstetter, L. G., Fisman, R., & Foley, C. F. 2006. Do stronger intellectual property rights increase international technology transfer? Empirical evidence from US firm-level panel data. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(1): 321–349.
Cano-Kollmann, M., Cantwell, J., Hannigan, T. J., Mudambi, R., & Song, J. 2016. Knowledge connectivity: An agenda for innovation research in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(3): 255–262.
Cantwell, J. 1989. Technological innovation and multinational corporations. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Cantwell, J., Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. 2010. An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4): 567–586.
Chung, W., & Alcácer, J. 2002. Knowledge seeking and location choice of foreign direct investment in the United States. Management Science, 48(12): 1534–1554.
Cohen, W., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Cremers, K., Ernicke, M., Gaessler, F., Harhoff, D., Helmers, C., McDonagh, L., et al. 2017. Patent litigation in Europe. European Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1): 1–44.
Dowrick, S., & DeLong, J. B. 2003. Globalization and convergence. In M. D. Bordo, A. M. Taylor, J. G. Williamson (Eds.), Globalization in historical perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Encaoua, D., & Lefouili, Y. 2005. Choosing intellectual protection: Imitation, patent strength and licensing. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 79: 241–271.
Freund, C., & Sidhu, D. 2017. Global competition and the rise of China. Working paper 17-3. Peterson Institute for International Economics, https://piie.com/system/files/documents/wp17-3.pdf. Retrieved February 21, 2018.
Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. 2003. The product market and the market for “ideas”: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 32(2): 333–350.
Ghemawat, P. 2007. Managing differences: The central challenge of global strategy. Harvard Business Review, 85(3): 58–68.
Ghoshal, S. 1987. Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 8(5): 425–440.
Graham, S. J. H., & Harhoff, D. 2014. Separating patent wheat from chaff: Would the US benefit from adopting patent post-grant review? Research Policy, 43(9): 1649–1659.
Graham, S., & Van Zeebroeck, N. 2014. Comparing patent litigation across Europe: A first look. Stanford Technology Law Review, 17: 655–708.
Guillen, M. F. 2003. Experience, imitation, and the sequence of foreign entry: Wholly owned and joint-venture manufacturing by South Korean firms and business groups in China, 1987–1995. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(2): 185–198.
Henisz, W. J., & Delios, A. 2001. Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990–1996. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3): 443–475.
Hymer, S. 1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of foreign direct investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
James, S. D., Leiblein, M. J., & Lu, S. 2013. How firms capture value from their innovations. Journal of Management, 39(5): 1123–1155.
Janicke, P., & Ren, L. 2006. Who wins patent infringement cases. Aipla Quarterly Journal, 34(1): 1.
Javorcik, B. S. 2004. The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: Evidence from transition economies. European Economic Review, 48(1): 39–62.
Jayachandran, S., Gimeno, J., & Varadarajan, P. R. 1999. The theory of multimarket competition: A synthesis and implications for marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 63(3): 49–66.
Kesan, J., & Ball, G. 2011. Judicial experience and the efficiency and accuracy of patent adjudication: An empirical analysis of the case for a specialized patent trial court. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 24(2): 393–467.
Kogut, B., & Chang, S. J. 1991. Technological capabilities and Japanese foreign direct investment in the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(3): 401–413.
Lai, E. L. C. 1998. International intellectual property rights protection and the rate of product innovation. Journal of Development Economics, 55(1): 133–153.
Lanjouw, J., & Lerner, J. 1998. The enforcement of intellectual property rights: A survey of the empirical literature. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 49–50: 223–246.
Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. 2001. Characteristics of patent litigation: A window on competition. Rand Journal of Economics, 32(1): 129–151.
Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. 2004. Protecting intellectual property rights: Are small firms handicapped? Journal of Law and Economics, 47(1): 45–74.
Leiponen, A., & Byma, J. 2009. If you cannot block, you better run: Small firms, cooperative innovation, and appropriation strategies. Research Policy, 38(9): 1478–1488.
Lemley, M. A., & Shapiro, C. 2005. Probabilistic patents. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(2): 75–98.
Lerner, J. 1995. Patenting in the shadow of competitors. Journal of Law and Economics, 38(2): 463–495.
Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., Gilbert, R., & Griliches, Z. 1987. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987(3): 783–831.
Linden, G., & Somaya, D. 2003. System-on-a-chip integration in the semiconductor industry: Industry structure and firm strategies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(3): 545–576.
Mansfield, E., Schwartz, M., & Wagner, S. 1981. Imitation costs and patents: An empirical study. Economic Journal, 91(364): 907–918.
Merges, R. P., & Nelson, R. R. 1990. On the complex economics of patent scope. Columbia Law Review, 90(4): 839–916.
Moore, K. A. 2003. Xenophobia in American courts. Northwestern University Law Review, 97(4): 1497–1550.
Nandkumar, A., & Srikanth, K. 2016. Right person in the right place: How the host country IPR influences the distribution of inventors in offshore R&D projects of multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8): 1715–1733.
Nerkar, A., Paruchuri, S., & Khaire, M. 2007. Business method patents as real options: Value and disclosure as drivers of litigation. Real Options Theory, 24: 247–274.
Park, W. G. 2008. International patent protection: 1960–2005. Research Policy, 37(4): 761–766.
Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Carraher, S. M., & Shi, W. 2017. An institution-based view of global IPR history. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(7): 893–907.
Pisano, G. 2006. Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution. Research Policy, 35(8): 1122–1130.
Polidoro, F., Jr., & Toh, P. K. 2011. Letting rivals come close or warding the off? The effects of substitution threat on imitation deterrence. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2): 369–392.
Sanderson, S. W., & Simons, K. L. 2014. Light emitting diodes and the lighting revolution: The emergence of a solid-state lighting industry. Research Policy, 43(10): 1730–1746.
Shane, S. 2001. Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Management Science, 47(2): 205–220.
Shane, S., & Somaya, D. 2007. The effects of patent litigation on university licensing efforts. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(4): 739–755.
Sherry, E. F., & Teece, D. J. 2004. Royalties, evolving patent rights, and the value of innovation. Research Policy, 33(2): 179–191.
Siegel, J. I. 2005. Can foreign firms bond themselves effectively by renting US securities laws? Journal of Financial Economics, 75(2): 319–359.
Somaya, D. 2000. Obtaining and protecting patents in the United States, Europe and Japan. In R. Kagan & L. Axelrad (Eds.), Regulatory encounters: Multinational corporations and American adversial legalism (pp. 275–310). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Somaya, D. 2003. Strategic determinants of decisions not to settle patent litigation. Strategic Management Journal, 24(1): 17–38.
Somaya, D. 2012. Patent strategy and management: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4): 1084–1114.
Somaya, D., & McDaniel, C. A. 2012. Tribunal specialization and institutional targeting in patent enforcement. Organization Science, 23(3): 869–887.
Squicciarini, M., Dernis, H., & Cricuolo, C. 2013. Measuring patent quality: Indicators of technological and economic value. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, OECD Publishing 03.
Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation—Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public-policy. Research Policy, 15(6): 285–305.
Teece, D. J. 2000. Strategies for managing knowledge assets: The role of firm structure and industrial context. Long Range Planning, 33(1): 35–54.
Wen, W., Ceccagnoli, M., & Forman, C. 2016. Opening up intellectual property strategy: Implications for open source software entry by start-up firms. Management Science, 62(9): 2668–2691.
Westlaw. 2006. Patents throughout the world. New York: Thomson.
Yu, T. Y., & Cannella, A. A. 2013. A comprehensive review of multimarket competition research. Journal of Management, 39(1): 76–109.
Zhao, M. 2006. Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Science, 5(8): 1185–1199.
Zhao, M., & Yeung, B. 2008. National IPR policies and multinational R&D strategies: An interactive perspective. In R. Bird & S. Jain (Eds.), Global challenge of intellectual property rights. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Ziedonis, R. H. 2004. Don’t fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Management Science, 50(6): 804–820.
We would like to thank the Mack Institute for Innovation Management and the Dean’s Research Fund at the Wharton School for their generous financial support.
Accepted by Suma Athreye, Area Editor, 15 February 2018. This article has been with the authors for one revision and was single-blind reviewed.
About this article
Cite this article
Beukel, K., Zhao, M. IP litigation is local, but those who litigate are global. J Int Bus Policy 1, 53–70 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-0002-3
- intellectual property protection
- global competition