Advertisement

International Politics Reviews

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 35–38 | Cite as

Review of Why Leaders Fight

Michael C. Horowitz, Allan C. Stam, and Cali M. Ellis, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015, ISBN 9781107655676
  • Jeff Carter
Book Review
  • 63 Downloads

The increased theoretical and empirical attention to the influence of political leaders is arguably the most important development in international conflict scholarship during the last 20 years. The basic idea underlying this trend in the literature is straightforward: decisions are not made by governments, regimes, or states, but by leaders. Most of this leader-centric research focuses on how incumbents’ desire to remain in power and domestic political institutions shape the initiation, escalation, prosecution, and/or termination of interstate conflict (e.g., Bueno De Mesquita et al., 1999, Chiozza and Goemans, 2004, Croco, 2011). This scholarship typically assumes that all leaders will make the same decision, holding the political context constant. Framed differently, most systematic research on political leaders and interstate conflict argues leaders are key to understanding questions of war and peace, but assumes who the particular leaders are in a given case is irrelevant to its...

References

  1. Bueno De Mesquita, B., Morrow, J.D., Siverson, R.M. and Smith, A. (1999) An institutional explanation of the democratic peace. American Political Science Review 93(4): 791–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chiozza, G. and Goemans, H.E. (2004) International conflict and the tenure of leaders: Is war still ex post inefficient? American Journal of Political Science 48(3), 604–619.Google Scholar
  3. Colgan, J.D. (2013) Domestic revolutionary leaders and international conflict. World Politics 65(4), 656–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Croco, S. (2011) The decider’s dilemma: Leader culpability, war outcomes, and domestic punishment. American Political Science Review 105(3), 457–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellis, C.M., Horowitz, M.C. and Stam, A.C. (2015) Introducing the LEAD data set. International Interactions 41(4), 718–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. George, A.L. (1969) ‘The operational code’: A neglected approach to the study of political leaders and decision-making. International Studies Quarterly 13(2), 190–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Horowitz, M.C. and Stam, A.C. (2014) How prior military experience influences the future militarized behavior of leaders. International Organization 68(3), 527–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Horowitz, M.C., Stam, A.C. and Ellis, C.M. (2015) Why Leaders Fight. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Renshon, J. (2008) Stability and change in belief systems: The operational code of George W. Bush from Governor to second term president. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52(8), 820–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Weeks, J.L. (2012) Strongmen and straw men: Authoritarian regimes and the initiation of international conflict. American Political Science Review 106(2), 326–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of MississippiUniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations