Skip to main content

Explaining the “cult of toughness”: in-group fear, Kennedy’s reputation for weakness, and the Berlin Crisis of 1961

Abstract

In late-July 1961, US President John F. Kennedy announced a major military buildup over the dispute with the Soviet Union in Berlin. But why? The USA was superior militarily, and many Western leaders and policymakers considered the Soviet threat overblown. I offer an explanation for the puzzle: widespread fear among Kennedy and members of his administration, opposition leaders, the press, the diplomatic community, and international allies (i.e., his “in-group”) that he lacked resolve. Their impression of him as irresolute—formed long before but continued to brew after he assumed the highest political office—drove the emotion. They were obsessed, less with ascertaining Soviet intention than with bolstering Kennedy’s reputation for resolve—as they imagined it. As they expressed and fed on each other’s emotion, their sense of crisis intensified. Pent-up fear gave rise to a “cult of toughness,” culminating in and eventually finding outlet through Kennedy’s dramatic show of force.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Data availability

There are no data or code (apart from those sources cited in the manuscript) to be shared or accessed publicly.

Notes

  1. Sidney Gruson, “Western Big Three Confer on Tough U.S. Berlin Plan,” New York Times, June 1, 1961.

  2. I study the Berlin Crisis for both reasons of empirical and theoretical advancement. As Trachtenberg (1991) remarked over two decades ago, the crisis was “one of the most important episodes in the history of great power politics in the nuclear age. Given its importance, it is surprising how little scholarly attention it has received” (169). His observation still holds today. Consider, for instance, how much more ink has been spilled on the Cuban Missile Crisis of the following year. Berlin was not as close a call to nuclear Armageddon as Cuba. However, the crisis culminated in a military showdown between the two superpowers in Berlin in August 1961 that was frightening in and of itself, and in the construction of the Berlin Wall that formalized the city’s partition and changed the course of the Cold War in Europe. The current analysis therefore fills such empirical lacuna. Moreover, the Berlin Crisis is at the same time a “least-likely” and “most-likely” case to demonstrate my theory (Eckstein 1975). It would be “least-likely” for in-group fear to matter because—as discussed earlier—the USA enjoyed overwhelming power (and Kennedy knew it) and at their heart American policymakers (including Kennedy) were dismissive of Khrushchev’s threats. My theory, if found to be relevant, may therefore be even more applicable to other cases in which such countervailing factors were less salient. On the other hand, at 43, Kennedy was the youngest person to become President. As I elaborate later, he had much to prove concerning his resolve, not only to the USA’ foreign adversaries but also to his domestic audiences. If in-group fear has any purchase as a general explanation for crisis escalation, Kennedy would be ideal as an initial case to study.

  3. As Markwica (2018) defines, fear “is an aversive emotion that comes about when people sense an immediate, concrete physical or psychological threat and when they are uncertain whether they can cope with it… It encompasses a broad spectrum of affective experiences, ranging from apprehension, worry, and anguish to fright, mortification, and terror.” Moreover, an emotion “closely related” to fear is anxiety. Markwica (2018) explains: “Whereas fear tends to be elicited by an identifiable imminent threat… anxiety is based on an anticipated menace whose source and nature remain obscure” (73). The latter operates more in the “background” (Ross 2014, 18, 154). By this definition, it was fear that plagued Kennedy and those around him, since the object of their emotion was ultimately the Soviet Union, specifically its threat over Berlin.

  4. On how fear is conceptualized in neorealism, neoliberalism, and constructivism, see Tang (2008). See also Lebow (2008, particularly Ch. 2), Jervis (2017, Ch. 3) and Crawford (2000, 119).

  5. For an overview, see Hutchison and Bleiker (2014).

  6. “John F. Kennedy,” The Economist, December 12, 1959.

  7. Ibid.

  8. Belair Jr., Felix. 1960. “Eisenhower Gibes at ‘Young Genius’ in Campaign Tour,” New York Times, November 5, 1960.

  9. It would be impossible to know with certainty if the Berlin Crisis would still have occurred or at least reached the level of danger the world experienced in the summer of 1961 had, counterfactually, some other leader—say, Nixon or Johnson (Kennedy’s main opponent in the 1960 Democratic Party presidential primaries)—been President instead, or had Eisenhower stayed on for a hypothetical third term. However, none of these leaders suffered as much (if at all) from widespread doubt about their “toughness,” and as such, would presumably not have felt much of an imperative to prove themselves in foreign policy. One could surmise that the conflict would have unfolded rather differently had they been at the helm.

  10. Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS) 1961–1963, Vol. XIV, Doc. 11 (March 16, 1961).

  11. Dean Acheson Oral History (OH), John F. Kennedy Presidential Library (JFKL).

  12. Dean Acheson OH, JFKL.

  13. “Summit Talk Aims at Exploration, Not Agreement,” New York Times, May 20, 1961.

  14. While de Gaulle was rather haughty toward many of his contemporaries in general, he would probably not have thought of Kennedy the way he did had the latter been or was someone more experienced and tested (Nixon, Johnson, Eisenhower, etc.). I thank one of the anonymous reviewers for pointing this out.

  15. “Confrontation in Vienna,” New York Times, June 4, 1961.

  16. Some 1,500 journalists were accredited to cover the event, unprecedented until then in the history of summit diplomacy (Glass 2017).

  17. James Reston, “Kennedy is Firm on Defense Aims,” New York Times, June 6, 1961.

  18. Llewellyn Thompson OH, JFKL.

  19. According to Sorensen (1965), Kennedy maintained “long-standing personal ties” with many newsmen (315). His press secretary explained: “Superimposed” on the administration was a “very important segment of the Washington press—the influential columnists” such as Reston, Walter Lippman, Joseph Alsop, Joseph Kraft and Ben Bradlee. “Because of their influence throughout the country, most of these columnists got special treatment… In any crisis situation, it was standard operating procedure to be in touch with these columnists… The President, himself, frequently took part in these background sessions” (Salinger 1966, 162).

  20. James Reston, “Vienna Talks End,” New York Times, June 5, 1961.

  21. Osgood Caruthers, “Khrushchev Quiet on Arrival Home,” New York Times, June 6, 1961.

  22. “Kissing Mood,” Time, June 16, 1961.

  23. James Reston, “Kennedy is Firm on Defense Aims,” New York Times, June 6, 1961.

  24. “Man of the Year: A Way with the People,” Time 79(1), January 5, 1962.

  25. Joseph W. Alsop OH, JFKL.

  26. Michael J. Mansfield OH, JFKL.

  27. “Fear Berlin Showdown by Next Winter,” Chicago Tribune, June 9, 1961.

  28. Jack L. Bell OH, JFKL.

  29. Robert F. Kennedy OH, JFKL.

  30. George Kennan OH, JFKL.

  31. Jenkins, Kempton B. OH, The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training.

    Foreign Affairs Oral History Project.

  32. “Convince Khrushchev We Would Fight for Freedom, Nixon Says,” Washington Post, June 21, 1961.

  33. “Before the Dead End,” The Economist, June 24, 1961.

  34. “A Policy of Preparedness,’ New York Times, June 25, 1961.

  35. “The Summer of Discontent,” Time, July 7, 1961.

  36. Papers of John F. Kennedy. Presidential Papers. National Security Files, Box 81, JFKL.

  37. Robert C. Doty, “Rusk Informs de Gaulle and NATO Council of the Kennedy–Khrushchev Meeting,” New York Times, June 6, 1961.

References

  • Beschloss, Michael R. 1991. Kennedy and Khrushchev: The Crisis Years, 1960–1963. HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlen, Charles E. 1973. Witness to History: 1929–1969. W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradlee, Benjamin C. 1975. Conversations with Kennedy. Pocket Books.

  • Brandon, Henry. 1988. Special Relationships: A Foreign Correspondent’s Memoirs from Roosevelt to Reagan. Atheneum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, James M. 1960. John Kennedy: A Political Profile. Avon Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catudal, Honoré M. 1980. Kennedy and the Berlin Wall Crisis: A Case Study in U.S. Decision Making. Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, Peter, and David Horowitz. 1984. The Kennedys: An American Drama. Summit Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Lloyd, and Steve Wood. 2017. ‘Got Him’: Revenge, Emotions, and the Killing of Osama Bin Laden. Review of International Studies 43(1): 112–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, Neta C. 2000. The Passion of World Politics: Propositions on Emotion and Emotional Relationships. International Security 24(4): 116–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, Neta C. 2014. Institutionalizing Passion in World Politics: Fear and Empathy. International Theory 6(3): 535–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dafoe, Allan, Jonathan Renshon, and Paul Huth. 2014. Reputation and Status as Motives for War. Annual Review of Political Science 17(1): 371–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallek, Robert. 2003. An Unfinished Life: John F. Kennedy. Little: Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Gaulle, Charles. 1971. Memoirs of Hope: Renewal, 1958–1962. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrynin, Anatoly. 1995. In Confidence. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, Thomas M. 2016. Emotion and Strategic Learning in War. Foreign Policy Analysis 12(4): 571–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, Harry. 1975. Case Studies and Theory in Political Science. In Handbook of Political Science, vol. 7, ed. F. Greenstein and N. Polsby, 79–138. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, James D. 1994. Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes. American Political Science Review 88(3): 577–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fettweis, Christopher J. 2007. Credibility and the War on Terror. Political Science Quarterly 122(4): 607–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fursenko, Aleksandr, and Timothy Naftali. 2006. Khrushchev’s Cold War: The Inside Story of an American Adversary. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelpi, Christopher. 2003. The Power of Legitimacy: Assessing the Role of Norms in Crisis Bargaining. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisinger, Alexandra, and Alastair Smith. 2002. Honest Threats: The Interaction of Reputation and Political Institutions in International Crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(2): 175–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, David. 1972. The Best and the Brightest. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Todd H. 2015. Emotional Diplomacy: Official Emotion on the International Stage. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Todd H., and Andrew A. G. Ross. 2015. Affective Politics after 9/11. International Organization 69(4): 847–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Todd H., and Andrew A. G. Ross. 2019. Rethinking Affective Experience and Popular Emotion: World War I and the Construction of Group Emotion in International Relations. Political Psychology 40(6): 1357–1372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Frank P., and J. Mitton. 2016. Fighting for Credibility: US Reputation and International Politics. University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersh, Seymour M. 1997. Dark Side of Camelot. Little: Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymann, C. David. 1989. A Woman Named Jackie: An Intimate Biography of Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy Onassis. Lyle Stuart.

  • Holmes, Marcus. 2018. Face-to-Face Diplomacy: Social Neuroscience and International Relations. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hopf, Theodore G. 1994. Peripheral Visions: Deterrence Theory and American Foreign Policy in the Third World, 1965–1990. University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horne, Alistair. 1989. Macmillan 1957–1986. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, Emma, and Roland Bleiker. 2014. Theorizing Emotions in World Politics. International Theory 6(3): 491–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, Robert. 2017. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. New. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, Robert, Richard N. Lebow, and Janice G. Stein. 1989. Psychology and Deterrence. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Fred. 2001. JFK’s First-Strike Plan. Atlantic Monthly 2001: 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempe, Frederick. 2011. Berlin 1961: Kennedy, Khrushchev, and the Most Dangerous Place on Earth. Berkley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Jacqueline. 2011. Historical Conversations on Life with John F. Kennedy. Hyperion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, Montague, Patricia W. Levering, and Ralph B. Levering. 1983. The Kennedy Crises: The Press, the Presidency, and Foreign Policy. University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khrushchev, Nikita. 1974. Khrushchev Remembers: The Last Testament. Little Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khrushchev, Sergei N. 2000. Nikita Khrushchev and the Creation of a Superpower. Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Khrushchev, Nikita. 2004. Memoirs of Nikita Khrushchev, Vol. 3. Statesman: 1953–1964. Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, Foy D. 1970. Understanding the Russians. Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschut, Simon. 2018. No Sympathy for the Devil: Emotions and the Social Construction of the Democratic Peace. Cooperation and Conflict 53(3): 320–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasky, Victor. 1963. J.F.K., The Man and the Myth. Arlington House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, Richard N. 2008. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, Richard N., and Janice Gross Stein. 1994. We All Lost the Cold War. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Evelyn. 1965. My Twelve Years with John F. Kennedy. David McKay Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, Jacques. 2013. My Kennedy Years: A Memoir. Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, Danielle L. 2020. Reputation for Resolve: How Leaders Signal Determination in International Politics. Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, Harold. 2011. The Macmillan Diaries. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markwica, Robin. 2018. Emotional Choices: How the Logic of Affect Shapes Coercive Diplomacy. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Ralph. 1983. A Hero for Our Time: An Intimate Story of the Kennedy Years. Fawcett Crest.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, Robert J. 1991. Credibility and World Power: Exploring the Psychological Dimension in Postwar American Diplomacy. Diplomatic History 15(4): 455–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, Roseanne. 2017. Statements of Resolve: Achieving Coercive Credibility in International Conflict. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, Jonathan. 1996. Reputation and International Politics. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, Jonathan. 2010. Emotional Beliefs. International Organization 64(1): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, Jonathan. 2013. Emotion and Strategy in the Korean War. International Organization 67(2): 221–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, Jonathan. 2014. Feeling Like a State: Social Emotion and Identity. International Theory 6(3): 515–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, Jonathan. 2017. The Illusion of International Prestige. International Security 41(4): 133–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitzen, Jennifer, and Randall L. Schweller. 2011. Knowing the Unknown Unknowns: Misplaced Certainty and the Onset of War. Security Studies 20(1): 2–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oonnell, Kenneth P., David F. Powers, and Joe McCarthy. 1970. “Johnny, We Hardly Knew Ye”: Memories of John Fitzgerald Kennedy. Little: Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, Thomas G. 1989. Kennedy's Quest for Victory: American Foreign Policy, 1961-1963. Oxford University Press.

  • Perret, Geoffrey. 2001. Jack: A Life Like No Other. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, Daryl G. 2005. Calculating Credibility: How Leaders Assess Military Threats. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, Richard. 1993. President Kennedy: Profile of Power. Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renshon, Jonathan. 2009. Assessing Capabilities in International Politics: Biased Overestimation and the Case of the Imaginary ‘Missile Gap.’ Journal of Strategic Studies 32(1): 115–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renshon, Jonathan, Allan Dafoe, and Paul Huth. 2018. Leader Influence and Reputation Formation in World Politics. American Journal of Political Science 62(2): 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reston, James. 1991. Deadline: A Memoir. Random House.

  • Reus-Smit, Christian. 2014. Emotions and the Social. International Theory 6(3): 568–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Andrew A. G. 2014. Mixed Emotions: Beyond Fear and Hatred in International Conflict. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salinger, Pierre. 1966. With Kennedy. Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasley, Brent E. 2011. Theorizing States’ Emotions. International Studies Review 13(3): 452–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, A.M., Jr. 1965. A Thousand Days: John F. Kennedy in the White House. Fawcett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenbaum, Thomas J. 1988. Waging Peace and War: Dean Rusk in the Truman, Kennedy, and Johnson Years. Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, Kenneth A. 2001. Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seaborg, Glenn T. 1981. Kennedy, Khrushchev, and the Test Ban. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shevchenko, Arkady N. 1985. Breaking with Moscow. Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidey, Hugh. 1963. John F. Kennedy, President. Atheneum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidey, Hugh. 2008. Counsellor: A Life at the Edge of History. Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidey, Hugh. 2014. The Personal Recollections of a Presidential Adviser in Vienna. In The Vienna Summit and Its Importance in International History, ed. Günter. Bischof, Stefan Karner, and Barbara Stelzl-Marx, 349–354. Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, Theodore C. 1965. Kennedy. Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, Ted. 2008. Counselor: A Life at the Edge of History. Harper.

  • Stein, Janice Gross. 2013. Threat Perception in International Relations. In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, 2nd ed., ed. Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears, and Jack S. Levy. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strober, Deborah H., and Gerald S. Strober. 2003. The Kennedy Presidency: An Oral History of the Era. HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, David. 2007. Brothers: The Hidden History of the Kennedy Years. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Shiping. 2005. Reputation, Cult of Reputation, and International Conflict. Security Studies 14(1): 34–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Shiping. 2008. Fear in International Politics: Two Positions. International Studies Review 10(3): 451–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taubman, William. 2003. Khrushchev: The Man and His Era. W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trachtenberg, Marc. 1991. History and Strategy. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • von Scheve, Christian, and Sven Ismer. 2013. Towards a Theory of Collective Emotions. Emotion Review 5(4): 406–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Jennifer L. 2014. Moral Masculinity. In The Vienna Summit and Its Importance in International History, ed. Günter. Bischof, Stefan Karner, and Barbara Stelzl-Marx, 311–327. Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisiger, Alex, and Keren Yarhi-Milo. 2015. Revisiting Reputation: How Past Actions Matter in International Politics. International Organization 69(2): 473–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Seanon S. 2016. Emotions and the Communication of Intentions in Face-to-Face Diplomacy. European Journal of International Relations 22(1): 144–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Seanon S. 2019. Stoics and Hotheads: Leaders Temperament, Anger, and the Expression of Resolve in Face-to-face Diplomacy. Journal of Global Security Studies 4(2): 190–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Seanon S. 2020. Mapping the Repertoire of Emotions and their Communicative Functions in Face-to-face Diplomacy. International Studies Review 22(1): 77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Seanon S. 2021. Who Blinked? Performing Resolve (or Lack thereof) in Face-to-face Diplomacy. Security Studies 30(3): 419–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarhi-Milo, Keren. 2018. Who Fights for Reputation: The Psychology of Leaders in International Conflicts. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, Thomas M. 2018. “Emotions and Foreign Policy.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press.

  • Glass, Andrew. 2017. “JFK and Khrushchev meet in Vienna, June 3, 1961,” Politico, June 2, 2017.

  • Shannon, William V. 1961. “The Kennedy Administration,” American Scholar XXX, Autumn.

  • Walt, Stephen M. 2012. “Why are U.S. Leaders So Obsessed with Credibility,” Foreign Policy, September 11, 2012.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seanon S. Wong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest or competing interests concerning this manuscript.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval is not required and necessary for the research conducted in the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong, S.S. Explaining the “cult of toughness”: in-group fear, Kennedy’s reputation for weakness, and the Berlin Crisis of 1961. Int Polit (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-023-00481-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-023-00481-5

Keywords