This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Akami, T. 2002. Internationalizing the Pacific: The United States, Japan, and the Institute of Pacific Relations in war and peace. London and New York: Routledge.
Bell, D.S.A. 2002. Language, legitimacy, and the project of critique. Alternatives Global Local Political 27 (3): 327–350.
Koselleck, R. 1985. Futures past: On the semantics of historical time. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Prakash, A. 2021. The new AUKUS alliance holds some lessons for India. Noida: The Indian Express.
Shimazu, Naoko. 1998. Japan, race and equality: The racial equality proposal of 1919. Routledge.
Spencer, P., and H. Wollman, eds. 2005. Nations and nationalism: A reader. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Vucetic, S. 2011. The anglosphere: A genealogy of a racialized identity in international relations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is, to the best of my knowledge, no conflict of interest involved in the writing of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Park, SH. Language, race, civilization: What is (and isn’t) Anglo-America?. Int Polit 60, 727–732 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-023-00440-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-023-00440-0