A battle for transportation routes in the Russian neighborhood: Is there a place for small states?

Abstract

Driven by an increased interest in enhancing connectivity, great powers are in the competition to implement their transportation projects. Meanwhile, small states located in the crossroad of the transportation routes are offered with benefits while facing several challenges. In this regard, the current article studies three major transportation initiatives in the South Caucasus region from both political and economic perspectives. The article will try to analyze how these might challenge the regional hegemony of Russia. Hereinafter, by looking at the case of Azerbaijan, the role of small states throughout this process is identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    There are various definitions for explaining the concept of a small state presented by many scholars (Maass 2009; Fukuyama 2004; Handel 1981), however, a generalized explanation based on all the previous definitions offered by Thorhallsson and Steinsson (2017) is considered throughout the article. In this regard, based on their explanation, the smallness of the state central to most previous definitions refer to the shortage of resources and capabilities that determine the power and influence of the state which not only concern the territorial size but also economic and military size. Thus, small state can be conceptualized as the entity lacking power that can be used in international affairs (Handel 1981; Olafsson 1998).

References

  1. ADY. n.d. Baku-Tbilisi-Kars. https://ady.az/en/read/index/8/43. Accessed January 1, 2020.

  2. Afandiyeva, O. 2019. Azerbaijan Doubles Volume of Trade Turnover with China. Azernews. https://www.azernews.az/business/158681.html. Accessed January 1, 2020.

  3. Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. n.d. AIIB Approves $600 Million to Support Energy project of Azerbaijan. https://www.aiib.org/en/news-events/news/2016/20161222_001.html. Accessed January 10, 2020.

  4. Bossuyt, F., and I. Bolgova. 2019. Connecting Eurasia: Is Cooperation Between Russia, China, and the EU in Central Asia Possible? In Regional Integration and Future Cooperation Initiatives in the Eurasian Economic Union, ed. M. Lagutina, 234–250. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Breslin, S. 2009. ‘Understanding China’s Regional Rise: Interpretations, Identities and Implications. International Affairs 85(4): 817–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bugajski, J. 2017. Moscow’s Divide and Rule Strategy. Center of European Policy and Analysis, 18 December, https://www.cepa.org/divide-and-rule-strategy. Accessed January 11, 2020.

  7. de Soyres, F., F. Mulabdic, and M. Ruta. 2019. Common Transport Infrastructure: A Quantitative Model and Estimates from the Belt and Road Initiative”, World Bank policy research working paper 8801.

  8. Delcour, L., and K. Hoffmann. 2018. The EU’s Policy in the South Caucasus. L’Europe en Formation 2018/1(385): 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Financial Tribune. 2018. Iran-Azerbaijan Railroads Officially Linked on March 29. 2 April. https://financialtribune.com/articles/economy-business-and-markets/83937/iran-azerbaijan-railroads-officially-linked-on-march-29. Accessed January 10, 2020.

  10. Fukuyama, F. 2004. State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goble, P. 2019. Can the Kremlin Finally Realise the North-South Transit Corridor?” Eurasia Daily Monitor 16(26). https://jamestown.org/program/can-the-kremlin-finally-realize-the-north-south-transit-corridor/. Accessed January 9, 2020.

  12. Golley, J., and A. Ingle (eds.). 2018. The Belt and Road Initiative: How to Win Friends and Influence People. Prosperity, 42–60.

  13. Gorshkov, T., and G. Bagaturia. 2001. TRACECA-Restoration of Silk Route. Japan Railway and Transport Review 28: 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Handel, M. 1981. Weak States in the International System. NJ: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heydarov, P., and T. Marsden. 2016. ALAT-The Missing Link Between Europe and Asia. The Visions. http://www.visions.az/en/news/826/333f1152/. Accessed January 10, 2020.

  16. Hoekman, B., A. Matoo, and P. English. 2002. Development, Trade and the WTO. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Idan, A., and B. Shaffer. 2011. The Foreign Policies of Post-Soviet Landlocked States. Post-Soviet Affairs 27(3): 241–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jafarov, S. 2019. China, Azerbaijan Sign Deals Worth $821M. China Daily. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201904/25/WS5cc15b33a3104842260b8595.html. Accessed January 5, 2020.

  19. Kritzinger-van Niekerk, L., and E. Pinto Moreira. 2002. Regional Integration in Southern Africa: Overview of Recent Developments (English). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lianlei, B. 2016. Azerbaijan in the Silk Road Economic Belt: A Chinese Perspective. Caucasus International: 30. http://cijournal.az/post/azerbaijan-in-the-silk-road-economic-belt-a-chinese-perspective-bai-lianlei. Accessed January 9, 2020.

  21. Maass, M. 2009. The Elusive Definition of the Small State. International Politics 46(1): 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Markedonov, S. 2017. Russia’s Evolving South Caucasus Policy: Security Concerns amid Ethno-political Conflicts. Berlin: Forschungsinstitut der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mammadova, L. (2019). Trade turnover between Azerbaijan and China $1.3 billion. Azernews. https://www.azernews.az/business/156248.html. Accessed 1 Jan 2020.

  24. Mobley, T. 2019. The Belt and Road Initiative: Insights from China’s Backyard. Strategic Studies Quarterly 13(3): 52–72.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mostafa, G., and M. Mahmood. 2018. Eurasian Economic Union: Evolution, Challenges and Possible Future Directions. Journal of Eurasian Studies 9(2): 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nation, R. 2015. Russia and the Caucasus. Connections 14(2): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  27. North-South-ADY Container. n.d. North-South International Transport Route. http://adycontainer.com/simal-cənub/. Accessed January 10, 2020.

  28. Nuriyev, E. 2015. Russia, the EU and the South Caucasus: Forging an Efficient Over-Arching Cooperative Regional Security Scheme. Connections 14(2): 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Official Website of President of the Republic of Azerbaijan. 2016. Azerbaijani, Iranian and Russian Presidents Hold Trilateral Meeting. 8 August. https://en.president.az/articles/20772. Accessed January 1, 2020.

  30. Olafsson, B.G. 1998. Small States in the Global System: Analysis and Illustrations from the Case of Iceland. UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pangestu, M., and R. Scollay. 2001. Regional Trading Arrangements: Stocktake and Next Steps. Bangkok: Trade Policy Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Prasad, J. 2015. Iran Deal Spells Good Tidings for India. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/lead-article-iran-deal-spells-good-tidings-for-india/article7085906.ece. Accessed January 10, 2020.

  33. Pritchin, S. 2019. Russia’s Caspian Policy. Russian Analytical Digest 235. https://css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/RAD235.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2020.

  34. Raballand, G. 2003. Determinants of the Negative Impact of Being Landlocked on Trade: An Empirical Investigation Through the Central Asian Case. Comparative Economic Studies 45: 520–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sarma, H.C. 2018. Turning the International North-South Corridor Into A “Digital Corridor”. Comparative Politics Russia. 9(4): 124–138.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Shaffer, B. 2012. Azerbaijan’s Foreign Policy since Independence. Caucasus International 2(1): 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schiff, M., and L. Winters. 2003. Regional Integration and Development (English). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Shaffer, Brenda. 2010. Foreign Policies of the States of the Caucasus: Evolution in the Post-Soviet Period. Uluslararası İlişkiler 7(26): 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shiriyev, Z. 2017. Will the North-South Transport Corridor Overshadow the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars Railway? Eurasia Daily Monitor 14(53). Retrieved from https://jamestown.org/program/will-north-south-transport-corridor-overshadow-baku-tbilisi-kars-railway/.

  40. State Oil Fund of the Republic of Azerbaijan. 2018. Baku-Tbilisi-Kars New Railway. http://www.oilfund.az/en_US/layiheler/baki-tbilisi-qars-demir-yolu.asp. Accessed January 10, 2020.

  41. Thorhallsson, B., and S. Steinsson. 2017. Small State Foreign Policy. In The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, 1–25.

  42. TRACECA. 2014. Opening of seaport Alat Postponed Until the End of 2014. 2014. TRACECA. http://www.traceca-org.org/en/countries/azerbaijan/publications/2014/. Accessed January 5, 2020.

  43. TRACECA. n.d. How TRACECA Started. http://www.traceca-org.org/en/traceca/history-of-traceca/. Accessed January 14, 2020.

  44. Trenin, D. 2016. Russia’s Asia Strategy: Bolstering the Eagle’s Eastern Wing, Russie.Nei.Visions 94.

  45. Valiyev, A. 2015. Can Azerbaijan Revive the Silk Road? PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo 382.

  46. Valiyev, A. 2017. Azerbaijan’s Foreign policy: What Role for the West in the South Caucasus? Working Paper Series—Eastern Voices: Europe’s East Faces an Unsettled West.

  47. Valiyev, A., and N. Mamishova. 2019. Azerbaijan’s Foreign Policy Towards Russia Since Independence: Compromise Achieved. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 19(2): 269–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ziyadov, T. 2011. Azerbaijan as a Regional Hub in Central Eurasia. Strategic Assessment of Euro-Asian Trade & Transportation. Baku: ADA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Global Challenge Research Fund (Grant No. ES/P010849/1).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anar Valiyev.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valiyev, A., Bilalova, S. A battle for transportation routes in the Russian neighborhood: Is there a place for small states?. Int Polit 58, 483–499 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00241-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Small states
  • International politics
  • Regional integration
  • South Caucasus