Driven by an increased interest in enhancing connectivity, great powers are in the competition to implement their transportation projects. Meanwhile, small states located in the crossroad of the transportation routes are offered with benefits while facing several challenges. In this regard, the current article studies three major transportation initiatives in the South Caucasus region from both political and economic perspectives. The article will try to analyze how these might challenge the regional hegemony of Russia. Hereinafter, by looking at the case of Azerbaijan, the role of small states throughout this process is identified.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
There are various definitions for explaining the concept of a small state presented by many scholars (Maass 2009; Fukuyama 2004; Handel 1981), however, a generalized explanation based on all the previous definitions offered by Thorhallsson and Steinsson (2017) is considered throughout the article. In this regard, based on their explanation, the smallness of the state central to most previous definitions refer to the shortage of resources and capabilities that determine the power and influence of the state which not only concern the territorial size but also economic and military size. Thus, small state can be conceptualized as the entity lacking power that can be used in international affairs (Handel 1981; Olafsson 1998).
ADY. n.d. Baku-Tbilisi-Kars. https://ady.az/en/read/index/8/43. Accessed January 1, 2020.
Afandiyeva, O. 2019. Azerbaijan Doubles Volume of Trade Turnover with China. Azernews. https://www.azernews.az/business/158681.html. Accessed January 1, 2020.
Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. n.d. AIIB Approves $600 Million to Support Energy project of Azerbaijan. https://www.aiib.org/en/news-events/news/2016/20161222_001.html. Accessed January 10, 2020.
Bossuyt, F., and I. Bolgova. 2019. Connecting Eurasia: Is Cooperation Between Russia, China, and the EU in Central Asia Possible? In Regional Integration and Future Cooperation Initiatives in the Eurasian Economic Union, ed. M. Lagutina, 234–250. Hershey: IGI Global.
Breslin, S. 2009. ‘Understanding China’s Regional Rise: Interpretations, Identities and Implications. International Affairs 85(4): 817–835.
Bugajski, J. 2017. Moscow’s Divide and Rule Strategy. Center of European Policy and Analysis, 18 December, https://www.cepa.org/divide-and-rule-strategy. Accessed January 11, 2020.
de Soyres, F., F. Mulabdic, and M. Ruta. 2019. Common Transport Infrastructure: A Quantitative Model and Estimates from the Belt and Road Initiative”, World Bank policy research working paper 8801.
Delcour, L., and K. Hoffmann. 2018. The EU’s Policy in the South Caucasus. L’Europe en Formation 2018/1(385): 7–25.
Financial Tribune. 2018. Iran-Azerbaijan Railroads Officially Linked on March 29. 2 April. https://financialtribune.com/articles/economy-business-and-markets/83937/iran-azerbaijan-railroads-officially-linked-on-march-29. Accessed January 10, 2020.
Fukuyama, F. 2004. State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Goble, P. 2019. Can the Kremlin Finally Realise the North-South Transit Corridor?” Eurasia Daily Monitor 16(26). https://jamestown.org/program/can-the-kremlin-finally-realize-the-north-south-transit-corridor/. Accessed January 9, 2020.
Golley, J., and A. Ingle (eds.). 2018. The Belt and Road Initiative: How to Win Friends and Influence People. Prosperity, 42–60.
Gorshkov, T., and G. Bagaturia. 2001. TRACECA-Restoration of Silk Route. Japan Railway and Transport Review 28: 50–55.
Handel, M. 1981. Weak States in the International System. NJ: Frank Cass.
Heydarov, P., and T. Marsden. 2016. ALAT-The Missing Link Between Europe and Asia. The Visions. http://www.visions.az/en/news/826/333f1152/. Accessed January 10, 2020.
Hoekman, B., A. Matoo, and P. English. 2002. Development, Trade and the WTO. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
Idan, A., and B. Shaffer. 2011. The Foreign Policies of Post-Soviet Landlocked States. Post-Soviet Affairs 27(3): 241–268.
Jafarov, S. 2019. China, Azerbaijan Sign Deals Worth $821M. China Daily. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201904/25/WS5cc15b33a3104842260b8595.html. Accessed January 5, 2020.
Kritzinger-van Niekerk, L., and E. Pinto Moreira. 2002. Regional Integration in Southern Africa: Overview of Recent Developments (English). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Lianlei, B. 2016. Azerbaijan in the Silk Road Economic Belt: A Chinese Perspective. Caucasus International: 30. http://cijournal.az/post/azerbaijan-in-the-silk-road-economic-belt-a-chinese-perspective-bai-lianlei. Accessed January 9, 2020.
Maass, M. 2009. The Elusive Definition of the Small State. International Politics 46(1): 65–83.
Markedonov, S. 2017. Russia’s Evolving South Caucasus Policy: Security Concerns amid Ethno-political Conflicts. Berlin: Forschungsinstitut der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik.
Mammadova, L. (2019). Trade turnover between Azerbaijan and China $1.3 billion. Azernews. https://www.azernews.az/business/156248.html. Accessed 1 Jan 2020.
Mobley, T. 2019. The Belt and Road Initiative: Insights from China’s Backyard. Strategic Studies Quarterly 13(3): 52–72.
Mostafa, G., and M. Mahmood. 2018. Eurasian Economic Union: Evolution, Challenges and Possible Future Directions. Journal of Eurasian Studies 9(2): 163–172.
Nation, R. 2015. Russia and the Caucasus. Connections 14(2): 1–12.
North-South-ADY Container. n.d. North-South International Transport Route. http://adycontainer.com/simal-cənub/. Accessed January 10, 2020.
Nuriyev, E. 2015. Russia, the EU and the South Caucasus: Forging an Efficient Over-Arching Cooperative Regional Security Scheme. Connections 14(2): 51–64.
Official Website of President of the Republic of Azerbaijan. 2016. Azerbaijani, Iranian and Russian Presidents Hold Trilateral Meeting. 8 August. https://en.president.az/articles/20772. Accessed January 1, 2020.
Olafsson, B.G. 1998. Small States in the Global System: Analysis and Illustrations from the Case of Iceland. UK: Ashgate.
Pangestu, M., and R. Scollay. 2001. Regional Trading Arrangements: Stocktake and Next Steps. Bangkok: Trade Policy Forum.
Prasad, J. 2015. Iran Deal Spells Good Tidings for India. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/lead-article-iran-deal-spells-good-tidings-for-india/article7085906.ece. Accessed January 10, 2020.
Pritchin, S. 2019. Russia’s Caspian Policy. Russian Analytical Digest 235. https://css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/RAD235.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2020.
Raballand, G. 2003. Determinants of the Negative Impact of Being Landlocked on Trade: An Empirical Investigation Through the Central Asian Case. Comparative Economic Studies 45: 520–536.
Sarma, H.C. 2018. Turning the International North-South Corridor Into A “Digital Corridor”. Comparative Politics Russia. 9(4): 124–138.
Shaffer, B. 2012. Azerbaijan’s Foreign Policy since Independence. Caucasus International 2(1): 73–84.
Schiff, M., and L. Winters. 2003. Regional Integration and Development (English). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Shaffer, Brenda. 2010. Foreign Policies of the States of the Caucasus: Evolution in the Post-Soviet Period. Uluslararası İlişkiler 7(26): 51–65.
Shiriyev, Z. 2017. Will the North-South Transport Corridor Overshadow the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars Railway? Eurasia Daily Monitor 14(53). Retrieved from https://jamestown.org/program/will-north-south-transport-corridor-overshadow-baku-tbilisi-kars-railway/.
State Oil Fund of the Republic of Azerbaijan. 2018. Baku-Tbilisi-Kars New Railway. http://www.oilfund.az/en_US/layiheler/baki-tbilisi-qars-demir-yolu.asp. Accessed January 10, 2020.
Thorhallsson, B., and S. Steinsson. 2017. Small State Foreign Policy. In The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, 1–25.
TRACECA. 2014. Opening of seaport Alat Postponed Until the End of 2014. 2014. TRACECA. http://www.traceca-org.org/en/countries/azerbaijan/publications/2014/. Accessed January 5, 2020.
TRACECA. n.d. How TRACECA Started. http://www.traceca-org.org/en/traceca/history-of-traceca/. Accessed January 14, 2020.
Trenin, D. 2016. Russia’s Asia Strategy: Bolstering the Eagle’s Eastern Wing, Russie.Nei.Visions 94.
Valiyev, A. 2015. Can Azerbaijan Revive the Silk Road? PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo 382.
Valiyev, A. 2017. Azerbaijan’s Foreign policy: What Role for the West in the South Caucasus? Working Paper Series—Eastern Voices: Europe’s East Faces an Unsettled West.
Valiyev, A., and N. Mamishova. 2019. Azerbaijan’s Foreign Policy Towards Russia Since Independence: Compromise Achieved. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 19(2): 269–291.
Ziyadov, T. 2011. Azerbaijan as a Regional Hub in Central Eurasia. Strategic Assessment of Euro-Asian Trade & Transportation. Baku: ADA.
Funding was provided by Global Challenge Research Fund (Grant No. ES/P010849/1).
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Valiyev, A., Bilalova, S. A battle for transportation routes in the Russian neighborhood: Is there a place for small states?. Int Polit 58, 483–499 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00241-9
- Small states
- International politics
- Regional integration
- South Caucasus