Advertisement

Shaping China’s rise: the reordering of US alliances and defence partnerships in East Asia

  • Hugo MeijerEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The US-led system of alliances and defence partnerships in East Asia has undergone profound change since the end of the Cold War. The so-called “hub-and-spokes” system of bilateral alliances has been gradually supplemented by a “networked security architecture”—a network of interwoven bilateral, minilateral and multilateral defence arrangements between the US and its regional allies and partners, in which China is also included through a variety of cooperation channels. This paper shows that, from Washington’s perspective, the networked security architecture is not merely a means to externally balance a revisionist China, as Structural Realist analyses contend. Rather, the US has sought to broaden the composition of the US-led hegemonic order in East Asia by diversifying the range of defence ties with and amongst its allies and partners, but also by seeking to include the PRC in it. Thereby, Washington aims to channel and shape the trajectory of China’s rise within the US-led hegemonic order, from a position of pre-eminence, through a mixture of negative and positive incentives (resistance and accommodation) with the ultimate goal of upholding the existing hegemonic order. To empirically substantiate this argument, the paper relies on a large body of elite interviews with senior US policymakers.

Keywords

English School Hegemony Alliances Defence cooperation United States China East Asia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

For useful and constructive feedback on previous drafts of this article, the author would like to thank Evelyn Goh, John Hemmings, Tongfi Kim and Luis Simón.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Albert, E. 2016. The U.S.-Philippines Defence Alliance. Council on Foreign Relations, Backgrounder, October 21.Google Scholar
  2. ADMM+ (ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting Plus). 2017. Chairman’s Statement on the 4th ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting Plus. Manila, October 24.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Department of Defence. 2018. United States Force Posture Initiatives in Australia. http://www.defence.gov.au/Initiatives/USFPI/ (accessed February 4, 2019).
  4. Australian Embassy in Vietnam. 2018. Defence Cooperation Program. http://vietnam.embassy.gov.au/hnoi/DefCoop.html (accessed February 4, 2019).
  5. Bader, J. 2012. Obama and China’s Rise: An Insider’s Account of America’s Asia Strategy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blair, D.C., and J.T. Hanley. 2001. From Wheels to Webs: Reconstructing Asia-Pacific Security Arrangements. The Washington Quarterly 24(1): 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bong, Y.D. 2016. The U.S.-South Korea Alliance: Local, Regional, and Global Dimensions. Asian Politics & Policy 8(1): 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buzan, B., and Y. Zhang. 2014. Introduction: Interrogating Regional International Society in East Asia. In Contesting International Society in East Asia, ed. B. Buzan and Y. Zhang. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brewster, D. 2010. The India–Japan Security Relationship: An Enduring Security Partnership? Asian Security 6(2): 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, K. 2016. The Pivot: The Future of American Statecraft in Asia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, K., and B. Andrews. 2013. Explaining the U.S. Pivot to Asia. Americas 1: 1945–1975.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, K., and E. Ratner. 2018. The China Reckoning. How Beijing Defied American Expectations. Foreign Affairs 97: 60.Google Scholar
  13. Carter, A. 2016. Asia-Pacific’s Principled Security Network. Secretary of Defence’s Speech at the 2016 IISS Shangri-La Dialogue, Singapore, June 4.Google Scholar
  14. Cha, V. 2009/10. Powerplay: Origins of the U.S. Alliance System in Asia. International Security 34(3): 158–196.Google Scholar
  15. Cha, V. 2011. Complex Patchworks: U.S. Alliances as Part of Asia’s Regional Architecture. Asia Policy 11: 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cha, V. 2016. Powerplay: The Origins of the American Alliance System in Asia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chanlett-Avery, E. 2018. Japan, the Indo-Pacific, and the ‘Quad’. The Chicago Council on Global Affairs, February 14.Google Scholar
  18. Chanlett-Avery, E., B. Dolven and W. Mackey. 2015. Thailand: Background and U.S. Relations, Congressional Research Service, July 29.Google Scholar
  19. Christensen, T. 2015. The China Challenge. Shaping the Choices of a Rising Power. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  20. Congressional Research Service. 2016. Singapore: Background and U.S. Relations, CRS Report for Congress R44127, July 20.Google Scholar
  21. Cronin, P., et al. 2013. The Emerging Asia Power Web: The Rise of Bilateral IntraAsian Security Ties. Washington, DC: Centre for a New American Security.Google Scholar
  22. Curtis, L., et al. 2011. Shared Goals, Converging Interests: A Plan for U.S.–Australia–India Cooperation in the Indo–Pacific. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. Davidson, P. 2018. Advance Policy Questions for Admiral Philip Davidson, USN Expected Nominee for Commander, U.S. Pacific Command. April 17. https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Davidson_APQs_04-17-18.pdf.
  24. Erickson, A.S., and A.M. Strange. 2014. China’s RIMPAC Debut: What’s in It for America? The National Interest, July 3.Google Scholar
  25. Feng, Z., and J. Huang. 2014. China’s Strategic Partnership Diplomacy: Engaging with a Changing World. European Strategic Partnership Observatory (ESPO). Working Paper 8, June 27, 2014.Google Scholar
  26. Foot, R., and A. Walter. 2013. Global Norms and Major State Behaviour: The Cases of China and the United States. European Journal of International Relations 19(2): 329–352. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Friedberg, A.L. 2018a. The Signs Were There. Foreign Affairs, July/August.Google Scholar
  28. Friedberg, A.L. 2018b. Competing with China. Survival 60(3): 7–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fontaine, R., et al. 2017. Networking Asian Security: An Integrated Approach to Order in the Pacific. Washington, DC: Center for a New American Security.Google Scholar
  30. Gady, F.-S. 2017. RIMPAC 2018: China Invited to Participate in Major U.S. Naval Exercise. The Diplomat, May 31.Google Scholar
  31. Goh, E. 2019. Contesting Hegemonic Order: China in East Asia. Security Studies 28(3): 614–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Green, M.J. 2014. Strategic Asian Triangles. In The Oxford Handbook of the International Relations of Asia, ed. R. Foot, S. Pekkanen, and J. Ravenhill. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Green, M.J. 2017. By More Than Providence: Grand Strategy and American Power in the Asia Pacific Since 1783. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Green, M.J., et al. 2014. Federated Defense in Asia. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
  35. Green, M., et al. 2016. Asia-Pacific Rebalance 2025: Capabilities, Presence, and Partnerships. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
  36. Harris, H.B. 2017. Statement of the U.S. Navy Commander, U.S. Pacific Command, on U.S. Pacific Command Posture, Before the Houses Armed Services Commitee on U.S. Pacific Command Posture, April 26.Google Scholar
  37. Hemmings, J. 2017. The US-Japan-Australia Trilateral Against the Backdrop of U.S. Grand Strategy. In U.S. Foreign Policy in a Challenging World: Building Order on Shifting Foundations, ed. M. Clementi, M. Dian, and B. Pisciotta. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Ikenberry, G.J. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Ikenberry, G.J. 2011. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Ikenberry, G.J. 2017. The Plot against American Foreign Policy: Can the Liberal Order Survive. Foreign Affairs 96: 2.Google Scholar
  41. Japanese Ministry of Defence. 2015. The Guidelines for Japan-U.S. Defence Cooperation, April 27. http://www.mod.go.jp/e/d_act/anpo/shishin_20150427e.html (accessed February 4, 2019).
  42. Kazianis, H.J. (ed.). 2015. Tackling Asia’s Greatest Challenges: A U.S.–Japan–Vietnam Trilateral Report. Washington, DC: Center for the National Interest.Google Scholar
  43. Khong, Y.F. 2014. East Asia and the Strategic ‘Deep Rules’ of International/Regional Society. In Contesting International Society in East Asia, ed. B. Buzan and Y. Zhang. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kuik, C.-C. 2016. Malaysia Between the United States and China: What do Weaker States Hedge Against? Asian Politics and Policy 8(1): 155–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liff, A.P. 2015. Japan’s Defense Policy: Abe the Evolutionary. The Washington Quarterly 38(5): 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liff, A.P. 2016. Whither the Balancers? The Case for a Methodological Reset. Security Studies 25(3): 420–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lohman, W., L. Stern, and W. Jordan. 2012. U.S.–Vietnam Defense Relations: Investing in Strategic Alignment. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
  48. Lu, D., and K. Yourish. 2018. Turnover at a Constant Clip: The Trump Administration’s Major Departures. The New York Times, March 22.Google Scholar
  49. Lum, T., and B. Dolven. 2014. The Republic of the Philippines and U.S. Interests—2014. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  50. Manyin, M.E. 2014. U.S.–Vietnam Relations in 2014: Current Issues and Implications for U.S. Policy. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  51. Mastanduno, M. 2014. Realism and Asia. In The Oxford Handbook of the International Relations of Asia, ed. R. Foot, S. Pekkanen, and J. Ravenhill. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Matsubara, M., et al. 2012. Trilateral Strategic Cooperative Mechanism Between Japan, the United States, and Vietnam: A Proposal. Issues & Insights 12(1): 1–8.Google Scholar
  53. Mattis, J. 2017. Remarks by Secretary Mattis at Shangri-La Dialogue. June 3.Google Scholar
  54. Mattis, J. 2018. Written Statement for the Record. House Armed Services Committee. April 26.Google Scholar
  55. Mazarr, M.J., T.R. Heath, and A.S. Cevallos. 2018. China and the International Order. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McDevitt, M.A., and J.A. Kelly. 1999. In Search of Stability: Designing for a Better Peace in East Asia. In U.S.–Korea–Japan Relations: Building Toward a “Virtual Alliance”, ed. R.A. Cossa. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
  57. Meijer, H. 2015. The Reconfiguration of American Primacy in World Politics. Prospects and Challenges for The US Rebalance to Asia. In Origins and Evolution of the US Rebalance toward Asia: Diplomatic, Military, and Economic Dimensions, ed. H. Meijer. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Misalucha, C.G., and J.S. Amador III. 2016. U.S.–Philippines Security Ties: Building New Foundations? Asian Politics & Policy 8(1): 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Muhibat, S.F. 2016. Indonesia–U.S. Security Collaboration: Still Under the Radar? Asian Politics and Policy 8(1): 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nishihara, M., et al. 2015. Building a Framework for Japan–US–Vietnam Trilateral Cooperation. RIPS Policy Perspectives, No. 22, February.Google Scholar
  61. Panda, A. 2017. US, Japan, India, and Australia Hold Working-Level Quadrilateral Meeting on Regional Cooperation. The ‘Quad’ is back. The Diplomat, November 13.Google Scholar
  62. Pant, H.V., and Y. Joshi. 2016. The U.S. Pivot and Indian Foreign Policy: Asia’s Evolving Balance of Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Parameswaran, P. 2015a. Philippines, Vietnam to Ink Strategic Partnership by End of 2015. The Diplomat, September 4.Google Scholar
  64. Parameswaran, P. 2015b. Japan, Philippines Boost Defense Ties. The Diplomat, February 4.Google Scholar
  65. Parameswaran, P. 2017a. Why the New Vietnam–Australia Defense Dialogue Matters. The Diplomat, November 8.Google Scholar
  66. Parameswaran, P. 2017b. What’s Behind the Resumed Vietnam–Philippines South China Sea Activity? The Diplomat, June 27.Google Scholar
  67. Pence, M. 2018. Remarks by Vice President Pence on the Administration’s Policy Toward China. October 4.Google Scholar
  68. Pompeo, M. 2018a. Remarks on America’s Indo-Pacific Economic Vision, at the Indo-Pacific Business Forum, July 30.Google Scholar
  69. Pompeo, M. 2018b. Restoring the Role of the Nation-State in the Liberal International Order. Remarks at the German Marshall Fund, Brussels, Belgium, December 4.Google Scholar
  70. Pongsudhirak, T. 2016. An Unaligned Alliance: Thailand–U.S. Relations in the Early 21st Century. Asian Politics & Policy 8(1): 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rajagopalan, R.P. 2016. U.S.–India Ties: Calibrating Collaboration Post-Non-Alignment. Asian Politics and Policy 8(1): 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rapp-Hooper, M. 2015. Interview with Admiral Gary Roughead—The Evolving Role of Military Exercise in Asia. Center for Strategic and International Studies, March 4. https://amti.csis.org/the-evolving-role-of-military-exercises-in-asia/.
  73. Republic of the Philippines. 2015. Joint Statement on the Establishment of a Strategic Partnership between the Republic of the Philippines and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, November 17. http://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2015/11/17/president-aquino-presscon-vietnam-president (February 4).
  74. Rinehart, I.E., S.A. Hildreth, and S.V. Lawrence. 2015. Ballistic Missile Defense in the Asia-Pacific Region: Cooperation and Opposition. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  75. Rosen, M., and J. Douglas. 2017. The U.S.–India Defence Relationship: Putting the Foundational Agreements in Perspective. Washington, DC: Center for Naval Analyses.Google Scholar
  76. Russel, D.R. 2014a. The Future of US-China Relations. Testimony by the Assistant Secretary, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Washington, DC, June 25.Google Scholar
  77. Russel D.R. 2014b. ASEAN and America: Partners for the Future. Remarks by the Assistant Secretary, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Commonwealth Club, San Francisco, CA, July 28.Google Scholar
  78. Russel, D.R. 2015. Remarks at the Fifth Annual South China Sea Conference. Remarks by the Assistant Secretary, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, at The Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC, July 21, 2015.Google Scholar
  79. Russel, D.R. 2016. Q&A at ‘Looking East—Trend Lines in the Asia Pacific’: Interview with Assistant Secretary, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Hertie School of Governance, Berlin, Germany, March 22.Google Scholar
  80. Sakaki, A., and G. Wacker. 2017. China–Japan–South Korea A Tense Ménage à Trois. SWP Research Paper, April.Google Scholar
  81. Satake, T., and J. Hemmings. 2018. Japan–Australia security cooperation in the bilateral and multilateral contexts. International Affairs 94(4): 815–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Satake, T. 2016. The New Guidelines for Japan–U.S. Defense Cooperation and an Expanding Japanese Security Role. Asian Politics and Policy 8(1): 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Saunders, P., and J. Bowie. 2016. US–China Military Relations: Competition and Cooperation. Journal of Strategic Studies 39(5–6): 662–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schriver, R. 2018. Testimony on American Leadership in the Asia-Pacific by the Assistant Secretary of Defence, Asian & Pacific Security Affairs, Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific, and International Cybersecurity Policy, May 15.Google Scholar
  85. Security Assistance Monitor. 2018. Security Aid: East Asia and the Pacific. https://www.securityassistance.org/data/country/military/country/2000/2018/all/East%20Asia%20and%20the%20Pacific/ (accessed August 10, 2018).
  86. Shear, D. 2015. Testimony by the Assistant Secretary of Defence for Asian and Pacific Security Affairs, Committee on Foreign Relations, U.S. Senate, May 13.Google Scholar
  87. Shepp, J. 2018. How U.S. Foreign Policy Is Being Shaped by Trump’s Tweets. New York Magazine, January 19.Google Scholar
  88. Silove, N. 2016. The Pivot before the Pivot U.S. Strategy to Preserve the Power Balance in Asia. International Security 40(4): 45–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Simón, L., A. Lanoszka, and H. Meijer. 2019. Nodal Defence: The Changing Structure of U.S. Alliance Systems in Europe and East Asia. Journal of Strategic Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2019.1636372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tan, S.S. 2015. Multilateral Asian Security Architecture: Non-ASEAN Stakeholders. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tan, S.S. 2016. The ADMM-Plus: Regionalism That Works? Asia Policy 22: 70–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tana, T.M., and Y. Takagi. 2018. Japan’s Foreign Relations with the Philippines: A Case of Evolving Japan in Asia. In Japan’s Foreign Relations in Asia, ed. J.D. Brown and J. Kingston. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  93. Tatsumi, Y. (ed.). 2015. U.S.–Japan–Australia Security Cooperation: Prospects and Challenges. Washington, DC: Stimson Center.Google Scholar
  94. Taylor, B. 2016. Unbreakable Alliance? ANZUS in the Asian Century. Asian Politics & Policy 8(1): 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Thayer, C.A. 2016. Vietnam’s Proactive International Integration: Case Studies in Defence Cooperation. VNU Journal of Science 32(1): 25–48.Google Scholar
  96. The White House. 2009. Joint Vision for the Alliance of the United States of America and the Republic of Korea. Office of the Press Secretary, June 16.Google Scholar
  97. The White House. 2013. Joint Declaration in Commemoration of the 60th Anniversary of the Alliance between the Republic of Korea and the United States of America, Office of the Press Secretary, May 7.Google Scholar
  98. The White House. 2015a. Remarks by President Obama and Prime Minister Abe of Japan in Joint Press Conference. Office of the Press Secretary, April 28.Google Scholar
  99. The White House. 2015b. United States–Vietnam Joint Vision Statement. Office of the Press Secretary, July 7.Google Scholar
  100. The White House. 2015c. Advancing the Rebalance to Asia and the Pacific. Factsheet, November 16.Google Scholar
  101. The White House. 2016. U.S. Building Maritime Capacity in Southeast Asia. Fact Sheet, November 17.Google Scholar
  102. The White House. 2017a. Statement from the Press Secretary on the United States-China Visit’, Office of the Press Secretary, April 7.Google Scholar
  103. The White House. 2017b. National Security Strategy of the United States of America, December 18.Google Scholar
  104. TCS, Trilateral Cooperation Secretariat. 2017. Annual Report 2016-2017. http://www.tcs-asia.org/bbs/board.php?bo_table=news&wr_id=426&page=4 (accessed February 4, 2019).
  105. US Department of Defence. 2015. Carter, Singapore Defense Minister Sign Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement. DoD News, December 7.Google Scholar
  106. U.S. Department of Defence. 2018. The National Defence Strategy of the United States of America. Sharpening the American Military’s Competitive Hedge. https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf (accessed February 4, 2019).
  107. U.S. Department of Defence. 2019a. Indo-Pacific Strategy Report. Preparedness, Partnerships and Promoting a Networked Region, June 1.Google Scholar
  108. U.S. Department of State. 2013. Expanded U.S. Assistance for Maritime Capacity Building. Fact Sheet, Office of the Spokesperson, Washington, DC, December 16.Google Scholar
  109. U.S. Department of State. 2015. Secretary Kerry Co-hosts a Lunch for Chinese President Xi Jinping Along With Vice President Joe Biden. Remarks by John Kerry. Ben Franklin Room, Washington, DC, September 25.Google Scholar
  110. U.S Department of State. 2016. U.S.-China Strategic & Economic Dialogue Outcomes of the Strategic Track. Media Note Office of the Spokesperson, Washington, DC, June 7.Google Scholar
  111. U.S. Department of State. 2018. U.S. Relations With Japan. Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Fact Sheet, January 25.Google Scholar
  112. U.S. Department of State. 2019. U.S. Security Cooperation with India. Fact Sheet, June 4.Google Scholar
  113. U.S. Department of Treasury. 2016. U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue U.S. Fact Sheet – Economic Track. Press Center, June 7.Google Scholar
  114. Wong, A. 2018. Briefing on The Indo-Pacific Strategy. Special Briefing by Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Press Correspondents Room, Washington, DC, April 2.Google Scholar
  115. Zoellick, R.B. 2005. Whither China: From Membership to Responsibility?. Deputy Secretary of State, Remarks to National Committee on U.S.-China Relations, New York City, September 21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sciences PoCenter for International Studies (CERI)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations