Networking hegemony: alliance dynamics in East Asia

  • Matteo Dian
  • Hugo MeijerEmail author
Original Article


This Special Issue aims to explain the transition from the Cold War US-led system of exclusive bilateral alliances in East Asia (or “hub-and-spokes” system) into a “networked security architecture”, i.e. a network of interwoven bilateral, minilateral and multilateral defence arrangements between the US and its regional allies and partners, and that also partly includes China. Drawing from the English School of International Relations, it challenges dominant Structural Realist explanations which interpret such development as a form of external balancing against a revisionist China. By contrast, this Special Issue submits that China’s selective contestation of the US-led hegemonic order in East Asia has sparked a renegotiation of such order among regional powers, which has resulted in the restructuring of the underlying alliances and defence partnerships into a networked security architecture. Specifically, regional powers have sought to broaden the composition of the US-led hegemonic order in East Asia—by diversifying the range of defence ties between US allies and partners, but also by seeking to include the PRC in it. Thereby, rather than merely balancing the People’s Republic of China, they have sought to channel the trajectory of China’s rise within this hegemonic order through a mixture of resistance and accommodation. This introductory paper develops the theoretical framework and central argument of the Special Issue.


English School Hegemony Alliances Defence cooperation United States China East Asia 



For useful and constructive feedback, the authors would like to thank Shaun Breslin, Tim Dunne, Rosemary Foot, Evelyn Goh, Joseph Grieco, Jonathan Kirshner, Beverly Loke, Avinash Paliwal, Luis Simón, Pascal Vennesson and Jiang Zhongjin.


  1. Allison, G. 2017. Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap?. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  2. Beckley, M. 2017. The Emerging Military Balance in East Asia: How China’s Neighbors Can Check Chinese Naval Expansion. International Security 42 (2): 78–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellamy, A.J., and M. MacDonald. 2004. Securing International Society: Towards an English School Discourse on Security. Australian Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bisley, N. 2013. An Ally for All the Years to Come: Why Australia is Not a Conflicted U.S. Ally. Australian Journal of International Affairs 67 (4): 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackwill, R.D., and P. Dibb (eds.). 2000. America’s Asian Alliances. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bull, H. 1961. The Control of the Arms Race. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  7. Bull, H. 1966. Society and Anarchy in International Relations. In Diplomatic Investigations, ed. H. Butterfield and M. Wight, 35–51. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  8. Bull, H. 1980. The Future Conditions of Strategic Deterrence. Adelphi Papers 160 (3): 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bull, H. 2002. The Anarchical Society, A study of Order in World Politics, 3rd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Butterfield, H. 1966. The Balance of Power. In Diplomatic Investigations, ed. H. Butterfield and M. Wight, 132–148. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  11. Buzan, B. 2004. From International to World Society: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buzan, B. 2014. An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Buzan, B. 2015. The English School: A Neglected Approach to International Security Studies. Security Dialogue 46 (2): 126–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buzan, B. 2018. China’s Rise in English School Perspective. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 18 (3): 449–476.Google Scholar
  15. Buzan, B., and R. Little. 2000. International Systems in World History (Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Buzan, B., and L. Schouenborg. 2018. Global International Society: A New Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buzan, B., and Y. Zhang. 2014a. Introduction: Interrogating Regional International Society in East Asia. In Contesting International Society in East Asia, ed. B. Buzan and Y. Zhang. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Buzan, B., and Y. Zhang (eds.). 2014b. Contesting International Society in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Calder, K.E. 2009. The Pacific Alliance: Reviving U.S.–Japan Relations. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Cha, V.D. 2011. Complex Patchworks: U.S. Alliances as Part of Asia’s Regional Architecture. Asia Policy 11 (2): 27–50.Google Scholar
  21. Cha, V.D. 2014. American Alliances and Asia’s Regional Architecture. In The Oxford Handbook of the International Relations of Asia, ed. R. Foot, S. Pekkanen, and J. Ravenhill, 737–757. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Cha, V.D. 2016. Powerplay: The Origins of the American Alliance System in Asia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chan, S., W. Hu, and K. He. 2018. Discerning States’ Revisionist and Status-Quo Orientations: Comparing China and the US. European Journal of International Relations. 25 (2): 613–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen, I.T., and A.H. Yang. 2013. A Harmonized Southeast Asia? Explanatory Typologies of ASEAN Countries’ Strategies to the Rise of China. The Pacific Review 26 (3): 265–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Christensen, T. 1996. Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947–1958. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Chung, C.P. 2004. Southeast Asia–China Relations: Dialectics of ‘Hedging’ and ‘Counter-Hedging’. Southeast Asian Affairs 2004: 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ciorciari, J. 2010. The Limits of Alignment: Southeast Asia and the Great Powers since 1975. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Clark, I. 2011. Hegemony in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cox, R. 1983. Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations. Millennium 12 (2): 162–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cronin, P., et al. 2013. The Emerging Asia Power Web: The Rise of Bilateral Intra-Asian Security Ties. Washington, D.C.: Centre for a New American Security.Google Scholar
  31. Dian, M. 2014. The Evolution of the U.S.–Japan Alliance. The Eagle and the Chrysanthemum. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Dolven, et al. 2015. Chinese Land Reclamation in the South China. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  33. Dunne, T. 2006. Global Governance: An English School Perspective. In Contending Perspectives on Global Governance, ed. A.D. Ba and M.J. Hoffmann, 82–97. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Dunne, T., and N.J. Wheeler. 2000. Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Fontaine, R.D., P.M. Cronin, M. Rapp-Hooper, and H. Krejsa. 2017. Networking Asian Security. An Integrated Approach to Order in the Pacific. Washington, D.C.: Center for New American Security.Google Scholar
  36. Foot, R., and E. Goh. 2019. The International Relations of East Asia: A New Research Prospectus. International Studies Review 21 (3): 398–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Foot, R., and A. Walter. 2010. China, the United States, and Global Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Foot, R., and A. Walter. 2013. Global Norms and Major State Behaviour: The Cases of China and the United States. European Journal of International Relations 19 (2): 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fravel, T.M. 2010. International Relations Theory and China’s Rise: Assessing China’s Potential for Territorial Expansion. International Studies Review 12 (4): 505–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Friedberg, A.L. 1993. Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia. International Security 18 (3): 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Friedberg, A.L. 2011. A Contest for Supremacy. China, America and the Struggle for Mastery in Asia. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  42. Gilpin, R. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Glaser, C.L. 2015. A US–China Grand Bargain? The Hard Choice Between Military Competition and Accommodation. International Security 39 (4): 49–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Goh, E. 2007. Southeast Asian Perspectives on the China Challenge. Journal of Strategic Studies 30 (4–5): 809–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Goh, E. 2013. The Struggle for Order: Hegemony, Hierarchy and Transition in Post-Cold War East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Goh, E. 2019. Contesting Hegemonic Order: China in East Asia. Security Studies 28 (3): 614–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Green, M.J. 2014. Strategic Asian Triangles. In The Oxford Handbook of the International Relations of Asia, ed. R. Foot, S. Pekkanen, and J. Ravenhill, 758–774. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Green, M.J. 2017. By More Than Providence: Grand Strategy and American Power in the Asia Pacific Since 1783. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Green, M.J., et al. 2014. Federated Defense in Asia. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
  50. Hoffmann, S. 1987. Janus and Minerva: Essays in Theory and Practice of International Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  51. Hopf, T. 2013. Common-Sense Constructivism and Hegemony in World Politics. International Organization 67 (2): 317–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hudson, G.F. 1966. Collective Security and Alliances. In Diplomatic Investigations, ed. H. Butterfield and M. Wight, 176–181. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  53. Hurrel, A. 2007. On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ikenberry, G.J. 2014. Introduction: Power, Order, and Change in World Politics. In Power, Order, and Change in World Politics, ed. G.J. Ikenberry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ikenberry, G.J., and A. Liff. 2014. Racing toward Tragedy? China’s Rise, Military Competition in the Asia-Pacific, and the Security Dilemma. International Security 39 (2): 52–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ikenberry, G.J., and D.H. Nexon. 2019. Hegemony Studies 3.0: The Dynamics of Hegemonic Orders. Security Studies 28 (3): 395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jackson, V.J. 2016. Red Teaming the Rebalance: The Theory and Risks of U.S. Asia Strategy. Journal of Strategic Studies 39 (3): 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Johnston, A.I. 2003. Is China a Status Quo Power? International Security 27 (4): 5–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kennedy, S. (ed.). 2017. Global Governance and China: The Dragon’s Learning Curve. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Khalilzad, Z. 1999. Congage China. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  61. Khong, Y.F. 2014. East Asia and the Strategic ‘Deep Rules’ of International/Regional Society. In Contesting International Society in East Asia, ed. B. Buzan and Y. Zhang, 144–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kindleberger, C. 1973. The World in Depression. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  63. Kirshner, J. 2010. The Tragedy of Offensive Realism. Classic Realism and the Rise of China. European Journal of International Relations 18 (1): 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kirshner, J. 2018. Handle Him with Care: The Importance of Getting Thucydides Right. Security Studies 24 (4): 1–24.Google Scholar
  65. Kupchan, C. 2014. Unpacking Hegemony: The Social Foundations of Hierarchical. In Power, Order, and Change in World Politics, ed. G.J. Ikenberry, 19–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lee, C.M. 2017. Asia’s New Long March: Bottling Conflicts and Managing Political Turbulences. The Pacific Review 30 (6): 843–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lemke, D., and R.L. Tammen. 2003. Power Transition Theory and the Rise of China. International Interactions 29 (4): 269–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Liff, A.P. 2016. Whither the Balancers? The Case for a Methodological Reset. Security Studies 25 (3): 420–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lim, D.J., and Z. Cooper. 2015. Reassessing hedging: The logic of alignment in East Asia. Security Studies 24 (4): 696–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Little, R., and J. Williams (eds.). 2006. The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  71. Manicom, J. 2014. China and American Seapower in East Asia: Is Accommodation Possible? Journal of Strategic Studies 37 (3): 345–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mastanduno, M. 2014. Realism and Asia. In The Oxford Handbook of the International Relations of Asia, ed. R. Foot, S. Pekkanen, and J. Ravenhill, 25–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Mazarr, M.J., T.R. Heath, and A.S. Cevallos. 2018. China and the International Order. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mearsheimer, J.J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  75. Mearsheimer, J.J. 2006. China’s Unpeaceful Rise. Current History 105 (690): 160–164.Google Scholar
  76. Mearsheimer, J.J. 2010. The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to U.S. Power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 4 (1): 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Meijer, H. (ed.). 2015. Origins and Evolution of the U.S. Rebalance Toward Asia: Diplomatic, Military, and Economic Dimensions. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  78. Nilsson-Wright, J. 2017. Creative Minilateralism in a Changing Asia Opportunities for Security Convergence and Cooperation Between Australia, India and Japan. London: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  79. Palmujoki, E. 2013. Fragmentation and Diversification of Climate Change Governance in International Society. International Relations 27 (2): 180–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pempel, T.J., and C.M. Lee (eds.). 2012. Security Cooperation in Northeast Asia: Architecture and Beyond. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Rinehart, I., and B. Elias. 2015. China’s Air Defense Identification Zone. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  82. Schoff, J.L. 2017. Uncommon Alliance for the Common Good. United States and Japan After the Cold War. Washington, D.C.: Carnagie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  83. Schweller, R.L. 1994. Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back. International Security 19 (1): 72–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schweller, R.L. 1999. Managing the Rise of Great Powers: History and Theory. In Engaging China: Managing a Rising Power, ed. A.I. Johnston and R. Ross. London and New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  85. Schweller, R.L. 2018. Opposite but Compatible Nationalisms: A Neoclassical Realist Approach to the Future of US–China Relations. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 11 (1): 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Shambaugh, D. 1996. Containment or Engagement of China? Calculating Beijing’s Responses. International Security 21 (2): 180–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Shambaugh, D. 2013. Tangled Titans: The United States and China. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  88. Shambaugh, D. 2018. U.S.–China Rivalry in Southeast Asia: Power Shift or Competitive Coexistence? International Security 42 (4): 85–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Shin, G.W. 2010. One Alliance, Two Lenses: U.S.–Korea Relations in a New Era. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Silove, N. 2016. The Pivot Before the Pivot U.S. Strategy to Preserve the Power Balance in Asia. International Security 40 (4): 45–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Simón, L., A. Lanoszka, and H. Meijer. 2019. Nodal Defence: The Changing Structure of U.S. Alliance Systems in Europe and East Asia. Journal of Strategic Studies. Scholar
  92. Sørensen, C.T. 2013. Is China Becoming More Aggressive? A Neoclassical Realist Analysis. Asian Perspective 37 (3): 363–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Spandler, K. 2015. The Political International Society: Change in Primary and Secondary Institutions. Review of International Studies 41 (3): 601–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Stubbs, M., and D. Stephens. 2017. Dredge Your Way to China? The Legal Significance of Chinese Reclamation and Construction in the South China Sea. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ocean Law and Policy 2 (1): 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tammen, R.L., and J. Kugler. 2006. Power Transition and China–US Conflicts. Chinese Journal of International Politics 1 (1): 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Tan, S.S. 2015. Multilateral Asian Security Architecture: Non-ASEAN Stakeholders. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Tellis, A.J. 2013. Balancing Without Containment: A U.S. Strategy for Confronting China’s Rise. The Washington Quarterly 36 (4): 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Tow, W.T. 2014. The East Wind and Australia’s Alliance Politics. Asian Survey 54 (2): 273–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Tow, W.T. 2016. Regional Perspectives on America’s Changing Asia-Pacific Alliances and Partnerships. Asian Politics & Policy 8: 1–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Tow, W.T., and B. Taylor. 2010. What is Asian security architecture? Review of International Studies 36 (1): 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Tow, W.T., and B. Taylor (eds.). 2013. Bilateralism, Multilateralism and Asia-Pacific Security: Contending Cooperation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  102. U.S. Department of Defence (2019) Indo-Pacific Strategy Report. Preparedness, Partnerships and Promoting a Networked Region, June 1.Google Scholar
  103. Vincent, J. 1986. Human Rights and International Relations: Issues and Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  104. Watson, A. 2000. The Evolution of the International Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  105. Wuthnow, J. 2019. U.S. ‘Minilateralism’ in Asia and China’s Responses: A New Security Dilemma? Journal of Contemporary China 28 (115): 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Zeng, K., and W. Liang. (eds.). 2013. China and Global Trade Governance: China’s First Decade in the World Trade Organization. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  107. Zhao, S. 2018. China and the South China Sea Arbitration: Geopolitics Versus International Law. Journal of Contemporary China 27 (109): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zheng, C. 2016. China Debates the Non-interference Principle. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 9 (3): 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze Politiche e SocialiUniversità di BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.Center for International Studies (CERI)Sciences PoParisFrance

Personalised recommendations