China’s resurgence has prompted an increased interest among English School theorists in assessing the great power strategies adopted to deal with that change in Beijing’s status, as well as a focus on the degree of challenge that a resurgent China poses to what is commonly recognized as US hegemony in the Asia-Pacific region. China’s material rise into the ranks of great powers has brought with it certain expectations and responsibilities for great power management that Beijing has tried in various ways to fulfil. While it has chosen only selective contestation of the material and normative pillars of the extant US-led regional order, Beijing has begun to outline a regional vision and to use its material power in ways that are leading to renegotiation of some of the primary institutions of East Asian hegemonic order. However, China’s partial bid for hegemonic transition has so far been stymied by a mismatch between the vision of order it has promulgated and some of the policy actions that Beijing has taken. As a result of this mismatch, a current or future Chinese search for hegemonic status already has met various forms of resistance, including the prompting of networked forms of defence cooperation in the region.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Bateman, S. 2018. China’s Latest Moves to Control the South China Sea. http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2018/06/05/chinas-latest-moves-to-control-the-south-china-sea/, June 5. Accessed 14 Aug 2018.
Beech, H. 2018. We Cannot Afford This. Malaysia Pushes Back Against China’s Vision. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/20/world/asia/china-malaysia.html. Accessed 22 Aug 2018.
Beetham, D. 1991. The Legitimation of Power. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Bukovansky, M., I. Clark, R. Eckersley, R. Price, C. Reus-Smit, and N.J. Wheeler. 2012. Special Responsibilities: Global Problems and American Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, I. 2011a. China and the United States: A Succession of Hegemonies? International Affairs 87 (1): 13–28.
Clark, I. 2011b. Hegemony in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, I. 2014. International Society and China: The Power of Norms and the Norms of Power. Chinese Journal of International Politics 7 (3): 315–340.
Ferchen, M. 2016. China, Economic Development, and Global Security: Bridging the Gaps. Beijing: Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy. Research Paper.
Foot, R. 2006. Chinese Strategies in a US-Hegemonic Global Order: Accommodating and Hedging. International Affairs 82 (1): 77–94.
Foot, R. 2016. Identity Politics and the US Rebalance to Asia: American and Northeast Asian Perspectives. EAI Working Paper, Fellows Program on Peace, Governance, and Development in East Asia, Seoul, Korea. March.
Foot, R. 2019. Remembering the Past to Secure the Present: Versailles Legacies in a Resurgent China. International Affairs 95 (1): 143–160.
Foot, R., and E. Goh. 2018. The International Relations of East Asia: A New Research Prospectus. International Studies Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy015.
Glosny, M.A. 2016. Chinese Assessment of China’s Influence in Developing Asia. In Rising China’s Influence in Developing Asia, ed. E. Goh, 24–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goh, E. 2013. The Struggle for Order: Hegemony, Hierarchy, and the Post-Cold War Order Transition in East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goh, E. 2019. Contesting Hegemonic Order: China in East Asia. Security Studies 28 (3): 614–644.
Hamilton-Hart, N. 2012. Hard Interests, Soft Illusions: Southeast Asia and American Power. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Heath, T.R. 2013. Diplomacy Work Forum: Xi Steps up Efforts to Shape a China-centered Regional Order. ChinaBrief 13 (2): 6–10.
Heath, T.R. 2014. China and the U.S. Alliance System. The Diplomat, 11 June. https://thediplomat.com/2014/06/china-and-the-u-s-alliance-system/. Accessed 15 Aug 2018.
Heath, T.R. 2018. China Prepares for an International Order After U.S. Leadership. RAND Corporation https://www.rand.org/blog/2018/08/china-prepares-for-an-international-order-after-us.html. Accessed 14 Aug 2018.
Heginbotham, E., and R.J. Samuels. 2018. Active Denial: Redesigning Japan’s Response to China’s Military Challenge. International Security 42 (4): 128–169.
Hoo, Tiang Boon. 2017. Hardening the Hard, Softening the Soft: Assertiveness and China’s Regional Strategy. Journal of Strategic Studies. 40 (5): 639–662.
Jakobson, L. 2016. Reflections from China on Xi Jinping’s “Asia for Asians”. Asian Politics and Policy 8 (1): 219–223.
Jakobson, L., and R. Medcalf. 2015. The Perception Gap: Reading China’s Maritime Strategic Objectives in Indo-Pacific Asia. Sydney: Lowy Institute Report.
Kynge, J. 2018. China’s Belt and Road Project Drives Debt Fears. The Financial Times. 8 August.
Martin, P., and A. Crawford. 2018. Is Xi Jinping’s Bold China Power Grab Starting to Backfire? Bloomberg Business Week, 7 August. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-08-07/is-xi-jinping-s-bold-china-power-grab-starting-to-backfire. Accessed 14 Aug 2018.
Mazarr, M.J., T.R. Heath, and A.S. Cevallos. 2018. China and the International Order. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.
MoFA. 2010. China’s Non-proliferation Policy and Measures, 27 May 2010. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjb_663304/zzjg_663340/jks_665232/kjlc_665236/fkswt_665240/t410729.shtml. Accessed 6 Sept 2018.
MoFA. 2017. China’s Policies on Asia Pacific Security Cooperation, 11 January. At http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/t1429771.shtml. Accessed 21 Aug 2018.
New Straits Times. 2018. Dr. Mahathir aims to scrap Chinese deals. https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2018/08/400855/dr-mahathir-aims-scrap-chinese-deals. Accessed 16 Aug 2018.
Shambaugh, D. 2018. U.S.–China Rivalry in Southeast Asia: Power Shift or Competitive Coexistence? International Security 42 (4): 85–127.
Shi, Y. 2016. Amid Western Uncertainties, China Mustn't Spread Too Thin. Global Times, 26 October.
US DoD. 2015. The Asia-Pacific Maritime Security Strategy: Achieving U.S. National Security Objectives in a Changing Environment. Washington, DC, August.
World Bank. 2018. World Bank National Account Data: China. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=CN. Accessed 29 Aug 2019.
World Intellectual Property Organization. 2018. China Drives International Patent Applications to Record Heights; Demand Rising for Trademark and Industrial Design Protection Geneva, March 21, 2018. http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2018/article_0002.html.
Wu, X. 2016. Cooperation, Competition and Shaping the Outlook: The United States and China's Neighbourhood Diplomacy. International Affairs 92 (4): 849–867.
Xi, J. 2014. New Asian Security Concept for New Progress in Security Cooperation. Remarks at the Fourth Summit of the Conference on Interaction and Confidence Building Measures in Asia, Shanghai, 21 May. http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/t1159951.shtml. Accessed 14 Aug 2018.
Xi, J. 2017. Full Text of President Xi’s Speech at Opening of Belt and Road Forum. Xinhua, 14 May.
Yang, J. 2013. Implementing the Chinese Dream. The National Interest, 10 September. http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/implementing-the-chinese-dream-9026/. Accessed 14 Aug 2018.
Zhang, Y. 2017. China’s Neighbours and the Quest for Regional Community. East Asia Forum, 3 February. http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2017/02/03/chinas-neighbours-and-the-quest-for-regional-community/. Accessed 6 Feb 2017.
Zhou, F. 2016. The U.S. Alliance System in Asia: A Chinese Perspective. Asian Politics & Policy 8 (1): 207–218.
Conflict of interest
The corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Foot, R. China’s rise and US hegemony: Renegotiating hegemonic order in East Asia?. Int Polit 57, 150–165 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-019-00189-5
- China and East Asia
- China's Rise
- Hegemonic transition
- US hegemony