Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Russia’s relationship with China: the role of domestic and ideational factors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past few years, Russian–Chinese relations have grown steadily closer. This article examines the domestic and ideational motivations that underlie Russia’s interactions with China. It is argued that Russia’s behavior toward China demonstrates in particular the importance of ideas at the domestic level. Moscow’s increasingly close relationship with China serves to confirm Russia’s perceived status as a great power, which functions as a fundamental tool of regime legitimacy. In addition, Russia and China have grown closer on national identity issues that are constituted in opposition to political and ideological principles endorsed by the West as universal values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrosio, T. 2017. The Architecture of Alignment: The Russia–China Relationship and International Agreements. Europe-Asia Studies 69 (1): 110–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordachev, T. 2017. Main Results of 2017: Energetic Russia and the Greater Eurasia Community. Russia in Global Policy, 29 December. http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/book/Main-Results-of-2017-Energetic-Russia-and-the-Greater-Eurasia-Community-19276. Accessed 31 December 2017.

  • Boulding, K. 1959. National Images and International System. Journal of Conflict Resolution 3 (2): 120–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukkvoll, T. 2016. Why Putin Went to War: Ideology, Interests and Decision-Making in the Russian Use of Force in Crimea and Donbas. Contemporary Politics 22 (6): 267–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clunan, A. 2009. The Social Construction of Russia’s Resurgence: Aspirations, Identities, and Security Interests. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawisha, K. 2014. Putin’s Kleptocracy: Who Owns Russia?. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Document 9. 2013. Document 9: A China File Translation. China File, 8 November. http://www.chinafile.com/document-9-chinafile-translatoin. Accessed 5 January 2013.

  • Dragneva, R., and K. Wolczuk. 2017. The Eurasian Economic Union: Deals, Rules and the Exercise of Power, Research Paper, Russia and Eurasia Programme. London: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugin, A. 2008. Liberalizm—ugroza chelovechestvu’. Profil 12: 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feklyunina, V. 2012. Russia’s International Images and Its Energy Policy: An Unreliable Supplier? Europe-Asia Studies 64 (3): 448–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flikke, G. 2016. Sino-Russian Relations. Problems of Post-Communism 63 (3): 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y. 2016. How China Sees Russia: Beijing and Russia are Close but Not Allies. Foreign Affairs 95 (1): 96–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabuev, A. 2015. Russia’s Policy Toward China: Key Players and the Decision-Making Process. TheAsanForum, 5 March.

  • Gabuev, A. 2016a. Friends with Benefits? Russian Chinese Relations After the Ukraine Crisis. Moscow: Carnegie Moscow Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabuev, A. 2016b. China’s Pivot to Putin’s Friends. Foreign Policy, 25 June. http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/06/25/chinas-pivot-to-putin-friends-xi-russia-gazprom-timchenko-sinopec. Accessed 27 June 2016.

  • Gabuev, A. 2017. China and Russia’s Dangerous Entente. Carnegie Moscow Center, 4 October.

  • Götz, E., and N. S. MacFarlane. 2018. Russia’s Role in World Politics: Power, Ideas, and Domestic Influences. International Politics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-018-0162-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Great Ocean 5. 2017. Toward the Great Ocean-5. From the Turn to the East to Greater Eurasia. Valdai Discussion Club Report, Moscow.

  • Hill, F. 2016. Understanding and Deterring Russia: U.S. Policies and Strategies, House Armed Services Committee, Testimony, 10 February. https://www.brookings.edu/testimonies/understanding-and-deterring-russia-u-s-policies-and-strategies. Accessed 20 June 2016.

  • Hopf, T. 2013. Common-Sense Constructivism and Hegemony in World Politics. International Organization 67 (2): 317–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J. 2012. Hu Jintao’s Article in Quishi Magazine—Translated, China Copyright and Media, 4 January. http://chinacopyrightandmedia.workpress.com/2012/01/04/hu-jintaos-article-in-qiushi=magazine-translated. Accessed 5 January 2012.

  • Hutcheson, D., and B. Petersson. 2016. Shortcut to Legitimacy: Popularity in Putin’s Russia. Europe-Asia Studies 68 (7): 1107–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaczmarski, M. 2012. Domestic Sources of Russia’s China Policy. Problems of Post-Communism 59 (2): 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaczmarski, M. 2014. Domestic Power Relations and Russia’s Foreign Policy. Demokratizatsiya 22 (3): 383–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaczmarski, M. 2015. Russia–China Relations in the Post-Crisis International Order. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaczmarski, M. 2016. The Asymmetric Partnership? Russia’s Turn to China. International Politics 53 (3): 415–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansikas, S. 2015. The Eurasian Economic Union, Russia’s Integration Policy, and the EU Challenge. Journal on Baltic Security 1 (1): 108–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaganov, S. 2014. Sergei Karaganov: “my vernulis’ v XIX vek”. The New Times 13: 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaganov, S. 2016. A Turn to Asia: The History of the Political Idea. Russia in Global Affairs, 13 January. http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/pubcol/A-turn-to-Asia-the-history-of-the-political-idea-17926. Accessed 24 February 2016.

  • Korolev, A. 2016. Systemic Balancing and Regional Hedging: China-Russia Relations. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 9 (4): 375–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koshkin, P. 2016. Russia’s National Identity Through the Lens of the Kremlin’s Foreign Policy. Russia Direct, 2 August. http://www.russia-direct.org/qa/russias-national-identity-through-lens-kremlins-foreign-policy. Accessed 8 August 2016.

  • Krickovic, A. 2017. The Symbiotic China–Russia Partnership: Cautious Riser and Desperate Challenger. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 10 (3): 299–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kryshtanovskaya, O., and S. White. 2003. Putin’s Militocracy. Post-Soviet Affairs 19 (4): 289–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, D., and A. Shevchenko. 2010. Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy. International Security 34 (4): 63–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledeneva, A. 2013. Can Russia Modernize? Sistema, Power Networks, and Informal Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R., and A. Lukin. 2015. Russia’s Far East: New Dynamics in Asia Pacific and Beyond. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levada. 2017. Gordost’ i styd, Levada Centre, 1 March. https://www.levada.ru/2017/03/01/gordost-i-styd/. Accessed 30 January 2018.

  • Lo, B. 2008. Axis of Convenience: Moscow, Beijing and the New Geopolitics. London: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, B. 2015. Russia and the New World Disorder. London: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukin, A. 2003. The Bear Watches the Dragon. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukin, A. 2015. Povorot Rossii k Azii: mif ili real’nost’? Mezhdunarodnaia Zhizn’ 12. https://interaffairs.ru/jauthor/material/1468. Accessed 28 June 2016.

  • Mankoff, J. 2015. Russia’s Asia Pivot: Confrontation of Cooperation? Asia Policy 19: 65–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marten, K. 2013. A New Explanation for Russian Foreign Policy: The Power of Informal Patronage Networks, PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 274. Washington DC: George Washington University.

  • Marten, K. 2015. Informal Political Networks and Putin’s Foreign Policy: The Examples of Iran and Syria. Problems of Post-Communism 62: 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medvedev, D. 2009. The Draft of the European Security Treaty, Moscow. The Kremlin, 20 November. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/6152. Accessed 30 December 2015.

  • Mezhuev, B. 2014. Russki mir prikhodit v Evropu. Izvestiia 71, 18 April.

  • Minchenko Consulting. 2017. Politburo 2.0: Renovation Instead of Dismantling, 12 October.

  • Neumann, I. 1996. Russia and the Idea of Europe. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, I. 2016. Russia’s Europe, 1991–2016: Inferiority to Superiority. International Affairs 92 (6): 1381–1399.

    Google Scholar 

  • OEC. 2016. Observatory of Economic Complexity. https://atlas.media.mit.edu/en/visualize/free_map/hs92/export/rus/chn/show/2016. Accessed 2 February 2018.

  • Oliker, O., C. Chivvis, K. Crane, O. Tkacheva, and S. Boston. 2015. Russian Foreign Policy in Historical and Current Context. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, T.V., D.W. Larson, and W. Wohlforth. 2014. Status and World Order. In Status in World Politics, ed. T.V. Paul, D.W. Larson, and W. Wohlforth, 3–29. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokof’ev, D. 2018. Kitai i Rossiia: neprimipimye protivorechiia na Dal’nem Voctoke. Ekspertnyi Konsaltinr. https://finobzor.ru/53969-kitay-i-rossiya-neprimirimye-protivorechiya-na-dalnem-vostoke.html. Accessed 16 February 2018.

  • Putin, V. 2010. Putin Envisions a Russia-EU Free Trade Zone. Spiegel Online, 25 November. http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/from-lison-to-vladivostok-putin–envisions-a-russia-eu-free-trade-zone-a-731109.html. Accessed 30 December 2015.

  • Putin, V. 2014. Address by President of the Russian Federation, 18 March, The Kremlin. http://eng.news.kremlin.ru/news/6889. Accessed 30 March.

  • Rozman, G. 2014. The Sino-Russian Challenge to the World Order: National Identities, Bilateral Relations, and East Versus West in the 2010s. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • RT. 2018. Russia Today. https://rt.com/business/415692-russia-china-trade-turnover. Accessed 2 February 2018.

  • Sakwa, R. 2011a. Russia’s Identity: Between the “Domestic” and the “International”. Europe-Asia Studies 63 (6): 957–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakwa, R. 2011b. The Crisis of Russian Democracy: The Duel State, Factionalism and the Medvedev Succession. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakwa, R. 2016. How the Eurasian Elites Envisage the Role of the EEU in Global Perspective. European Politics and Society 17 (supp1): 4–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan, J. 2017. Russian Ties “Best in History”. Global Times, 4 July. https://www.alwihdainfo.com/Sino-Russian-ties-best-in-history-Xi_a55828.html. Accessed 25 January 2018.

  • Skalamera, M. 2018a. Understanding Russia’s Energy Turn to China: Domestic Narratives and National Identity Priorities. Post-Soviet Affairs 34 (1): 55–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skalamera, M. 2018b. Explaining the 2014 Sino-Russian Gas Breakthrough: The Primacy of Domestic Politics. Europe-Asia Studies 70 (1): 90–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovmestnoe Zaiavlenie. 2017. Sovmestnoe zaiavlenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Kitaiskoi Narodnoi Respubliki o dal’neishem uglublenii otnoshenii vseob”emlushchego partnerstva i strategicheskogo vzaimodeistviia, Kremlin, 4 July. http://kremlin.ru/supplement/5218. Accessed 29 January 2018.

  • Trenin, D. 2000. The China Factor: Challenge and Chance for Russia. In Rapprochement or Rivalry? Russian–Chinese Relations in a Changing Asia, ed. S. Garnett, 39–70. Washington DC: Carnegie Institute for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenin, D. 2015. From Greater Europe to Greater Asia? The Sino-Russian Entente. Moscow: Carnegie Moscow Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsygankov, A. 2005. Vladimir Putin’s Vision of Russia as a Normal Great Power. Post-Soviet Affairs 21 (2): 132–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsygankov, A. 2016. Crafting the State Civilization: Vladimir Putin’s Turn to Distinct Values. Problems of Post-Communism 63: 146–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsygankov, A., and P. Tsygankov. 2010. National Ideology and IR Theory: Three Incarnations of the Russian Ideal. European Journal of International Relations 16 (4): 663–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, M. 2010. Cultures of Power in Post-Communist Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkov, D. 2018. National Pride in Russia. Intersection, 8 January. http://intersectionproject.eu/article/society/national-pride-russia. Accessed 30 January 2018.

  • Wendt, A. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wishnick, E. 2016. In Search of the “Other” in Asia: Russia–China Relations Revisited. The Pacific Review 30: 114–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. 2004. Strategic Partners: Russian–Chinese Relations in the Post-Soviet Era. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. 2009. Coloured Revolutions: The View from Moscow and Beijing. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 25 (2): 369–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. 2010. Russia: The Legacy of the Color Revolutions. Problems of Post-Communism 57 (2): 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wheaton College Massachusetts, 26 E. Main Street, Norton, MA, 02766, USA

    Jeanne L. Wilson

Authors
  1. Jeanne L. Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeanne L. Wilson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilson, J.L. Russia’s relationship with China: the role of domestic and ideational factors. Int Polit 56, 778–794 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-018-0167-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-018-0167-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation