Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Russia’s role in world politics: power, ideas, and domestic influences

  • Introduction
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Russia’s role in world politics has become the object of a spirited debate among policymakers, think-tank analysts, and academics. Much of this debate focuses on one central question: What are the main drivers, or causes, of Moscow’s increasingly proactive and assertive foreign policy? The purpose of this special issue is to address this question by focusing on the interplay of power, ideas, and domestic influences. Our introductory article sets the scene for this analytical endeavor. More specifically, the article has three aims: (1) to review the existing explanations of Moscow’s assertiveness; (2) to discuss the challenges, opportunities, and benefits of employing eclectic approaches in the study of Russian foreign policy; and (3) to outline the contributions of the articles that follow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, R. 2013. Russia and Syria: Explaining alignment with a regime in crisis. International Affairs 89 (4): 795–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosio, T. 2006. The political success of Russia-Belarus relations: Insulating Minsk from a color revolution. Demokratizatsiya 14 (3): 407–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosio, T. 2009. Authoritarian Backlash: Russian Resistance to Democratization in the Former Soviet Union. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, A.M., I. Henneberg, and F. Plank. 2014. “If you compress the spring, it will snap back hard”: The Ukrainian crisis and the balance of threat theory. International Journal 70 (1): 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremmer, I., and S. Charap. 2007. The Siloviki in Putin’s Russia: Who they are and what they want. Washington Quarterly 30 (1): 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byman, D.L., and K.M. Pollack. 2001. Let us now praise great men: Bringing the statesman back in. International Security 25 (4): 107–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadier, D. 2015. Policies towards the Post-Soviet Space: The Eurasian Economic Union as an Attempt to Develop Russia’s Structural Power? In Russia’s foreign policy: Ideas, domestic politics and external relations, ed. D. Cadier, and M. Light, 156–174. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadier, D., and M. Light. 2015. Conclusion: Foreign policy as the continuation of domestic politics by other means. In Russia’s foreign policy: Ideas, domestic politics and external relations, ed. D. Cadier, and M. Light, 204–216. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charap, S., and C. Welt. 2015. Making sense of Russian foreign policy. Problems of Post-Communism 62 (2): 67–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J.T. 2013. Theoretical pluralism in IR: Possibilities and limits. In Handbook of international relations, 2nd ed, ed. W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, and B.A. Simmons, 220–241. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clunan, A.L. 2009. The social construction of Russia’s resurgence: Aspirations, identity, and security interests. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clunan, A.L. 2014. Historical aspirations and the domestic politics of Russia’s pursuit of international status. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 47 (3–4): 281–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. 2007. Domestic factors driving Russia’s foreign policy. Washington, DC: Backgrounder No. 2048, The Heritage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, T., R. Heller, and R. Wolf. 2014. Special issue: Status and emotions in Russian foreign policy. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 47 (3–4): 261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, T., and C. Pursiainen. 2017. The psychological dimension of Russian foreign policy: Putin and the annexation of Crimea. Global Society 31 (2): 220–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz, E. 2015. It’s geopolitics, stupid: Explaining Russia’s Ukraine policy. Global Affairs 1 (1): 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz, E. 2017. Putin, the state, and war: The causes of Russia’s near abroad assertion revisited. International Studies Review 19 (2): 228–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. 2015. How Vladimir Putin’s world view shapes Russian foreign policy. In Russia’s foreign policy: Ideas, domestic politics and external relations, ed. D. Cadier, and M. Light, 42–61. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopf, T. 2002. Social construction of international politics: Identities and foreign policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopf, T. 2005. Identity, legitimacy, and the use of military force: Russia’s great power identities and military intervention in Abkhazia. Review of International Studies 31 (S1): 225–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopf, T. 2006. Moscow’s foreign policy, 1945–2000: Identities, institutions, and interests. In The Cambridge History of Russia (Vol. 3): The Twentieth Century, ed. R.G. Suny, 662–705. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopf, T. 2016. ‘Crimea is ours’: A discursive history. International Relations 30 (2): 227–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupille, J., J.A. Caporaso, and J.T. Checkel. 2003. Integrating institutions: Rationalism, constructivism, and the study of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 36 (1–2): 7–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, R. 2008. The return of history and the end of dreams. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.D. 2016. Eurasia’s coming anarchy: The risks of Chinese and Russian weakness. Foreign Affairs 95 (2): 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korolev, A. 2017. Theories of non-balancing and Russia’s foreign policy. Journal of Strategic Studies (online first). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2017.1283614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krastev, I., and S. Holmes. 2014. Russia’s aggressive isolationism. The American Interest, 10 December.

  • Krickovic, A. 2016. Catalyzing conflict: The internal dimension of the security dilemma. Journal of Global Security Studies 1 (2): 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krickovic, A. 2017. The symbiotic China-Russia partnership: Cautious riser and desperate challenger. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 10 (3): 299–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, D.W., and A. Shevchenko. 2010. Status seekers: Chinese and Russian responses to U.S. primacy. International Security 34 (4): 63–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, D.W., and A. Shevchenko. 2014. Russia says no: Power, status, and emotions in foreign policy. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 47 (3–4): 269–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankoff, J. 2007. Russia and the West: Taking the longer view. Washington Quarterly 30 (2): 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marten, K. 2015. Informal political networks and Putin’s foreign policy: The examples of Iran and Syria. Problems of Post-Communism 62 (2): 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matz, J. 2001. Constructing a post-Soviet international political reality: Russian foreign policy towards the newly independent states, 1990–95. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J.J. 2014. Why the Ukraine crisis is the West’s fault: The liberal delusions that provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs 93 (5): 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendras, M. 2015. The rising cost of Russia’s authoritarian foreign policy. In Russia’s foreign policy: Ideas, domestic politics and external relations, ed. D. Cadier, and M. Light, 80–96. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J. 2017. The illusion of international prestige. International Security 41 (4): 133–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, N.P., and K.G. Ruby. 2009. IR and the false promise of philosophical foundations. International Theory 1 (1): 15–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, I.B. 2008. Russia as a great power, 1815–2007. Journal of International Relations and Development 11 (2): 128–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, I.B. 2016. Russia’s Europe, 1991-2016: Inferiority to superiority. International Affairs 92 (6): 1381–1399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye Jr., J.S. 2015. The challenge of Russia’s decline. Project Syndicate, 14 April.

  • Saradzhyan, S. 2016. Is Russia declining? Demokratizatsiya 24 (3): 399–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevtosva, L. 2010. Lonely power. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sil, R. 2009. Simplifying pragmatism: From social theory to problem-driven eclecticism. International Studies Review 11 (3): 648–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sil, R., and P.J. Katzenstein. 2010. Beyond paradigms: Analytical eclecticism in the study of world politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. 2003. Dialogue and the reinforcement of orthodoxy in international relations. International Studies Review 5 (1): 141–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staun, J. 2007. Siloviki vs. liberal-technocrats: The fight for Russia and its foreign policy. DIIS Report No. 9. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.

  • Tansey, O. 2016. The problem with autocracy promotion. Democratization 23 (1): 141–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsygankov, A.P. 2006. Projecting confidence, Not Fear: Russia’s Post-Imperial Assertiveness. Orbis 50 (4): 677–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsygankov, A.P. 2009. Russia in the post-western world: The end of the normalization paradigm? Post-Soviet Affairs 25 (4): 347–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsygankov, A.P. 2010. Russia’s foreign policy: Change and continuity in national identity, 2nd ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsygankov, A.P. 2012. Russia and the West from Alexander to Putin: Honor in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhill, R. 2013. Promoting authoritarianism abroad. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Way, L.A. 2015. The limits of autocracy promotion: The case of Russia in the ‘near abroad’. European Journal of Political Research 54 (4): 691–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. 2014. The Ukraine crisis brings the threat of democracy to Russia’s doorstep. European View 13 (1): 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Uppsala University, Box 514, 75120, Uppsala, Sweden

    Elias Götz

  2. Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford, Manor Road Building, Manor Road, Oxford, OX1 3UQ, UK

    Neil MacFarlane

Authors
  1. Elias Götz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Neil MacFarlane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elias Götz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Götz, E., MacFarlane, N. Russia’s role in world politics: power, ideas, and domestic influences. Int Polit 56, 713–725 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-018-0162-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-018-0162-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation