Advertisement

Fostering liberty in international relations theory: the case of Ayn Rand

  • Edwin van de Haar
Original Article

Abstract

Freedom is one of the pivotal ideas within liberal political thought. All liberals aim to secure individual liberty, but they differ about the degree of freedom that is required for the ‘good life’, particularly in relation to the desired level of interference by the state through public services and taxation. The importance and relevance of this internal liberal debate is hardly acknowledged by theorists of international relations (IR). This has led to a one-sided, often erroneous portrayal of liberalism, despite its dominance in IR theory. Here, this issue will be elaborated through the first comprehensive analysis of the international political thought of Ayn Rand. An analysis of her ideas, put against the main common characteristics of current liberal theories of international relations, yields additional and new evidence for the existence of a ‘liberal knowledge gap in IR theory’. This clearly needs to be acknowledged and addressed by IR theorists to get a fuller comprehension of liberalism and international relations theory.

Keywords

Liberalism IR theory Ayn Rand International political theory Human nature History of international thought 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Douglas Den Uyl, Douglas Rasmussen, Elan Journo, and Andreas Harald Aure for their comments, and Jeff Scialabba and Yaron Brook for assistance. None of them is resposible for the views expressed, or any remaining error, in this article.

References

  1. Barry, N.P. 1987. On Cassical Liberalism and Libertarianism. New York, St: Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell, D. (ed.). 2007. Victorian Visions of Global Order. Empire and International Relations in Nineteenth-Century Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Binswanger, H. 1986. The Ayn Rand Lexicon. Objectivism From A to Z. New York: Meridian.Google Scholar
  4. Branden, N. 1999. My Years with Ayn Rand. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Brennan, J. 2012. Libertarianism. What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Britting, J. 2004. Ayn Rand. New York: Overlook Duckworth.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, C., T. Nardin, and N. Rengger. 2002. Introduction. In International Relations in Political Thought. Texts from the Ancient Greeks to the First World War, ed. C. Brown, T. Nardin, and N. Rengger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burns, J. 2009. Goddess of the Market. Ayn Rand and the American Right. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Busby, J.W. 2007. Bono Made Jesse Helms Cry: Jubilee 2000, Debt Relief, and Moral Action in International Politics. International Studies Quarterly 51: 247–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cobden, R. 1878. The Political Writings of Richard Cobden. London: William Ridgway.Google Scholar
  11. Den Uyl, D. 2007. A Note on Rand’s Americanism. In Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged. A Philosophical and Literary Companion, ed. E.W. Younkins. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  12. Den Uyl, D.J., and D.B. Rasmussen. 1983. The Philosophical Importance of Ayn Rand. Modern Age 27: 67–69.Google Scholar
  13. Doherty, B. 2007. Radicals for Capitalism. A Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  14. Doyle, M. 2015. The Question of Intervention. John Stuart Mill and the Responsibility to Protect. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doyle, M.W. 1997. Ways of War and Peace. Realism, Liberalism and Socialism. New York and London: Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  16. Dunne, T. 2005. Liberalism. In The Globalization of World Politics. An Introduction to International Relations, ed. S. Smith and J. Baylis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Elshtain, J.B. (ed.). 1992. Just War Theory. New York and London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Freeden, M. 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Freeden, M. 2015. Liberalism. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Freedland, J. 2017. The New Age of Ayn Rand: How She Won Over Trump and Silicon Valley. London: The Guardian.Google Scholar
  21. Friedman, R., K. Oskanian, and R. Pachedo Pardo (eds.). 2013. After Liberalism? The Future of Liberalism in International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Gladstein, M.R. 1999. The New Ayn Rand Companion. Revised and Expanded Edition. Westport and London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gladstein, M.R. 2010. Ayn Rand. New York and London: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenspan, A. 2007. The Age of Turbulence. Adventures in a New World. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  25. Guibernau, M. 1996. Nationalisms. The Nation-State and Nationalism in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  26. Heller, A.C. 2009. Ayn Rand and The World She Made. New York: Nan A. Talese/Doubleday.Google Scholar
  27. Hill, C. 2003. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Ikenberry, G.J. 2006. Liberal Order and Imperial Ambition. Essays on American Power and World Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  29. Jahn, B. 2013a. Liberal Internationalism. Theory, History, Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jahn, B. 2013b. Liberalism—In Theory and History. In After Liberalism? The Future of Liberalism in International Relations, ed. R. Friedman, K. Oskanian, and R. Pachedo Pardo. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Journo, E. (ed.). 2009. Winning the Unwinnable War. America's Self-Crippled Response to Islamic Totalitarianism. Lanham: Lexington.Google Scholar
  32. Journo, E. 2012. Paul Ryan, Ayn Rand and U.S. Foreign Policy. Irvine: Ayn Rand Institute.Google Scholar
  33. Kelly, P. 2005. Liberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  34. Keohane, R.O. 2012. Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism. International Relations 26: 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lewis, J.D., and G. Salmieri. 2016. Philosopher of Her Times. Ayn Rand's Political and Cultural Commentary. In A Companion to Ayn Rand, ed. A. Gotthelf and G. Salmieri. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Long, D. 1996. Towards A New Liberal Internationalism. The International Theory of J.A. Hobson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Manent, P. 1995. An Intellectual History of Liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Martin, L.L. 2007. Neoliberalism. In International Relations Theories. Discipline and Diversity, ed. T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Mayhew, R. (ed.). 2009. Essay's on Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged. Lanham: Lexington.Google Scholar
  40. Merrill, R.E. 1991. The Ideas of Ayn Rand. La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  41. Milgram, S. 2016. The Life of Ayn Rand: Writing, Reading, and Related Life Events. In A Companion to Ayn Rand, ed. A. Gotthelf and G. Salmieri. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  42. Miller, F.D., and A. Mossof. 2016. Political Theory. A Radical for Capitalism. In A Companion to Ayn Rand, ed. A. Gotthelf and G. Salmieri. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  43. Panke, D., and T. Risse. 2007. Liberalism. In International Relations Theories. Discipline and Diversity, ed. T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Peikoff, L. 1993. Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand. New York: Meridian.Google Scholar
  45. Powers, K. 2016. Donald Trump’s ‘kinder, gentler’ version. McLean: USA Today.Google Scholar
  46. Rand, A. 1964. The Virtue of Selfishness. A New Concept of Egoism. New York: Signet.Google Scholar
  47. Rand, A. 1967. Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal. New York: Signet.Google Scholar
  48. Rand, A. 1979. The Ayn Rand letter. Volumes I–IV 1971–1976. Palo Alto Book Service: Palo Alto.Google Scholar
  49. Rand, A. 1982a. The Objectivist Newsletter. Volumes 1–4 1962–1965. Palo Alto Book Service: Palo Alto.Google Scholar
  50. Rand, A. 1982b. The Objectivist. Volumes 5–10 1966–1971. Palo Alto Book Service: Palo Alto.Google Scholar
  51. Rand, A. 1984. Philosophy: Who Needs It. New York: Signet.Google Scholar
  52. Rand, A. 1990. The Voice of Reason. Essays in Objectivist Thought. New York: Meridian.Google Scholar
  53. Rand, A. 1997. Letters of Ayn Rand. Edited by Michael S. Berliner. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
  54. Rand, A. 1998. The Ayn Rand Column. Written for the Los Angeles Times. Edited with an introduction by Peter Schwartz. New Milford: Second Renaissance Books.Google Scholar
  55. Rand, A. 1999a. Journals of Ayn Rand. Edited by David Harriman. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
  56. Rand, A. 1999b. Return of the Primitive. The Anti-Industrial Revolution. Edited and with an Introduction and Additional Articles by Peter Schwartz. New York: Meridian.Google Scholar
  57. Rand, A. 2005. Ayn Rand Answers. The Best of Her Q & A. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  58. Recchia, S., and J.M. Welsh (eds.). 2013. Just and Unjust Military Intervention. European Thinkers from Vitoria to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Rengger, N.J. 2002. On the Just War Tradition in the Twenty-First Century. International Affairs 78: 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Salmieri, G. 2016. An Introduction to the Study of Ayn Rand. In A Companion to Ayn Rand, ed. A. Gotthelf and G. Salmieri. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  61. Schwartz, P. 2004. The Foreign Policy of Self-Interest. A Moral Idea for America. Irvine: Ayn Rand Institute Press.Google Scholar
  62. Sciabarra, C.M. 1995. Ayn Rand. The Russian Radical. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Smith, A.D. 1998. Nationalism and Modernism. A Critical Survey of Recent Theories of Nations and Nationalism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Smith, S. 2007. Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory. In International Relations Theories. Discipline and Diversity, ed. T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Sørensen, G. 2011. A Liberal World Order in Crisis. Choosing Between Imposition and Restraint. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tesón, F.R. 2003. The Liberal Case for Humanitarian Intervention. In Humanitarian Intervention. Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas, ed. J.L. Holzgrefe and R.O. Keohane. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Tomasi, J. 2012. Free Market Fairness. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van de Haar, E.R. 2009. Classical Liberalism and International Relations Theory. Hume, Smith, Mises, and Hayek. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Van de Haar, E.R. 2010. The Liberal Divide Over Trade, Peace and War. International Relations 24: 132–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Van de Haar, E.R. 2013. Adam Smith on Empire and International Relations. In The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith, ed. C. Berry, M.P. Paganelli and C. Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Van de Haar, E.R. 2015. Degrees of Freedom. Liberal Political Philosophy and Ideology. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  72. Wall, S. 2015. Introduction. In The Cambridge Companion to Liberalism, ed. S. Wall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Walzer, M. 2005. Arguing About War. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Wright, D. 2016. A Human Society. Rand's Social Philosophy. In A Companion to Ayn Rand, ed. A. Gotthelf and G. Salmieri. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  75. Younkins, E.W. (ed.). 2007. Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged. A Philosophical and Literary Companion. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  76. Zacher, M.W., and R.A. Matthew. 1995. Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands. In Controversies in International Relations Theory. Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge, ed. C.W. Kegley Jr. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Den HaagThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations