Iraq: a liberal war after all: a critique of Dan Deudney and John Ikenberry

Abstract

As the fifteenth anniversary of the Iraq war approaches, a debate has arisen over the war’s intellectual origins. G. John Ikenberry and Dan Deudney argue that it was predominantly a realist war, not a liberal one. I demonstrate, however, that both liberals and liberalism were deeply implicated in the decision to strike Iraq, and the wider public case for doing so. Liberal ideas were not a retrospective face-saving fiction after the invaders discovered Saddam had no WMD arsenal. Rather, ambitious objectives for regional transformation were central to the drive for war from the beginning. Liberalism married with the capabilities of a superpower gives America a proclivity for reckless military adventures. So long as liberalism, untempered by prudential balance-of-power realism, remains a central engine of American grand strategy, the USA will be prone to further such tragedies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allawi, A. 2007. The Occupation of Iraq: Winning the War, Losing the Peace. Yale, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ambrosius, L.E. 2006. Woodrow Wilson and George W. Bush: Historical Comparisons of Ends and Means in Their Foreign Policies. Diplomatic History 30: 509–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. BBC News. 2003 Straw backs Exile Deal for Saddam 20 January.

  4. Blair, A. 2003. Private note to George W. Bush, ‘The Fundamental Goal, 26 March, at http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/media/244166/2003-03-26-note-blair-to-bush-26-march-2003-note-the-fundamental-goal.pdf. Accessed 14 November 2017.

  5. Bonin, R. 2013. Arrows of the Night: Ahmad Chalabi and the Selling of the Iraq War. New York, NY: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bremer, P. 2006. My Year in Iraq: The Struggle to Build a Future of Hope. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brooks, S., G.J. Ikenberry, and W.C. Wohlforth. 2013. Lean Forward. Defence of American Engagement. Foreign Affairs 92(1): 130–142.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brown, M.E., S.M. Lynn-Jones, and S.E. Miller. 1995. The Perils of Anarchy: Contemporary Realism and International Security. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bruni, F. 2001. A Nation Challenged: White House Memo. New York Times 22 September.

  10. Bush, George W. 2003. Both Our Nations Serve the Cause of Freedom. New York Times, 20 November.

  11. Bush, George W. 2005. Second Inaugural Address, https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/bushrecord/documents/Selected_Speeches_George_W_Bush.pdf. Accessed 14 November 2017.

  12. Bush, George W. 2002. National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Butt, G. 2003. Bahrain offers exile as Egypt reviles Saddam. The Telegraph 20 March.

  14. Colby, E. 2007. Restoring Deterrence. Orbis 51(3): 413–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Danner, M. 2007. Words in a Time of War. Asia Times 2 June.

  16. Desch, M.C. 2007. America’s Liberal Illiberalism: The Ideological Origins of Overreaction in U.S. Foreign Policy. International Security 32(3): 7–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Deudney, D., and G.J. Ikenberry. 2017. Realism, Liberalism and the Iraq War. Survival 59(4): 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Deudney, D. and Ikenberry, G.J. 2012. Democratic Internationalism. Working Paper, Council on Foreign Relations.

  19. Deudney, D., and G.J. Ikenberry. 1999. The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order. Review of International Studies 25: 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Doyle, M.W. 1997. Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dunne, T. 2004. When the Shooting Starts: Atlanticism in British Security Strategy. International Affairs 80(5): 893–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dyson, S. 2014. Leaders in Conflict: Bush and Rumsfeld in Iraq. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Flibbert, A. 2006. The Road to Baghdad: Ideas and Intellectuals In Explanations of the Iraq War. Security Studies 15(2): 310–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Friedman, B.H. 2012. The Real Problem with a Secretary of State Susan Rice. CATO Institute Commentary 27 November.

  25. Gellman, B. 2008. The Angler: The Cheney Vice-Presidency. New York, NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gholz, E., D.G. Press, and H. Sapolsky. 1997. Come Home America: The Strategy of Restraint in the Face of Temptation. International Security 21(4): 5–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hastings, M. 2011. Inside Obama’s War Room. Rolling Stone, 13 October.

  28. Heilbrunn, J. 2009. They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  29. House Joint Resolution. 2002. The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002, Pub.L. 107–243, 116 Stat. 1498, enacted October 16, 2002, H.J.Res. 114.

  30. Iraq Study Group. 2006. The Way Forward: A New Approach. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hurd, D. 1967. The Arrow War: An Anglo-Chinese Confusion, 1856–1860. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ikenberry, G.J., T.J. Knock, A.-M. Slaughter, and T. Smith. 2008. The Crisis of American foreign policy: Wilsonianism in the Twenty-first Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ikenberry, G.J. 2011a. The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism after America. Foreign Affairs 90(3): 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ikenberry, G.J. 2011b. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jervis, R. 2003. Understanding the Bush Doctrine. Political Science Quarterly 118(3): 365–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Keller, B. 2003. ‘The I Can’t Believe I’m a Hawk Club’ New York Times 8 February.

  37. Kennedy, D.M. 2005. What ‘W’ owes to ‘WW’. The Atlantic 30(5): 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kirshner, J. 2010. The tragedy of offensive realism: Classical realism and the rise of China. European Journal of International Relations 18(1): 53–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Layne, C. 1994. Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace. International Security 19: 5–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Layne, C. 2005. Wilson’s Ghost: Spreading Freedom around the World Will Destroy It at Home. The American Conservative 4(4): 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lieber, K., and D.G. Press. 2013. Why States Won’t Give Nuclear Weapons to Terrorists. International Security 38(1): 80–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mann, J. 2004. Rise of the Vulcans: The History of Bush’s War Cabinet. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  43. McIntyre, J. 2003. Pentagon Challenges Vanity Fair Report. CNN 30 May 2003.

  44. McLellan, S. 2008. What Happened: Inside the White House and Washington’s Culture of Deception. New York, NY: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mearsheimer, J.J., and S.M. Walt. 2003. An Unnecessary War. Foreign Policy 134: 50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Meyer, J. 2004. The Manipulator: Ahmad Chalabi Pushed a Tainted Case for War. The New Yorker 7 June.

  47. New York Times Advertisement. 2002. War with Iraq is Not in the National Interest. 26 September.

  48. Packer, G. 2002. The Liberal Quandary over Iraq. New York Times Magazine, 8 December, pp.104-7.

  49. Parent, J.M., and J.M. Baron. 2011. Elder Abuse: How the Moderns Mistreat Classical Realism. International Studies Review 13: 193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Pfiffner, J.P. 2007. The first MBA president: George W. Bush as public administrator. Public Administration Review 67: 6–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Pollack, K. 2002. The Threatening Storm: The Case for Invading Iraq. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Powell, C. 2002. Memorandum for the President, Your Meeting with the United Kingdom Prime Minister Tony Blair, April 5-7 2002 at Crawford, at https://foia.state.gov/searchapp/DOCUMENTS/April2014/F-201233239/DOC_0C05446915/C05446915.pdf. Accessed 14 November 2017.

  53. Posen, B.R. 2014. Restraint: A New Foundation for U.S. Grand Strategy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ricks, T. 2006. Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq. New York, NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rosato, S. 2003. The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory. American Political Science Review 97(4): 585–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Schmidt, B., and M. Williams. 2008. The Bush Doctrine and the Iraq War: Neoconservatives Versus Realists. Security Studies 17(2): 191–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Shifrinson, J.R.I. 2016. Deal or No Deal? The End of the Cold War and the US Offer to Limit NATO Expansion. International Security 40(4): 7–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Slaughter, A-M. 2003. Good Reasons for Going Around the U.N. New York Times 18 March.

  59. Starobin, P. 2006. The Realists. National Journal 39(37): 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Thompson, J.A. 2010. Wilsonianism: The Dynamics of a Conflicted Concept. International Affairs 86(1): 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Tomasky, M. 2007. Beyond Iraq: Toward a New Liberal Internationalism. In Liberalism for a New Century, ed. N. Jumonville, and K. Mattson, 209–219. Berkeley, Cal: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tyler, P.E. 1992. U.S. Strategy Plan Calls for Insuring No Rivals Develop. New York Times, 8 March.

  63. Van Rythoven, E. 2016. The Perils of Realist Advocacy and the Promise of Securitization Theory: Revisiting the tragedy of the Iraq War debate. European Journal of International Relations 22(3): 487–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. White House. 2002. Press Release, Remarks by the President at 2002 Graduation Exercise of the Unites States Military Academy. 1 June.

  65. Wieseltier, L. 2003. Against Innocence. The New Republic 3 March.

  66. Williams, M.C. 2007. Morgenthau Now: Neoconservatism, National Greatness, and Realism. In Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans Morgenthau in International Relations, ed. M.C. Williams. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Wilson, W. 1927. War and Peace: Presidential Messages, Addresses, and Public Papers 2 vols. New York: NYL Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Woodward, B. 2006. State of Denial. London: Pocket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Woodward, B. 2002. Bush at War. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Zegard, A. 2008. The Legend of a Democracy Promoter. The National Interest 97: 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Zimmerman, W. 2002. First Great Triumph. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Porter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Porter, P. Iraq: a liberal war after all: a critique of Dan Deudney and John Ikenberry. Int Polit 55, 334–348 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0115-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Iraq war
  • Realism
  • Liberalism