Skip to main content

Bridging the legitimacy gap: a proposal for the international legal recognition of INGOs

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that there is a gap between the de facto and de jure legitimacy of international non-governmental organisations (INGOs) that requires more consideration from scholars studying their role in the international system. The gradual acceptance of INGOs as de facto legitimate actors can be seen in the long-term expansion of their role in international norm deliberation. Despite this development, most INGOs still lack international legal recognition, and thus de jure legitimacy. We argue that this gap between de facto and de jure legitimacy creates problems for both INGOs and members of international society. In seeking to address this disjunction, we highlight the limits of the current literature in understanding legitimacy as primarily sociological phenomena through an examination of the accountability agenda. We then propose a template for INGO legal recognition based on the principles that underpin the regulation of charities in English law as a first step in a gradualist argument for the institution of their international de jure legitimacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Beetham, D. 2013. The Legitimation of Power, 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellamy, A.J. 2002. Pragmatic Solidarism and the Dilemmas of Humanitarian Intervention. Millennium—Journal of International Studies 31 (3): 473–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernstein, S. 2011. Legitimacy in Intergovernmental and Non-state Global Governance. Review of International Political Economy 18 (1): 17–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boesenecker, A.P., and L. Vinjamuri. 2011. Lost in Translation? Civil Society, Faith-Based Organizations and the Negotiation of International Norms. International Journal of Transitional Justice 5 (3): 345–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolton, J.R. 2000. Should We Take Global Governance Seriously? Chicago Journal of International Law 1 (2): 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bovens, M. 2007. Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal 13 (4): 447–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, L.D. 2008. Creating Credibility: Legitimacy and Accountability for Transnational Civil Society. Sterling: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bull, H. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Büthe, T., S. Major, and A. de Melo e Souza. 2012. The Politics of Private Foreign Aid: Humanitarian Principles, Economic Development Objectives, and Organizational Interests in NGO Private Aid Allocation. International Organization 66 (4): 571–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Callahan, D. 2015. Who will Watch the Charities? The New York Times, 30 May. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/31/opinion/sunday/who-will-watch-the-charities.html. Accessed 25 April 2017.

  11. Charities Act. 2011. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/25/contents. Accessed 24 April 2017.

  12. Charity Commission. 2013. Public Benefit: The Public Benefit Requirement (PB1). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/588234/PB1_The_public_benefit_requirement.pdf. Accessed 26 April 2017.

  13. Charity Commission. 2014. Charitable Purposes and Public Benefit. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/charitable-purposes-and-public-benefit. Accessed 13 July 2015.

  14. Charnovitz, S. 1997. Two Centuries of Participation: NGOs and International Governance. Michigan Journal of International Law 18 (2): 183–286.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Charnovitz, S. 2011. The Illegitimacy of Preventing NGO Participation. Brooklyn Journal of International Law 36 (3): 891–910.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Christensen, D., and J.M. Weinstein. 2013. Defunding Dissent: Restrictions on Aid to NGOs. Journal of Democracy 24 (2): 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Civicus. 2014. State of Civil Society Report 2014: Reimagining Global Governance. http://civicus.org/images/stories/SOCS%202014.pdf. Accessed 12 March 2015.

  18. Clark, I. 2007. Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Collingwood, V. 2006. Non-governmental Organisations, Power and Legitimacy in International Society. Review of International Studies 32 (3): 439–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Council of Europe. 2007. The Legal Status of Non-governmental Organisations in Europe: Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)14 and Explanatory Memorandum. https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/cdcj/CDCJ%20Recommendations/CMRec(2007)14E_Legal%20status%20of%20NGOs.pdf. Accessed 24 April 2017.

  21. Crack, A.M. 2016. Reversing the Telescope: Evaluating NGO Peer Regulation Initiatives. Journal of International Development 28 (1): 50–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Crack, A.M. 2017. The Regulation of International NGOs: Assessing the Effectiveness of the INGO Accountability Charter. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. doi:10.1007/s11266-017-9866-9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. d’Aspremont, J., and D. Brabandere. 2011. The Complementary Faces of Legitimacy in International Law: The legitimacy of Origin and the Legitimacy of Exercise. Fordham International Law Journal 34 (2): 190–235.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Davies, T. 2013. NGOs: A New History of Transnational Civil Society. London: Hurst & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dodworth, K. 2014. NGO Legitimation as Practice: Working State Capital in Tanzania. Critical African Studies 6 (1): 22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Global Reporting Initiative. 2011. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines & NGO Sector Supplement. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/G3-English-NGO-Sector-Supplement.pdf. Accessed 25 April 2017.

  27. Hammer, M., Rooney, C., & Warren, S. 2010. Addressing Accountability in NGO Advocacy: Practice, Principles and Prospects of Self-Regulation. London: One World Trust. https://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/49891/1/IDL-49891.pdf. Accessed 25 April 2017.

  28. Hansard. 2014. Charity Commission: Question for Short Debate. 27 Feb, GC369–GC384. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201314/ldhansrd/text/140227-gc0001.htm. Accessed 14 July 2015.

  29. Havrda, M., and P. Kutliek. 2010. Accountability 2.0—In search for a new approach to international non-governmental organisations’ accountability. In Evaluating Transnational NGOs: Legitimacy, Accountability, Representation, ed. J. Steffek, and K. Hahn, 157–181. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. INGO Accountability Charter. 2014. The Accountability Charter: 10 Commitments to Accountability by International Non-governmental Organisations. http://www.ingoaccountabilitycharter.org. Accessed 11 Oct 2015.

  31. Keating, V.C., and E. Thrandardottir. 2017. NGOs, Trust, and the Accountability Agenda. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19 (1): 134–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kissling, C. 2008. The evolution of CSOs’ legal status in international governance and its relevance for the legitimacy of international organizations. In Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance: A Cure for the Democratic Deficit?, ed. J. Steffek, C. Kissling, and P. Nanz, 30–52. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Kochevar, S. 2013. Amici Curiae in Civil Law Jurisdictions. Yale Law Journal 122 (6): 1653–1669.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Krähenbühl, P. 2004. The ICRC’s Approach to Contemporary Security Challenges: A Future for Independent and Neutral Humanitarian Action. International Review of the Red Cross 86 (855): 505–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lang, S. 2012. NGOs, Civil Society, and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Lindblom, A.K. 2005. Non-Governmental Organisations in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Martens, K. 2003. Examining the (Non-)status of NGOs in International Law. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 10 (2): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Meakin, R. 2008. The Law of Charitable Status: Maintenance and Removal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Morgan, G., L. Baker, M. Harris, and R. Moran. 2013. The Public Benefit Requirement for Charities in England and Wales: A Qualitative Study of Its Impact. The Charity Law and Practice Review 15: 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Morgan, G.G., and N.J. Fletcher. 2013. Mandatory Public Benefit Reporting as a Basis for Charity Accountability: Findings from England and Wales. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 24 (3): 805–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Morris, D. 2016. The Charity Commission for England and Wales: A Fine Example or Another Fine Mess? Chicago-Kent Law Review 91 (3): 965–990.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Noortmann, M. 2015. Non-governmental organisations: Recognition, roles, rights and responsibilities. In Non-state Actors in International Law, ed. M. Noortmann, A. Reinisch, and C. Ryngaert, 205–224. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Peruzzotti, E. 2006. Civil society, representation and accountability: Restarting current debates on the representativeness and accountability of civic associations. In NGO Accountability: Politics, Principles and Innovations, ed. J. Lisa, and P. van Tuijl, 43–58. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Philp, M. 2009. Delimiting Democratic Accountability. Political Studies 57 (1): 28–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Reimann, K.D. 2006. A View from the Top: International Politics, Norms and the Worldwide Growth of NGOs. International Studies Quarterly 50 (1): 45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Reus-Smit, C. 2007. International Crisis of Legitimacy. International Politics 44 (2): 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rutzen, D. 2015. Aid Barriers and the Rise of Philanthropic Protectionism. International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law 17 (1): 5–44.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Saastamoinen, O., and D. Gritten. 2010. The Roles of Legitimacy in Environmental Conflict: An Indonesian Case Study. Society & Natural Resources 24 (1): 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Schmitz, H.P., P. Raggo, and T. Bruno-Van Vijfeijken. 2012. Accountability of Transnational NGOs: Aspirations vs. Practice. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 41 (6): 1175–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Scholte, J.A. 2007. Civil Society and the Legitimation of Global Governance. Journal of Civil Society 3 (3): 305–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Shivji, I.G. 2007. Silences in NGO Discourse: The Role and Future of NGOs in Africa. Nairobi: Fahamu.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Spiro, P.J. 2002. Accounting for NGOs. Chicago Journal of International Law 3 (1): 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Steffek, J., and K. Hahn. 2010. Introduction: Transnational NGOs and legitimacy, accountability, representation. In Evaluating Transnational NGOs: Legitimacy, Accountability, Representation, ed. J. Steffek, and K. Hahn, 1–25. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  54. Steffek, J. 2013. Explaining Cooperation Between IGOs and NGOs—Push Factors, Pull Factors, and the Policy Cycle. Review of International Studies 39 (4): 993–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Steffek, J., and P. Nanz. 2008. Emergent patterns of civil society participation in global and European governance. In Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance: A Cure for the Democratic Deficit?, ed. J. Steffek, C. Kissling, and P. Nanz, 1–29. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  56. Szazi, E. 2012. NGOs: Legitimate Subjects of International Law. Leiden: Leiden University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Taylor, M., and D. Warburton. 2003. Legitimacy and the Role of UK Third Sector Organizations in the Policy Process. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 14 (3): 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Thrandardottir, E. 2015. NGO Legitimacy: Four Models. Representation 51 (1): 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. United Nations. 2004. We the Peoples: Civil Society, the United Nations and Global Governance [The Cardoso Report]. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Walton, O., T. Davies, E. Thrandardottir, and V.C. Keating. 2016. Understanding Contemporary Challenges to INGO Legitimacy: Integrating Top-Down and Bottom-Up Perspectives. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 27 (6): 2764–2786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Willetts, P. 2011. Non-Governmental Organisations in World Politics: The Construction of Global Governance. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Math Noortmann for his insightful comments on an early draft of this paper. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the ISA 2015 and BISA 2015 annual conferences. We would like to thank the panel participants for their helpful feedback.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erla Thrandardottir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thrandardottir, E., Keating, V.C. Bridging the legitimacy gap: a proposal for the international legal recognition of INGOs. Int Polit 55, 207–220 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0098-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Legitimacy
  • INGOs
  • Accountability
  • International law and order
  • Global governance
  • Charity Commission