You can’t force a friendship? An analysis of US/Argentine relations

Original Article

Abstract

This paper builds on the extant literature of friendship in international politics. State friendship is not the same as personal friendship. States do not ‘feel affection’; rather, the affective attachment is part of a given state’s culture and practice of foreign policy. This attachment grows with a mutual history of positive interactions and can be intensified by a so-called defining moment. This article analyzes the failure of friendship to develop between the USA and Argentina, despite the fact that in the 1990s Argentina was desirous of having good relations with the USA. When an economic crisis hit Argentina from 1999 to 2002, the USA offered little assistance and responded with indifference. Argentina has had a long history of hostility toward the USA, and one decade of support cannot obviate the earlier interactions. Argentina’s tacit support of Nazi Germany during World War II provides a negative defining moment that acts as a strong barrier to friendship.

Keywords

Argentina State friendship US foreign policy 

References

  1. AFP. 2015. German parliament approves military action in Syria against Islamic State. The Express Tribune, 4 December. https://tribune.com.pk/story/1003839/german-parliament-to-back-military-action-in-syria-against-islamic-state/. Accessed 2 May 2017.
  2. Allison, V. 2004. White evil: Peronist Argentina in the US popular imagination since 1955. American Studies International. 42(1): 4–48.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, E. 2002. I.M.F. loan to Brazil also shields U.S. interests. New York Times, 9 August. http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/09/business/imf-loan-to-brazil-also-shields-us-interests.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
  4. Associated Press. 2017. Trump, Argentine president Macri hold White House talks. New York Times, 27 April. https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2017/04/27/us/politics/ap-us-united-states-argentina.html. Accessed 1 May 2017.
  5. Baker, D. 1996. Adolf Galland: The authorized biography. London: Windrow & Greene.Google Scholar
  6. Baldwin, D.A. (ed.). 1993. NeoRealism and neoliberalism: The contemporary debate. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bull, H. 1977. Anarchical society: A study of order in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cavallo, D. 2004. Argentina and the IMF during the two Bush administrations. International Finance 7(1): 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cirincione, J., J.B. Wolfsthal, and M. Rajkumar. 2005. Deadly arsenals: Nuclear, biological, and chemical threat. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  10. Corrales, J. 2002. The politics of Argentina’s meltdown. World Policy Journal 19(3): 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Denniston, C. 2003. Couple dance begins in Europe. http://www.history-of-tango.com/couple-dance.html. Accessed 21 Sept 2015.
  12. Deutsch, Karl, et al. 1957. Political community and the North Atlantic area: International organization in light of historical experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Diehl, P. 1985. Contiguity and military escalations in major power rivalries, 1816–1980. Journal of Politics 47(4): 1203–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Digeser, P.E. 2009. Friendship between states. British Journal of Political Science 39(2): 323–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Epstein, E. and D. Pion-Berlin. 2006. The crisis of 2001 and Argentine democracy. In Broken promises? The argentine crisis and argentine democracy, ed. E. Epstein and D. Pion-Berlin, 3–25. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  16. Eznack, L. and S. Koschut. 2014. The sources of affect in interstate friendship. In Friendship and international relations, ed. S. Koschut and A. Oelsner, 72–88. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Feldman, L.G. 2014. German-Polish ties: Special relationship, friendship, or reconciliation? In Friendship and international relations, ed. S. Koschut and A. Oelsner, 123–143. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Galasso, N. 2005. Perón: Formación, Ascenso y Caída (1893–1955) Tomo I. Buenos Aires: Colihue.Google Scholar
  19. Gray, V.J. 2011. Colombia: Violence, resources wealth, transnational forces, and a vibrant civil Society. In Latin American politics and development. 7th ed, ed. H. Wiarda and H. Kline, 200–233. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  20. Grieco, J.M. 1988. Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: A realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism. International Organization 42(3): 485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hedges, J. 2011. Argentina: A modern history. New York: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  22. Hjelmgaad, K. and G. Zoroya. 2015. France, UK to accept 44,000 migrants as Europe copes with crisis. USA Today, 8 September. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2015/09/07/europe-refugee-migrantsgermany/71833332/. Accessed 13 Jan 2016.
  23. Hull, M.M. 2002. The Irish interlude: German intelligence in Ireland, 1939–1943. The Journal of Military History. 66(3): 695–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. International Monetary Fund. 2001. Transcript of a press briefing by Thomas Dawson. 6 December. http://www.imf.org/external/np/tr/2001/tr011206.htm. Accessed 5 Feb 2016.
  25. Kant, I. 1983. To perpetual peace: A philosophical sketch. In Perpetual Peace and Other Essays, T. Humphrey (trans.), 107–143. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  26. Keller, S. 2009. Against friendship between countries. Journal of International Political Theory 5(1): 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klotz, A. 1995. Norms reconstituting interests: Global racial equality and U.S. sanctions against South Africa. International Organization 49(3): 451–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kupchan, C. 2010. How enemies become friends: The sources of stable peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leontsini, E. 2013. The motive of society: Aristotle on civic friendship, justice, and concord. Res Publica 19(1): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lochery, N. 2014. Brazil: The fortunes of war. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  31. Mussa, M. 2002. Argentina and the fund: From triumph to tragedy. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  32. Mearsheimer, J.J. 1994/95. The false promise of international institutions. International Security 19(3): 5–49.Google Scholar
  33. Mearsheimer, J.J. 2001. The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  34. Morgenthau, H.J. 2006 Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. 7th ed. Revised by K. W. Thompson and W. D. Clinton. New York/Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  35. Neto, O.A. and A. Malamud. 2015. What determines foreign policy in Latin America? Systemic versus domestic factors in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico, 1946–2008. Latin American Politics and Society 57(4): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nolan, J.E. 1991. Trappings of power: Ballistic missiles in the third world. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  37. Norden, D.L. and R. Russell. 2002. The United States and Argentina: Changing relations in a changing world. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Oelsner, A. 2014. The construction of international friendship in South America. In Friendship and international relations, ed. S. Koschut and A. Oelsner, 144–162. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Oelsner, A. and S. Koschut. 2014. A framework for the study of international friendship. In Friendship and international relations, ed. S. Koschut and A. Oelsner, 3–31. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Oelsner, A. and A. Vion. 2011. Friends in the region: A comparative study on friendship building in regional integration. International Politics 48(1): 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Onuf, N. 1989. The world of our making. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  42. Patsias, C. and D. Deschênes. 2011. Unsociable sociability: The paradox of Canadian American friendship. International Politics 48(1): 92–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peterson, H.F. 1964. Argentina and the United States: 1810–1960. New York: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  44. Plato. 1997. Definitions. In Complete works, ed. J.M. Cooper and D.S. Hutchinson, 1677–1686. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  45. Poggio Teixeira, C.G. 2012. Brazil, the United States, and the South American subsystem: Regional politics and the absent empire. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  46. Rohter, L. 2001. The world: First things last; Argentina and the aid next-door. New York Times, 12 August. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/12/weekinreview/the-world-first-things-last-argentina-and-the-aid-next-door.html. Accessed 22 Sept 2015.
  47. Rotnem, T.E. 2016. Putin’s arctic strategy: Collaboration or conflict after Ukraine? Problems of Post-Communism, advanced online publication 27 October. doi:10.1080/10758216.2016.1222869.
  48. Russell, R. and J.G. Tokatlian. 2006. Will foreign allies help? Argentina’s relations with Brazil and the United States. In Broken promises? The argentine crisis and argentine democracy, ed. E. Epstein and D. Pion-Berlin, 245–269. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  49. Russett, B. 1993. Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a post-cold war world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Russett, B. and J. Oneal. 2001. Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence and international organization. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  51. Sarmiento, D.F. 2011. The United States: An inconceivable extravaganza. In Latin America and the United States: A documentary history. 2nd ed, ed. R.H. Holden and E. Zolov, 30–32. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Schvarzer, J. 2006. The cost of the convertibility plan: The economic and social effects of financial hegemony. In Broken promises? The argentine crisis and argentine democracy, ed. E. Epstein and D. Pion-Berlin, 73–96. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  53. Schwab, S.I. 2002. The role of the Mexican expeditionary air force in World War II: Late, limited, but symbolically significant. The Journal of Military History. 66(4): 1115–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sheinin, D.M.K. 2006. Argentina and the United States: An alliance contained. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  55. Skidmore, T.E., P.H. Smith, and J.N. Green. 2014. Modern Latin America. 8th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, G. 2011. Friendship and the world of states. International Politics 48(1): 10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith, P.H. 2013. Talons of the eagle: Latin America, the United States and the world. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Tulchin, J.S. 1990. Argentina and the United States: A conflicted relationship. Boston: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
  59. Tulchin, J.S. 2016. Latin America in international politics: Challenging US hegemony. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  60. Vion, A. 2014. Franco-German friendship: A dynamic perspective. In Friendship and international relations, ed. S. Koschut and A. Oelsner, 109–122. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  61. Waltz, K.N. 1979. Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  62. Wayman, F.W. 1996. Power shifts and the onset of war. In Parity and war evaluations and extensions of the war ledger, ed. J. Kugler and D. Lemke, 145–162. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  63. Wendt, A. 1999. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wendt, A. 2004. The state as person in international theory. Review of International Studies. 30(2): 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and International AffairsKennesaw State UniversityKennesawUSA

Personalised recommendations