Skip to main content

Russian strategy in the age of Dmitry Medvedev


The aim of this article is to analyze the main characteristic features of the security culture of the Russian Federation (RF) during Medvedev’s presidency in the context of the Russian foreign and security policy in the period 2008–2012. The second aim of this paper is to demonstrate that the continuity of the main features of the Russian security culture represents a possible starting point for understanding the reasons for the current Russian military intervention in Crimea. The main features of the Russian security culture will be searched for on three levels: firstly, the level of key foreign and security strategic documents of the RF; secondly, that of the Russian position toward military interventions; and finally, that of Russia’s relations with the West.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. According to Daniel Treisman, there are several interpretations or motives that led Putin to occupy and annex the Crimea. Firstly ‘the Crimean operation was a response to the threat of NATO’s further expansion along Russia’s western border.’ Secondly, ‘the annexation of Crimea was part of a Russian project to gradually recapture the former territories of the Soviet Union.’ Finally thirdly, ‘the annexation of Crimea was a hastily response to the unforeseen fall of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych’ (Treisman 2016, p. 47).

  2. Although Medvedev stated already on August 12, 2008, that he had ordered the armed forces to end their military operations in Georgia, the Russian troops actually finally left Georgia at the turn of August and September 2008.

  3. At the same time, Russia views the Muslim-populated Caucasus and Central Asia regions as a key national security challenge. Of the 50 million Muslims who lived in the USSR, some 20 million remained in Russia; the rest became citizens of the six Muslim nations situated along Russia’s border (Magen 2013, p. 24).


  • Allison, R. 2013a. Russia, the West, & Military Intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, R. 2013b. Russia and Syria: Explaining Alignment with a Regime in Crisis. International Affairs 89(4): 795–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baev, P. K. 2008. Medvedev´s Foreign Policy Takes Indefinite Shape. Eurasia Daily Monitor, advance online publication 21 July,

  • Berger, T. 1996. Norms, Identity and National Security in Germany and in Japan. In The Culture of National security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, ed. P.J. Katzenstein. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., O. Waever, and J. de Wilde. 1998. Security. A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lyne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charap, S. 2013. Russia, Syria and the Doctrine of Intervention. Survival 55(1): 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyganok, A. 2008. Uroki pjatidnevnoj vojny v Zakavkaze. Nezavisimoje vojennoje obozrenije, 29 August.

  • de Haas, E. 2010. Russia’s Foreign Security Policy in the 21st Century. Putin, Medvedev and Beyond. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haas, M. 2011. Russia’s Military Doctrine Development (2000–10). In Russian Military Politics and Russia´s 2010 Defence Doctrine, ed. S.J. Blank, 1–62. Carlisle Barracks: Strategic Studies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichler, J. 2011. Bezpečnostní a strategická kultura USA, EU a ČR. Praha: Karolinum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichler, J., and L. Tichý. 2013. USA a Ruská federace. Komparace z pohledu bezpečnostní a strategické kultury. Praha: Ústav mezinárodních vztahů.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felgernhauer, P. 2008. A Military Reform That Does Not Seem to Satisfy Anyone, Eurasia Daily Monitor 241, advance online publication 18 December,[tt_news]=34282.

  • Gvosdev, N.K., and R. Marsch. 2014. Russian Foreign Policy. Interests, Vectors and Sectors. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. 1994. The Soldier and the State. The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations, 11th ed. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M.N. 2012. Russia and Arab Spring. George Mason University, 3 April.

  • Kirchner, E. and J. Sperling (eds.). 2007. Global Security Governance: Competing Perceptions of Security in the 21st Century. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. 2012. Russia and the Arab Spring. Foreign and Domestic Policy Challenges. Berlin: Institute for International and Security Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriendler, J. 2013. NATO–Russia Relations: Reset is not a Four-Letter Word. In Understanding NATO in the 21st Century. Alliance Strategies, Security and Global Governance, ed. P.G. Herd and J. Kriendler. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulhánek, J., and Fedorov, Y. 2010. Russia’s New Military Doctrine: Is the Reset Over? Europe’s World, 22 February.

  • Liountri, C. 2013. Understanding Russia’s Reaction to the Arab Spring. INSIGHTS, 5 February.

  • Lippman, W. 1946. Zahraniční politika a válečné cíle Spojených států. Praha: Družstevní práce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyukanov, F. 2016. Putin´s Foreign Policy. The Quest to Restore Russia´s Rightful Place. Foreign Affairs 94(May/June): 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarychev, A. 2011. Russia’s “Libya Debate”. Political Meanings and Repercussions. PONARS Eurasia Memo No. 178, September.

  • Magen, Z. 2013. Russia and the Middle East: Policy Challenges. Tel Aviv: Institute for National Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankoff, J. 2012. Russian Foreign Policy. The Return of Great Power Politics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerstvo inostrannykh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2010. Programm effektivnogo ispol’zovaniya na sistemnoy osnove vneshnepoliticheskikh faktorov v tselyakh dolgosrochnogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. May.

  • Nichol, J. 2011. Russian Military Reform and Defense Policy, Congressional Research Service, advance online publication 24 August,

  • Oldberg, I. 2011. Aims and Means in Russian Foreign Policy. In Russian Foreign Policy in the 21st Century, ed. K.E. Robert, 30–58. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlovsky, G. 2016. Russian Politics Under Putin. The System Will Outlast the Master. Foreign Affairs 94(May/June): 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prezident Rossii. 2008 Kontseptsiya Vneshney politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii. July.

  • Prezident Rossii. 2009. Dogovor o Yevropeyskoy bezopasnosti. November.

  • Prezident Rossii. 2010. Voyennaya doktrina Rossiyskoy Federatsii. February.

  • Savelyev, A.G. 2011. Russian Defence Doctrine. In Russian Military Politics and Russia’s 2010 Defence Doctrine, ed. S.J. Blank, 153–179. Carlisle Barracks: Strategic Studies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherr, J. 2014. Russia’s Elusive Search for Soft Power. New Eastern Europe 6(2): 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovet Bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2009. Strategiya natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 goda. May.

  • Survey, Strategic. 2012. Russia and Eurasia, 171–198. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, D. 2016. Why Putin Took Crimea. The Gambler in the Kremlin. Foreign Affairs 94(May/June): 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenin, D. 2016. The Revival of the Russian Military. How Moscow Reloaded. Foreign Affairs 94(May/June): 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsygankov, A.P. 2013. Russia´s Foreign Policy. Change and Continuity in National Identity. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsygankov, A.P. 2014. Putin’s Crusade. New Eastern Europe 6(2): 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lukáš Tichý.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tichý, L. Russian strategy in the age of Dmitry Medvedev. Int Polit 55, 189–206 (2018).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: