This article makes a comparative assessment of English School and constructivist world society conceptions. It argues neither provides a clear conception, only its theoretical relief in the analytical abstract. The argument contains five points. First, the English School often refers to the political world beyond the society of states as a world society without sufficient conceptual reasoning or evidence to justify the usage. Second, both literatures betray a limited grasp of the profundity of social transformations a world society entails. Third, this suggests the evidence of a world society is a novel cosmopolitan culture. Fourth, idealism in these literatures is undercut by identifying conflict and instability as a contributing cause of a world society’s potential emergence. Fifth, the contemporary emergence of a world society via human rights is found to be unconvincing. A final gesture of a possible ‘overlapping consensus’ on human rights is made towards a future world society.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aalberts, T.E. 2010. Playing the game of sovereign states: Charles Manning’s constructivism Avant-la-Lettre. European Journal of International Relations 16 (2): 247–268.
Adler, E. 2005. Barry Buzan’s use of constructivism to reconstruct the English School: ‘Not All the Way Down’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 34 (1): 171–182.
Adorno, T. 1994. Stars down to earth and other essays on the irrational in culture. London: Routledge.
Andersen, B. 1983. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
Armstrong, D. 1999. Law, justice and the idea of a world society. International Affairs 75 (3): 547–561.
Bain, W. 2007. One order, two laws: Recovering the ‘normative’ in English School theory. Review of International Studies 33 (4): 557–575.
Barnett, M., and M. Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the world: International ordganizatios in global politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Barnett, M., and K. Sikkink. 2008. From international to global society. In The Oxford handbook of international relations, ed. Christian Reus-Smit, and Duncan Snidal, 62–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bartelson, J. 2009. Visions of world community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bartelson, B. 2015. Towards a genealogy of ‘Society’ in international relations. Review of International Studies 41 (4): 675–692.
Beitz, C. 2009. The idea of human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berlin, I. 1993. The magus of the north: J.G. Hamann and the origins of modern irrationalism. London: John Murray.
Brown, C. 2001. World society and the english school: An ‘International Society’ perspective on world society. European Journal of International Relations 7 (4): 423–441.
Brown, C. 2015. International society, global polity: An introduction to international political theory. London: Sage.
Bull, H. 1966. The Grotian conception of international society. In Diplomatic investigations, ed. Herbert Butterfield, and Martin Wight, 51–73. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bull, H. 1975. Has the Sovereign states system a future? Fryer Memorial Lecture, Hobart, 3 June, 1975, Paper held in the Hedley Bull Papers in the Bodleian library, Oxford University.
Bull, H. 1977. The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics. London: Macmillan.
Bull, H. 1984. Justice in international relations. Waterloo: University of Waterloo.
Bull, H. 1990. The importance of grotius for the study of international relations. In Hugo grotius and international relations, ed. Hedley Bull, Benedict Kingsbury, and Adam Roberts, 65–94. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bull, H., and A. Watson (eds.). 1985. The expansion of international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buzan, B. 2001. The English school: An underexploited resource in IR. Review of International Studies 27 (3): 471–488.
Buzan, B. 2004. From international to world society? English School theory and the social structure of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B. 2010. Culture and international society. International Affairs 86 (1): 1–26.
Buzan, B. 2011. A world order without superpowers: Decentered globalism. International Relations 25 (1): 3–25.
Buzan, B. 2014. An introduction to the English School of international relations: The societal approach. Cambridge: Polity.
Buzan, B., and R. Little. 2014. The historical expansion of International Society. In Guide to the English School in international studies, ed. Cornelia Navari, and Daniel Green, 59–76. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
Calhoun, C. 1997. Nationalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Calhoun, C. 2003. Belonging in the cosmopolitan imaginary. Ethnicities 3 (4): 531–553.
Clark, I. 2007. International legitimacy and world society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Donelan, M. 1982. The community of mankind. In The community of states: A study in international political theory, ed. J. Mayal, 140–157. London: George Allen.
Dunne, T. 1998. Inventing international society: A history of the English School. London: Macmillan.
Dunne, T., and C. Reus-Smit (eds.). 2017. The globalization of international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Finnemore, M. 2001. Exporting the English School? Review of International Studies 27 (3): 509–513.
Hall, I. 2006. The international thought of Martin Wight. London: Palgrave.
Hoffmann, S. 2002. Clash of globalizations. Foreign Affairs 81 (4): 104–115.
Holsti, K.J. 2004. Taming the Sovereigns: Institutional change in international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopgood, S. 2013. The end times of human rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Ignatieff, M. 2000. The rights revolution. Toronto: Anansi.
Jackson, R. 2000. The global covenant: Human conduct in a world of states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keck, M.E., and K. Sikkink. 1999. Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. UNESCO, 1999.
Keck, M.E., and K. Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kessler, O. 2016. Practices and the problem of world society. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 44 (2): 269–277.
Khagram, S., J.V. Riker, and K. Sikkink (eds.). 2002. Restructuring world politics: Transnational social movements, networks, and norms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Kratochwil, F. 2011. Global governance and the emergence of ‘World Society’. The puzzles of politics: Inquiries into the genesis and transformation of international relations, 262–280. London: Routledge.
Kratochwil, F. 2014. The status of law in world society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kratochwil, F. 2016. Of words and deeds: A reply to my critics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 44 (2): 278–291.
Manning, C. 1962. The nature of international society. London: G. Bell and Sons.
Neumann, I.B. 2001. The English School and practices of world society. Review of International Studies 27 (3): 503–507.
Neumann, I.B., and O.J. Sending. 2010. Governing the global polity: Practice, mentality, rationality. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
O’Hagan, J. 2005. The question of culture. In International society and its critics, ed. Alex J. Bellamy, 209–228. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Onuma, Y. 2010. A transcivilizational perspective on international law: Questioning prevalent cognitive frameworks in the emerging multi-polar and multi-civilizational world of the twenty-first century. Boston: Brill.
Pella, J.A. 2013. Thinking outside international society: A discussion of the possibilities for English School conceptions of world society. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 42 (1): 65–77.
Phillips, A. 2011. War, religion and empire: The transformation of international orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ralph, J. 2007. Defending the society of states: Why America opposes the international criminal court and its vision of world society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reus-Smit, C. 1999. The moral purpose of the state: Culture, social identity, and institutional rationality in international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Reus-Smit, C. 2002. Imagining society: Constructivism and the English School. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4 (3): 487–509.
Reus-Smit, C. 2005. The constructivist challenge after September 11. In International society and its critics, ed. A. Bellamy, 81–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reus-Smit, C. 2009. Constructivism and the English School. In Theorising international society: English School methods, ed. C. Navari, 58–77. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Reus-Smit, C. 2011. Human rights in a global ecumene. International Affairs 87 (5): 1205–1218.
Reus-Smit, C. 2013. Individual rights and the making of the international system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reus-Smit, C. 2014. International law and the mediation of culture. Ethics & International Affairs 28 (1): 65–82.
Ruggie, J.G. 1983. Human rights and the future international community. Daedalus 112 (4): 93–110.
Ruggie, J.G. 1998. Constructing the world polity: Essays on international institutionalization. London: Routledge.
Shannon, V.P. 2005. Wendt’s violation of the constructivist project: Agency and why a world state is not inevitable. European Journal of International Relations 11 (4): 187–581.
Sikkink, K. 2011. The justice cascade: How human rights prosecutions are changing world politics. New York: Norton.
Suganami, H. 2001a. C.A.W. Manning and the study of international relations. Review of International Studies 27 (1): 91–107.
Suganami, H. 2001b. Alexander Wendt and the English School. Journal of International Relations and Development 4 (4): 403–423.
Suganami, H. 2002. Wendt’s philosophy: A critique. Review of International Studies 28: 23–37.
Taylor, C. 2004. Modern social imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.
Taylor, C. 2007. A secular age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
Taylor, C. 2011a. Nationalism and modernity. In Dilemmas and connections: Selected essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 81–104.
Taylor, C. 2011b. Conditions of an unforced consensus on human rights. Dilemmas and connections. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 105–123.
Tilly, C. 1995. To explain political processes. The American Journal of Sociology 100 (6): 1594–1610.
Vincent, R.J. 1978. Western conceptions of a universal moral order. British Journal of International Studies 4 (1): 20–46.
Vincent, R.J. 1986. Human rights and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vincent, R.J. 1993. Modernity and universal human rights. In Global politics: Globalization and the nation state, ed. A. McGrew, and P. Lewis, 293–311. Cambridge: Polity.
Walker, R.B.J. 1992. Inside/outside: International relations as political theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walker, R.B.J. 2010. After the globe, before the world. London: Routledge.
Weinert, M. 2011. Reframing the pluralist-solidarist debate. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 40 (1): 21–41.
Weinert, M. 2015. Making human: World order and the global governance of human dignity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Wendt, A. 1999. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wendt, A. 2003. Why a world state is inevitable. European Journal of International Relations 9 (4): 491–542.
Wheeler, N. 2000. Saving stranger: Humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wheeler, N., and T. Dunne. 1996. Hedley Bull’s pluralism of the intellect and solidarism of the will. International Affairs 72 (1): 91–107.
Wheeler, N., and T. Dunne. 1998. Hedley Bull and the idea of a universal moral community: Fictional, primordial or imagined? In International society and the development of international relations theory, ed. B.A. Robertson, 43–58. London: Printer.
Wight, M. 1962. Review: Politics and culture in international history by Adda Bozeman’. International Affairs 38 (2): 229.
Wight, M. 1991. International theory: The three traditions. London: Leicester University Press.
Wight, M. 2015. The disunity of mankind. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 44 (1): 129–133.
Williams, J. 2005. Pluralism, solidarism and the emergence of world society in English School theory. International Relations 19 (1): 19–38.
Williams, J. 2014. The international society—world society distinction. In Guide to the English School in international studies, ed. C. Navari, and D. Green. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Williams, J. 2015. Ethics, diversity, and world politics: Saving pluralism from itself?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, P. 2004. Manning’s quasi-masterpiece: The nature of international society revisited. The Round Table 93 (377): 755–769.
Wilson, P. 2009. The English School’s approach to international law. In Theorising international society: English School methods, ed. Cornelia Navari, 167–188. London: Palgrave.
Zehfuss, M. 2006. Constructivism and identity. In Constructivism and international relations: Alexander Wendt and his critics, ed. Stefano Guzzini, and Anna Leander, 92–116. London: Routledge.
About this article
Cite this article
McKeil, A. A silhouette of utopia: English School and constructivist conceptions of a world society. Int Polit 55, 41–56 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0067-3
- World society
- English School