Boekle, H., V. Rittberger, and W. Wagner. 2001. Constructivist foreign policy theory. In German foreign policy since unification: Theories and case studies, ed. Rittberger, 105–137. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Börzel, T.A., and T. Risse. 2012. From Europeanisation to diffusion. West European Politics 35: 1–19.
Brazys, S., and D. Panke. 2017. Push and pull forces in the UNGA analyzing foreign policy change in the context of international norms. International Politics. doi:10.1057/s41311-017-0056-6.
Cantir, C., and J. Kaarbo. 2012. Contested roles and domestic politics: Reflections on role theory in foreign policy analysis and IR theory. Foreign Policy Analysis 8: 5–24.
Carlsnaes, W. 1992. The agency-structure problem in foreign policy analysis. International Studies Quarterly 36 (3): 245–270.
Checkel, J.T. 1997. International norms and domestic politics: Bridging the rationalist—constructivist divide. European Journal of International Relations 3 (4): 473–495.
Checkel, J.T. 1998. The constructive turn in international relations theory. World Politics 50 (2): 324–348.
Cortell, A.P., and J.W. Davis. 2005. When norms clash: International norms, domestic practices, and Japan’s internalisation of the GATT/WTO. Review of International Studies 31: 3–25.
Doeser, F. 2011. Domestic politics and foreign policy change in small states. The fall of the Danish ‘footnote policy’. Cooperation and Conflict 46 (2): 222–241.
Doeser, F., and J. Eidenfalk. 2013. The importance of windows of opportunity for foreign policy change. International Area Studies Review 16 (4): 390–406.
Dukalskis, A. 2017. Foreign policy change and the international criminal court. International Politics. doi:10.1057/s41311-017-0057-5.
Finnemore, M. 1996. Norms, culture, and world politics: insights from sociology’s institutionalism. International Organization 50 (02): 325–347.
Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization 52 (04): 887–917.
Garrison, J.A. 2003. Foreign policymaking and group dynamics: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. International Studies Review 5 (2): 155–202.
Goldmann, K. 1982. Change and stability in foreign policy: Détente as a problem of stabilization. World Politics 34 (02): 230–266.
Gustavsson, J. 1999. How should we study foreign policy change? Cooperation and Conflict 34 (1): 73–95.
Hagan, J.D., and M.G. Hermann. 2002. Leaders, groups, and coalitions. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishers.
Hecht, C. 2017. Advantages and disadvantages of inclusive multilateral venues: The rise and fall of the United Nations General Assembly resolution on new or restored democracies. International Politics. doi:10.1057/s41311-017-0058-4.
Hermann, C.F. 1990. Changing course: When governments choose to redirect foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly 34 (1): 3–21.
Holsti, K.J. 1982. Why nations realign: Foreign policy restructuring in the postwar world. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Hudson, V. 2005. Foreign policy analysis: Actor-specific theory and the ground of international relations. Foreign Policy Analysis 1: 1–30.
Immergut, Ellen M. 1998. The theoretical core of the new institutionalism. Politics and Society 26: 5–34.
Jakobi, A. 2017. Global norms and U.S. foreign policy change: The Governance of transnational. International Politics. doi:10.1057/s41311-017-0059-3.
March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1998. The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization 52: 943–969.
Kaarbo, J. 2015. A foreign policy analysis perspective on the domestic turn in IR theory. International Studies Review 17 (2): 189–216.
Kaarbo, J. 2017. Coalition politics, international norms, and foreign policy: Multiparty decision-making dynamics in comparative perspective. International Politics. doi:10.1057/s41311-017-0060-x.
Kleistra, Y., and I. Mayer. 2001. Stability and flux in foreign affairs modelling policy and organizational change. Cooperation and Conflict 36 (4): 381–414.
Klotz, A. 1995. Norms reconstituting interests: Global racial equality and US sanctions against South Africa. International Organization 49 (03): 451–478.
Kuperman, R.D. 2006. A dynamic framework for analyzing foreign policy decision making. International Studies Review 8 (3): 537–544.
Kursani, S. 2017. Foreign policy coordination vis-à-vis the international norm of sovereignty: Macedonia’s and Montenegro’s recognition of Kosovo. International Politics. doi:10.1057/s41311-017-0061-9.
Lee, Y.W. 2012. Synthesis and reformulation of foreign policy change: Japan and East Asian financial regionalism. Review of International Studies 38 (04): 785–807.
Legro, J.W. 1997. Which norms matter? Revisiting the ‘failure’ of internationalism. International Organization 51 (01): 31–63.
Lehman, Howard P., and Jennifer L. McCoy. 1992. The dynamics of the two-level bargaining game. The 1988 Brazilian debt negotiations. World Politics 44: 600–644.
Ozkececi-Tanner, B. 2006. Reviewing the literature on sequential/dynamic foreign policy decision making. International Studies Review 8 (3): 545–554.
Panke, D. 2013. Unequal actors in equalising institutions. Houndmills, Palgrave: Negotiations in the United Nations General Assembly.
Panke, D. 2014. Is bigger better? Activity and success in negotiations in the United Nations General Assembly. Negotiation Journal 30: 367–392.
Putnam, Robert. 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics. The logic of two-level games. International Organization 42: 427–460.
Panke, D., and U. Petersohn. 2011. why international norms disappear sometimes. European Journal of International Relations 18: 719–742.
Peltner, A. 2017. Competing norms and foreign policy change—Humanitarian intervention and British foreign policy. International Politics. doi:10.1057/s41311-017-0062-8.
Risse-Kappen, T. 1994. Ideas do not float freely: transnational coalitions, domestic structures, and the end of the cold war. International Organization 48 (02): 185–214.
Rosati, J.A., J.D. Hagan, and M.W. Sampson (eds.). 1994. Foreign policy restructuring: How governments respond to global change. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Ruggie, J.G. 1998. What makes the world hang together? Neo-utilitarianism and the social constructivist challenge. International Organization 52 (04): 855–885.
Rynhold, J. 2007. Cultural shift and foreign policy change Israel and the making of the Oslo accords. Cooperation and Conflict 42 (4): 419–440.
Shannon, V.P. 2000. Norms are what states make of them: The political psychology of norm violation. International Studies Quarterly 44 (2): 293–316.
Shannon, V.P., and J.W. Keller. 2007. Leadership style and international norm violation: The case of the Iraq war. Foreign Policy Analysis 3: 79–104.
Stevenson, H. 2011. India and international norms of climate governance: A constructivist analysis of normative congruence building. Review of International Studies 37 (03): 997–1019.
Strange, S. 1996. The retreat of the state. The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wendt, A.E. 1987. The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization 41 (03): 335–370.
Wehner, L.E., and C.G. Thies. 2014. Role theory, narratives and interpretation: The domestic contestation of roles. International Studies Review 16: 411–436.
Wiener, A. 2009. Enacting meaning-in-use: Qualitative research on norms and international relations. Review of International Studies 35 (1): 175–193.
Wiener, A. 2012. The invisible constitution of politics. Contested norms and international encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wunderlich, P., J. Kranz, D. Totzek, D. Veit, and A. Picot. 2013. The impact of endogenous motivations on adoption of IT-enabled services the case of transformative services in the energy sector. Journal of Service Research 16 (3): 356–371.