Skip to main content
Log in

An abiding antagonism: realism, idealism and the mirage of western–Russian partnership after the Cold War

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Europe’s security environment is critically dependent on nature of the relationship between Russia and the broader west. What are the obstacles in the way of a stable partnership? Against the conventional wisdom that foregrounds domestic politics, we establish the importance of an abiding clash of definitions of national interest on both sides. The US and Russian strategic perspectives draw on the modern historical experience of both sides, are consistent with well-established international relations theories and are independent of particular personalities such as Putin’s. We demonstrate that though personalities, ideas and contingency played their roles, these basic clashing perspectives existed even during the euphoric days of the Cold War’s end. Success in negotiating an improvement in USA–Russian relations will require a pragmatic compromise between deeply divergent interests. Stable economic and political relations may be possible, but the first step in attaining it is recognizing the scale of the challenge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bozo, Frederic, Andreas Roedder, and Mary Sarotte, eds., 2016. German unification: An international history (Routledge).

  • Burgoon, B., T. Oliver, and P. Trubowitz. 2017. Globalization, domestic politics, and transatlantic relations. International Politics. doi:10.1057/s41311-017-0040-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernyaev, Anatoly. 1997. Obiedineniie Germanii. Politicheskie mekhanizmy i psikhologicheskiie stereotypy. Svobodnaia mysl 8: 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, Will. 2014. Kerry condemns Russia’s ‘incredible act of aggression’ in Ukraine” Reuters Mar 2, 2014. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-usa-kerry-idUSBREA210DG20140302.

  • Friedberg, Aaron L. 2000. In the Shadow of the Garrison State: America’s anti-statism and its cold war grand strategy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Charles L. 2010. Rational theory of international politics. The logic of competition and cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldgeier, James. 1999. Not whether but when: The U. S. decision to enlarge NATO. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldgeier, James, and Michael McFaul. 2003. Power and purpose. U. S. Policy towards Russia after the cold war. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Thomas, and Matthew Rojansky. 2016. America’s Russia policy has failed. Foreign policy, October 13. https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/10/13/americas-russia-policy-has-failed-clinton-trump-putin-ukraine-syria-how-to-fix/.

  • Ikenberry, John. 2000. After victory: Institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O., and Celeste A. Wallander. 1999. Imperfect unions: Security institutions over time and space. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O. 2001. Governance in a partially globalized world. American Political Science Review 95 (1): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O. 2012. Hegemony and after: Knowns and unknowns in the debate over decline. Foreign Affairs 91 (4): 117–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leffler, Melvyn P. 2007. For the Soul od Mankind. The United States, the Svoiet Union, and the cold war. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieven, Dominic. 2000. Empire: The Russian empire and its rivals. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J.J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Norton.

  • Mearsheimer, J.J. 2014 Why the ukraine crisis is the west’s fault: The liberal delusions that provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs.

  • Poe, Marshall. 2003. The Russian Moment in World History. Princeton University Press.

  • Rieber, Alfred J. 2015. Stalin and the struggle for supremacy in Eurasia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sestanovich, Steven. 2014. Maximalist: America in the world from Truman to Obama. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiraev, Eric, and Vladislav Zubok. 2000. Anti-Americanism in Russia; from Stalin to Putin. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K.E. 2017. A European Union global strategy for a changing world? International Politics. doi:10.1057/s41311-017-0041-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, Jack. 1991. Myths of empire: Domestic politics and international ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taagepera, Rein. 1997. Expansion and contraction patterns of large polities: Context for Russia. International Studies Quarterly 41 (3): 475–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traynor, I. 2014. Ukraine crisis: Vladimir Putin has lost the plot, says German chancellor. Guardian Monday 3 March 2014 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/03/ukraine-vladimir-putin-angela-merkel-russian.

  • Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politcs. Addison-Wesley.

  • Westad, Q.A. 2005. The global cold war: Third world interventions and the making of our times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlforth, W.C. 1993. The elusive balance: Power and perceptions in the cold war. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlforth, W.C. 2001. The Russian-Soviet empire: A test of neorealism. Review of International Studies 27: 213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zubok, Vladislav. 2003. Gorbachev and the end of the cold war: Different perspectives on the historical personality. In Cold war endgame: Oral history. Analysis, debates, ed. William C. Wohlforth. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubok, Vladislav. 2007. A failed empire. The Soviet Union in the cold war from Stalin to Gorbachev. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubok, Vladislav. 2016.  Russia, the US, and the backstory behind the breakdown. The Wilson Quarterly, Winter.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William C. Wohlforth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wohlforth, W.C., Zubok, V.M. An abiding antagonism: realism, idealism and the mirage of western–Russian partnership after the Cold War. Int Polit 54, 405–419 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0046-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0046-8

Keywords

Navigation