Skip to main content

Obama and US policy towards Africa: A study in failure?

International Politics volume 54, pages 73–88 (2017)Cite this article

Abstract

When Barack Obama came into office in January 2009, there were high expectations that he would change the policy towards Africa. It has not happened. Critics maintain that the current policy is not only a continuation of the policy of George W. Bush but has also become increasingly ‘militarized’. The paper argues that it is not adequate to describe US Africa policy as having become ‘militarized’. It is too incoherent and too inconsistent to possibly describe it by such a term. The policy is much more country specific and case specific depending on the coalition trying to influence policy-making at a given moment towards a given issue or country/region. This type of policy-making is to be explained by the nature of the American decision-making system dealing with Africa. It is pluralistic and open to all kinds of pressures and interests. And not to forget, the Africa policy is a bipartisan issue in the USA.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Adebajo, A. 2015. Obama failing to live up to his pledges on Africa. http://bdlive.co.za/opinion/columnists/205/02/23/obama-failing-to-live-up-to. Accessed 24 June 2015.

  • Alden, C. 2007. Emerging countries as new ODA players in LDCs: The Case of China and Africa. Paris: Institute du développement durable et des relations internationals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budabin, A.C. 2014. Diasporas as development partners for peace? The alliance between the Darfuri diaspora and the Save Darfur Coalition. Third World Quarterly 35 (1): 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, S.F. 2015a. Comparative challenges in securing the Horn of Africa and Sahara. Comparative Strategy 34 (2): 202–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, S.F. 2015b. The United States in the Horn of Africa. ASPJ Africa & Francophonie 1st Quarter: 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, G.K. 2013. The logistics of the war in the Sahel. Stability: International Journal of Security & Development 2 (2) article 22: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J. 2013. The Obama Administration’s Africa Policy: The first four years, 2009–2013. American Foreign Policy Interests 35 (6): 317–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copley et al. 2014. The US Africa leaders summit: A focus on foreign direct investments. Brookings. Africa in Focus. http://brookings.edu/blogs/africa-in-focus/posts/2014/07/11-foreign-direct-inve. Accessed 03 July 2015.

  • Downie, R. 2014. EU and US Policies in the Sahel and the Horn of Africa: The search for sustainable approaches. In Transatlantic security from the Sahel to the Horn of Africa, ed. R. Alcaro, and N. Pirozzi, 43–58. Edizioni Nuova Cultura: Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fact sheet. 2012. US assistance to the African Union, United States Mission to the African Union. http://photos.state.gov/libraries/usau/231771/PDFs/US_assistance_to_the_au_fact_sheet.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2013.

  • Friedberg, A.L. 2015. The debate over US China strategy. Survival 57 (3): 89–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huliaras, A. 2008–2009. The evangelical roots of US Africa policy. Survival 50 (6): 161–182.

  • International Crisis Group. 2012. Mali: The Need for Determined and Coordinated International Action, Africa Briefing, no. 90, 24 September.

  • Keller, E.J. 2014. US Africa relations and AFRICOM: Possibility, problem and limitation. In US Africa Relations. From Clinton to Obama, ed. C.R. Veney, 59–73. Lanham: Lexington books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieh, G.K. 2014. The Obama administration’s policy towards Africa. In Obama and the world. New directions in US foreign policy, ed. I. Parmar, et al., 165–184. Hoboken: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen, N. 2010. Systemic pressures and domestic ideas: a neoclassical realist model of grand strategy formation. Review of International Studies 36 (1): 117–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanteigne, M. 2014. China’s Peacekeeping Policies in Mali: New Security Thinking or Balancing Europe?. Berlin: NGF Working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larémont, R.R. 2013. After the fall of Qaddafi: political, economic and security consequences for Libya, Mali, Niger and Algeria. Stability: International Journal of Security & Development 2 (2) article 29: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, Z. 2011. Two pillars of China’s global peace engagement strategy: UN peacekeeping and international peace building. International Peacekeeping 18 (3): 344–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nsia-Pepra, Kofi. 2014. Militarization of US Foreign Policy in Africa: Strategic Gain or Backlash? Military Review 94 (1): 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploch, L. 2011. Africa Command: U.S. strategic interests and the role of U.S. military in Africa. Washington: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploch, L. 2010. Countering terrorism in East Africa: The US response. Washington: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploch, L.B. 2014. The Crisis in South Sudan. Washington: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichwein, A. 2012. The tradition of neoclassical realism. In Neoclassical realism in European politics. Bringing power back in, ed. A. Toje, and B. Kunz, 30–60. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. 1998. Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics 51 (1): 144–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samatar, A.I. 2013. Africa: Beware of Obama’s second term. African Studies Review 56 (2): 179–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, B. 2008. Theories of US foreign policy. In US foreign policy, ed. M. Cox, and D. Stokes, 7–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraeder, P. 1995. United States foreign policy towards Africa: Incrementalism, crisis and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraeder, P. 2001. Forget the rhetoric and boost the geopolitics: Emerging trends in the Busch administration’s policy towards Africa. African Affairs 100: 387–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraeder, P. 2006. The Africa dimension in US foreign policy in the Post-9/11 Era. Paper prepared for IV Flad-IPRI International Conference on ‘Strategy and Security in Southern Africa, October 12–13, Lisbon.

  • Schraeder, P. 2011. The Obama Administration’s engagements in Africa within historical context: Great expectations versus daunting challenges. In African engagements. Africa negotiating an emerging multipolar world, ed. T. Dietz, et al., 300–324. Leiden: Brill.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taliafarro, J.W., S.E. Lobell, and N.M. Ripsman. 2009. Introduction: Neoclassical realism, the state and foreign policy. In Neoclassical realism, the state and foreign policy, ed. S.E. Lobell, N.M. Ripsman, and J.W. Taliaferro, 1–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Toje, A., and B. Kunz. 2012. Introduction: neoclassical realism in Europe. In Neoclassical realism in European politics, ed. A. Troje, and B. Kunz, 1–16. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of State & USAID. 2003. Strategic Plan. Fiscal Years 2004–2009, Washington D.C.

  • US Department of State, Bureau of Counterterrorism. Programs and Initiatives. http://www.state.gov/j/ct/programs/. Accessed July 10 2015.

  • van de Walle, N. 2009. US policy towards Africa: The Bush legacy and the Obama administration. African Affairs 109 (434): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hoeymissen, S. 2011. Regional Organizations in China’s Security Strategy for Africa: The Sense of Supporting ‘African Solutions to African Problems’. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 40 (4): 91–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veney, C.R. 2014. Introduction. In US Africa Relations. From Clinton to Obama, ed. C.R. Veney, 1–6. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • White House. 2002. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington DC: White House.

  • White House. 2012. US Strategy towards Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington DC: White House.

  • Wiley, D. 2012. Militarizing Africa and African studies and the US Africanist response. African Studies Review 55 (2): 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.R. 2015. African growth and opportunity act (AGOA): Background and reauthorization. Washington, DC: CRS Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi-chong, X. 2008. China and the United States in Africa: Coming conflict or commercial coexistence? Australian Journal of International Affairs 62 (1): 16–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeleza, P.T. 2013. Obama’s Africa policy: Limits of symbolic power. African Studies Review 56 (2): 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zengyu, W., and I. Taylor. 2011. From refusal to engagement: Chinese contributions to peacekeeping in Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies 29 (2): 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Social Science & Business, Roskilde University, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark

    Gorm Rye Olsen

Authors
  1. Gorm Rye Olsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gorm Rye Olsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olsen, G.R. Obama and US policy towards Africa: A study in failure?. Int Polit 54, 73–88 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0018-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0018-z

Keywords

  • US Africa policy
  • Obama
  • American political system
  • Militarization
  • Security
  • Somalia
  • Sudan
  • Mali