Advertisement

International Politics

, Volume 53, Issue 5, pp 574–595 | Cite as

Anarchy in the East: Eurocentrism, China-centred geopolitics and uneven and combined development

Original Article

Abstract

Mainstream international theories have not been successful in explaining patterns of non-Western international systems due to their deep-seated problem of Eurocentrism. Yet for many attempts at alternative theorization, antidotes to Eurocentrism are only conceivable from a position which denies the theoretical core of mainstream IR, namely the ‘logic of anarchy’. Take the China-centred international system for example: a cultural-reductionist argument currently suggests that premodern East Asia was more peaceful because it comprised a hierarchical, rather than an anarchical order, underpinned by the predominant Confucian culture. This article will first show that such alternative cultural-reductionist explanations are no more advanced than Eurocentric theories because they both tend towards uni-linear understanding of an historical evolution which in fact is multi-linear in nature. What is really problematic is not anarchy, but the lack of an interactive perspective in both mainstream and cultural-reductionist IR that enables a progressive understanding of the evolution of human political agency. The article will then propose that Leon Trotsky’s theory of uneven and combined development can resolve this problem, providing a theoretical re-appraisal of premodern East Asia. Central to the geopolitics of premodern East Asia, I will suggest, is not Confucianism, but the ‘internationally generated combination’ in China’s political agency: a transformation from a prototypical nation-state to a cosmopolitan empire against an enduring backdrop of agrarian society.

Keywords

anarchy Eurocentrism cultural-reductionism East Asian international system uneven and combined development 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Justin Rosenberg, Kamran Matin, Darius A’zami and Jasper Green for their valuable input and continuous encouragement.

References

  1. Anderson, J.A. (2008) Treacherous factions: Shifting frontier alliances in the breakdown of Sino-Vietnamese relations on the eve of the 1075 Border War. In: D. Wyatt (ed.) Battlefronts Real and Imagined: War, Border, Identity in the Chinese Middle Period. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, P. (1974) Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, P. (1979) Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  4. Arrighi, G. (2009) Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. Banaji, J. (2010) Theory as History: Essays on Modes of Production and Exploitation. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Betts, R.K. (1993) Wealth, power and instability: East Asia and the United States after the Cold War. International Security 18(3): 34–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloch, M. (1978) Feudal Society: The Growth of Ties of Dependence, Vol. 1. London: Routledge and Kagan Paul.Google Scholar
  8. Bull, H. (1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bodde, D. (1986) The State and Empire of Chin. In: The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 1. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
  10. Buzan, B. (1995) The level of analysis problem in international relations reconsidered. In: K. Booth and S. Smith (ed.) International Relations Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 198–216.Google Scholar
  11. Buzan, B. (2010) Culture and International Society. International Affairs 86(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buzan, B. and Waever, O. (2003) Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chakrabarty, D. (2000) Provincializing Europe, Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chia, N. (1993) The Lifanyuan and the inner Asian rituals in the early Qing (1644–1795). Late Imperial China 14(1): 60–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark, I. (2009) How hierarchical can international society be?. International Relations 23(3): 464–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Christensen, T. (2001) Posing problems without catching up: China’s rise and challenge for US security policy. International Security 25(4): 5–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Bary, W.T. (1991) The Problems with Confucianism. Cambridge: University of Harvard Press.Google Scholar
  18. Di Cosmo, N. (2004) Ancient China and Its Enemies: The Rise of Nomadic Power in East Asian History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Donnelly, J. (2006) Sovereign inequalities and hierarchy in anarchy: American power and international society. European Journal of International Relations 12(2): 139–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ebenhard, W. (1965) Conquerors and Rulers: Social Forces in Medieval China. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  21. Elliot, M.C. (2001) The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Elvin, M. (1973) The Pattern of the Chinese Past. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Fairbank, J.K. (ed.) (1968) The Chinese World Order: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fairbank, J.K, Reischauer, E.O. and Craig, A.M. (1973) East Asia: Tradition and Transformation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  25. Gellner, E. (1983) Nations and Nationalism. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Goldstein, A. (1997) Great Expectations: Interpreting China’s Arrival. International Security 22(3): 36–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hartwell, R. (1962) A revolution in the iron and coal industries in the Northern Sung. Journal of Asian Studies 21(2): 153–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hui, V.T.B. (2005) War and State in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ho, P.T. (1967) The Significance of the Ch’ing Period in Chinese History. The Journal of Asian Studies 26(2): 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoffmann, S. (1959) International Relations: The Long Road to Theory. World Politics 11(3): 346–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jervis, R. (1985) From balance to concert: A study of international security cooperation. World Politics 38(1): 58–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kang, D. (2003) Getting Asia wrong: The need for new analytical framework. International Security 27(4): 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kang, D. (2010) East Asia Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Knei-Paz, B. (1978) The Social and Political Thought of Leon Trotsky. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  35. Kelly, R. (2012) A ‘Confucian Long Peace’ in Pre-Western East Asia?. European Journal of International Relations 18(3): 407–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Khazanov, A. (1994) Nomads and the Outside World. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kuhn, P.A. (1978) The Taiping Rebellion. The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 10, Late Ching, 18001911, Part 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kuhn, P.A. (1980) Rebellion and Its Enemies in Late Imperial China: Militarization and Social Structure 17961864. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lake, D.A. (2009) Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lapid, Y. and Kratochwil, F. (ed.) (1996) The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory. London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  41. Lattimore, O. (1951) Inner Asian Frontiers of China. New York: American Geographical Society.Google Scholar
  42. Lattimore, O. (1962) Nomads and Commissars: Mongolia Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lau, N.Y. and Huang, K.C. (2009) Founding and consolidation of the Sung Dynasty under Tai-tsu. In: The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Layne, C. (1993) The unipolar illusion: Why new great powers will rise. International Security 17(4): 5–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Layne, C. (2006) The unipolar illusion revisited: The coming end of the United States, unipolar moment. International Security 31(2): 7–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lebow, R.N. (2009) A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Legro, J.W and Moravcsik, A. (1999) Is anybody still a realist?. International Security 24(2): 5–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lewis, M.E. (2007) The Early Chinese Empires: Qin and Han. London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Liu J.W. (ed.) (1992) Riben Xuezhe Yanjiuzhongguo Shilunzhu Xuanyi (Selected Translation of Japanese Scholars’ Research on China), Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar
  50. Mann, M. (1986) The Sources of Social Power Vol. 1, A History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Manning, R. and Przystup, J. (1999) Asia’s transition diplomacy: Hedging against futureshock. Survival 41(3): 43–67.Google Scholar
  52. Marx, K. (1973) Grundrisse. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  53. Matin, K. (2007) Uneven and combined development in world history: the international relations of state-formation in premodern Iran. European Journal of International Relations 13(3): 419–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Matin, K. (2013) Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations 19(2): 353–377.Google Scholar
  55. McCord, E.A. (1993) The Power of the Gun: The Emergence of Modern Chinese Warlordism. Berkeley: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
  56. Mearsheimer, J. (1995) Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War. International Security 15(1): 5–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mearsheimer, J. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  58. Michael, F. (1949) Military organization and power structure of China during the Taiping Rebellion. Pacific Historical Review 18(4): 469–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Michael, F. (1965) The Origin of Manchu Rule in China: Frontier and Bureaucracy as Interacting Forces in the Chinese Empire. New York: Octagon Books.Google Scholar
  60. Milner, H. (1991) The assumption of anarchy in international relations theory: A critique. Review of International Studies 17(1): 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Natsagdorj, S. (1967) The economic basis of feudalism in Mongolia. Modern Asian Studies 1(3): 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Perdue, P. (2005) China Marches The West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
  63. Perdue, P. (2009) Nature and nurture on imperial China’s frontiers. Modern Asian Studies 43(1): 245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pomeranz, K. (2000) The Great Divergence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Reischauer, E.O. (1974) The Sinic world in perspective. Foreign Affairs 52(2): 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rosenberg, J. (2006) Why is there no international historical sociology?. European Journal of International Relations 12(3): 307–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rosenberg, J. (2007) International relations: The `Higher Bullshit’: A reply to the globalization theory debate. International Politics 44(4): 450–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rosenberg, J. (2009) Basic problems in the theory of uneven and combined development: A reply to the CRIA Forum. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22(1): 107–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rosenberg, J. (2010) Basic Problems in the theory of uneven and combined development II: Unevenness and political multiplicity. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 23(1): 165–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rosenberg, J. (2013a) The ‘Philosophical Premises’ of uneven and combined development. Review of International Studies 39(03): 569–597. First view article: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rosenberg, J. (2013b) Kenneth Waltz and Leon Trotsky: Anarchy in the mirror of uneven and combined development. International Politics 50(2): 183–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ross, R. (2006) Balance of power politics and the rise of China: accommodation and balancing in East Asia. Security Studies 15(3): 355–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rossabi, M. (1994) The Reign of Khubilai Khan. The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 6, Alien Regimes and Border States, 9071368. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Rowe, W.T. (2001) Saving the World: Chen Hongmou and Elite Consciousness in Eighteenth-Century China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Rowe, W.T. (2009) China’s Last Empire: The Great Qing. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
  76. Ruggie, J.G. (1986) Continuity and transformation in the world polity: toward a neorealist synthesis. In: Keohane, R (ed.) Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Ruggie, J.G. (1993) Territoriality and beyond: Problematizing modernity in international relations. International Organization 47(1): 139–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schrecker, J.E. (2004) The Chinese Revolution in Historical Perspective. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  79. Schroeder, P. (1994) Historical reality vs. neo-realist theory. International Security 19(1): 108–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Smith, P.J. (2009) Shen-Tsung’s Reign and the new policies of Wang An-shih. In: Cambridge History of China, Vol. 5, Part One: The Sung Dynasty and Its Precursors, 9071279. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Tenbruck, F. (1994) Internal history of society or universal history?. Theory, Culture & Society 11: 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Teschke, B. (1998) Geopolitical relations in the European middle ages: History and theory. International Organization 52(2): 325–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Teschke, B. (2002) Theorizing the Westphalian system of states: The international relations from absolutism to capitalism. European Journal of International Relations 8(1): 5–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Teschke, B. (2003) The myth of 1648. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  85. Teschke, B. and Lacher, H. (2007) The Changing ‘Logics’ of capitalist competition. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 20(4): 565–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Trotsky, L. (1964) The Age of Permanent Revolution: A Trotsky Anthology, edited by I. Deutscher. New York: Dell Publishing.Google Scholar
  87. Trotsky, L. (1971) 1905. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  88. Trotsky, L. (1972) The Revolution Betrayed. New York: Pathfinder.Google Scholar
  89. Trotsky, L. (1980) The History of Russian Revolution. New York: Pathfinder.Google Scholar
  90. Tu, W.M. (1996) Confucian Tradition in East Asian Modernity: Moral Education and Economic Culture in Japan and the Four Mini-dragons. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Twitchett, D. (1962) Land Tenure and the Social Order in T’ang and Sung China. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
  92. Vasquez, J.A. (1997) The realist paradigm and degenerative versus progressive research programs: An appraisal of neotraditional research on Waltz’s balancing proposition. The American Political Science Review 91(4): 899–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wakeman, F. (1978) The Canton trade and the Opium War. The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 10, Late Ching, 18001911, Part 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Waltz, K. (1959) Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw.Google Scholar
  96. Waltz, K. (1993) The emerging structure of international politics. International Security 18 (2): 44–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Waltz, K. (2000) Structural realism after the Cold War. International Security 25 (1): 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wang, G.W. (1963) The Structure of Power in North China During the Five Dynasties. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.Google Scholar
  99. Weber, M. (1951) The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism. Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  100. Wendt, A. (1987) The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization 41(3): 335–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wendt, A. (1992) Anarchy is what state make of it. International Organization 46(2): 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wendt, A. (1997) Collective identity formation and the international state. The American Political Science Review 88(2): 384–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wendt, A. and Friedheim, D. (1995) Hierarchy under Anarchy: Informal Empire and the East German State. International Organization 49(4): 689–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wittfogel, K. (1957) Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Wohlforth, W. (2009) Unipolarity, status competition and great power war. World Politics 61(1): 28–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wong, R.B. (1997) China Transformed: Historical Change and the Limits of European Experience. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Woodside, A. (1998) Territorial order and collective identity tensions in Confucian Asia: China, Vietnam, Korea. Daedalus 127(3): 191–220.Google Scholar
  109. Zhang, F. (2014) How hierarchical was the historical East Asian system?. International Politics 51(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International RelationsUniversity of SharjahUniversity CityUAE

Personalised recommendations