Abstract
The study examines the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and earnings management strategies (expense shifting and revenue shifting). Based on the sample of 41,100 Bombay Stock Exchange listed firm-years spanning over fourteen years (2009–2022), we find that CSR-oriented firms prefer revenue shifting over expense shifting for core earnings management, and this effect is more pronounced among government CSR firms (firms spending on government-related sectors). Our subsequent tests exhibit the differential impact of earnings management strategies on stock return, where investors are found to perceive expense shifting as riskier than revenue shifting, which in turn, is likely to incentivize CSR firms to prefer revenue shifting for core earnings management. Our findings alert auditors about suspected firms (CSR and government CSR firms) that inflate core earnings through shifting practices and highlight the market arbitrage opportunity (mispricing) for investors, where abnormal returns can be fetched by making a zero-investment strategy in expense and revenue shifter stocks. The study is among the pioneering attempts to document the substitution relationship between earnings management strategies in CSR firms and provide empirical evidence on the pricing impact of these strategies. Our findings are robust to the problem of endogeneity and self-selection bias.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Expense misclassification merely inflates core earnings, keeping the bottom-line earnings unchanged; hence, such misclassification has a lesser likelihood of being detected by auditors.
All the untabulated results in the study are made available from authors upon the reader’s request.
The words “misclassification” and “shifting” have been used interchangeably in the study.
References
Abernathy, J.L., B. Beyer, and E.T. Rapley. 2014. Earnings management constraints and classification shifting. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 41 (5–6): 600–626.
Adhikari, A., M. Bansal, and A. Kumar. 2021. IFRS convergence and accounting quality: India a case study. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 45: 100430.
Ahmad, G., F. Hayat, F.A. Almaqtari, N.H. Farhan, and M. Shahid. 2023. Corporate social responsibility spending and earnings management: The moderating effect of ownership structure. Journal of Cleaner Production 384: 135556.
Ali, A., and M. Bansal. 2023. Impact of upward and downward earnings management on stock returns. South Asian Journal of Business Studies 12 (2): 202–219.
Alsaadi, A., M.S. Ebrahim, and A. Jaafar. 2017. Corporate social responsibility, Shariah-compliance, and earnings quality. Journal of Financial Services Research 51 (2): 169–194.
Bansal, M. 2022. Impact of corporate life cycle on misclassification practices: Evidence from IFRS adoption in India. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 23 (3): 628–649.
Bansal, M., and A. Ali. 2022. Betting against real earnings management. Asian Review of Accounting 30 (2): 233–257.
Bansal, M., and H.A. Bashir. 2023. Business strategy and classification shifting: Indian evidence. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies 13 (1): 69–92.
Bansal, M., and V. Kumar. 2021. Forcing responsibility? Examining earnings management induced by mandatory corporate social responsibility: Evidence from India. Review of Accounting and Finance 20 (2): 194–216.
Bansal, M., A. Kumar, and K.N. Badhani. 2021. Do Indian firms engage in classification shifting to report inflated core earnings? Managerial Finance 47 (11): 1533–1552.
Bansal, M., A. Kumar, and V. Kumar. 2022. Gross profit manipulation in emerging economies: Evidence from India. Pacific Accounting Review 34 (1): 174–196.
Bansal, M., A. Kumar, A. Bhattacharyya, and H.A. Bashir. 2023. Predictors of revenue shifting and expense shifting: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 19 (1): 100339.
Bashir, H.A., M. Bansal, and D. Kumar. 2021. Predictive view of the value relevance of earnings in India. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-08-2021-0219.
Braam, G., M. Nandy, U. Weitzel, and S. Lodh. 2015. Accrual-based and real earnings management and political connections. The International Journal of Accounting 50 (2): 111–141.
Brahem, E., F. Depoers, and F. Lakhal. 2022. Corporate social responsibility and earnings quality in family firms. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 23 (5): 1114–1134.
Branco, M.C., and L.L. Rodrigues. 2006. Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics 69: 111–132.
Cao, Z., W. Rees, and T. Rodionova. 2023. Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Quality in the Context of Changing Regulatory Regimes and the Financial Crisis. Spanish Accounting Review 26 (1): 124–137.
Cho, E., and S. Chun. 2016. Corporate social responsibility, real activities earnings management, and corporate governance: Evidence from Korea. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics 23 (4): 400–431.
Christensen, D.M. 2016. Corporate accountability reporting and high-profile misconduct. The Accounting Review 91 (2): 377–399.
Cohen, D.A., and P. Zarowin. 2010. Accrual-based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (1): 2–19.
DesJardine, M.R., E. Marti, and R. Durand. 2021. Why activist hedge funds target socially responsible firms: The reaction costs of signaling corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal 64 (3): 851–872.
Dharmapala, D., and V. Khanna. 2018. The impact of mandated corporate social responsibility: Evidence from India’s Companies Act of 2013. International Review of Law and Economics 56: 92–104.
Ditlev-Simonsen, C.D., and F. Wenstøp. 2013. How stakeholders view stakeholders as CSR motivators. Social Responsibility Journal 9 (1): 137–147.
Ehsan, S., A. Tariq, M.S. Nazir, M.S. Shabbir, R. Shabbir, L.B. Lopez, and W. Ullah. 2022. Nexus between corporate social responsibility and earnings management: Sustainable or opportunistic. Managerial and Decision Economics 43 (2): 478–495.
Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 2017. International tests of a five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics 123 (3): 441–463.
Fan, Y., W.B. Thomas, and X. Yu. 2019. The impact of financial covenants in private loan contracts on classification shifting. Management Science 65 (8): 3637–3653.
Gaio, C., T. Goncalves, and M.V. Sousa. 2022. Does corporate social responsibility mitigate earnings management? Management Decision 60 (11): 2972–2989.
Giannarakis, G., G. Konteos, and N. Sariannidis. 2014. Financial, governance and environmental determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure. Management Decision 52 (10): 1928–1951.
Gonenc, H., and M.B. Karan. 2003. Do value stocks earn higher returns than growth stocks in an emerging market? Evidence from the Istanbul stock exchange. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting 14 (1): 1–25.
Gras-Gil, E., M.P. Manzano, and J.H. Fernández. 2016. Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings management: Evidence from Spain. BRQ Business Research Quarterly 19 (4): 289–299.
Harrison, J.S., and A.C. Wicks. 2013. Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (1): 97–124.
Hasan, M.M., and A. Habib. 2017. Corporate life cycle, organizational financial resources, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 13 (1): 20–36.
He, F., X. Miao, C.W. Wong, and Y. Tang. 2020. Corporate social responsibility and operating performance: The role of local character in emerging economies. Sustainability 12 (12): 4874.
Healy, P.M., and J.M. Wahlen. 1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons 13 (4): 365–383.
Hwang, J., S. Choi, S. Choi, and Y.G. Lee. 2022. Corporate social responsibility and classification shifting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 41 (2): 106918.
Khalil, M., S. Harianto, and Y. Guney. 2022. Do political connections reduce earnings management? Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 59 (1): 273–310.
Kothari, S.P., A.J. Leone, and C.E. Wasley. 2005. Performance-matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (1): 163–197.
Kumar, S., A. Sharma, P. Mishra, and N. Kaushik. 2023. Corporate social responsibility disclosures and earnings management: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 20 (1): 27–51.
Luo, K., and S. Wu. 2022. Corporate sustainability and analysts’ earnings forecast accuracy: Evidence from environmental, social and governance ratings. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 29 (5): 1465–1481.
Malikov, K., S. Manson, and J. Coakley. 2018. Earnings management using classification shifting of revenues. The British Accounting Review 50 (3): 291–305.
Malikov, K., J. Coakley, and S. Manson. 2019. The effect of the interest coverage covenants on classification shifting of revenues. The European Journal of Finance 25 (16): 572–1590.
Martínez-Ferrero, J., S. Banerjee, and I.M. García-Sánchez. 2016. Corporate social responsibility as a strategic shield against costs of earnings management practices. Journal of Business Ethics 133: 305–324.
McVay, S.E. 2006. Earnings management using classification shifting: An examination of core earnings and special items. The Accounting Review 81 (3): 501–531.
McWilliams, A., and D. Siegel. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review 26 (1): 117–127.
Michelon, G., G. Boesso, and K. Kumar. 2013. Examining the link between strategic corporate social responsibility and company performance: An analysis of the best corporate citizens. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 20 (2): 81–94.
Mulchandani, K., and K. Mulchandani. 2022. Does institutional ownership limit classification shifting: Evidence from Indian firms. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 19 (4): 466–477.
Murfin, J. 2012. The supply-side determinants of loan contract strictness. The Journal of Finance 67 (5): 1565–1601.
Muttakin, M.B., A. Khan, and M.I. Azim. 2015. Corporate social responsibility disclosures and earnings quality: Are they a reflection of managers’ opportunistic behavior? Managerial Auditing Journal 30 (3): 277–298.
Mutuc, E.B., J.S. Lee, and F.S. Tsai. 2019. Doing good with creative accounting? Linking corporate social responsibility to earnings management in a market economy, country, and business sector contexts. Sustainability 11 (17): 4568.
Nyame-Asiamah, F., and S. Ghulam. 2020. The relationship between CSR activity and sales growth in the UK retailing sector. Social Responsibility Journal 16 (3): 387–401.
Palacios-Manzano, M., E. Gras-Gil, and J.M. Santos-Jaen. 2021. Corporate social responsibility and its effect on earnings management: Empirical research on Spanish firms. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 32 (7–8): 921–937.
Roychowdhury, S. 2006. Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42 (3): 335–370.
Scholtens, B., and F.C. Kang. 2013. Corporate social responsibility and earnings management: Evidence from Asian economies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 20 (2): 95–112.
Shi, G., and J. Sun. 2015. Corporate bond covenants and social responsibility investment. Journal of Business Ethics 131 (2): 285–303.
Shipman, J.E., Q.T. Swanquist, and R.L. Whited. 2017. Propensity score matching in accounting research. The Accounting Review 92 (1): 213–244.
Thomas, S.S., M. Bansal, and I.E. Ahmed. 2023. Investigating the disclosure compliance of Basel III in emerging markets: A comparative study between UAE and Indian banks. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance 31 (3): 281–297.
Xu, S., and D. Liu. 2017. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate diversification: Do diversified production firms invest more in CSR? Applied Economics Letters 24 (4): 254–257.
Zang, A.Y. 2012. Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. The Accounting Review 87 (2): 675–703.
Funding
No funds, grants, or other support were received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author has no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bansal, M. Unpacking the drivers of earnings management in CSR firms: influence of investor risk perception. Int J Discl Gov 21, 127–142 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-023-00201-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-023-00201-8
Keywords
- Corporate social responsibility
- Earnings management
- Classification shifting
- Core earnings
- Stock return
- India