Abstract
The lack of uniform non-voluntary corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure standards and the complexity around different stakeholder demands have resulted in considerable flexibility in corporate compliance with CSR reporting. Covering a wide range of CSR dimensions, this paper investigates corporate views on CSR disclosure. Evidence presented is based on an online survey with 278 corporate professionals, who are familiar with corporate reporting in the UK, such as CSR professionals, managers, CEOs, CFOs and non-executive directors. The findings reveal the primacy of shareholder and institutional investor needs in CSR disclosure decisions. Some practitioners believe multiple reports are needed to ensure appropriate dissemination of CSR information. Fair business practice and environment-related information are perceived as the most important items to disclose. Whilst financial information remains paramount, the relative importance of reporting non-financial information has increased significantly, with the key areas relating to governance, health and safety, environmental impact and pollution control, and human rights information. For many participants, mandatory regulation is considered as the only way for CSR reporting to be taken seriously on the corporate level. This paper contributes to the limited studies that investigate the views of practitioners by means of primary data. The study complements the literature on CSR disclosure by intensifying the clarity of the understanding of corporate perspectives on CSR and by identifying potential factors that influence CSR reporting decisions in the UK context. The findings strengthen the arguments of prior studies about what items of information should be included in CSR reports and how to disclose the company’s CSR information in a more substantive way.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackers, B. 2017. Independent corporate social responsibility assurance: A response to soft laws, or influenced by company size and industry sector? International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 14: 278–298.
Adams, C. 2002. Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15 (2): 223–250.
Adams, C., and N. Kuasirikun. 2000. A comparative analysis of corporate reporting on ethical issues by UK and German chemical and pharmaceutical companies. European Accounting Review 9 (1): 53–79.
Adams, C., and A. Zutshi. 2004. Corporate social responsibility: Why business should act responsibly and be accountable. Australian Accounting Review 14 (3): 31–39.
Adams, C., W. Hill, and C. Roberts. 1998. Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: Legitimating corporate behaviour? The British Accounting Review 30 (1): 1–21.
Adams, C., P. Druckman, and R. Picot. 2020. Sustainable Development Goal Disclosure (SDGD) Recommendations, by ACCA, Chartered Accountants ANZ, ICAS, IFAC, IIRC and WBA, available at: https://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Adams_Druckman_Picot_2020_Final_SDGD_Recommendations.pdf. Accessed 20.11.2020
Adams, C.A., A. Alhamood, X. He, J. Tian, L. Wang, and Y. Wang. 2021. The Double-Materiality Concept: Application and Issues. Project Report. Published by the Global Reporting Initiative. https://www.globalreporting.org/media/jrbntbyv/griwhitepaper-publications.pdf
Board Agenda (2018) Leadership in Corporate Sustainability—European Report 2018”. Available at: https://www.insead.edu/sites/default/files/assets/dept/centres/icgc/docs/leadership-in-corporate-sustainability-european-report-2018.pdf. Accessed 24.07.2019.
Alotaibi, K., and K. Hussainey. 2016. Determinants of CSR disclosure quantity and quality: Evidence from non-financial listed firms in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 13 (4): 364–393.
Anagnostopoulou, S., A. Tsekrekos, and G. Voulgaris. 2020. Accounting conservatism and corporate social responsibility”. The British Accounting Review 100942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2020.100942.
Arvidsson, S. 2010. Communication of corporate social responsibility: A study of the views of management teams in large companies. Journal of Business Ethics 96 (3): 339–354.
Ballou, B., D. Heitger, and C. Landes. 2006. The future of corporate sustainability reporting: A rapidly growing assurance opportunity. Journal of Accountancy 202 (6): 65–73.
Bassen, A., K. Gödker, F. Lüdeke-Freund, and J. Oll. 2019. Climate Information in Retail Investors’ Decision-Making: Evidence From a Choice Experiment. Organization & Environment 32 (1): 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026618771669.
Beattie, V. and K. Pratt. 2002. Voluntary annual report disclosures: what users want. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland, Bell&Bain, Glasgow.
Bebbington, J., C. Larrinaga-Gonzalez, and J. Moneva-Abadia. 2008a. Corporate social reporting and reputational risk management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21 (3): 337–361.
Bebbington, J., C. Larrinaga-Gonzalez, and J. Moneva-Abadia. 2008b. Legitimating reputation/the reputation of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21 (3): 371–374.
Biswas, P., and S. Bala. 2015. General investors’ views of information sources in Bangladesh. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 12: 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2014.7.
Boiral, O. 2013. Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 26 (7): 1036–1071.
Boiral, O., I. Heras-Saizarbitoria, M. Brotherton, and J. Bernard. 2019. Ethical Issues in the Assurance of Sustainability Reports: Perspectives from Assurance Providers. Journal of Business Ethics 159 (4): 1111–1125.
Boyatzis, R.E. 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Bozzolan, S., C. Cho, and G. Michelon. 2015. Impression Management and Organizational Audiences: The Fiat Group Case. Journal of Business Ethics 126 (1): 143–165.
Brammer, S., and S. Pavelin. 2008. Factors Influencing the Quality of Corporate Environmental Disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment 17 (2): 120–136.
Brooks, C., and I. Oikonomou. 2018. The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosures and performance on firm value: A review of the literature in accounting and finance. The British Accounting Review 50 (1): 1–15.
Campbell, D. 2004. A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of environmental disclosure in UK companies—a research note. The British Accounting Review 36 (1): 107–117.
Campbell, D., and R. Slack. 2008. Narrative Reporting: Analysts’ Perceptions of its Value and Relevance - Research Report 104. Available at: https://www.accaglobal.com/pk/en/technical-activities/technical-resources-search/2008/january/narrative-reporting.html. Accessed 12.10.2017.
Carroll, A. 2016. Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: Taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility 1 (3): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6.
Carroll, A., J. Brown, and A. Buchholtz. 2018. Business & Society: Ethics, Sustainability, and Stakeholder Management, 10th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Chan, C., and M. Milne. 1999. Investor Reactions to Corporate Environmental Saints and Sinners: An Experimental Analysis. Accounting and Business Research 29 (4): 265–279.
Chan, M., J. Watson, and D. Woodliff. 2014. Corporate governance quality and CSR disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics 125 (1): 59–73.
Cho, S., and C. Lee. 2019. Managerial Efficiency, Corporate Social Performance, and Corporate Financial Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 158 (2): 467–486.
Cho, C., and D. Patten. 2007. The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organization and Society 32 (7/8): 639–647.
Cho, C., G. Michelon, D. Patten, and R. Roberts. 2012. Impression Management in Sustainability Reports: An Empirical Investigation of the Use of Graphs. Accounting and the Public Interest 12 (1): 16–37.
Cho, C., G. Michelon, D. Patten, and R. Roberts. 2014. CSR report assurance in the USA: An empirical investigation of determinants and effects. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 5 (2): 130–148.
Cho, C., K. Bohr, T. Choi, K. Partridge, J. Shah, and A. Swierszcz. 2020. Advancing Sustainability Reporting in Canada: 2019 Report on Progress. Accounting Perspectives 19 (3): 181–204.
Cho, C., G. Michelon, and Y. Tanaka. 2013. Does environmental disclosure influence cost of capital? An empirical investigation of Japanese companies. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference.
Clarke, J., and M. Gibson-Sweet. 1999. The use of corporate social disclosures in the management of reputation and legitimacy: A cross sectoral analysis of UK Top 100 Companies. Business Ethics: A European Review 8 (1): 5–13.
Clarkson, P.M., Y. Li, G.D. Richardson, and F.P. Vasvari. 2008. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33 (4–5): 303–327.
Clarkson, P., X. Fang, Y. Li, and G. Richardson. 2013. The relevance of environmental disclosures: Are such disclosures incrementally informative? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 32 (5): 410–431.
Clarkson, P., Y. Li, G. Richardson, and A. Tsang. 2019. Causes and consequences of voluntary assurance of CSR reports: International evidence involving Dow Jones Sustainability Index Inclusion and Firm Valuation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 32 (8): 2451–2474.
Cohen, J., L. Holder-Webb, L. Nath, and D. Wood. 2011. Retails investors’ perceptions of the decision-usefulness of economic performance, governance, and corporate social responsibility disclosures. Behavioural Research in Accounting 23 (1): 109–129.
Cohen, J., L. Holder-Webb, and V. Zamora. 2015. Nonfinancial information preferences of professional investors. Behavioural Research in Accounting 27 (2): 127–153.
Cohen, J., L. Holder-Webb, and S. Khalil. 2017. A Further Examination of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance on Investment Decisions. Journal of Business Ethics 146 (1): 203–218.
EU Commission. 2020. Consultation Document: Review of the Non-financial Reporting Directive. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/finance-consultations-2020-non-financialreporting-directive_en.
Contrafatto, M., J. Ferguson, D. Power, L. Stevenson, and D. Collison. 2019. Understanding power-related strategies and initiatives: The case of the European Commission Green Paper on CSR. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 33 (3): 559–587.
Couper, M.P. 2000. Web Surveys: A Review of Issues and Approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly 64 (4): 464–494.
Cox, R., A. Dayanandan, and H. Donker. 2014. Materiality disclosure and litigation risks: A Canadian perspective. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 11: 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2013.16.
Davis, K. 1960. Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review 2 (3): 70–76.
Dawkins, C., and J. Fraas. 2013. An Exploratory Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility and Disclosure. Business and Society 52 (2): 245–281.
Deegan, C., and B. Gordon. 1996. A Study of the Environmental Disclosure Practices of Australian Corporations. Accounting and Business Research 26 (3): 187–199.
Deegan, C., and M. Rankin. 1997. The Materiality of Environmental Information to Users of Annual Reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 10 (4): 562–583.
Deegan, C., M. Rankin, and P. Voght. 2000. Firms disclosure reactions to major social incidents: Australian evidence. Accounting Forum 24 (1): 101–130.
Dienes, D., R. Sassen, and J. Fischer. 2016. What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 7 (2): 154–189.
Dilla, W., D. Janvrin, J. Perkins, and R. Raschke. 2019. Do environmental responsibility views influence investors’ use of environmental performance and assurance information? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 10 (3): 476–497.
Druckman, P. 2018. Corporate reporting and accounting for externalities: A practitioner view. Accounting and Business Research 48 (5): 523–524.
Eccles, R. and T. Youmans. 2015. Materiality in Corporate Governance: The statement of significant audiences and materiality. Working paper 16-023. Available at: https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/materiality-in-corporate-governance-the-statement-of-significant-audiences-and-materiality (accessed 24.01.2019).
Edie. 2019. Sustainable Business Leadership Survey 2019. Available at: https://www.edie.net/downloads/Business-Leadership-Survey-2019/361. Accessed 24.07.2019.
Epstein, M., and A. Buhovac. 2014. Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts, 2nd ed. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing Limited.
Epstein, M., and M. Freedman. 1994. Social disclosure and the individual investor. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability 7 (4): 94–109.
Ernst, and Ernst. 1978. Social responsibility disclosure: Surveys of Fortune 500 annual reports, Ernst and Ernst, Cleveland, OH.
IFRS Foundation. 2021. About the International Sustainability Standards Board. Available from https://www.ifrs.org/groups/international-sustainability-standards-board/
Gao, F., Y. Dong, C. Ni, and R. Fu. 2016. Determinants and Economic Consequences of Non-financial Disclosure Quality. European Accounting Review 25 (2): 287–317.
Girerd-Potin, I., S. Jimenez-Garceś, and P. Louvet. 2014. Which Dimensions of Social Responsibility Concern Financial Investors? Journal of Business Ethics 121 (4): 559–576.
Gray, R., and J. Bebbington. 2001. Accounting for the Environment, 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications.
Gray, S., L. Campbell, and J. Shaw. 1984. International Financial Reporting: A Comparative International Survey of Accounting Requirements and Practices in 30 Countries. Hampshire: Macmillan.
GRI. 2013. Sustainability topics for sectors: what do stakeholders want to know? Available at: https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/sustainability-topics.pdf (accessed 24.07.2017).
GRI. 2021. A Short Introduction to the GRI Standards. Available from https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/standards-development/universal-standards/
GRI database. 2020. Available at: https://database.globalreporting.org/. Accessed 03.12.2020.
Haider, M.B., and K. Nishitani. 2020. Views of corporate managers on assurance of sustainability reporting: Evidence from Japan. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 17: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-019-00070-0.
Harjoto, M., and H. Jo. 2011. Corporate Governance and CSR Nexus. Journal of Business Ethics 100 (1): 45–67.
Hassanein, A., A. Zalata, and K. Hussainey. 2019. Do forward-looking narratives affect investors’ valuation of UK FTSE all-shares firms? Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 52 (2): 493–519.
Holder-Webb, L., J. R. Cohen, L. Nath, and D. Wood. 2009. The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among U.S. firms. Journal of Business Ethics 84(4): 497–527.
Hooghiemstra, R. 2000. Corporate communication and impression management—new perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1–2): 55–68.
Huimin, G., and C. Ryan. 2011. Ethics and corporate social responsibility—an analysis of the views of Chinese hotel managers. International Journal of Hospitality Management 30 (4): 875–885.
Hummels, H., and D. Timmer. 2004. Investors in Need of Social, Ethical, and Environmental Information. Journal of Business Ethics 52: 73–84.
Hung, H. 2011. Directors’ roles in corporate social responsibility: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 103 (3): 385–402.
ICAEW. 2009. Turning questions into answers environmental issues and annual financial reporting. Available at: https://www.icaew.com/-/media/corporate/files/technical/sustainability/environmental-issues-and-annual-financial-reporting-2009.ashx?la=en. Accessed 27.07.2019.
ICAEW. 2017. What’s next for corporate reporting: time to decide? Financial reporting faculty. Available at: https://www.icaew.com/-/media/corporate/archive/files/technical/financial-reporting/information-for-better-markets/whats-next-for-corporate-reporting.ashx. Accessed 21.07.2019.
IEMA. 2016. The Corporate Sustainability Challenge: Beyond the Perfect Storm. Available at: https://www.iema.net/assets/newbuild/documents/IEMA%20Corporate%20Sustainability%20Report%202016%20rebranded.pdf. Accessed 28.07.2019.
Ioannou, I. and G. Serafeim. 2011. The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Harvard Business School Research Working Paper No. 11-100: 1–44.
Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Finance 3 (4): 305–360.
Khan, A.F., and A. Atkinson. 1987. Managerial Attitudes to Social Responsibility: A Comparative Study in India and Britain. Journal of Business Ethics 6 (6): 419–432.
Konadu, R., G.S. Ahinful, and S. Owusu-Agyei. 2021. Corporate governance pillars and business sustainability: Does stakeholder engagement matter? International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 18: 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-021-00115-3.
KPMG. 2015. Currents of change: The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2015. Available at: https://home.kpmg/cz/en/home/insights/2015/11/kpmg-international-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2015.html
KPMG. 2017. The road ahead: The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017. Available at: https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/campaigns/2017/10/survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017.html. Accessed 24.07.2019.
KPMG. 2020. The time has come: The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2020. Available at: https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2020/11/the-time-has-come-survey-of-sustainability-reporting.html. Accessed 03.12.2020.
Lee, M. 2008. A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews 10 (1): 53–73.
Legislation.gov.uk. 2021. Companies Act 2006. [online] Available from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/172/2012-07-02. Accessed 24.12.21.
Leung, S., L. Parker, and J. Courtis. 2015. Impression management through minimal narrative disclosure in annual reports. British Accounting Review 47 (3): 275–289.
Lev, B., C. Petrovits, and S. Radhakrishnan. 2010. Is doing good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal 31 (2): 182–200.
Lindrianasari, and R.W. Adriyanto. 2010. Manager’s perception of the importance of environmental accounting and its effect on the quality of corporate environmental accounting disclosures: Case from Indonesia. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting 4 (1): 74–86.
Lydenberg, S. 2013. Responsible Investors: Who They Are, What They Want. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 25 (3): 44–49.
Mangalagiri, J., and M.P. Bhasa. 2022. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Evidence from India’s national stock exchange listed companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 19: 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-021-00138-w.
Marquis, C., M. Toffel, and Y. Zhou. 2016. Scrutiny, Norms, and Selective Disclosure: A Global Study of Greenwashing. Organization Science 27 (2): 483–504. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1039.
Moser, D., and P. Martin. 2012. A broader perspective on corporate social responsibility research in accounting. The Accounting Review 87 (3): 797–806.
Martin, P., and D. Moser. 2016. Managers’ green investment disclosures and investors’ reaction. Journal of Accounting and Economics 61 (1): 239–254.
Merkl-Davies, D., and N. Brennan. 2007. Discretionary Disclosure Strategies in Corporate Narratives: Incremental Information or Impression Management? Journal of Accounting Literature 27: 116–196.
Michelon, G., S. Pilonato, and F. Ricceri. 2015. CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 33: 59–78.
Michelon, G., D. Patten, and A. Romi. 2019. Creating Legitimacy for Sustainability Assurance Practices: Evidence from Sustainability Restatements. European Accounting Review 28 (2): 395–422.
Murninghan, M., and T. Grant. 2013. Corporate Responsibility and The New “Materiality.” Corporate Board 34 (203): 12–18.
Murray, A., D. Sinclair, D. Power, and R. Gray. 2006. Do financial markets care about social and environmental disclosure? Further evidence and exploration from the UK. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 19 (2): 228–255.
Nguyen, L.T., A. Doan, and M. Frömmel. 2021. Boards of directors and corporate sustainability performance: Evidence from the emerging East Asian markets. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 18: 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-020-00102-0.
Nunnally, J., and I. Bernstein. 1994. Psychometric theory, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
O’Donovan, G. 2002. Environmental disclosures in the annual report. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15 (3): 344–371.
O’Dwyer, B. 2002. Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15 (3): 406–436.
O’Dwyer, B. 2011. The case of sustainability assurance: Constructing a new assurance service. Contemporary Accounting Research 28 (4): 1230–1266.
O’Dwyer, B., and J. Unerman. 2020. Shifting the focus of sustainability accounting from impacts to risks and dependencies: Researching the transformative potential of TCFD reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 33 (5): 1113–1141.
OECD. 2011. The Role of Institutional Investors in Promoting Good Corporate Governance. Corporate Governance: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264128750-en. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/49081553.pdf. Accessed 07.08.2019.
ONS. 2020. Ownership of UK Quoted Shares: 2018. Office for National Statistics. Available from https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/investmentspensionsandtrusts/bulletins/ownershipofukquotedshares/2018. Accessed 01.05.2021.
Oppenheim, A.N. 1966. Questionnaire design and attitude measurement. London: Heinemann.
Parker, L. 2014. Corporate social accountability through action: Contemporary insights from British industrial pioneers. Accounting, Organizations and Society 39 (8): 632–659.
Patton, D.M. 1992. Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organisations and Society 17 (5): 471–475.
PGS. 2013. Determining materiality: a key for corporate sustainability. Available from http://www.pgsadvisors.com/2013/07/determining-materiality-a-key-tool-for-corporate-sustainability/. Accessed 30.10.2020
Prencipe, A. 2004. Proprietary Costs and Determinants of Voluntary Segment Disclosure: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies. European Accounting Review 13 (2): 319–340.
Qui, Y., A. Shaukat, and R. Tharyan. 2016. Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. The British Accounting Review 48: 102–116.
Rangan, K., L. Chase, and S. Karim. 2012. Why every company needs a CSR strategy ad how to build it. Working paper 12-088. Available at: https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/why-every-company-needs-a-csr-strategy-and-how-to-build-it. Accessed 24.07.2019.
Rodgers, W., H. Choy, and A. Guiral. 2013. Do Investors Value a Firm’s Commitment to Social Activities? Journal of Business Ethics 114 (4): 607–623.
Rogers, J., and R. Herz. 2013. Corporate Disclosure of Material Information: The Evolution-and the Need to Evolve Again. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 25 (3): 50–55.
Saunders, M. and P. Lewis. 2012. Doing research in business and management an essential guide to planning your project, eBook, Financial Times Prentice Hall, Harlow, New York.
Sharma, P., P. Panday, and R.C. Dangwal. 2020. Determinants of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) disclosure: A study of Indian companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 17: 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-020-00085-y.
Sheldon, M.D., and J.G. Jenkins. 2020. The influence of firm performance and (level of) assurance on the believability of management’s environmental report. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 33 (3): 501–528.
Solomon, J.F., A. Solomon, N.L. Joseph, and S.D. Norton. 2013. Impression management, myth creation and fabrication in private social and environmental reporting: Insights from Erving Goffman. Accounting, Organizations and Society 38 (3): 195–213.
Sprinkle, G., and L. Maines. 2010. The benefits and costs of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons 53 (5): 445–453.
Sundaram, A., and A. Inkpen. 2004. The Corporate Objective Revisited. Organization Science 15 (3): 350–363.
Tschopp, D., and R.J. Huefner. 2015. Comparing the Evolution of CSR Reporting to that of Financial Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 127: 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2054-6.
UN. 2019. The Sustainable Development Agenda. Available at: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda/. Accessed 10.08.2019.
Verrecchia, R. 1983. Discretionary Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5 (1): 179–194.
Wang, J., and J. Sun. 2022. The role of audit committees in social responsibility and environmental disclosures: Evidence from Chinese energy sector. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 19: 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-021-00131-3.
Whitehouse, L. 2006. Corporate Social Responsibility: Views from the Frontline. Journal of Business Ethics 63: 279–296.
Willaert, T. 2016. New: GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards - Overview of the main changes. Available from https://www.dqsglobal.com/intl/blog/new-gri-sustainability-reporting-standards-overview-of-the-main-changes
Xiao, X. and G. Shailer. 2022. Stakeholders’ perceptions of factors affecting the credibility of sustainability reports. The British Accounting Review 54(1), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101002
Zahller, K., V. Arnold, and R. Roberts. 2015. Using CSR disclosure quality to develop social resilience to exogenous shocks: A test of investor perceptions. Behavioural Research in Accounting 27 (2): 155–177.
Zouari, G., and K. Dhifi. 2021. The impact of board characteristics on integrated reporting: Case of European companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 18: 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-021-00105-5.
Zu, L., and L. Song. 2009. Determinants of managerial values on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1): 105–117.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Editor and two anonymous reviewers for their expert advice to improve the paper. We would like to gratefully acknowledge the insightful comments and support provided by Prof Christine Helliar, as part of the BAFA Accounting Education SIG Mentorship programme. We are also thankful for the helpful suggestions and constructive comments provided at different earlier stages of this research by Nina Seppala, Shrabani Saha, Ted Fuller, Giovanna Michelon, Khaled Hussainey, Fadi Alkaraan, Mahfuzur Rahman and Rebecca Herron. Special thanks go to the research participants for generously giving up their time and the willingness to share their views.
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This study involving human participants was performed in accordance with the institutional ethical standards and guidelines. The ethics approval was granted on 09.05.2017.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendices
Appendix A
Variables and statements
Variable | Items included | N of items included | Related H | Cronbach’s α |
---|---|---|---|---|
Audience | ||||
CSR: individual investors | Corporate social responsibility information is important for investment decisions of individual (PRIVATE) investors Individual (PRIVATE) investors rely on a company’s corporate social responsibility information in investment decision-making Corporate social responsibility information is material for individual (PRIVATE) investors | 3 items | H1b | 0.790 |
CSR: institutional investors | Corporate social responsibility information is important for investment decisions of institutional investors Institutional investors rely on a company’s corporate social responsibility information in investment decision-making Corporate social responsibility information is material for institutional investors | 3 items | H1b | 0.806 |
CSR audience factor | Existing shareholders Institutional (professional) investors Individual (private) investors Regulators Other stakeholders (e.g. employees, customers, suppliers, competitors, local community, creditors) | 5 items | H1a | 0.722a |
6 CSR themes | environment, energy, human resources, products, community and fair business practice | 6 items | H1c | 0.788 |
Materiality | ||||
Materiality: financial vs non-financial information | Profits Net assets Cash flow disclosures Dividend payments Market share b Environmental impact/pollution control Health and safety issues Environmental policies Employee policies Human rights informationb Governanceb Cost of environmental programmes Product quality/safety-related information Product innovationb Cost of environmental compliance Community involvement | 16 items | H2a | 0.841 |
Materiality: companies’ responsibilities towards CSR | Business has social and environmental responsibilities beyond making a profit The fact that corporations have great economic power in society means that they have social and environmental responsibilities beyond the interests of their shareholders | 2 items c | H2b | 0.699 |
Materiality: cost of CSR information | The cost of providing information about a company’s social or environmental activities in publicly available sources is higher than the benefits of this to the company It is financially challenging for companies to provide external users with sufficient information about a company’s social and environmental activities Corporate social responsibility reporting is too costly for companies | 3 items | H2h | 0.814 |
Materiality: improvement of CSR information | Reliability of corporate social responsibility information has improved over the last 10 years Quality of corporate social responsibility information has improved over the last 10 years | 2 items | H2e | 0.873 |
Materiality: Regulation of CSR | Making environmental information as a mandatory and regulated component of corporate rereporting would be a positive change Making social information as a mandatory and regulated component of corporate rereporting would be a positive change Quality of corporate social responsibility rereporting will improve if rereporting is made mandatory for all companies Reliability of corporate social responsibility rereporting will improve if rereporting is made mandatory for all companies | 4 items | H2f | 0.801 |
Materiality: CSR activities | Ethics, governance, transparency, business relationships, financial return to investors and lenders, community involvement and economic development, value of products and services, employment practices, protection of the environment | 9 items d | H2d | 0.763 |
Materiality: high-risk vs low-risk industries | Engagement with social and environmental activities is more important for companies from high-risk industries Companies from high-risk industries should provide more social and environmental information in publicly available sources than low-risk companies Companies from high-risk industries should be more concerned about social and environmental activities than other companies | 3 items | H2g | 0.784 |
Materiality: CSR value in the long term | Engagement with corporate social responsibility activities creates long-term value for companies Investment in corporate social responsibility activities leads too positive outcomes in the long-term | 2 items | H2c | 0.730 |
Motivations | ||||
Investor influence | CSR reporting is a good way to influence investors’ opinions CSR reporting is a good way to enhance shareholder value CSR reporting is a good way to satisfy investors’ demands on CSR information | 3 items | H3 | 0.812 |
Stakeholder influence | CSR reporting is a good way to influence stakeholder perceptions CSR reporting is a good way to manage important stakeholders CSR reporting is a good way to satisfy various stakeholders demands on CSR information | 3 items | H3 | 0.749 |
Compliance | CSR reporting is a good way to comply with legal requirements CSR reporting is a good way to comply with industry requirements CSR reporting is a good way to comply with Global Reporting Initiative principles | 3 items | H3 | 0.741 |
Corporate image and reputation | CSR reporting is a good way to receive positive publicity through demonstration of good citizenship CSR reporting is a good way to enhance corporate image CSR reporting is a good way to improve company’s reputation | 3 items | H3 | 0.932 |
Financial | CSR reporting can lead to financial benefits CSR reporting can improve a company’s financial performance and economic success A company’s increased CSR reputation can lead to better financial performance | 3 items | H3 | 0.889 |
Appendix B
Summary of hypotheses testing results
Hypotheses detail | Result | |
---|---|---|
Audience | ||
1a | CSR information in corporate reporting is primarily focused on existing shareholders and institutional investors rather than wider stakeholders | Supported |
1b | CSR information in corporate reporting is more oriented towards institutional investors rather than individual investors | Supported |
1c | Environment-related information is considered the most important content in CSR reporting when targeting private investors | Supported |
Materiality | ||
2a | Reporting of financial information is perceived by corporate managers in the UK as more important than reporting of social and environmental information | Supported |
2b | Companies have social and environmental responsibilities beyond making a profit and the interests of their shareholders | Supported |
2c | Engagement in CSR activities creates value for companies in the long term | Supported |
2d | Environment protection is considered as the most important CSR activity | Partially supported |
2e | CSR reporting in terms of quality and reliability has improved over the last 10 years | Supported |
2f | CSR reporting will improve if it is made mandatory | Supported |
2 g | CSR reporting is more important for companies from high-risk industries | Partially supported |
2 h | CSR reporting is perceived as an extra cost for companies | Not supported |
Motivations | ||
3 | Enhancing corporate public image is perceived by managers as the key motivation in CSR reporting | Supported |
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gulko, N., Hyde, C. Corporate perspectives on CSR disclosure: audience, materiality, motivations. Int J Discl Gov 19, 389–412 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-022-00157-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-022-00157-1