Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relationship between top executive compensation and corporate governance: evidence from large Italian listed companies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The modernization of corporate governance aims the alignment of the interests of managers with those of companies, promoting a new discipline of internal controls and risk analysis with an enforcement of shareholder rights of information. This research investigates the impact of corporate governance variables—ownership, board of directors and remuneration committee—on executive compensation. A balanced sample of 52 Italian listed companies has been adopted to test the hypotheses, covering 55.98% and 47.13% of market capitalization in 2011 and 2015, respectively, and including 669 board members. Theoretical models evidence a certain stability of compensation schemes for Italian managers over time. Findings suggest that there is a statistically significant positive effect of familiar ownership on the amount of compensation. Along with the nature of ownership, the number of directors in the remuneration committee appointed by minorities assumes a determinant role. With statistical significance, it affects negatively the compensation level, but, contrarily to best practices, it affects negatively the adoption of forms of incentive compensation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altomare, E., and A. Zattoni. 2013. Le determinanti della remunerazione degli amministratori delegati: un’analisi empirica sulle imprese italiane quotate. In La retribuzione del top management: incentivi, carriera e governance, ed. D. Pittino, R. Viganò, and A. Zattoni. Milano: EGEA spa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R.C., and J.M. Bizjak. 2003. An empirical examination of the role of the CEO and the compensation committee in structuring executive pay. Journal of Banking & Finance 27(7): 1323–1348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barontini, R., and S. Bozzi. 2011. Board compensation and ownership structure: empirical evidence for Italian listed companies. Journal of Management and Governance 15(1): 59–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk, L.A., and J.M. Fried. 2006. Pay without performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk, L.A., J.M. Fried, and D.I. Walker. 2002. Managerial power and rent extraction in the design of executive compensation. National bureau of economic research Working Paper No. 9068. http://www.nber.org/papers/w9068.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2017.

  • Bebchuk, L.A., Y. Grinstein, and U. Peyer. 2010. Lucky CEOs and lucky directors. The Journal of Finance 65(6): 2363–2401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becht, M., P. Bolton, and A. Röell. 2003. Corporate governance and control. Handbook of the Economics of Finance 1(1): 1–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, M., M. Bianco, and L. Enriques. 2010. Pyramidal groups and the separation between ownership and control in Italy. In The control of corporate Europe, ed. Barca Fabrizio and Becht Marco, 154–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianco, M. 2001. Country reports: Corporate governance and economic performance—Italy. In Corporate governance and economic performance, ed. Gugler Klaus, 130–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco-Hernandez, A., and G. Sánchez-Marín. 2007. The determinants of employee compensation in family firms: Empirical evidence. Family Business Review 20(3): 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., P. Cohen, S.G. West, and L.S. Aiken. 2013. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Combs, J.G., Christopher R. Penney, T.R. Crook, and J.C. Short. 2010. The impact of family representation on CEO compensation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 34(6): 1125–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comitato per la Corporate Governance delle Società Quotate. 2015. Codice di Autodisciplina. http://www.borsaitaliana.it/borsaitaliana/regolamenti/corporategovernance/codice2015.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2017.

  • Conyon, M.J., and L. He. 2004. Compensation committees and CEO compensation incentives in US entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Management Accounting Research 16(1): 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croci, E., H. Gonenc, and N. Ozkan. 2012. CEO compensation, family control, and institutional investors in Continental Europe. Journal of Banking & Finance 36(12): 3318–3335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyl, E.A. 1988. Corporate control and management compensation: Evidence on the agency problem. Managerial and Decision Economics 9(1): 21–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC—The Commission of the European Communities. 2004. Commission Recommendation of the Commission of the European Communities, dated 14 December 2004 on fostering an appropriate regime for the remuneration of directors of listed companies. Official Journal of the European Union, L 385/55. http://eur-lex.europa.eu. Accessed 15 July 2017.

  • EC—The Commission of the European Communities. 2005. Commission Recommendation of the Commission of the European Communities, dated 15 February 2005 on the role of non-executive or supervisory directors of listed companies and on the committees of the (supervisory) board. Official Journal of the European Union, L 52/51. http://eur-lex.europa.eu. Accessed 15 July 2017.

  • EC—The Commission of the European Communities. 2009. Commission Recommendation of the Commission of the European Communities, dated 30 April 2009 on complementing Recommendations 2004/913/EC and 2005/162/EC as regards the regime for the remuneration of directors of listed companies. Official Journal of the European Union, L 120/28. http://eur-lex.europa.eu. Accessed 20 July 2017.

  • Enriques, L., and P. Volpin. 2007. Corporate governance reforms in continental Europe. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(1): 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F., and M.C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics 26(2): 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia, L.R., and R.M. Wiseman. 1997. Reframing executive compensation: An assessment and outlook. Journal of Management 23(3): 291–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haid, A., and B.B. Yurtoglu. 2006. Ownership structure and executive compensation in Germany. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=948926. Accessed 19 March 2017.

  • Jensen, M.C., and K.J. Murphy. 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98(2): 225–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., K.J. Murphy, and E.G. Wruck. 2004. Remuneration: Where we’ve been, how we got to here, what are the problems, and how to fix them. Harvard Negotiation, Organizations & Markets Working Paper No. 04-28. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=561305. Accessed 25 July 2017.

  • Lopes, I.T., and D.P. Ferraz. 2016. The value of intangibles and diversity on boards looking towards economic future returns: evidence from non-financial Iberian business organizations. International Journal of Business Excellence 10(3): 392–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehran, H. 1995. Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 38(2): 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melis, A. 2000. Corporate governance in Italy. Corporate Governance: An International Review 8(4): 347–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melis, A., S. Carta, and S. Gaia. 2012. Executive remuneration in blockholder-dominated firms. How do Italian firms use stock options? Journal of Management & Governance 16(3): 511–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2015. Principles of corporate governance. OECD Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors. http://www.oecd.org/daf/ca. Accessed 20 July 2017.

  • Paternoster, R., R. Brame, P. Mazerolle, and A. Piquero. 1998. Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology 36(4): 859–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakawa, H., K. Moriyama, and N. Watanabel. 2012. Relation between top executive compensation structure and corporate governance: Evidence from Japanese public disclosed data. Corporate Governance: An International Review 20(6): 593–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., and R.W. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance 52(2): 737–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., and S. Cahan. 2009. The effect of compensation committee quality on the association between CEO cash compensation and accounting performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review 17(2): 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, A. 2002. Overcoming poor value executive remuneration: Resolving the manifest conflicts of interest. Corporate Governance: An International Review 10(4): 256–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosi, L., and L.R. Gomez-Mejia. 1989. The decoupling of CEO pay and performance: An agency theory perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly 1(1): 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vafeas, N. 2003. Length of board tenure and outside director independence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 30(7–8): 1043–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zattoni, A. 1999. The structure of corporate groups: The Italian case. Corporate Governance: An International Review 7(1): 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NOVA School of Business and Economics, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

    Andrea Nannicini & Duarte Pitta Ferraz

  2. Business Research Unit (BRU-IUL), Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisbon, Portugal

    Ilídio Tomás Lopes

Authors
  1. Andrea Nannicini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Duarte Pitta Ferraz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ilídio Tomás Lopes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilídio Tomás Lopes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nannicini, A., Ferraz, D.P. & Lopes, I.T. Relationship between top executive compensation and corporate governance: evidence from large Italian listed companies. Int J Discl Gov 15, 197–209 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-018-0050-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-018-0050-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation