Intangible assets on the balance sheet and audit fees

Original Article


This study empirically examines how auditors view intangible assets that are recorded on the balance sheet. Intangible assets have been rising on corporate balance sheets and are growing in importance. In contrast to tangible assets, intangible assets pose unique challenges to auditors in terms judgment and complexity. The study uses a sample of COMPUSTAT firms over the period 2010-2015. The results show that auditors charge higher fees for firms with higher proportion of intangible assets on the balance. This result holds for all intangible assets, goodwill type intangible assets, and intangible assets other than goodwill. For firms with high book to market ratios these results are stronger indicating that potential impairment concerns lead auditors to charge even higher fees for such firms. A variety of sensitivity tests are conducted to verify the robustness of the results. These results are of interest to investors, regulators, firm managers, corporate boards, and auditors.


Intangible assets Audit fees Goodwill Audit risk Impairments 


  1. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1994. Statements on auditing standards 73. Using the work of a specialist.Google Scholar
  2. Ashbaugh, H., R. LaFond, and B. Mayhew. 2003. Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review 78(3): 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beneish, Messod D. 1999. The detection of earnings manipulation. Financial Analysts Journal 55: 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calcbench. 2016. A look at intangible assets.
  5. Coulton, J., G. Liven, A.K. Petticnicchio, and S. Taylor. 2016. Abnormal audit fees and accounting quality working paper.
  6. Fields, L.P., D.R. Fraser, and M.S. Wilkins. 2004. An investigation of audit pricing for financial institutions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 23: 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). 1985. Accounting for the costs of computer software to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed. SFAS No. 86. Stamford, CT: FASB.Google Scholar
  8. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). 2017. ASC 350, intangibles—Goodwill and other. Stamford, CT: FASB.Google Scholar
  9. Holder-Webb, L., and M. Kohlbeck. 2006. The hole in the doughnut: Accounting for acquired intangibles at Krispy Kreme. Issues in Accounting Education 21(3): 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jiang, W., and M. Son. 2015. Do audit fees reflect risk premiums for control risk? Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance 30: 318–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnstone, K.M., A.A. Gramling, and L.E. Rittenberg. 2014. Auditing: A risk based approach conducting a quality audit, 9th ed. Cengage Learning, OH.Google Scholar
  12. Kieso, D., J. Weygandt, and T. Warfield. 2016. Intermediate accounting. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Kinney, W.R., Z.V. Palmrose, and S. Scholz. 2004. Auditor independence, non-audit services, and restatements: Was the U.S. government right? Journal of Accounting Research 42(3): 561–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krishnan, G.V., and C. Wang. 2014. Are capitalized software development costs informative about audit risk? Accounting Horizons 28(1): 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lev, B., and F. Gu. 2016. The end of accounting and the path forward for investors and managers. Hoboken: Wiley Finance.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, Y., D. Simunic, and M. Ye. 2017. Do auditors care about clients’ compliance with environmental regulations?
  17. McInnis, J.M., and B.R. Monsen. 2017. Are the recorded values of acquired intangible assets indicative of their future payoffs?
  18. Messier, W.F., S.M. Glover, and D.F. Prawitt. 2017. Auditing and assurance services. New York: McGraw Hill Companies.Google Scholar
  19. Monga, V. 2016. Accounting’s 21st century challenge: How to value intangible assets. The Wall Street Journal.
  20. Mulford, C., and J. Roberts. 2006. Capitalization of software development costs: A survey of accounting practices in the software industry. Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  21. Nakamura, L.I. 2008. Intangible assets and national income accounting. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia working paper.Google Scholar
  22. Palmrose, Z.V. 1987. Litigation and independent auditors: The role of business failures and management fraud. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 6(2): 90–103.Google Scholar
  23. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 2015. Audit committee dialogue.
  24. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 2016a. AS2502: Auditing fair value measurements and disclosures. Washington, DC: PCAOB.Google Scholar
  25. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 2016b. Preview of observations from 2015 inspections of auditors of issuers.
  26. Ramanna, K., and R. Watts. 2012. Evidence on the use of unverifiable estimates in required goodwill impairment. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17(4): 749–780.Google Scholar
  27. Sherman, H.D., and S.D. Young. 2016. Where financial reporting still falls short. Harvard Business Review: Brighton.Google Scholar
  28. Shipman, J.E., J.V. Carcello, and T.L. Neal. 2016. Non-audit fees: Do they matter after all?
  29. Simunic, D.A. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18: 161–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Spiceland, J.D., M.W. Nelson, and W.B. Thomas. 2017. Intermediate accounting, 9th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations